 Okay, thank you everyone for being here, I can measure India Charter's fourth anniversary as we celebrate the blockchain tech fest 2022. So here he is, so Sandeep has about 11 plus years of experience and he is a blockchain enthusiast and has been working for the last 10 or 15 years. And then, you know, he tried on the customer-centric solutions with over a decade consulting. He has all his projects with range from ERP limitations to designing cloud-based solutions. So I would like to welcome Sandeep to share his thoughts on, you know, green coin, a blockchain-based organization framework can be leveraged for carbon trading. So, welcome Sandeep, over to you. Yeah, thanks Vikram. Am I audible? Good afternoon everyone. Yeah. So today we'll be discussing about green coin, which is our carbon trading platform, which is our carbon trading platform. This platform is built on blockchain. This uses a concept of tokenization, which will cover in detail what exactly which all parts it is going to cater. So there's a lot of buzz in the market about sustainability. We need to reduce our carbon emissions. Paris Agreement is there, Kyoto Protocol is there, which each nation has to follow. So in order to meet those requirements, every nation is like bound and they have to submit their annual reports to United Nations. Yeah. So before starting, we'll see some of the market trends on carbon emission, what exactly, how is the market update, what all different organizations, industry sectors are doing. There is a United Nations framework convention on climate change, which regulates all the carbon management programs running across the world. We have carbon management system, which is being evaluated by Mounder Intelligence, which is a research organization. It values the carbon market as 10.93 billion in 2020, and it is projected to be 19.83 billion by 2026, which is like a growth of 12.3% during the tenure of 2021 to 2026. There are various micro drivers, which is going to help the carbon emission. Like 75 countries have less to achieve net zero carbon emission by 2020. There is also a global shift towards circular economy, sustainable mode of production and demands and supply consumption. So we can see there is a lateral shift in consumption also as a consumer, we are trying to use products which are like eco-friendly. So there is a demand and there is also regulations as per the UN Charter. So these are the industry drivers which is like changing our focus towards carbon emission reduction. Companies have also focusing on purchasing goods, energy consumed during the production of these goods, direct emissions, and also the logistic part will also come into picture. There are potential renewable energy sources which are being utilized like solar energy or other sources which are being promoted by the government. So we would like to see some key industry initiatives. Some of the key industry initiatives in manufacturing we have Siemens, which has targeted to be carbon neutral by 2020. In ID industry, Facebook targets to reduce its carbon emission by 75%. From the government point of view, Copenhagen aims to be the world's first carbon neutral city in the world by 2025. In the retail sector, IKEA is also trying to become energy neutral and be an energy provider. So these are some of the initiatives which we have seen. There are many more initiatives which are taken by various organizations because this is ultimately going to help us achieve our sustainable goals. We have seen a lot of talk about carbon reduction. Now how we are going to achieve if somebody is a carbon, some organization is carbon surplus. They can promote or help other organizations who are carbon deficit. So they can trade with the carbon and they can help and promote the projects which are like green initiative projects or some kind of solar projects or various other projects. Some of the important projects which in India, which are going on, I could list as general vision agency. They have saved around $225 million in five years. PowerGood in Andhra Pradesh is currently selling around 147 tons of carbon credits which they have on through their business activity. India Forest and MP, they annually live on around $300,000 from carbon payments by restoring forests. So they are doing great work. This is from the government point of view, Toran Par. Toran Par is earning around 200 crores from the energy efficient projects which they are into. There is also a grassy industry which has earned around five crores in energy projects. So these are some of the initiatives which we can see in our Indian context. There are also other global initiatives which are going on. Now in order to understand how carbon trading takes place, we have taken a scenario where there is a regulatory body. There are two manufacturing units. One is a low pollution plant, another is a high pollution plant. Definitely the high pollution plant will use the carbon credits which is allocated to them beyond the limit. And low pollution plant can be energy surplus. So they can be surely transfer their carbon credits but in order to transfer their credits mechanism like they have to go through a regulatory body. There is no clear mechanism which can transfer a mechanism and immutable mechanism which can help trace the carbon emissions and also other trading between the carbon emissions. So we saw that there are few key drivers in the market which helps in carbon market like new developments, enhancing the carbon market accessibility and liquidity. There is an actually determined contribution under the Paris Agreement in which each nation has to submit the annual report that how much carbon deficit they have been and what all measures they are taking in order to be carbon neutral or achieving net zero emissions. There are corporates which are having initiatives through CSR activities to be carbon neutral and achieve net zero targets like SCL itself is doing some good work sponsoring some NGOs to reduce the carbon emissions. And also within their premises they are also taking initiatives to reduce their carbon emissions. So also there is after the Q2 report which was signed in 2005, again the Paris Agreement was there which brings in