 I'd like to welcome everybody back to the independent investor channel. If nothing has proven true in owning highly on stock, their ability to surprise to the upside and continue to deliver upon a timeline. Now that's been just recently delayed with the last Q3 earnings report. That was to be expected really the impact cannot be ignored. But but I think it's it's fair to say that highly on holdings is not the only company that is incurring some of the problems with some of the chip delays that go into the products that is going to ultimately delay their ability. I think this is going to be a test for them to circumvent this and this will not be the first hurdle that they'll have to overcome in the history of the company. Unfortunately, they're having to do it so close to the inception of the company. If there is any silver lining that exists with highly on holdings is that I don't think highly on is prepared to accept mass order anyway. And I think they can continue along their product validation stage really solidify their customer relationships and build and continue to deliver on other catalyst established other forms of relationships going into 2022, which this video is aimed at exploiting where I think based on the track record that highly on has been able to surprise to the upside that I believe that that's going to continue and I think that it's just going to continue to build the pressure behind the dam with the company itself in what I feel is still a very disconnected stock price from the action with the company. This company is still brand new, and even though it is pre revenue, these strategic pieces that highly on is putting into place on multiple fronts will continue to build that pressure until these catalysts are put forward in the marketplace to be not ignored anymore. I think for those folks out there that benefit from my highly on videos. A couple reasons why I put these out so frequently. I wish I didn't have to do this. I'm dissatisfied with the amount of transparency that highly on provides to shareholders. I wish that Thomas Healy would share a little bit more in my sentiment and who am I, but I frequently have guests on the channel CEOs, CIOs, CFOs, many, many times over, and I can't tell you how many times the driving shareholder value is echoed as a paramount responsibility of the leadership in a company and specifically on the CEO itself so if I was going to give a critical recommendation to highly on it would be to mention driving shareholder value much much more than they currently do. And I think with regard to the transparency on really telling the highly on story. I think highly on at this point and I don't mean to be rude, but this is business. They get enough. I don't think they do a good job at all in sharing the right stuff. They share stuff. I think it's the right stuff. And it doesn't have to be a professional production. It does not have to be, you know, anything outside of just an iPhone that we all carry around pushed up to Twitter and those feeds that are good and conducive for that type of material. That's all it takes, you know, put an on board driving video or a vlog that that right there is going to churn some information for people I don't care about the professional nature of the videos. As a matter of fact some of the professional videos you can tell that they were made months prior to the release online. And I think a lot more real time type of transparency on progress being made at the company would actually truly tell the story the one that I think is going on, which is why there's a lot of reason why I put out my content the way that I do. Because I just don't outside of a few other channels out there like Paul and Ronnie and Henry, and a few others that are telling the highly on story that the best that they can. I don't think highly on gets even close to its due attention for the opportunity and the pressure that I speak of that's building behind the dam and there's many many things that I'm going to talk about and this is not just my opinion. This is based on track record. So if you disagree, please leave that disagreement down in the comments section because I don't want to make this seem like because I am a known advocate for and bowl of and large shareholder in highly on holdings that somehow I have the inability to provide a perspective from both sides of the story. I just told you one of my bearish thesis. Do I think that's a reason to have the stock months in the basement. No, I don't. Do I think that highly on is in is intending to do that. No, I don't. I give them a pass and my opportunity through the independent investor channel to share the highly on story from my perspective, only speaks to what I presume is going on behind the scenes and that is progress toward highly on's goal of changing the world and building a company that has staying power. And I do believe that a lot of these initiatives that they talk about through product validation are aimed at just that. A bone every now and then to provide some level of acknowledgement the driving shareholder value as the number one priority like number one, you're a publicly traded company. It is your number one responsibility. If you don't like that responsibility, go private. You are now a publicly traded company and driving shareholder value should not be anything other than the number one priority, not priority seven, not priority 672, it needs to be priority number one. I don't know if executives or management or anybody else that follows the highly on story or is in, you know, in highly on I don't get replied to on