 रफ़ नद मैं, सत्ताली, ये नहां नहीं लागना। ये भी कुई लिए टेटिण, अगर ख़ाईया नहीं तुम भी आपनी जोट तुम थी, तो, तरम दोंगो थक नहीं, और असर्टि नेः कॉई पनापुटबी diye, इसे थी नुर्ईटा, नुट्छाँँउवाख़। तरिईचा मूग्लिएँ Jobson-Woggling आज्ती होसत्रिछाँरत्ए शुड़ॉएग। बूइनी च्यूँउग्य। और दिस्त्रिंश्यार्ट्तर, दिस्त्रिखळिश्याँर्ट्ऊज्ाझ। పిలి, ఎంరియో కి. గియి, నౢకి సిమారని కారారిలు. నినూవన్సికాసారి సినికా పెరాలికి. और राज, जेसी कि मुझे काग आए कि अंदियोर अंगरी जी जोनो में बुलना है. तो एक बार ये प्रेवोगाम कर चुक्या है। और उस में काफी अच्छी सबलता मिली है, इसले तोडी उनकि भी हमत भगी विकाज जी की। और हमें भी लगा गगी चलो भी प्रग वूँश्च्छी क्या यागे। अब बार में एक समच्चा या डिया थी है की कानून की भाशा जा, वो पाले सी अंगरेजे में पाडे है कानून काम किया है अंगरेजे में जजमेंस लिख है। अर हिंदी अर मराथी यह सब ज़ा लिजनल लंग़ कोर्ष मैंने के पहले हम लोग आएकोट प्मजिय तो हम को वी मराती में भी जगमें दिखने का पुई मोख्गा नी मिला अर हिंदी में दिखने के लिगा नी है, यहां गया गया गया गया जो ब्रोकल बाहिशा हो मराथी है तो इस करनच के वहाँ वा की जो कानुन की बाहिशा एंटी में है विसस्वोग, समजज आ या उव वो पतिकलर शक्ध प्रहों करना वो तोर अएक तो हो सकता है अब आपी कुछ आग्रेजी में बोलने की जरत पर से येख तुछी अमकोगी जुसे सदिकमिनलिकेत करना है अव विना मतलप के जिसका लिए मैं मालोगनी एं भे वो आपी युज नी करूँँँँँँँँँँँँँँ. जो रगर लग धोन में प्रच में थे natuurlijk आप खोमन अब्रेक शेर कते हैं और वर अप प्रक म्याँ Happy जू routine is a vast of the inhibiting participation, this meeting of mind. wells these two main important factors to be born in mind adequately responsible be because of the a Section 34, which is the kind of principle of evidence where a Section 149 makes a distinct offence Section 34 does Ve not make a distinct offense it may provides punishment for the person who shares ॐ ृ ौ ृ ॄ ो ौ sixty-nine ौ ॉ ॰ ॄ ौ ौ ॉ ौ ॢ ौ ॄ ॉ ौ । has अगर लग of  अउब प्रप्ति के लिए लिए एडि भी अपश्च हुता है, तुस्तरा offence करते है, लिकिन उसका पर प्रप्च ज़irez अग्डिश प्रप्च के लिए उपी अपश्च किया गा है, वो सब्जा़ बुगत्नी परणेगी क्यों तुई वो उस असैमली का ब्मेमबर सा जिसका कोमन अबजक उसे मालुं था वो कोमन अबजक असमली का ख्या है ये वो से मालुं था या चानषेच ते की भी ये अफिश हो सब ता यह आज़ा करते सना है तो वो आद में उस कोमन अबजेट को अचीव करते सचना है, उस उदेश्टी प्राप्तिक के लिए एक मेंवर ने जोपी अप्राद किया है, तो वो कोमन अलफल असेम्ली के सबी सदर्स्यों को वो लागु रहेगा. और उस उदेश्ट्टी विरुद असेम्ली के अप मेंवर है, और उस उदेश्ट्टी के किसी एक सदर्से ने उदेश्ट्टी के लिए जो बना किया है अप्राद किया है, उसकी सचना अपको, उसद्टी दुसरे लोगों को भी बोगतनी पड़ेगी. अब उस में कई बार यह सा अथा है कि उदेश्ट्ट्टी के समः है, उसलोग तुसरा यह सा अप्टिन्स कर बड़ते है, जो उस उदेश्ट्ट्टी का बाग नें का, उकिसी का खुन का जेते है, मुक्के का फाइदा अथा है कि अपने परसिनल बड़ा लेनी कि लिए एक आज्मी की उसी का खुन का जेता है. अब यह खुन होगा, यह यह यह ज़ी आपको उसका हिस्रास है, उो बन्दूक लेके यह पिस्टल लेके यह रिवाल्वर लेके आपके सा चल रहा है, अद अनलफल असेमलि का एडी वो मिमर है, तो फिर कहा जा सकता है कि उडिष्ठाःप्ती के लिए, आपको यह मालुं ता है कि यह यह यह एडी पिस्टल चराएगा तो विस्टल कोई से कुन हो सकता. अपको यह मालुम नहीं है कि उसके पास कोई यह सा पायराम है, जिसके लिए use करने से को किसी का कुन हो सकता है, यह किसी को बहुत गरीविस सहर्ट हो सकती है, तो उस सालत में आपको उसके लिए जवाप लेह नहीं है. उसके परसनल मामला उसको मालुम है कि अच साथमी वहापर है, और दितनी भीड में मैं भीड का फयदा उताके, उसको गोली मार दूंग, पता नहीं चलेगा, मेरे परपस सरोजगागा. आसे वेक्ती के किसी काम के लिए, विधि विévिरोस्य संबली के मेंबर जवாवार दे क्या गा है. विती विरोड़् एस्म्लि के मिंब्र जवार दे नहीं है. विभि� profile었던 asambli के मिंबर जवार दे नहीं है कि, विढि विरोड्विरोड्�女संबी के मिंवर劣 के ही जवाब डे है, अब उदेश पाप्ति किले कुन्सा काम क्या गया है, ये प्री दिटर्मिन नहीं हुता है, ये समय पे भी कुछ हो सकता है, लिकन आपको माल्म हो जान जाएग, कि जब हम पचास लोग जारे हैं और वारे कुछ लोगों के आत में पत्तर हैं तो, प्लिस्कोपर पत्तर फिंक स को घेदी जुध आसम्डली के जितनमी मिंबा है है, उजाएग दार हैं आपका आपके अक बत्तर है, यह नहीं है, कोई सावर बैजा नहीं होता है. एकन आप देख रहे है, आप उनके साथ है, यो वो और वार्ग वारे विप बचाछाँ जाएग. अब उन्त्यों बभे नावास्मबिज़। यह यह ऎदे काई ख़ाई तर्विए आप पूई यह नीच़त्तो थी क्चरते है। सब परदिटित के चामना है, भी देमेख देशागी ही एक देशागी है। वो उच्छने किसी एक में वेटेंगी कुक्किक एक दोग सीर्ज़्यस offence अप्रेंसे अप्रेंसे थोडो में भेटेंगी तो चारी आपाईद मैं बेटेंगी तो उख्छने वो जो है मुसल्ग आपने देखा हो गॉगे रापिंक जितनी दी कैसे सुत्ती एंप इस में वो उ सब आँप्तार। कोई वैपन की अप्योक्निया जाता है। इसक्छ इस बज्यद सम वैपन, आब से आपन लापल सैमली ड़िया۔ एक वो आपकशास अकोब लित भी की घर्गाद. और ब्रजा कोई अप्योक्निया आपकार। ख्छ लिया, अबेट करते है, तो उन लोगों को 109 लागों जाएगा या 114 लागों जाएगा जो भी अप्लिक बलुगा अबेद्में का सेख्षन लेकिन ये 34 109 114 जो है ये अल्लाफुल असेम्ली के सबही मेंवर्स को लागों नहीं होगा योंकि ये उनके नोलेज में नहीं था ये अद उस ती मैंवर्स नहीं और तो अबजेक गड्दाए उस सब बा喜 मैंवर्स को बालुम नहीं था उन्टि चान्छेस नहीं टैकी इस प्रकर को डि प्रे रके क्सका हो लागों नहीं यह सब कुईज़न अमको भी रहा है, और जब हमें यह सब्टेग दिया गया, तो उस मैं भी शाएद कुईज़न रहा होगा जो तोरा सा देखनिक तुगी याद एसा तो बोलें तो कोई भी सिन्यर आदमी एक अंटे के लिए गंटा किसी भी विश्यापे बोल सकता है. लिकें उसे तो तो अपाल लिए उस बली इसुत में उपालटीना कि कहाजा था तुई बआप है. तो यह कि और बाश्झा फिलिदिए कर तुछ थे लोग के. तो यह से जैसे जेसे हम लोग प्राटिस करते रहा थे तैं और वह से वहमें गया रह से ख़ीष रहे है. अब ज़से सचछ़ say, आप then you can register for 149.34, ख़्दिसए चिस्छ़ से आप वुस 149.34 कर தटी।भी उर्पन स्प्रिम्�essed क्रई mies स्डटिए बढद Sab flower will consider 114 verb judgments in 4stone bons compiler past北 bursting person. वृक्रिM्कृरके很有 जजिस्टिः कचक्ग्यें जीचिसे शीय अब � macam with 5 judgments. ृूरको सी यें, अगर ता उनका वमाँजनी। वहँर पहुठी। अखाज़ाच ममथा प्रश्व माँच़ा। library , you see go on just reading whenever there is a difficulty. even just few days before I was we read so many judgments of high crores which are set aside by the Supreme Court. Therefore, you see that is learning process for the high court judges also at the stage of high court Recommendation is set aside by the Supreme Court,그� acontecer That means I am in a learning process. Because the Supreme Court, anybody is in the learning process as There is a review. So, we cannot claim that we have achieved a perfection on a particular subject. So, we can make ourselves better and better day by day. So, these webinars and meetings on tirelike కాపినినిసిందాతిత౸ి సిరంనినివాసిందిస üst ఏంవిందిందిక౿ కాదావి వారెవవ౦నైలవ. పిఆటినిలెవతికి బిసికిటిందిపూపిచి పిలూడివాతియం� ऴॉज़ा आए जदीना, आप बगववाशा कासाज लिए, आप ऎलने आए बगवाशा है। आप बगव वाशा और छ़े चाहितां, आप बगवाशा एक आचाए, अवना वह दाशा इस सल्पोख़ि फरा से, आप बगवाशा ये साज्टेर के रहें। आभाडा, भी कर उपाहॉ रवाद्र वाद्र मुझा, धेदाे हैं, खदा चाहगे कुर्दे ने सादच माद्खागा है। एक आप वह क्या में बात लेगम सेंगा मरगा बारे वे तॉव्प्यद कर, रवादा सेंगा नेदागा में बादी बाहासाद्चा लग भगा, War From This, as I stated by has been mentioned earlier, 1634 does not create any specific offense whereas section 149 creates a specific offense. Common Intention Required under section 34 may be of any type. As I stated earlier that intention may be of any type which should be an offense of course. भीड़ का जो लीड़ार हो सब से पहले मिल चुका है, सब से बाद की है, सब को संगया है, यसा कुचुस में नहीं होता है। इसलिए under section 149, prior meeting of the minds is not necessary. mere membership of an unlawful assembly at the time of commission of office is sufficient. आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप, under section 34, some active participation is necessary, particularly in a crime involving physical violence. section 149 does not require any active participation and the liability arises by reason of mere membership of an unlawful assembly. now this defence is taken many times to avert just standing. it becomes very difficult for the judges sometime whether this man was present on the spot because witnesses say he was present. he did not do any overt act. अजली की आदा थी, ती आदे लग़ी वेतर से लब यहाद लग़्ानी वेतर आचम्फल आशम्णि उसुफ्वलाव, अजली बहुंगे, यह दो तरिएड़ी क़ाब से पहलेंग तरिघिस चली, जो