 Save 10% with my code Bobby10 on raw, organic, grass-fed and grass-finished, freeze-dried organ meats from grassland nutrition. Link in the description box. All right guys, welcome back to the channel. If you're new, my name's Bobby. Guys, today we're going to react to a super old video. This has been uploaded 13 years ago by the Islamic Informant. The video title is Old Bible Proofs Quran Is Right. I know nowadays we have those absolutely amazingly produced Islamic motivational videos of which Hollywood is getting jealous but nevertheless in those old videos sometimes we find true gems. With no further ado, let's have a look. The letters of Jesus' brothers were so dangerous that for hundreds of years the Church Fathers refused to include them in the Bible. They were only finally accepted because the oral traditions concerning Jesus' family were so strong. Yeah, it's quite interesting because if you look into Christianity you would have to rely upon the Church Fathers. There is a thing called canonization. It means that those scriptures are acceptable, that those scriptures are legit and real, similar to the Sahih process of the Hadith. However, it is up to those Church Fathers to decide if the scriptures are legit or not. Therefore, we would have to put our faith into the Church Fathers and accept them as authorities. Some people can do that. I personally cannot. I do not know those Church Fathers personally and I've seen what has happened at the Nicene Council and therefore I personally cannot put my trust in them. Some Christian leaders who said, well, James, I don't know if we should include him. Now he's the brother of Jesus. Why wouldn't you want his letter? Because if you read the letter it doesn't have the gospel that people came to associate with Christianity. In complete contrast to today's Christianity, the letters of Jesus' brothers describe him as their master but not divine. They see Jesus as a human character blessed by God. The thing about the book of James, it's the teachings of Jesus but not the teachings about Jesus. James passes on what he got from his brother. You could say it has no theology and yet it does have a theology but it's the theology of Jesus but it's no theology about Jesus in that book. Doesn't mention the cross of Christ. And this is something that I learned while studying Buddhism. I learned about the teachings of the Buddha but then ultimately had to realize that Buddhism as the word describes, Buddhism is the teaching about the Buddha and the same applied to Christianity. Was it truly about the teachings of Christ? Sure, partially but predominantly it was about the teachings about Christ, who Christ was according to the church fathers yet again. This doesn't mention the blood of Jesus, doesn't mention forgiving sins through believing in the Lord our Savior who's in heaven, nothing like that. It's an amazing book to read. This alternative version of Jesus's message can be found in other texts too. In the Greek Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem there is another ancient book that was not included in the Bible. It's one of the most contested of early Christian documents, possibly even older than the Gospels themselves. I believe it is the key to understanding Jesus's original message. I'm very sorry that the library is not in its proper situation. The library of the Greek Patriarch has the only complete copy of an ancient handbook specially written for converts to Christianity that was compiled when Jesus's family was still alive. The diddhiké gives a direct insight into what the very earliest Christians thought and did. So this is absolutely amazing if it is true. The priest claims that this here is from the time of Jesus, from the time of the family of Jesus. It would be of course very interesting to see if we have some carbon dating for this document because I never heard about it. It has never before been filmed. Can I hold it? Yes. Wow. This is like being close to the early church. Of course. And I'm not using gloves. Is that okay? It's okay. I'm using this one. Wow. The book begins here. Really? This book is 2000 years old. I'm skeptical because it is so well preserved. There are two ways. One of the life and one of the death. The diddhiké or teaching contains a code of Christian ethics based on the original teachings of Jesus and some instructions as to the proper forms of worship. Which language is this in? There is a great difference between the two ways. But what makes it so dangerous for today's Christianity is what it leaves out. There is no mention of the virgin birth, no mention of the resurrection and above all no mention of Jesus as God. In talk of Jesus in here as Lord and not Lord God suggesting that they saw him as being more human than divine. That's striking. In my opinion in the evangelists in the Gospels and in the works of Apostles there is a balance between the presentation of Christ as the Son of God and as the Son of Man. The Lord to whom we believe is divine but is human. All right so ultimately I do not know what's in those scriptures but the Orthodox priest gave us the Orthodox version of course. He said that there is a balance with that he wants to tell us that Jesus is equally man as he is God. 100% man, 100% God. Fully man, fully God. This is the Orthodox doctrine of course. For 2000 years the church has grappled with the balance between Jesus' divine and human natures. But it is the divine that has dominated. In the process it is Jesus' essential humanity and the humanity of his teaching. No it's not only that it has dominated yet again as I