Twitter. I've stopped engaging with investor relations because again my grade of their performance is terrible. They get they get a one out of 10. And that's, that's terrible. There's room for improvement. I'm being constructively critical, and I might be overly unfair to their defense because there has been more presence put through with the YouTube channel and with the Twitter Twitter presence but there needs to be more, and it needs to be the right stuff. And I think just coming up with these ideas off the top of someone's head might not be the way to go perhaps maybe they need to get somebody in there that really understands marketing and how to tell this story correctly, because I think right now, it's a complete hot mess, and I don't believe that they're going to tell a story again. If I didn't have to come out every three days with a new highly on video and tell my perspective on what I think is the real play with highly on. I would be a shareholder. If I had to do this or not, it would not matter. My bullish thesis does not change. This is not meant to misconstrue or tell a story about highly on that that is that is untrue. This is to provide clarity on what I feel is the real talk on this opportunity in highly on meeting its long term goals. So let's get into this guys I've done up a list here of 10 catalysts, 10 elements that I think over the coming 12 months highly on will will and this will be the very checklist that I work from. So get a pen and a pay a paper. If anybody with highly on is listening, get a pen and a paper, you can learn a little bit from this as well, because your track record of providing incentive to the market has been phenomenal. Unfortunately, the driving shareholder value has been nil. It has been non existent. The stock market does not believe what you're putting down. Okay, so the definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over and over and over again and expecting different results. I think you really need to look into that philosophy and again this isn't meant to be rude. This is meant to be constructively critical. And with a stock price that's off close to 70% year over year. I would put this in the bucket of insanity and a well overdue bucket of insanity that you've been in here for for months and months and months and failing to acknowledge that reality is really really drawing on retail investors sentiment with the company in other words, pulverized investor sentiment at this point without even throwing a bone their way. And I think the disconnect between that transparency with the company and shareholders like myself and thousands of others who come to my channel for a little bit of real talk, a little bit of perspective and a little bit of forward thinking and perspective and acknowledgement of where we are in the current current situation with highly on specific not only with the company but the disconnect between the company and the stock price. Highly on will secure more orders. Okay, they will. And you've got companies out there if you listened correctly. Amazon was mentioned on the call. Anybody picked that up. FedEx was mentioned on the call. Scary how interesting the relationship is with Sherry Baker, the CFO and Pepsi. The interesting relationship that Warren Buffett may have to tie into this whole thing. Talk about this a little bit into the future. Interesting how Elaine Chao has the ties with Kroger, the number two grocer in the United States of America. Now, are any of those going to be secured? I don't know. But here's the thing. I base my thesis and my presumption based on historical ability to garner orders. Monet was a perfect example of that 40 orders with a fleet of 48 trucks. What that means to me is a relatively small fleet has the conviction enough to pledge their loyalty with a company like Highly on and put in an order of 40 trucks probably realize a couple of those orders once the binding happens. And I think I've explained this many, many times these reservations will be the benchmark by which binding orders are weighed against going forward. In other words, in year one, if Monet takes delivery of let's say two trucks, okay, one or two trucks, depending on what the OEM hubs can assist with on a little bit more volume production, I don't know what that's going to be. I don't know if it's going to be one or two or if they're going to be able to utilize the order book for Monet to get them more than one or two trucks on the onset. And then that binding order will be based against their reservation book. In other words, it'll go down to 38 at that point. The following year, if it's three to five trucks, it'll go down respectively in respect to those binding orders against the reservation playbook. Now, remember the reservation playbook is enormously widespread. Okay, Detmar is fairly small company as well. It is a private company interesting enough and just speaks to me that the diversity across the reservation book ranges from some of these smaller companies to some of these larger companies like Agility, of course, with their 1000, A and G, as well as Detmar with their 300. But what's going to end up happening is as we start to solidify that reservation book going forward. And is there anybody out there that thinks that that's not going to continue to happen? This has been a consistent theme over the last 18 months with Hyde Leon being able to secure this reservation order book. And if you guys think that that's somehow going to stop, I think that takes more imagination than my presumption that the order book will continue to grow out with reservation