इस भगी ग़ुशा कंदो तेराशिलाउग टर्रनी ती, क़ाशाशा वग नहीं, बाज़ाॉ, वो भी वाज़ाक में देखवागका तुम्झ्वादरे। तुम्झ्वागका। थिञें, तूफीजे कर करनेतागते वो जिया चीर लिजका था, और दूद को बबछह्टेगी का इ से पलज़ायगे। तो वगकर भूथ, वी गर्छु करिदूर, उल श़ियों वो लगी और थी शहार वो आप मेंने कमेखुत। आप ब्रादने वह आप प्रस्थदे की और वो जागेय कि आपुद्झें्द. तो एक वगेखान की वहे रहा है, ॐ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ ौ  य्र कोंगागा, यँम अब यात सब कहुत होगरग कूा, मैस काणम ढ़ियत त्यावा। न्रिब आच्टबर, अब मुस्वाक वुम्ँन, छिक ब्राहामान, छ своей कल सब घर्ट roll-orted होंते कृक्ऩ बर्ऑी आच्टबर, अभ बहुता, अरी वीध्वीगी भाचा बच्द्वीच कि लगा ज़नमा के वत आज़ा है। ना को वर्टेगदे थो ब अनिक ताज़ा तोऍ at अरी लिए लिए वोगागा आप लगा पटाएगी गर नाई ख़ाँद. because the law is like that if you are member of Allah, you are equally responsible for that. So friends, I think broadly we have discussed what is the difference between common intentions and common object. उदेश और इरादा, common object उदेश है, or common intention उदेश है. उदेश की प्राप्ती के लिए आपका एरादा लगल हो सकता है. अब अबजेट टच्यू करने के लिए न्टेश नली तुस्रा कोई काम कर सकते है. और उदेश और एरादा में ये दिखरन्स है. उदेश जो है एक प्राप्ती करना है आपने को. लकन उसके लिये आपने क्रिमनल आच्ट का अदार लिया. तो एसके लिये वो अफेंस बन गया. आप कोई भी सिविल खाम करते सामघ, ताबा लिए ते सामघ, जु प्रोषिस आप लोग से एद या थिगय का पटिष्षन ले रहे ठह है, यह अद्छिया क्यफर्से अग मैं, तरते ish sarin peach sarin purta's share to any person to take, or obtain, अधिया क्यफर्से बचाँहिgodhishya knaapya priya of any property or to deprive any person चिष्ट एक छब हुझकोग आशनी बार, उआप आ� tort herya koi opa ke bhajchhe is in the position of injermen or enforce in the right or suposed right. अखो आपन्से से अपने दिखा होगा, और वोंसका लिए अपन्से से, ज़ोग अपन्से के बी लग. औ devotees of land so instead of going to port or instead ofCC filing complaint before the Magistrate under section application before them Magistrate on the section 143 that the breach of peace is likely in respect of the claim over the property if you take recourse to the breach of law then the criminal law comes into picture now depending upon the number of persons friction will be applicable whether it is 34 or 149 149 requires minimum 5 persons 34 requires more than 1 person now there is some sometimes confusion with regard to the offense committed by decoys during the course of committing decoyty now for decoyty decoyty robbery is you see the what we say the severe offense of theft and then decoyty is more severe as compared to robbery because in robbery the number of persons is not necessary to be 5 but in decoyty it is necessary to 5 persons commit robbery it becomes decoyty now there are cases when the question arises before the court whether the decoyts while committing decoyty whether when they did not intend to commit murder of anybody but they had gone there to commit decoyty and one of them commits murder now whether 149 will be applicable whether it is necessary to prove the ingredients of 141 in that event it will not be necessary to prove the ingredients of 141 because if the offense is committed by one of them in presence of others while committing decoyty the question only will be there whether they shared that whether they had a meeting of minds to commit murder or that depends upon the facts of each case whether other decoyts will be liable for the offense of murder committed by one of the decoys suppose there are six rooms in house and three decoyts are commit you see robbing property in one room fourth decoy is robbing property in another room and fifth decoy is robbing property in the room where an old lady is lying on a bed because she is not well and when she tries to cry that fellow commits her murder now the question in such cases may arise whether the other decoyts will be liable for the murder committed by one of the decoys so in such cases also the situation can be gathered from the facts of particular case as to whether 34 will be applicable or not so this 34 149 has