 Good morning. When Andy, we want to test your sound. Sure. How does it sound? Can you hear me? Yep. Sounds great. Thanks. Thank you. Good morning, Andy. Let's check your sound. Good morning. How did that sound? Good morning. Sounds good. Background looks good. I will mute myself until about two minutes before. Or for another couple of minutes. Thank you. Before we get started, is there any member of an applicant team that would like to do a sound check? If so, please raise your hand in the Zoom meeting. We have Randy. You should receive a prompt and you receive it. You can go ahead and check it. Randy, are you there? So far, we're not hearing you. It does look like you're unmuted. I'm going to maybe check your sound on your device. Let's try and see. Let's move to the next one here. Randy, if you were calling in on that phone. But I just saw disappear. Then go ahead and call back in. Because when you are on the menu that I'm seeing. It's showing you signed in on a computer. And then it's also showing a phone sign in. So we'll have to do your sound over the phone connection in case the sound on your device is not working. Let's try the sound for Eric Horstall. Okay, that should be working. Yep, we can hear you just fine. Perfect. Okay. Thank you. Do you have me now? Yes, we can hear you. Okay, perfect. Yeah, I'm just on my phone. So it's always a little squirrelier. Okay. So if you, if, uh, if you guys want to go ahead and mute yourselves and we won't have to go through the prompting and we'll just wait. You just wait till the appropriate time and then you can unmute again. Okay. Madam hearing secretary, are we ready to go? Shall I call to order the. The administrator meeting of June 17, 2021. Today's meeting is a virtual meeting due to the provisions of the governor's executive orders and 2520 and. 2529 20, which suspended certain requirements of the Brown act and the order of the public health officer is County of Sonoma. With regard to COVID-19 and to help prevent the spread of the pandemic is this zoning administrator meeting. Is being held via a zoom webinar. It will be conducted as we would conduct. Any face to face meeting and. But there are some special provisions here how we participate. I'll just run those briefly through with you. For those of you who have joined us via zoom, you will be invited to comment at certain points during the meeting. If you wish to do so, please raise your hand by pressing this hand icon on your screen. Those of you who are calling in. You'll have to press pound or star nine. Is that a pound nine or star nine. Is correct me. I forget. It's star nine. Our nine. Okay. Thank you. Yeah. And we'll be, we'll recognize you similarly. If you wish to do so. In each case, you'll have to. Well, those of you on zoom will have to unmute yourself to speak. So this meeting is live streamed and recorded. If you wish to review the recording. You can do so going, going to page. Www. YouTube. Tom. Backslash city of Santa Rosa. So with that. Call to order has been completed. I do offer. And this meeting opportunity for public comment. If you have any matter. That you wish to raise that's not on the agenda. And is also subject to the authority or review of the zoning administrator. You please raise your hand and you have three minutes to, to do so now. I'm going to move on to the public comment. I'm going to work at the participant list. And I see. Out of our three attendees, none. I requested to. Offer a public comment. So let's move on to. Item. Or regularly scheduled item. List on our agenda. We have three items today. The first. And the second item. We have our 1756 Walnut Creek drive. For a fence within the required. Corners. Side yard setback. And my net. She colleague is the project planner. And my net. Would you please give your presentation. Thank you. Sure. Thank you. And good morning, Mr. I'm going to share my screen right now. To go over my presentation. I'm going to show you the site. The site is located on the corner of the Walnut Creek road. Dry. And it's done. R16 RC. Which stands for single family residential. And resilient city. And the general plan land use permit. For a fence located at 1756 Walnut Creek road. Here is the example of the six foot fence. That is going to be placed between the 15 feet. Corner setback. The site is located on the corner of the Walnut Creek road. Dry. And it's done. And it also stands for residential housing. And resilient city. And the general plan land use is low density residential. Here is the location where the fence will be placed. The fence will be placed. Five feet from back of the sidewalk. And also it will be placed. Outside of the vision triangle. make sure the proposed funds will be outside the five feet utility is easement, which is measured from back of the sidewalk, and also be placed outside of the vision triangle. And the applicant is aware of those conditions. Notices were sent out to neighbors within 600 feet staff did not receive any comments or questions for the proposed project. And the project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and it qualifies for a class three exemption under section 15303. The fence is construction of an accessory structure for the existing single families. The planning and economic development department recommends that stoning administrator by resolution approve a minor control use permit for the property located at 1756 will not click right. And that was my presentation. It was pretty short and quick. My information is available here for anyone who wants to contact me. Thank you. My name