said this balance that they're speaking about is literally that Jesus is 100% man and 100% God that is the balance they're speaking about. Things that has been lost. The Didache also contains a detailed description of a very early communion service. Unlike today there is no suggestion that the bread and wine are the body and blood of Christ. In fact Jesus is referred to not as God's Son but his servant and concerning the servant and the Son of Man. Broken bread. We thank you our Father for the life and knowledge which you made known to us through Jesus your servant. To you belongs the glory forever. Do you think that one of the reasons why they don't mention Jesus as Lord God and they don't mention the resurrection was because they didn't believe that those events had taken place. That Jesus wasn't the Son of God and that Jesus wasn't raised from the dead but instead he was a human, a prophet and not divine. It's a dangerous question. In my opinion the fact of resurrection of Christ couldn't and shouldn't be ignored. Paul speaks and says if Christ was not resurrected then we shall be accused that we speak falsely against God. Exactly so now the priest is taking his worldview from Paul even though he is presented evidence previously to Paul. He's ignoring that evidence even though he himself said that this is from the time of Jesus. Nevertheless he listens to Paul and this is what indoctrination is. If you look into the Orthodox Church as I said you would have to obey the church fathers you would have to obey Paul and Paul says Jesus is God you can eat pork. Congratulations now you can. That doesn't make sense now. What is absolutely fundamental to all Christians including myself is the idea that Jesus is God. Without that there is no Christianity. There is unitarian Christianity as well. Clear is that the very earliest Jewish Christians including Jesus's own family did not see him as God and ultimately that is why the church has gone so far to delete them from the Christian story. Heretics. Heretics. This is Judas the brother of the Lord according to the place. Jude. In the Bible in the letter of Jesus's younger brother Jude there is an extraordinary passage denouncing a group of people who are secretly corrupting the true faith. For admission has been secretly gained by some who long ago were designated for this condemnation ungodly persons who pervert the grace of our God. If you decode it it becomes a clear warning that the new movement was losing sight of Jesus's original message. By this time Jude writes he could see the writing on the wall. He could see we're losing out and it's a battle cry. It's a call to arms spiritually speaking. He's not talking about outsiders. He's talking about people who claim to be part of us that are not teaching what we were originally handed down. These are grumblers, malconsents following their own sinful desires. They are loudmouth boasters flattering people to gain advantage. He's getting very worried and he's telling the little group that would still listen to him. I think in effect he's saying don't listen to all these new things that are coming along. You fight hard for that original faith that was delivered to us. Family tradition. Follow the tradition of the family. Almost a mute testimony to what used to be the way. When Constantine the Great made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire 1600 years ago it was Paul's interpretation of Jesus's message that was adopted and Paul based his authority on a series of mystical visions although he had never met Jesus and only joined the movement after his death. They get it. In contrast James and the rest of the family who had grown up with Jesus followed his mission and been at his death. Their version of Christianity a vision of Jesus as a more human character was declared heresy. All right guys and this is it for today's video. Absolutely amazing to see that this was produced by Christians apparently and not by an Islamic production company because when people watch Islamic productions they of course think that they are biased. But hey how about the Christians doing their own research here. Ultimately they come to the same conclusion. It was Paul. Paul with his visions about eating whatever he likes and about abandoning the law and of course making Christ into God. Yet again as I described throughout this video I saw this within Buddhism but I failed to recognize back then that the same has been done in Christianity. If you look at Buddha in his teaching he was a humble man that was going his own way. He didn't want to have followers to begin with nor did he want to have any type of statues but now you look around in Thailand and Southeast Asia and you will see those huge golden Buddha statues. His true message is forgotten and it became all about the worship of the Buddha. The same applies of course to Christianity. If you look at Jesus what is his true message. Why don't we listen to him when he says Israel your Lord is one. When he says the Father is greater than I. No we're not listening to it. We are simply worshiping Jesus. We are praying to Jesus even. It is absolutely unbelievable what has happened but at the same time not so much because it is human nature to worship everything they can see. All right guys but this is it for today's video. If you liked it leave it a thumbs up. If you haven't subscribed already guys please do so. If you want to support this channel via Patreon guys all the links are in the description box below. Thank you so much for your ongoing support and as always may God bless you all much love and peace.