been the subject matter of discussion from our college day i believe that everybody must have come across this distinction between common object and common intention extortion theft kidnapping abduction and all these things were there when we were studying law but as we grow and as we practice more and more and as we come across cases of this nature i think we become better and better in understanding of the finer aspects of the case these finer aspects of the case if are not if not understand properly sometimes create a lot of problem not necessarily that prosecutor is not aware or defense is not aware it is possible that the judge may not be aware it is possible that what you are submitting the judge is not able to follow it or he could not follow it and he may give wrong judgment take a case of 302 where there is one clause the hurt likely to cause death if you cause any hurt intentionally which is likely to cause death the offense of murder is committed now there are some sometimes there is a confusion likely to cause death whether the offender must know that the hurt which he is going to cause to the victim is likely to call death some people entertainer believe that offender must know that the hurt which he is causing on abdomen or chest will cause the death of victim then only offense of 302 will be established otherwise it will give us hurt or hurt depending upon the nature of hurt but it is law is not like that law is that you caused hurt offender caused hurt one it is proved that he caused hurt he had intention to cause hurt and that hurt was likely to cause death in ordinary course of the nature now hurt was likely to cause death in ordinary course of nature is an independent thing to be proved without knowledge of the it is not necessary that accused must know that the hurt which he is causing will definitely cause his death or likely to cause his death so these are final aspects of the issues in criminal law which we come to understand in the course of time in the course of our practice as compared to civil law criminal law is different it is adversarial so prosecution has to lead everything and defense has to defend at the end of prosecution evidence defense is not supposed to disclose different activities is not supposed to disclose his defense he is not supposed to tell the court he was simply present i did not do anything he can say so but he is not supposed to develop his story at the time of framing of charge he has to develop his story during the course of cross examination he can add to that during the course of three and in thirteen of CRPC he can add little more if he wants to examine the defense witness so in 149 and 34 also the person particularly who has not done any work act has to develop his story from the cross examination of fitness number one itself to show to the court that i i was simply present there i was not member of unlawful assembly so friends remember that in 149 being member of unlawful assembly remaining present at the time of one of the members of unlawful assembly one or two or more members of the unlawful assembly committing crime is an offense being member of an unlawful assembly the object of which unlawful assembly was one of the objects stated in 141 is an offense in section 34 meeting of mind with other criminals and participation in the crime is necessary to prove the offense of 34 read with a particular section a might not have used weapon a might not have used pistol or knife or whatever is the weapon of offense but if it is established that he had a meeting of mind with the person who has committed the offense and he participated to some extent he went with him took him back from the scene of offense on a scooter or on in a car so these facts are sufficient to prove the meeting of minds and the participation in the offense so these are the basic differences between 149 and 34 of IPC which i have explained to you and if we read more and more we may find little more finer aspects of the issue which i have discussed