placeholders. And what this means for these reservation placeholders is it is building a queue, an order queue that is going to be used to prioritize who takes first delivery on the first available trucks that come off of the OEM hubs when that product reservation is complete. This is going to be huge. And this is going to be the multi-layered approach and strategy to getting into the four year rotation of these fleets. Thomas Healy talked about this. So the first order out of the gate, just imagine we're going to have multiple initial orders stepping into a potential relationship long term with these companies that are going to look to either scale up or yes, do away with. They could take their first order delivery to trucks and not like it. Okay, but here's the thing with the amount of product validation that Hyde Leon right now is standing up and saying this is absolutely the best way to do it. We have to, before we scale up to mass scale, go through this product validation. And we need to make sure that we can win customers based on the product that we put forward as the best drive train solution on the market. Okay, so this is absolutely key. If we're going to win customers, you have to win them the right way. What it is for the right way is not just to get a 40 reservation delivered to and they're unhappy with the product because proper validation has not been completed, and they have problems with the truck that could have been foresaw during the product validation stage. Okay, doesn't make any sense. I would rather see that order come through under two. Monet come forward on their earnings report and say the bottom line savings because of our highly on solutions that we put into our fleet renders this to the bottom line X and X to the bottom line. Our truck drivers love it, and it's helped improve and drive our efficiency, and we get to fly the flag of a company that is stepping in the right direction for the green initiative and for the, the protection of the planet and the environment and carbon emissions etc right. This is a customer that is going to step in the following year and say you know what we want to increase our truck fleet size to five we're going to continue to roll on our old trucks, or we're going to rotate out a couple of our older trucks with the new trucks replacing our entire fleet or a good percentage of our fleet with the new hyper truck erx okay so Amazon FedEx I think Kroger is going to be a player in this deal. And I actually believe that there's going to be some order orders that come in from companies that surprise to the upside that there's no way at the time of filming this video that I could forecast. We're very good at predicting based on past events, what we can anticipate happening into the future, but if they are educated guests at this point, but imagine what an order from Amazon of 500 erx trucks would do for the stock. You're telling me that that's not a catalyst or an icing on the cake, or a one last pressure behind the dam that could potentially break the dam on this thing. You're crazy if you'd suggest otherwise. And I think this continued order book when streak is going to continue into the future for highly on and I think it's going to only continue to build that pressure behind the dam second. And it will continue to expand the team, the team has expanded up to 150, and in all fairness man that's a pretty small company, if you ask me, you have to build this team to strategically offer their expertise to the whole. And I think 150 is relatively light what they're anticipating doing over the long term. And I think highly on will also continue to expand their facility. And get this idea. Well, if you listened closely to the earnings call, they increased their team from just shy of 100 up to around 150 employees. So that is the track record the trajectory is on an upswing. Why does it make any sense at all that somehow the progress will not be made toward building out the team, continuing to build out the management team, and continuing to improve upon the team, right with the board of directors, highly on has proven no such up anything other than an upward trajectory on this front. So it would be ill advised for me to not speculate in a certain capacity that that trajectory will continue north, and I have no reason to believe that that won't happen. The facility they've leased the building right behind the headquarters that's basically double the space looks like that facility is going to be continued space for R&D battery production in that space and continued expansion for employees going forward. Here just taking the right steps in expanding and really looking to build out that framework and really the baseline of the pyramid right now for a company that is going to look drastically different in five years. I mean, this company is going to look back on this timeframe and it's going to laugh it's going to be like man you remember when we leased that building where they may just have multiple sites both here in the US and abroad that they're working from to push their solution out into the mass scale production line. Okay, number three, they will recognize revenue. Okay, this is going to be a big catalyst. I can remember not too long ago when Tesla, that was their big catalyst, when they recognized revenue for the the discussion up until then every single analyst out there had a cell rating on the stock. Every single one of those analysts have really had to eat pro where from a fundamental perspective they may have been right, but ultimately they were proven wrong. And that's the