 We are coming back towards corporate governance and we had a very interesting discussion earlier in part one and as a comparison of corporate governance codes of different countries and this is going to be the second part. We basically were looking at four different countries, we were looking at Bangladesh, we were looking at Sri Lanka, we were looking at India and we were looking at Pakistan. So let us move a little bit forward and look at how they tend to be similar or they tend to be different in the context of the audit committee, the remuneration committee and the nomination committee. So when we look at the size of the audit committee then ladies and gentlemen, in Bangladesh, in India and in Pakistan minimum of three members while in Sri Lanka, we are talking about only two members. The chairman of the audit committee in Bangladesh and India, it should be an independent director while in Sri Lanka it has to be a non-executive director and again in Pakistan it is preferably an independent director. Non-executive or independent directors under the audit committee, well in Bangladesh at least one independent director, in India two third members should be independent directors. So in Sri Lanka there should be the majority while in Pakistan all non-executive directors and one independent director would be formulating the audit committee and the audit committee is the most important committee in the context of corporate governance. Reporting framework of the audit committee, well in all four countries in the reporting framework of the audit committee is to the board of directors it to be Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka or Pakistan. So again, a lot of similarities. We see the frequency of meeting of the audit committee and time gap between the two meetings, well in Bangladesh it is not covered. In India at least four times and not having a gap of more than four months between two meetings. In Sri Lanka it is not specifically covered and in Pakistan at least once every quarter of the financial year. So again we see a little bit of disparity and independence in the time frame of these different meetings. The quorum of the audit committee meeting, well in Bangladesh at least one independent member. In India either two members or one third of the members of the audit committee whichever is greater but the minimum of two independent members should be over there and it is not specifically covered in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. So therefore in those areas in which it is not specifically covered I think that Pakistan has a lot to learn from our other SAAK countries so that things can not be ambiguous, there cannot be any gray areas and things should be much more specific to ensure better compliance and better implementation of the guidelines and code of governance. We look at the size of the remuneration committee, well that is not covered in Bangladesh, at least three directors in India, two directors in Sri Lanka and again three directors in Pakistan. In the remuneration committee, non-executive and independent directors, well not covered in Bangladesh, all of them should be non-executive directors and at least half should be independent, well in Sri Lanka we see exclusively non-executive directors while in Pakistan a majority of non-executive directors and preferably an independent director should be a part of the remuneration committee which is extremely important. Now the chairman of the remuneration committee is not covered in Bangladesh but in India should be an independent director in Sri Lanka an independent non-executive director and in Pakistan can be any member of the remuneration committee except the chief executive officer. Now when we look at the size of the nomination committee which is the third committee, it is not covered in Bangladesh and Pakistan but in India at least three members and in Sri Lanka two of them. When we are talking about the chairman or chairperson of the nomination committee then not covered in Bangladesh and Pakistan but in India should be an independent director and in Sri Lanka should be a non-executive director, non-executive or independent directors under the nomination committee not covered in Pakistan and Bangladesh, in Sri Lanka it should be the majority and in India all of whom non-executive directors and at least half of them should be independent. So again what we see is that actually in Pakistan what we see is that the nomination committee is not a requirement and therefore we see that it is not covered and similarly also in Bangladesh but because it is a requirement in India and Sri Lanka therefore we see that the stipulations are properly formulated. So again we looked at two committees, three committees actually the audit committee, the remuneration committee and the nomination committee and the differences between Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan. Thank you so much.