 Good morning everyone. Firstly, I want to apologize for my French accent. I am a PhD student in the University of Toulouse. My research is about late iron age habitat identified as the current era of Toulouse. It concentrates mainly on the relationships between domestic and specialized activity space. In this session, I will present a guest study, what that we put into Christian iron age settlement pattern and ways of dealing with them. In the current era of Toulouse, archaeology revealed two main centres of late iron age occupation. J. Toulouse and Saint-Roch. Their separality by 5 km array is one from the other. Both are characterized by the identity of archaeological remains. Ancient texts refer to a city named Toulouse, which was the main agglomeration of the Velkaet Tectosagy. It's a galactrive evoked for events going as far back as the 200th century BC. Muching was paid on debattique which one of the two sites, Veytoulouse and Saint-Roch, could be identified with the capital Toulouse. The question of the status of the settlement and the nature of the relationships has been easily discussed and led to the formulation of several hypotheses. Two phases could be at the outline. The first one corresponds to the pre-romance period but begins at the end of the third century BC. This phase is characterized by two large main centres by farms and specialised arrears. The second phase starts at 100 BC. It is characterized by the persistence of farms and the only one main settlement paid Toulouse while in Saint-Roch only few tries of occupation persist. This restructuration probably is a consequence of Roman intervention in 106 BC during the war against the Simplic and the Toton. Indeed, textual evidence referred to Tectosagy, fighting alongside the invader captured by the Roman army and to the further stacks of the city sentry by the Roman. This defeat means for the Volcay-Tectosage a loss of their political autonomy and statue of a light room. As we could see, settlement in the region of Toulouse evolved from the complexe towards the more simple, with two main settlements observed during the first period while the structure of the second phase may be considered more classic with only one centre. For the first phase, the most widespread hypothesis provides to explain this complex settlement but then are the following. A model of political and symbolic domination of Viet Toulouse over Saint-Roch with an elite presence at Viet Toulouse. Viet Toulouse is the opidum and the capital of the Volcay-Tectosage while Saint-Roch is only an area of activity dependent of Viet Toulouse. Over hypothesis, several agglomeration exist but the main centre is located in Saint-Roch because of its economic predominance explained by its topographical position. In this model, the economic and political domination is exercised by Saint-Roch over Viet Toulouse. Sorry, I have a problem. From a topographical point of view these two settlements are very different. Saint-Roch is a lowland settlement while Viet Toulouse is a hilltop settlement position which ensure a natural defensive position. Both settlements are very close to the Galron river with the proximity permitted exchange towards the Atlantic. Both these are not equally now from an archaeological point of view. All rescue excavations have permit the discovery of 100 water routes each site. This well gives us a general vision of the extent of occupation. This has a main and almost the only structure preserved with the exception of a few pits and post-holes. However, they reflect very indirectly reality because the material found in it is clearly not in situ. The study of the content nevertheless reveals a considerable amount of vestiges of domestic construction and specialized activity all parallel together. The era excavated from the beginning of the 21 century as part of preventive ecology rely on urban development projects allow for the first time to characterize domestic building. Most of the construction was built on local materials such as maul and wood. To address issues related to the possibility with the possible air-key or complementary of these both sites I have concentrated on the special distribution of activity marker. During the first phase material relative to domestic work such as mining, weaving and spinning or material linked to the domestic life like dishes show that domestic activity are spread over the entire extension of both sites. In some era domestic and specialized space are intimate linked in the urban map as you can see in yellow to Saint-Roch and in blue for Olivier II. However, at Saint-Roch in some places an organization by area of activity appears. During the second phase the situation not differ really from the one that will be observed. Saint-Roch is set up toward HCBC within the habitat. We can suppose blacksmiths live and work in the same place. This proximity reveals a certain permeability of the activities between domestic and craft sphere. From 75 BC a specialist aura with pottery kind develops on the margin of the habitat. On the Sydney often solely to the two main aura of occupation pottery kind now for the first period. It may be assumed that this activity is moving and is annexed to way to lose in the second period. During the second phase we can observe that this process of polarization of domestic and specialist activity observed in the first period continues. However, we can see images of Angikwa district highway to lose. Another criteria important is trade. Reused as construction material after wine consumption is found in large quantity on all sites in to lose. Demonstrating the importance of to lose in trade and consumption of Mediterranean products. These sheets of importation are also well represented in particular the one of Italian tradition but also of Iberian ceramic and Guay ceramic of the Catalan coast. These two types of material are present on both seats and faces. It can be observed that aura which concentrates most of the imported sheets are reduced. These aura are also the ones that have delivered the most dance number of domestic remains. The material culture reflects the diversity of geographical origins of the inhabitants and exogenous culinary practices. It informs us as much on the relation that tectosage maintain with the neighbor as we have the possibility of Iberian inhabitants as they lose on some rock. No difference appear between the both sides from this point of view. Another feature common to both seats is the presence of a rare artifact in southern gold, stylusis, used for writing and accounting. It's finding substance sites where the center of a large network of trade but also of information. Stylusis are present in both periods. The distribution map of Iberian imported sheets and stylusis are quite similar. Maybe it reflects aura occupied by trader. Finally, I concentrated on the structuration of spaces. Durant la première phase, l'urbanisme en both sites reste initialement très libre. Mais après le 143 BC à l'aventure, des plantes régulaires de l'urbanisation matérialisées par les déchets et les rues qui définissent les blocs de la maison ont été identifiés. L'orientation de cette structure va continuer durant la seconde période et disparaît le contexte historique à la fin de la seconde période. Pour conclure, la catégorie est une constante préoccupation des élèves. La conception de la Méditerranée de la ville avec un seul centre est présente dans notre main. Nous devons considérer le cas de Toulouse. A la première phase, l'extension de la organisation mérite de la question de la division de fonctions politiques, économiques et religieuses entre les deux étalements. Je crois que la question de l'observation est cruciale. D'ailleurs, par l'observation de la capitale de Volcaire de Tectosagie, nous avons le sentiment d'une centrale d'occupation avec Toulouse, la capitale, tout le fonction comme vous pouvez le voir sur la map. Mais le centre est organisé organisé selon un pattern polynucleur qui semble fonctionner comme une sorte d'entité polycentrale centrale. Avec plusieurs centres d'occupation géographiquement séparatisées mais liées par l'interconnection de leurs fonctions plutôt qu'un centre séparatiste. La deuxième phase est plus classique avec une sorte de réorganisation plus proche de la modélisation méditerranique avec des politiques économiques et du centre culturel comme un sens romain.