 What I'd like to do, if I may, is to start, first of all, with Aminata Turei, because she brings a perspective of having thought about these issues and dealt with them in different ways in Senegal. And so, Madame Turei, if I could start with you, and then we'll go further. Thank you very much. Well, it's always a pleasure to be here. So we're talking about a fragmented word. I think societies themselves are fragmented, whether you're from a wealthy country or a less wealthy country. And that's the first thing that we need to acknowledge, that even in a wealthy country you do have people who feel left, you know, on the side. Internationally, when we talk about international development, we have to reshuffle our concept. Theoretically, China is supposed to still be a developing country, by the way, which I think doesn't meet the criteria. To say that we live in a world where we really need to stop and maybe offer a new length to analyze it. I think there is sort of a history in the making, in a painful way, most of the time. But what we are witnessing from where I'm sitting, which is Africa, let's remember that it's 54 countries, it's an important grouping. That's where maybe the future of nutrition will be decided, because you do have 60% of available land. You do have the youngest population in the world. You have huge resources. So you cannot talk about the future without having a deep analysis about what's going on in Africa. And what is going on in Africa is sort of a mixture of concern first, of course, from West Africa, concern about security. And we know what's going on in the Sahel. What happened between the former colonial power, but became a partner, and the relationship is not necessarily going well in Mali and Niger and Chad. You do have new generation coming to power in questionable ways, for sure, but they are there. And how are we going to sort of make sure that we do have international development along the side of international institution that works and partners who trust themselves? Because I think we are in a mix of trust crisis among international partners, among countries who were under colonial sort of power, and moved on 60 years down the line, developing different relationships. Some people are saying, well, it's not that different between Africa and its former partners. So I think there is also, from the other side, a new way of looking at things. And secondly, we do have, as I said, the youngest population in the world. So how are you going to make sure that that population is more of an asset rather than a liability? Liability also concerns our partners with international migrations and even securities and all these things. So I think what we really need to think about is what could be the solution to make sure that we converge together and we define a civilized world. First of all, I think we have to think about the United Nations. That is weaker and weaker. International cooperation is occurring outside of the United Nations that is still struggling to find even funding. We saw how, sorry to say, little relevant they have been in the Ukraine crisis, for instance. But in other crises too. I was talking about the Sahel and other places. But I think we need to give stronger teeth to the United Nations first. Second, I think we need to open up the leadership. As we speak, I say talk about 54 countries, African countries, and no permanency. That doesn't make sense to me. Taking into consideration what I said before. So second, making sure that an important part of the world is part of the Security Council. I think we need to redefine the relationship between former colonial powers and current developing countries. For instance, acknowledging what happened across history and maybe trying to make it right. I see that in some countries after the Johnson events two years back that many countries are looking into their colonial history and trying to sort of make it right, as I said. And also having a genuine international cooperation, which means that we're going to look generally into young people's right, into women's rights. And we're going to make sure that on a solidarity basis we are going together to define common goals and accomplish it. Which means also that countries who pledge financially should come to the pot, which is not the case. And of course, you cannot talk about fragmented world without talking about climate change. We have hopes that after Chalmencher we will really see genuine movement toward making sort of the financial pledges reality. So that's what I wanted to say at this point. Let's look into the solution because the problem, we know them. And we saw the solution. We saw the problem, we know them. So now we should focus on the solution. And the solution for me is a more unified vision, putting human being at the center. And I know we have a lot of people coming from the private sector which is important. And I think private sector should look again into their practices because you only do business when you have peace, when you don't have unrest, when you have consumers who are healthy, because nobody is doing business in Ukraine anyway. Or in many other places that we don't talk about. That brings also the issue of forgotten conflicts that goes over time. And the feeling that, you know, it depends on where you sit on the planet for your conflict to be recognized and solution brought up for peace to come back. So I think it brings back the whole issue, common issue of human rights. We are all human fellows. So we have a common planet that we want to work and live in and be loved and et cetera. So maybe if we go, we start by the end, we may find ways to converge. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much for starting us off and thank you for saying that maybe we've described the problem often enough, but we need to focus on what are the ways not just to define the solutions, but also to make the bridge to the solutions. How do we create the conditions so that the solutions actually become real?