 My current project is really the notion of building an interactive decision support system that can be used to advise and help people making legal decisions. I call it choice boxing, and it involves representing a choice as an interactive geometrical framework. The basic notion is, as we face a choice, we have options under consideration. We have aspects or factors that differentiate those options, and we have conflicting evaluative perspectives, and we don't have a good tool that I know of right now to handle this complex of moving parts. So I've been trying to devise a online interface that lets people model how they think about choices in a graphical form. Today we had a number of working sessions trying to see, are there any specific legal applications to which this might be applied, and a couple examples occurred. One is when you're dealing with startup organizations trying to decide what form of entity to establish. Should they be a partnership or a corporation or an LLC? There are well-known considerations that favor one over the other depending upon your circumstances. So, and we feel that it's the kind of decision that doesn't lend itself to a decision tree. It's not algorithmic. It's not something you look up the answer to. People seem to respond to the idea that if we can provide an interactive representation of the factors in play, that will assist people to make better choices in this area.