 Industry is really not interested much in basic research because it's too risky, so industry and ICE in particular, they are interested in bridging information that comes from university to make money in a certain part of, you know, a certain product, for example. If I compare Japan with the most highly innovating countries, the G7, Japan is about at the end. If you look at the number of papers per yen, you can recognize that the funding system that is implemented in Japan is inefficient. So you have three major issues here. You have not enough money, you have inefficient funding, and the result is you have very low level of science production. Japan is also saying that the government, the Japanese economy, the economy, and the economy are important. Japan's companies are developing research. How much research is done in the open innovation, especially in university, and in the public research institution? It's about 1 billion yen. 0.7% only open innovation companies are not doing it. In Germany, the total number of employees is a little less than 14 employees, and the total number of employees is less than 10 employees. However, the total number of employees is 6% in open innovation. So, the ecosystem is working. How do we catch up with the OBE countries? There was a goal. The goal was to catch up with the companies. It was easy to do it at some point. But after 2000 years, the goal was gone. Originally, it was the order in which Japan had its own innovation, but it wasn't really angry. So, Japan felt that there was a need to do open innovation. However, it wasn't really angry. The research was chosen to be helpful and to be able to stand up for it. And the point where the employees can get money is to be able to do it. But the point where the money can't get to the point where it's not good. The point where the innovation can be created. What do you want to ask them? What kind of things do you want to do to have money in the air? It is time for a major reform of the Japanese R&D system. If you give money to R&D, it's not subsidy. It's investment to the future, because without that money, in 10 years down the road, you'll have nothing. One of the, you know, problems as I see it in the Japanese university system is that you have the full professors being in charge of associate professors and assistant professors. But that means neither one is completely independent. But if I tell you that most of the results that have led to the Nobel Prize were done by people under 40 in most fields, you can see why it is so important that the young people become independent. And this independence is needed to generate creativity. I have advocated a funding system that is not based on project plans, but is based on brains. Currently, most of the third party funds in Japan is given for a project. But I've read a funny story about what this means. Antibiotics were discovered by Fleming. And Fleming was going a few days on vacation and he left the Petri dish on his bench. When he came back, this Petri dish was full with bacteria, except for one area where a mold was fallen into. It was a contamination. And around this mold, no bacteria could grow. So now this guy to the Canadian parliament said, if you were Fleming, what grant would you write? You would write, I am planning to take three days of vacation. I will leave a Petri dish on my bench. I hope that it will be contaminated so that I can subsequently discover the antibiotics. If you want to have a good research system, you have to have a balance between project and curiosity-driven research. It's quite different. What is different is that the goal is big and different. In the case of SASOKEN, the mission is to solve the social problem by doing social implementation. Of course, the base is based on innovation. The mission is to strengthen the cooperation between Japan and Japan. In the case of university, it is possible to change the world in a more advanced and basic way and to create a new innovation that cannot be destroyed. And to be able to change the world in a more secure way. That is what we aim for. And at the same time, the people's education is also a big mission. For the purpose of the SASOKEN project, I think that there is a big difference between a research center and a university. I think that the way to invest money is much different. I think that it is better to invest money in a more secure way than to invest in a research center. I think that it is better to invest money in a more secure way than to invest in a research center. That is what I have changed. There are many universities that have not taken such a form yet. As the teacher said, there is a possibility that the SASOKEN research center is particularly advanced. It is really necessary as a mechanism to implement a wonderful season in a research center. Of course, it is necessary to support the SASOKEN project. But when you look at it from a researcher's point of view, it is not possible to build a research center that is quite original and that is why I think that the SASOKEN project is necessary. The SASOKEN project is to trust the organization and trust the SASOKEN project as well. That kind of environment is necessary. There is a vision for the organization. It is necessary that everyone can share their ideas. Another important thing is to work hard. It is not just working hard, it is working hard. It is not good to just work hard. If you really want to share your ideas, you should not create a group of young people who are involved. You should not create a group of young people who are involved. You should work as a vision for the organization. The SASOKEN project was made by young people who were involved last year. It is important to work hard and work hard in that direction. This is a main route of technology transfer that you provide products or ideas for products to existing industries. But there is a second route driven by new ideas, new concepts that are then translated into new companies. The main job of a university president is to give these people all the freedom they can get to come up with some crazy idea that then opens up a new market. These universities that have as a mission a technology transfer. has produced graduates that have started 30,000 new companies. They would amount to being about the 12th largest economy in the world. So this is the direction that OIST is taking. The number of people who want to study abroad is decreasing. I wonder why. The challenge spirit is accelerating in Japan. On the contrary, when you fail in a challenge, you think about it. If you fail in a challenge, you will be able to open it up. Those people will not be able to carry the project. Roughly speaking, there are three types of scientists. There is the pure scientist, take Einstein. I don't think Einstein has thought of GPS when he developed the relativity theory. But it was important for GPS 50 years later. The second is use inspired research. Take Pasteur. Everything Pasteur did throughout his life. And I would actually say most people working in life sciences have in the back of their mind the use inspiration. What can I do in order to improve certain things for humanity? You know, diagnostics, therapy, new drugs. And the final one is Edison. It's like the engineer. This is where you have a little science on the side. But the bottom line is you only think about application. These three individuals as subtypes are in every university. Now you have to foster it. You have to make the transition into business easy. I think it would be great if you could collaborate with each other. I think it would be difficult to collaborate with Einstein. But I think it would be difficult to collaborate with him. In the case of Pasteur, Einstein has a strong personality. If you have to do something like this, you have to be able to connect with him. I think there is enough potential to collaborate with him. For example, Edison. I think it would be difficult to collaborate with him. But I think there is enough potential to collaborate with him. I think it would be difficult to collaborate with him in Okinawa. I think Einstein has a chance to collaborate with him in the ocean. I think there is enough potential to collaborate with him in the ocean. In a sense, we are complementary. OIS clearly needs more contact to Japanese industry. And I believe that if we would work together and we can do so, I would believe that it would be of mutual benefit if we would work together, utilizing the different types of expertise we have. I would like to give a message to the researchers in Japan. As I said earlier, it is very important to have a challenge spirit. As a whole, I don't think I should be shocked. I think this is very important. I think diversity can be evolved for the first time by merging with the things of consciousness. Unlike Neanderthals, our homo sapiens have evolved. Neanderthals seems to be better than homo sapiens, but they have never evolved. They have always been in the same cave. The homo sapiens have evolved. In the end, the homo sapiens crushed Neanderthals. Of course, the researchers themselves have also been shocked from the point of view of consciousness. And I would like to return the challenge spirit to them. Homo sapiens is inherently curious. This is why we are sitting here. We want to make use of the environment in a positive sense. And as we all know, there are numerous challenges. So we need to train the next generation, but we also need to train the current generation that they understand what's coming up. Although I agree there has to be a level of bottom-up, universities have to rewrite their curriculum. From my point of view in Japan, it doesn't work without a strong top-down signal.