 My name is Mike Dawley, and before I start, I'd like to just mention other people that have been involved in this project, which there are many, and especially work from York University, living in Houston in the Plains, and Catholic who's involved in other aspects of our community. I'd also like to thank them, I'd like to thank them for their help throughout this project, and for their assistance, and also as you mentioned, as they have ever, it's a council job, so it's actually possibly easier to get decent funding from council work than it is from other practising developments, but also, sort of, in the help massively with the funding. So, it's said, and seen that the effect of the Houston's link road was that the new road, which is designed to ease the congestion between the county of Exhill and Hastings, which are on the south of Houston's link road, is a five-and-a-half-kilometer stretch of road, only a single lane in its direction, so it's actually quite a small road, but it ran through an area of outstanding natural beauty, so it's quite controversial, it went through public enquiries, and the road itself starts in an urban area, and there's very little prehistoric archaeology surviving, as you'd expect, but once it emerges from the back of Exhill, it runs through a series of valleys, which are these dark areas, and over a series of bridges. And these systems, although there's no known archaeology in this area, the prehistoric archaeology probably began, obviously these infilled wetland areas have massive potential. And, I should also say, it floods every room to quite a depth, so working here was quite tricky. And this shows you the development of the river systems, so it was on Coonhaven, around about, this only goes back to 10,000, but it's broadly similar. It would have been inland, and probably on a scar, but astride it at such an expulsible place, but the river system itself is not very large, it only runs from 10,000 miles in one, and obviously at the time the lane is barely mesolithic, in the upper palette, I think it is effectively probably quite fairly treeless in a good regard. By the time you get to the mesolithic wet area, it becomes a sea, and by the minute it becomes a beat box. I should just say a bit, because we've been talking earlier about places like Barnett and Fields, and the concerns about loads coming through these discovering areas of undiscovered footwork, but there's nothing that we use on commercial measures that aren't actually very useful for buying wood, and there's methods that you can use, better methods that you should be using, and this involves sort of direction from the planning process so that they require us to do things like, for instance, to stop using the valuation trenches to the footwork satisfaction. Really, it's almost a waste of time, whereas test kits by hand are perfect for this scenario, and this is actually us attempting to dig an evaluation trench into this wetland area. It works fine when you're looking for deep systems that are fine when you're digging, and bronze age, iron age, bone archaeology, but it doesn't really work. As you can imagine from Flintstown. This is a couple of examples here. This first one here, the first is about this trench. That's what they nailed it. They've got the levels as well as you can get them with a machine, a 25mm machine. As you can see from the drawing, this actually trenched all these ships a bit. You can see a clear line of truncation, which you can see the scottery also becomes less dense. It becomes less dense, so even if you dig it perfectly and you're lucky enough that the underlying property matches what you're trying to do, you're going to truncate the archaeology somewhat, and this is a bad example, and unfortunately this might be scottery, it might be whatever, and we're raising the scotters, but it's very little that survives, and you can see the trenches simply truncate it away. With this in mind, when we went to the actual main phases of excavation, we thought of our strategy, that the main case of excavation required more evaluation, and what we did was basically, we augured some of these large areas to give us a handle on the deposits. We all had to shape some of these points so we didn't impact the development surface, and when we actually also did handle tests to find these scotters, and when we come to excavate it, again this is quite appropriate for finding the understrict, massive areas in tension, understricted by a third international archaeology, and usually means you've done something wrong, but here it's done in tension so that we did not damage the surface, and it works very well. Just to say briefly, about how we handled the metal flint and how we handled excavating these scotters, and the guilty scotters were done fairly similarly to the methodology, they were used by a complicated system that you often see, where every speck, and every speck on the x-ray speck is a unique context number, and this can be thousands of context numbers next, very prone to a number of errors. We worked for a very simple system, we gave scotters an individual number, and we gave the grids, there were obviously high, high, high grids, we gave them the code, and we just recorded the speck number, and with this system we managed to do a couple of round 1000 field finds, an x-ray, two of them, and a lot of flint scotters, with very few numbering errors, and any flint scotters in the area, this is going to go ahead, and we're going to take a large scale of flint scotters and recommend that system. So in terms of the cleaning activity, this is really getting a bit nervous, we don't ask for it very much, and the reason for that might well be that the river system question is so small that it wasn't really suitable for which to penetrate the land into the brim, or it may just be that this is actually a fairly standard representation of how much late craze of activity there is. I should say that we probably are covered at around about a five kilometre strip by about 15 metres of preserved land surface. So it wasn't a little snapshot into the landscape, it was quite extensive. And this is one area, a many area of activity, we have a very odd piece which we usually call the Cornish Pass, which I don't have a picture of, but I brought it with me, so I like everyone's opinion to offer on it, I think Nick suggested it, once it is a code preform, and it is a very unusual flint, potentially late glazial. There is one bruised blade, it's a straight line from in here, it's not a very mazalistic activity, but there was one potential lay-over ballad that inspired 22, which