humble nature of the stock market. And I think all too often analysts are put in a corner where they're having to put forward a report on a company that they've pledged their coverage to. And unfortunately, I think a lot of these folks have to derive their opinion based on the short and maybe even the medium term. And I think that's really unfortunate. I think it's really a tough position to be in on having to speculate on a company that doesn't have a lot of predictable metrics to go on. It's got to be almost close to an impossible task and this is why I'm an advocate for coming on saying these guys are just dead wrong. They're just dead wrong, because there's no way that they are in the know, in such a capacity to put forward a report unless there are motives behind it and there are. And if you don't have folks like me coming up with a thesis, I could be wrong. I could be wrong. You could say, and I get crap all the time it's like well you don't like what they have to say therefore you're down on them. No that's not true. If you look at the increase in position by both of the companies that they represent, they come out with the hit job, and then they accumulate more shares. My money is with the big boys. Okay, I don't follow these analysts and say, oh my goodness, the stock's going to five I'm going to sell and wait till highly on hits $5 on the nose. I'm not going to do that. Of course not. I have my own conviction on the company. I believe that these 10 catalysts that I'm going to talk about in this video will transpire over time. I absolutely believe with 100% conviction that they will. If the stock maintain its current stock price in the gutter. I don't know. I don't know. But again, it's a step in the right direction and providing that ample pressure for eventually that damn to break. And I think recognizing revenue. You don't think that that's going to be bullish. And if you don't believe that they're going to recognize revenue, the 359 that showed up in accounts receivable 359,000 was about a 300% on the 89,000, about a 325 if my math is correct increase from the 89,000 on the books, these hybrid units, man, they're selling. Okay, and they're being sent out the door, and they're being billed as appropriate, you can't recognize that as revenue. But coming into February 2022. If your bet is that highly on us not going to surprise to the upside. That's fair based on a track record to say look Ryan, I haven't recognized revenue as of yet. It's really a criteria for you to look at the stock and either say invest or not invest. Be fair. If you make it up in your mind as being one of those criteria and pillars for your investment thesis. So be it that's the beauty of independent investing is that you get to come up with your own investment thesis that thesis could lead you along the right path to profitability, or it could be ill ill founded. And you could find that eventually, this company does actually turn out revenue and it just so happens to be the predictable catalyst that allows some level of of of anticipated revenues of bottom line earnings that are going to come in with the company and that we can start to evaluate and start to do some price to earnings projections going forward. Right now it's impossible. You can't do it. It's an educated guess. That's why at this point I don't really understand, you know, analysts coming out and every month they've got a new opinion because they're pulling out whatever hair they have left because this company can't provide the metrics necessary to provide those accurate assessments and I chalk them up as a hit job. That's my opinion. I'm entitled to my opinion. I'm allowed to give my opinion and have free speech and will on what I see and the timing of said get downgrades based on publicly available information on said downgrades. Okay, these companies are sitting back fat and happy on their few hundred thousand shares. I think last jet Goldman Sachs is up over 650,000 shares of owned in the company. If they weren't so bullish and they thought that it was going to the pink sheets, do you think they would own a position at all? Ask yourself those rhetorical questions. Okay, gotta read between the lines. You gotta be somewhat creative when you own a company like this. And I do believe that they're going to recognize revenues whether or not it's on our next milestone February 2022. I'm not holding my breath. I don't really care if it happens it happens if the stock pops 25%, I could care less. My stock position does not change my disposition with my position does not change at all, because my long term thesis is still intact. Number four, the OEM hubs. This is something that I need to hear more granularity around on the Q2 earnings call. Thomas Healy was asked about this, what is going to be the cost of the components that go in and the cost associated with the OEM agreement and these hubs that are going to assist with mass production and scale up. And the vendor really just kind of alluded to this a little bit in response to one of the analysts call on the Q3 call, talking about the margins and the relationships with the vendors driving, increasing those margins by driving down the price with the new relationships with the that they're solidifying and that will continue to solidify over time because I can only imagine the component order book that goes into these highly on products that they're turning out. Those relationships only stand to improve over time, but I think the relationship with the OEM hubs is going to be something that I focus on. This is going to be their path to profitability