is Chicago. I think that was a very clear and direct presentation. I have no questions as member of the applicant project team or the applicant wish to comment at this point if so please raise your hand you'll be recognized. Seeing none. for any member of the public who might be in attendance to comment. If you wish to do so, please raise your hand or press star nine and you'll be recognized. All right, I don't think we have any members of the public in attendance today. So I'll close the public hearing on this matter and take action. So this is a very straightforward project. Ms. Chikali, I think the site corner lot with its very large footprint of the house deprives or diminished the amount of side yard or rear yard outdoor area available to the property owner and the proposed side yard fence and that along that street property line gives that property owner the kind of rear yard privacy that benefit that's anticipated or expected by single family homeowners in that same area. So I think your proposed resolution and findings do a fine job of addressing the issue and the conditions of approval are appropriate and I'll approve the project as recommended by staff. This project may be appealed should anyone wish to do so, the deadline for the appeal date of this hearing will be Monday, the 28th at the end of the business day. All right, with that, I'd like to move on to the next item on our agenda, which is a minor landmark alteration at 238 Kerrio Street and it's for the addition of a rear bedroom to an existing home and Monette is the project planner again. Please give me a second. Thank you, Mr. Gustafson. I'm sharing my screen here. So the project is called Kerrio Home Edition, as you mentioned a minor landmark alteration permit. Go ahead here. The applicant is proposing to add 238 square foot bedroom addition to the southwest side of the existing residence and it will be four feet from the side yard which includes the new addition, includes three new windows and a sliding glass door. I'm going to go through the floor plans and elevation informations right now. So the site is zoned R318, which stands for multi-family residential with combining historic district and the general plan land use is low density residential. Here is the location of the site and here the red square shows the location for the new addition on the back of the property for the backside of the existing residence. Here are the pictures from the existing house. The three pictures on tops are showing the house from the street. Three pictures below, two of them are showing two on the right side are showing other houses in that area and the lower left one is showing the backside of the existing house on 238 Carrillo Street. So this is the existing floor plan and as you can see, the master bedroom is all the way in the back and the applicant is proposing to add this is a new floor plan, the addition basically fills the gap in the back and expand the master bedroom. Here are the existing and proposed elevation. Here is the on the top part, you see the existing elevations. This is for the rear side and this is on the side side and below shows the proposed new addition that will have new windows and a sliding door and they will be made with aluminum frames windows similar to what they already have on the house. Notices were sent out. But one thing also the new addition will be similar in materials to the existing house which is going to be a stucco. So the applicant is proposing similar materials and colors with the existing house because it's located within the historic district. So the notices were sent out to neighbors within 600 feet and staff did not receive any comments or questions. I just had one phone call asking about what the process is, what they have to do if they wanna do additions. So it was not related to this project but it was just general questions and no other comments has received. The project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and it qualifies for class tree exemption. It is the involves negligible addition to an existing single family, the residents. With that, the planning and economic development department recommends that the zoning atmosphere by resolution approve a minor llama cultivation permit for the property located at 238 Carrillo Street. And that was my presentation. I know the architect whose name is Randy is also available. If you have any questions, he can answer them. Thank you. Thank you. And Manette, I do not have any questions of you and certainly the architect or inter applicant is welcome to comment further but I have no questions of them either. I would invite the opportunity now for comment by the applicant or the owner. If you so wish, please press star nine or raise your hand. And it looks like Randy has unmuted himself. Hearing secretary, can we recognize or allow Randy to speak? Yeah, he should be all set. Okay, so good morning. Yeah, I think the staff presentation kind of covered all the major bases. I think probably the only other things to mention is that the additions replacing an existing kind of covered portion trellis. The additions not visible from the street at all. And we did have a historical report done by an architectural historian that ended up determining that we were following all the standards of the secretary's interiors requirements for this type of development in a historic district, historic neighborhood. And I think that's about it. Thank you. I appreciate clarification regarding the historic resource report and its findings. That's helpful. Now I invite anyone