 Karen asks, can anyone tell me if a guest with Microsoft licenses is treated different than a guest without Microsoft licenses when joining a team's meeting from another party? Yes. Yes. Yes. All right. They are. Thank you. Yeah. I knew. I had a 50-50 shot. Yes. I went with it. I mean, everything in the Microsoft world is license and permissions based. So if you are two users that look like they have the same, you know, should have the same experience, have different experiences, is because you have differences in licensing. There's different SKUs that are out there that have different variations in the products and then different permissions levels around each one of those. But in general, when joining a meeting, a lot of it depends if you're both, if one's licensed, one's unlicensed, then you're going to have a reduced feature set that you'll, as a guest, invite it into. I mean, well, I will say this, like, if, like, I'm hosting a meeting with my company, so CollabTalk, and I invite both of you that are with, you've got fully licensed in your, in your environments, but your capability is limited based on what I enable through my meeting, what I allow guests to go and do. Now is there a difference between if you were an unlicensed guest that I just email, invite you in? Well, then you start getting into the difficulties of the, between using, if you're using a free version of Teams, then, yeah, the, it's oil and water. They don't mix. The free version is outside of the business application, the paid versions. You can be invited in as a guest. I just keep going back to when Hal couldn't chat and drove him crazy in all of these AMAs last year. And he was like, why don't I have this? And do you remember all that when he was? Yeah, but it's, there's a, that's kind of my point. There's a difference though between being a licensed user who is logging into a meeting from the wrong tenant. And so he's still logged into his personal tenant trying to get into. So he's coming in as a, as a, as a guest through that tenant versus a full-fledged member through another tenant. So there's that issue. But we're still talking about business licensed users and versus, I don't have a license. I've been, been invited into this. So that's the, yeah, you're going to have reduced functionality where it's going to not let you see, you'll share, participate in the chat. It's not going to let you do other basic functionality. I don't know what the complete list is, what you can't do as an unpaid, unlicensed member of a meeting. Like you're, as a host, I can invite anybody into participate in a meeting. But yeah, you just have a reduced feature set by not being licensed. And then there's on top of that, there's, if you're, if you have a free license, which is a completely different team's free, that was my point is it's a completely different product. So reading into Karen's, I don't think she's asking about that free version. She's saying unlicensed, but I just want to differentiate those three different things. Paid, licensed user, unpaid, unlicensed, licensed free, three different experiences. Yeah. And then on top of that, you've got the, for me to dead giveaways when you get the little login that says, what is your name? And it doesn't know who you are. You're truly like, like anonymous. That's a sign that you're, that you've logged in incorrectly. Yes. Exactly. It's a big red flashing thing saying we have no idea who you are. Hi, Mike. Mike couldn't even stand this discussion. He had to, uh, had to leave. So. He warned us. That's a hard stop. That's great.