and mass scale up. The profitability will come as a means to an end, but the really the ability to mass scale up and use those OEMs to fill out those binding orders that they get against their reservation order book is going to be key. And if over the next 12 months we hear nothing on this front, then that will remain an open checklist item, but it makes my list of 10 that has to happen. I believe that it will happen. And I believe based on the us us winning one of those OEMs right now, I believe we're in bed with Peter built I think what what a fantastic opportunity with those folks. OEMs are not going to stand by and allow Peter built to turn out a massive amounts of this product to big, big fortune 500 companies without getting on board. And I talked about this before I think the demand from the customer to the OEM is really going to be the OEM. Okay, highly on is not going to need to sell OEMs, but I haven't got a lot of granularity around what existing relationships with the OEMs exist as of yet to allow those relationships and those chassis to go to the OEM hubs right off of the main OEM line for the public install of the highly on product whether it be the hyper truck ERX or a new install off the line of the hybrid product whether it be an existing new truck roll out on the diesel side or the CNG side. Okay. So the OEM hubs that number five is the government relationships and you guys remember. Every card is start still part of the program here, you know, the old department of transportation secretary Elaine Chow on the board of directors with these direct connections to Washington DC, the fuel the fuel credits that have been put forward on the hyper truck ERX with the 75 of pure electric miles that can be run in our big cities. I'm thinking about Los Angeles and New York specifically, these products, they are ready to go. Okay, just need a little bit of product validation but I think some incentive from the government is a catalyst that could be enormous. This could be one singular catalyst amongst many that could break the pressure behind the dam relationships and incentives. Okay, a lot of Tesla's income comes from government incentive. And a lot of people don't understand that they think that the two versions of the car that they have or the ones at least that we see all the time on the road is driving the sales. That's just not true. Okay. And I think to have that much support from the government in other words if you took that support away from Tesla. What would it look like? What exactly would it look like and a lot of people are saying that highly on doesn't need that. But you're telling me that an incentive to a company like Monet to provide some level of green incentives to say hey we're willing to step in the right direction, and the power of highly on to go to the government and say look man we've got 1500 and 90 reservations. If you can just provide some level of incentive 25% 50% 100% of an incentive from the government to step into this to allow for that payback over time to happen. So these new technologies can be put in place on the onset and really ramp up what has been conveyed as an emergency for the planet. And it's been conveyed whether or not I believe that or not is is is irrelevant. But if the government really insists upon initiating these green initiatives and doing so now, then provide set initiatives for these fleets who are standing up high, ready to rock. Okay, that is a big one. Okay, number five over the next 12 months if there's no government intervention. This will again remain an open action item on my path roadmap for highly on over the next 12 months but the government is a big one. Number six is to product validate. And we if we don't hear any type of product validation and certification Thomas Healy talked about this on the q3 earnings call the EPA, EPA certification and other certifying companies. This is the only company that I've heard talk about this. Evidently high zone has the ability and Nicola to just jam products through without going through any type of validation at all, zero. Nicola bulls will disagree with me but I just don't see it. And I do from a surface level cover both of those companies for interest sake, say what is highs on doing different than Nicola. What they're doing is they're jamming product to marketplace and it looks really really good for Nicola to come out and say by the end of 2021, we're going to deliver 25 trucks. Okay, the market takes that vague information. And I think this is where highly on is much more transparent with the real talk. Okay, in, you know, supply chain shortages delays in delivery of trucks until 2023. And I think they're being truthful with this. And I'm not sure if Nicola is conveniently not being so forthcoming. And then when they get to that point they just delay the order and they've already benefited from the good news that's been put out through the market. The market looks at it and says wow Nicola is killing it 25 trucks. They don't even look below the surface and say and say, where are those trucks going, have there been validation, what are the specs on the truck. Do I had to go on to highs on website, and their specs are a 500 mile range. So comparatively speaking, it does not even hold a candle to highly on and nobody's nobody's talking about these cross comparisons. I'd like to see these cross comparisons come up with the evolution of the technology weekly. I think it could be a very, very simple graph that they put on to Twitter, and highly on is the one that goes on the offensive and starts to starts to say no. This