Article 6 to like redefine the carbon offset markets. While redefining the carbon offset markets there have been three initiatives which have come into existence like European Union has come up with their emission trading system. Similarly, California also have their cap and trade program, Korea Emission Trading System, China National ETS. So these are the key initiative trading platforms. At the moment also have one exchange which is National Commodity and Derivative Exchange which deals in carbon trading. But all these platforms are like centralized platforms but there is a public need for a decentralized platform which because these centralized platforms have some problems which we'll be discussing now. There is a difficulty in mobilizing the potential supply whereas carbon certificates issued but while doing the carbon reduction some carbon certificates are issued. But there is always a danger of like double spending those carbon certificates. Whatever implementations are there they are fragmented. There is unclear lifecycle of issued carbon credits. There can be a one major issue of overgrading and also there is a lack of cross market exchange value like a unified value of the carbon credits is not generalized so there is no standardization available right now. So these are the challenges which we can overcome through implementation of blockchain. So if the blockchain may provide a solution which can help the carbon trading and bringing all the stakeholders on a particular network and it can help in creating the tokens like all the carbon credits will be issued in form of tokens and they can be easily available for trading on the platform. So it will be a kind of a digital market place where consumers can buy and sell carbon credits on the net platform. This platform also provides kind of automation where smart contract is responsible for melting, burning and distribution of carbon tokens. So as you can see we have investors, green projects and purchases. So purchases are generally those organizations which have carbon deficit. Now also with carbon trading we are enabling a new asset class to be defined which is a carbon asset class. So people who want to invest they can also buy and bring on carbon tokens. So right now we generally go in the marketplace for any exchange to buy some shares but right now we can also bring for a good cause for a green initiative. So investors can come over there and provide new carbon credit. Now with the blockchain it helps to record the transactions. It provides a better governance. It also helps in better trading. There can be multiple stakeholders in the network like regulator, energy industry, project verifiers, liquidity providers or NGOs who are promoting green projects. Develop a framework called Green Point Framework. This framework is a carbon credit platform which helps to create multiple carbon credit tokens. It has multiple features like fungible tokens. It provides to trade on fungible tokens so each carbon credit is represented as a token and that can be easily tradable on the network. This solution, the NOPOR solution where we can define our own rules and easily customizable. It also provides a smart contract handling. It can be easily integrated with other networks as well. So these are the important features of our framework. Coming to the architecture point of view. This framework is built upon hypervisor fabric where we have different channels, portal spheres, portal searches, certificate authority. And in our implementation we devised two channels, basically an ESG channel and carbon market channel. ESG is a score which is being provided to each entity which helps us to identify whether they are a good promoter of carbon emissions or not. So there are various parameters which will define in the ESG channel and based on that your credit score will be calculated. And accordingly you will be eligible for a quota of those tokens which can be traded. Then we have the carbon market channel in which we can trade all the tokens. So as an interface you will have the functionality for defining the token. Once you have the final token you can define the on hypervisor where you define the rules. And then once the rules have been finalized you can publish the rules, define and then issue the tokens. And these issue tokens can be traded to the network. Once the trade hasn't been complete, let's say somebody wants to redeem this token, they can also redeem. User management is also a part of this solution. We have connected the green chain option review also, so some of the data is stored in option review. And also it can be indicated with any of the database like LGO, SQL or any database. Now what are the benefits of trading using blockchain? We have discussed about the solution. It provides us a standardization. Some of the basic problems in the existing system was standardization. So it brings standardization. The centralization tool is now decentralized as we move forward to blockchain. It increases the liquidity because we are using more investors as carbon has been a new asset class which has been defined. It also increases the accessibility. Also by using the blockchain we increase the security. We minimize the investment threshold. Blockchain also brings the transparency among the stakeholders. So all the participants in the network get more transparency about the data. It brings better compliance. It helps in rights management. So these are some of the benefits that we have observed in using blockchain in carbon trading. Also prior to carbon trading we also need to track carbon emissions. So just to discuss on how blockchain can be helpful for carbon emissions tracking also. So there are some things like the current process for carbon emissions tracking is less reliable. And the process to calculate the carbon emission is complex, inaccurate. For carbon emissions tracking there are Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 emission line is within the pursuit of what business activity we are doing. So the direct emissions are under Scope 1. Scope 2 is in the indirect emissions like the services which we are revealing. Energy services which we are revealing. Electricity services or any