I'll talk about in a minute. So this was found really kind of by-optimist, and we dug these drainage ditches and made them stand off the cornarchology, then we cut them into a ditch, there was a bronze-age base that was still in the ditch, and at the side of it, you can see these massive chunks of flint, when you're digging up the late mazalistic effect, so the flints of this size are actually treated there. It was found kind of by-optimist, but the developer, again, we appreciated them that these things are important, and they actually let us expand the area to try and fill the exterior of the cliff. The way that we didn't get to dig is on the right, which is under the Hall Road, so this is where all the plant access and all the materials on the site were brought in out, we never brought them all wood wood, so I'm sure some of this would start well. By many, the scathella sebecta involves overlapping flint scatters, and there's definitely a late mazalistic scatter which overlaps with it, which is unfortunate and makes trying to interpret this a bit more difficult, and there's possibly even another little late mazalistic cluster. So in terms of the flints, these are some of the flints from Scathella 22, they're not excessively large, they were 10 centimeters, but most of them are 8 to 10 centimeters in range. They're actually very thick and heavy blades, sort of for vexel, and they realise this could be quite painful flint with these almost half-cycled bands from the film, which is not seen in vexel or any other Scathella part, in the two or three straight bands. At the time, we did other site visits at various people came to see these scathella that had been excavated, and there's a suggestion that we'd be able to get anyone who's worked on that material to be quite interesting. Here, the pinnacles are mostly hand-restructed and it's mostly plain, quite big platforms, but there's occasionally plastic platforms, and you can see crests in here. And these all leave that in these pieces. In terms of tools, I guess most of the purely obvious tools are quite heavy units on truncations and die-heeled units on large plates, but unfortunately, there are no, and no points whatsoever. There are lots of clay, a lot of pieces, almost all are made in the same flints, and I'm assuming they're all made up of the same core, and I think we have this core. The cores tend to have a core tablet, and there's cresting, and you can be cresting. But unfortunately, I'd like to guess that Gilbert, he found quite a few flints, found 3,000 flints from here, but there's only, or whatever. So actually, we don't really know how it is, but our feelings, it might be kind of an answer. You should say that we're only at the initial stage of the sentence, so more analysis should follow the bottom way. There's no way we'll get anything that we can't make from the site, there's no CPR. So maybe we'll get T.L.Bakes, but there's very little of them. This is another part of the project, and again, there's absolutely lots of flint scanners everywhere, insanely dense concentrations of mesolithic flint work. Occasionally, there's one bruised lake from here, and there's a set of quite large lakes that refit with a couple of flints and flint scanners. And there's one long plate site, I believe, in here, that's got a certain value, and a few long plates on this area behind me, which I mostly am mainly familiar with. So these are some of the pieces, they're some pieces with quite heavy bruising, and then slightly micro bruising, and that was the stray flint, and this is from site 15. These are from Scala 75, and you can see this is about 15 centimeters long, and it crests in, and it's actually not completely broken. This is obviously a street snap as well, but these are very, very long straight ways, and there are quite a few of these from Scala. Scala itself is not much. It only has 700 points. And this again, we showed you, Scala 75 is quite unfortunate for a Scala pixel, and it's cut by a modern ditch, cut in half by a modern ditch, and it has seven features associated with the Birdman. And this Scala is quite a very mesmerizing and significant point, given the fact that in my case, we found that it's possible to beat the Continental Scals, and Scala 75 is one of these very unpointy, obliquely blooded microbes, so it's potentially with microbes of suicidity. In total, though, if we add up all the upper-parallel ethic finds from it, it only adds up to about 0.8 percent, even if you set Scala 22 as up and power with it. The upper-parallel and the terminal of the parallel only add up to 0.8 percent, in different contexts. The early mesolithic Scala is up to 10 times at a minute, and the early mesolithic over 100 times at a minute. So it does suggest it was very good to move it into this ballet system that did become, I think, very important in the early mesolithic and true to the late mesolithic. I am going to say a bit about the early mesolithic as well, because this is largely what we found, and I think it's important to set everything with the correct context. The lower-parallel mesolithic activity in this ballet, these are three sides quite closely together. This is on the sparrow we're looking at the ballet. This is on whether these are near falls and shoulder of the falls best here, and this is on the main if you like, vantage point where we're looking at the ballet. And here, by early mesolithic, we're getting, potentially, tents or hides, or a hunting camp, where this on this empire, where this is the tools, 200 metres, 200 metres, there's lots of scars at the same elevation giving us exactly similar maybe 8,000 dates, but focused on scraper production and ambience. So, the landscape is clearly being used in a complicated fashion by the other mesolithic. I hadn't really ever been sort of very dense activity in the upper-parallel. That's the sum of the early mesolithic microbes. And I should say as well as with Fexel, as we actually saw, at the end, you were basically given two years' time to get it. This is the last site you were working on and this is what the understripping means that you can actually work the site effect down here quite well. But I didn't really matter what we did with pumps, and I tried to control what eventually the whole ballet flooded and we learned a lot of the archaeology in the Dynish including the Scarlet Climatic. I'm not even going to be dating the mesolithic scientists. I'm not going to be dating the mesolithic activity including early mesolithic and also the harsh and base here. But we didn't have any lot of time to date any of our archaeology scholars. Thank you.