is the product specs as declared on the investor slide deck from highs on and Nicola, and here's what highly on can do to in a cross comparison and let, let investors look at that information. Okay, that's key, and they failed to do so thus far we've moved away from what type of fuel savings are provided through the ex one improved model. Okay, I haven't heard one single thing on the 30% fuel savings that that's supposed to render for fleets 30% is enormous, and it isn't. Is it a pipe dream. Is it was it a concept. Is it something that is actually being realized in fleets now. We don't know driving shareholder value that is key. All right, so validating the product over the next 12 months continues to be a theme that Thomas Healy foot stomps all the way through each and every one of these order books and excuse me the conference calls. Other earnings calls and how important to roll these larger fleets play in that product validation phase that they're in right now. Number seven is to break the short interest. This is huge. This is just another pressure that's keeping the dam intact. The short interest still resides at 20%. Short sellers will continue to short the stock until they have been provided a reason not to short the stock. Right now, they've been provided no reason not to short the stock. This is business. Okay, short sellers have been right on the money with this company and highly on which is interesting if Thomas Healy is a race car driver. He should be portraying a little bit more of a competitive spirit in in combating some of the short seller articles. I can presume any more that any of the articles out there, especially ones like investor place are not impartial. If you read the description of what their goal and motive is, it's an opinionated article. And those opinions, I believe I presume have motive, and I could be wrong, but I believe that they do. Okay, because one opinion comes out and it's completely on one side of the fence. Another opinion from the same investor place comes out and they give an opinion on the bull case for highly on that doesn't tell the story. It just does not tell the granular story of what's going on. And that's all it is, it's an opinion and a hit piece but to break the short interest. It's going to be any one of these catalyst that are going to break the short interest and put a squeeze on to where the shorts are going to have to cover shares. I think the key that's being missed in all that is the lungs that have well, well established positions in highly on, they won't sell. They won't sell. And I think that very fact is being underestimated in the marketplace. I don't think large institutions will sell. And I actually don't think that retail investors will sell based on this conditioning of retail investors that we've been there and done that before. If you're able to hold this stock in the $7 to $8 range, you're most definitely going to hold this stock in the 12 to $15 range. Now I do think that there's probably some folks that invest on emotion, and we'll sell out of the stock because they're just pissed off the company, and they've lost all conviction in said company I do believe that. Okay, I hope I'm wrong. I will not be in that camp. I will be in the long term holder camp I will be a lot more comfortable in knowing that we've established a base and started on an upswing in the 12 to $15 range than the range that we're at right now. Which could both break below the 675 support. I don't see that happening. If it does, it doesn't matter. Again, my day to day conviction has nothing to do with my long term thesis on the company. Okay, so stay, stay long. Stay strong. If you're going to make an educated decision on this company. Don't make that educated decision which is is ill founded day to day make the educated decision on what you presume to be the company stock price in 2345 years plus. Okay, that is the only way that you're going to give yourself a fighting chance in this company. Now in five years if this company is still $7 a share or $8 a share. Fair enough. I will eat crow. We will make an educated decision together. No problem. But in the interim, it's feudal, and it's irrelevant. It's feudal, and it's irrelevant earnings, government contracts, 20% pops in the stock should not play into your long term conviction at all. And I do contend and I give away the goods by saying this, if you want to own the company, just hold it long. It's very, very simple. It's the most simple strategy you can follow. And if you truly buy into that conviction move in the company to just hold the shares, no matter what, then the day to day does in fact dissolve to irrelevant. Okay, it really does. Okay, so break the short interest over the next 12 months will still be monitoring the 20% short share float and we're looking to break free from that have the stock trade a little bit more outside of a kind of a manipulated type of fashion. The stock gets bought right as soon as the market close, you see the stock pop, you know, a few percent and then those shells shares are sold right back on the market. The company dumps every day, and then it fights its way back they do that so not to garner SEC scrutiny over their short selling tactics. Okay, because they don't have any interest in the company at all. They don't. They would like to see the company goes low as physically possible, so they can continue to make money. This is the game. And unfortunately for short sellers, I think in 10 years, this is going to be such a predictable game that there's going to be a lot of retail investors that make a ton