from the public who wishes to comment on the project to do so. Again, I don't think anyone here is in attendance. So with that, I'll close the public hearing on this item. This is a very, I'll call it stealthy addition to an existing home. And as we all just learned also, it replaces a trellis in that footprint of the addition. I think the findings presented by the resolution by Ms. Chikali is are appropriate and well-supported and the conditions as well are appropriate. So I will approve this LMA or landmark alteration permit as recommended by staff. Thank you very much. All right. So now we can move on to the third item on our agenda today on our last item. And that is a minor conditional use permit for 386 Yolanda Avenue. And it is for a type 11 cannabis distribution facility. Moedek, can you give your presentation? Sure. Here I'm sharing my screen. This is a minor conditional use permit for a project that's called Mothership Distribution located at 386 Yolanda Avenue, Suite D. The applicant is proposing type 11 cannabis distribution facility for light storage cannabis products within an existing 2000 square feet suite which is located between an industrial building and industrial site. Here is location of the site and Suite D is being shown which is in this corner. The zone for this parcel is IL which stands for light industrial and the journal plan land use is also a light industry. A closer aerial look of the proposed project, location of this project. There are also other similar uses within those warehouse units in this property. And here is a site plan for where this Suite D is located with the existing parking for the users on that lot. The adjacent Suite also has a distribution use and another Suite on the north side here have similar use which is a cannabis distribution. So there are similar uses on this property for cannabis distributions. The applicant has provided a security plan that shows how they're gonna provide security on the site. And they have provided also and other other mitigation by certified engineer and they have provided information about lighting on the site. Those documents were provided to make sure the project meets with the requirements for general cannabis land uses which is required by the zoning code to provide a security plan and other mitigation plans. Notices were sent out to neighborhood within 600 feet. I have received two emails. One email said that they are just opposing the proposed project but they did not provide any reason. The second email was from another neighborhood that was opposing the proposed project. They had a concern about cannabis uses and people using cannabis in the city but it was not directly about only the distribution. And I had to email back to that person and tell them that the cannabis distribution is proposing to distribute cannabis to retail businesses not to a specific person or like a customer. I did not hear back or email receive any email back from that neighbor. The project has been also reviewed in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act and qualifies for a class one exemption. The project involves minor alteration of an existing private structure with no expansion of the use. And the planning then the planning and economic development department recommends that the zoning administrator by resolution approve a minor conditional use permit for the property located at 386 Yolanda Avenue, Sweet D. And that was my presentation. I know the applicant Eric Forssell is also available if you have any questions. Thank you. Thank you so much for your presentation. I think the proposal that you put forward is very clear and straightforward. I do invite the applicant or the applicant's team to comment or add to Ms. Chick Holly's presentation. If you wish to do so, please raise your hand and you'll be recognized. Mr. Forssell, please be recognized. Good afternoon. I'd like to just say thank you to Benay for an excellent presentation. I think she's covered everything. This is pretty much an identical project to what we just got approved a few months ago for North Coast. Pretty straightforward and that's a good property. We've almost filled up all the suites there. So we're looking forward to this project moving on. So I'm available if there's any questions. That's already, thank you. I have none. Thank you. Any other representative of the applicant or the applicant wish to speak? So I will see none. I'll welcome comments from the public. If you wish to do provide comment, please raise your hand. See we have two members in attendance. You wish to speak. Please press the icon, hand icon. You'll be recognized. I'll pause for a moment there. All right. I've seen none. I'll close the public hearing on this item. Again, Ms. Chicago, the presentation was clear. Proposal also very clear. This is a light industrial site where this type of use is allowed because of its proximity to the residential area does require this use permit process to help to ensure people in the area are noticed. And I am comforted to know that you, we did receive some comments and we responded to those concerns about the project. I read the staff report and on review found the findings, including the provisions of the cannabis ordinance to be fully complied with. And based on that and the conditions of approval, I will approve this requested minor use permit. So with that, we conclude our meeting of the zoning administrator for June 17, 2021. And for all of those who remain in attendance, thank you so much for participating today and have a great day. Thank you. Bye-bye.