with you i think we may take some questions if there are because i think we have covered the subject sufficiently although you cover such in such a nice way that and it is also i will say even anyway i have been in one take if you are reading it or understanding it for the first time it takes time but slowly as if you will see it a few times then just like what we study it is only what you say just like from a teacher you are learning so the more you hear and then if you jot down the notes then it is more important as i have not come on this but i will just check it out on the as to whether we have got it on the we will give it court time right sir vini sir is a common intention necessary for a to commit an act in furtherance i don't understand what he wants to know vini is asking is common intention necessary to commit an act in furtherance of a the question is incomplete question is incomplete yeah that's what i'm saying also someone is asking the judgments but we always believe that once you understand the concept and the judgments cannot be the judgments i don't store with me oh that otherwise is also not required the fundamental rule even otherwise in law is that first you understand the second then try to in the facts and then you can okay even if you read my judgments reported judgments you will find that hardly there are citations in my because i quote is also again quote of facts in our first appeal therefore my judgments are mostly on the facts of the case i don't touch too much sir that is what i am saying that when you first understand the section you can break the sections that how the ingredients are not cut out in that particular case or how you come out in that in the law and the other jurisprudence and service law etc if you are able to show that how that section has been breached how there is a violation or if you try to give an interpretation that can be done for manoj camera says detailed commentary on ipc he can try with the rathal lal and dheeraj lal which has recently been revised that can always work so there are no questions you have explained it so well that people will like it and tomorrow friends we are starting with the new series on the service law primarily we have designed it with the 15 part series with mr. p.s. raja gopal a senior advocate from karnataka bar association and do stay connected with us at 5 30 tomorrow we will understand what is the significance of act statute instructions and orders what is the difference between these acts statutes instructions and order what is the interplay between them how and what can be the significance what will be the relevance of articles 309 what will be the significance of article 161 these all interplays will be quite relevant those who want to understand the service law we thought why not start with the series on the entire concept so which can understand and as usual justice talyani has been explaining things very elucidatedly illustratively and his judgments what he wrote during his illustrative career speaks volume of the knowledge he has uh as i say what were the challenges and what actually went upon and how those entire facts should be brought forth that can be another part where the persons who are the judges can understand the art of writing judgment and for a lawyer they can understand how to see about the facts how can they bring forth that that will be another day another time but be that as it may sir has always been time enough and his patronage to this channel of beyond law clc speaks volume and we will say that sir has taken so many sessions those who have missed any of his sessions can like share and subscribe to the channel of beyond law clc they can watch the previous webinars not only of justice talyani but of other speakers also so stay blessed namaskar and covid is rising so take precautions and those who have missed it they should go for the booster dose the government is taking all these steps for the betterment of better tomorrow and better today thank you much