of money off of that predictability, because it is going to be less manipulative into the future, because it is so predictably manipulatable. Okay, and retail investors like myself will call that BS all day, and we'll profit from it. Okay, we'll just wait it out. Until they get done bending the stock over and raping it, because again they have no interest in the stock. We'll just call that BS and know that eventually that stuff will work itself out. They'll be forced to short cover, and then it'll be off to the races. Okay. The next number eight, this might catch some of you guys off topic a little bit, but I actually think an X factor for highly on will be to land a whale. Yep, we've bagged the elephant. Right. Is it so much of a far fetch type of thing to think that Warren Buffett steps in in some capacity. Now remember Warren Buffett I believe owns a large position in Kroger. The connection to this is, you don't think that he would accept a Berkshire wouldn't accept a call from the board of directors, and you know exactly who I'm talking to a talking about. Okay, a lot of these board of directors own chairs in other boards. Okay, now if if highly on starts to turn out some predictable revenue and monger and Buffett take a look at this like any savvy investors. I think it would be far not far fetched to think that maybe they would take a small position in the company based on their bullish thesis around the ANG network. Okay. And the bullishness around renewable natural gas. Now Buffett monger would have to buy into this as a fuel. Okay. And they would have to understand and look at the metrics that exist between the RNG costs to diesel equivalent in comparison, and really just make a bullish call on that. You want to know what that would do if Buffett takes a position in highly on directly under Berkshire at the way. I believe that rhetorical question to you. Now, if this thesis does not play out over the next 12 months. No problem. No problem. I think institutional buyers will continue to increase, which I think that there has been some, you know, a degree of increased of financial institutions interest in the company. Okay, and I think that will continue. And how do I know that it's based on the amount of institutions that currently own highly on holdings and have added those to their ETFs. Okay, they're part of the Russell, they're part of the the SMP. And they'll continue to be added as appropriate, going forward. And I think institutions, as the stock continues to build that pressure behind the dam, they will start to accumulate more shares here. Because the stock has just proven time and time again to have ample support at about the seven to $750 range. Again in the short term, it could dip. Okay, it doesn't mean anything. Large institutions, do you think they invest on emotion? Of course not. Of course not. So when they see those opportunities might be a nice sample opportunity to add a mill, two million shares more to their to their existing positions, or lower that cost basis anymore, get more. And so the cost of value proposition over the long term, entering into a company like this with with as much upside potential as there is at $7 very, very attractive. And right now it's giving an open door to buy the stock at these levels but I think landing a whale might be one of those catalysts and mark my word I'm the only one who's offered this. I mean, does it have a potential to not transpire? Of course not. But this is, this is a discussion. I mean, of course, you know, this could just mean that it's an open action item, but to have a big ticket whale to kind of step in. And even somebody who steps in and takes a seat on the board from more of an advisory role could be absolutely huge for highly on and really be that catalyst, right. And really give them that direction that they need and provide that that incentive and pressure behind the dam that I talked about. Number nine, Sherry Baker talked about this on the Q3 earnings and that's penetrate Europe. She knows it exists. We've got to get the product validation done here. And from now until that product validation and the beginning of securing some binding orders on the order book, that that's going to be the real telling time is when highly on plays the Europe card and moves abroad. I think that that was something in a staunch difference between highs on and highly on is that highs on already has international exposure, and quite frankly me, I disagree with highly on on this. I think they should go international. I think they should start the product validation right now. I think they should go for it. I think they should go for it right now. I disagree with the path that they're taking in getting the validation here in our backyard. I understand, and I have to support it. It doesn't mean that I have to disagree with more of what I perceive to be more of a blase type of approach to hey, we're going to we're going to validate a product over and over again, that we were supposed to be product validating for the previous 24 months. Right. So I don't understand why we have to continue to validate validate validate. When it seems like to me the perception, at least the stock market's perception of these companies is that Hila and highs on are eating highly on lunch. And they're doing so because highly on seemingly is taking this high road of product validation with no real guarantee that companies are going to step on board because of the validation. I think companies are ready to step on board right now. And I think they're ready to evolve with these companies with highly on. But side by side, instead of highly on taking on all the risk of product validation and perfecting a product and really laying a red carpet in front of these companies to take delivery of these trucks. I think there needs to be some shared risk and that's where I go back to the potential for government incentives to share a little bit in some of these risks because what I'm saying here with a $1.5 billion company. They're going to have to incur massive, massive costs to get where they inevitably need to go. Now remember, there is a share offering. Capital raise in highly on future at some point and make no mistake that is going to happen. But I think it needs to happen when there is clear, clear guidance going forward. There is wide acceptance of the product from multiple fleets out there that there can be some level of anticipated letters of intent to purchase products going forward. Okay, timing on that share offering and raise of capital is going to be key that's been on the books ever since the original submissions to the SEC, and they know not to do it now the stock would plunder to two bucks. And they know not to do it but I think where it be well timed into the future. That's really going to be one of those catalysts to the upside. If they well position the capital raise. Okay. The last thing I will say is to deliver the continued to deliver on catalyst. Okay, some of the catalyst that have allowed the stock to pop a little bit find a little bit of favor in the marketplace has been the eight minutes of charging on their battery system that they have their proprietary system that's key. The 70 mile miles above and applying for the ZEV credits in both California and New York that are kind of the leaders and in the forefront to the industry highly on as well positioned to kind of play that card. The ability to provide us a little bit more granularity on being the fuel agnostic erx I feel is another catalyst that we know that eventually highly on can profit from the hydrogen fuel cell initiative and how everybody is so bullish on that product. I think some of that bullishness is ill founded with the lack of infrastructure in place and the cost to produce and the cost to offer. Heizen does a really good job of glazing over this, but the fact of the matter is the cost in the marketplace is not convict conducive to the transition to that right now. It's not. And I think the bet there is that the cost to produce the hydrogen will come down over time that the infrastructure grants and the multi multi billions of dollars that need to be put to that initiative will be provided government supplement because that's what it's going to to provide and build out the infrastructure to that a catalyst to that end will be highly on stepping forward and saying hey, we can actually play in this space as well. As well as our existing fleets that we put out that are looking to burn RNG through the existing network through ANG so those multiple catalysts. These are all catalysts that are real. These have all happened over the last 12 months, and I think the idea behind putting out this videos to provide some level of forecast going forward on what I feel are going to be the 10 elements or road maps or catalyst call it what you will that could really continue to build the pressure behind the dam. It's going to happen when you least expect it, and it could be any one of or all of the aforementioned catalyst that I mentioned in this video to keep a perspective on this. The short term means nothing. The medium term means nothing. Will all of these happen will none of these happen. It will be the very framework that I judge and say look we've met this catalyst. I can check it off the list. Some of them will be continual catalysts. Some of them will be those that we revise and evolve with highly on over time. As for example the order book turns out, we've heard nothing on a whale stepping into helping that the highly on over time. We've heard nothing from the government potential for incentive. And if we start to get a lit a bit of discussion on these particular fronts, it's only going to help the fire smolder a little more in providing that little pressure behind the dam that I feel like eventually is going to break that dam and really unlock that value that we all know is there, but we're just waiting for those catalysts to align with the company and the stock action as of now guys tuned in to the highly on videos I would invite you please leave your comments man we don't get anywhere without open dialogue and commentary around this because right now that's all we have with the lack of information coming from highly on I'm looking to generate and manufacture that dialogue outside of an expectation of highly on to continually feed information, because of nothing what they've proven over the last 12 months is that they are incapable of doing such things. So let's manufacture it on our own if you enjoy the content make sure and subscribe to the channel. Share the message with anybody out there that you know is interested in the company owns stock in the company is a bull or bear on the company would love to have them on. It's an open invite to come on and discuss this once in a lifetime opportunity in stepping into the EV space specifically with electrifying power trains on existing existing trucks with major problems going forward. And I think the next 12 months is going to be absolutely critical in meeting some of these catalysts that I talked about in this video guys thank you so much for tuning into the message, and good luck in your investment future.