fuel which we are using. Scope 3 lies in the pursuit of let's say the indirect activities through our employees. Let's say a business rebel is there or somebody moves or purchase. So all those lies in Scope 3. So one more challenge comes into picture is that there is no standardized approach for measurement and analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. Again double spending of carbon credit certificate is also a challenge. There is definitely a need of immutable near the time dissemination of carbon gas information for all the stakeholders so that they can keep the corrective measures to reduce their carbon emissions. So if we implement the blockchain on the network, we need to bring all the participants on a particular blockchain network. So you can see the representation over there where we have taken different examples like manufacturing production plan and distribution or mining regulatory body or logistic provider. So they all need to follow the same regulatory complexes and all the data is near real-time share with everyone with less amount of data leakage. Now we have a detailed view of greenhouse emission tracking on blockchain as we discussed just now that emissions can be tracked as a Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 where Scope 1 comes from the direct business activity. So these emissions needs to be tracked against the Scope 2 where as I mentioned electricity, fuel, gas or any fossil fuel emissions which are like indirect emissions. Then for the Scope 3 emissions, good transportation, base generation and capital growth. So these emissions needs to be tracked in a blockchain so that the leakage becomes immutable. Similarly, they can be vendor partners with whom we are doing a self-contracting so they will also have their Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3 emissions. And also the regulatory body will ensure that all the regulatory complexes are being followed up. So this was all from our side. Any questions? Yes, definitely we need a permission kind of network because all the regulatory complexes. We cannot go ahead with a public network because there has to be some regulation which is followed. So we need a semi-decentralized or permission kind of network in order to manage the platform properly. And again it is permission yes but permission doesn't say that we can't open it up. It can be permission but just for adding nodes it is a permission. But otherwise for participating you can always make it open to people. So we are looking at it from a different view. Yes it is permission. Yes you choose who participates in it. Yes to provide that level of immutability. But otherwise when it comes to the participation in that, you don't necessarily have to be closed. It can be open for participation but closed for who can participate in a consensus. So that is the reason I suppose. So basically your question is how will you provide the consensus right? So essentially because we have to be able to understand the topic. So there has to be a consensus at this point. I know that might be the topic as you know for like a recent time as well. But for now you know like in the last you know the rock-based you know dashboard governance system. And again you know when it comes to carbon credits or something like that. You have a really big company in your commercial chain world who can keep watch of it right. It's not really the people that you know these guys want to. It's not really malicious details that are there right. So that's why it's a closed system where it comes to nodes. So that malicious intents are controlled. But at the same time when now you know it is open for participation right. For participation to open for holding the nodes and you know coming up to the consensus. That's where it is provisioned. Because if you hold any public blockchain the only problem is they are still very slow right. So that what is there and how much you can be open. How much data you can put. It always comes down to cost as well. So they are slow. They still have cost right. So that is where I suppose you know at this point of time it still makes sense. I know that you know variance happens recently. But again you know that there are so many other sites. But our GSP you know how it should be made so it was also there. So they have a different model going to come to it. That's why you know they are not so open with the use of this. Regulations like assigned amount units being assigned to each state border. So that is being managed by the regulatory body that how many units has to be initially allocated based on that. ESG score. So the ESG score part we discussed that can be evaluated under the parameters. So there are different parameters to evaluate. And what how many how many carbon credits needs to be initially allocated. And beyond which if they do the consumption they will be carbon deficit. And then in order to compensate they have to buy or fund some carbon green production. So anyway. No it will not be a centralized system because all the nodes will be added as a part of the spent money. So that is why it is in a permissioned network format. Because the regulatory bodies are the governing bodies who will decide the rules and regulations. And rest all the rules. So that can be managed like we have in the architecture diagram we showed the user management. So through user management we can assign different rules and that can be managed from there. So there can be for every node they can have their own users like to subscribe to their node and do services. So they can even use the authorization server before their node to allow them. So you mean there is something like if there is a node and a node in its regulatory body inside there. Yes. They can all have power. They can share power. So the power is only with the consensus right. There is no separate power when it comes to you know specially you have to use the carbon grid. You can participate in consensus. You can say yes or no. I agree or I do not agree. And even you do not agree it is not really an option. The consensus is only to the power. You know do we all agree that this was the last state and this is the new state when you know this data comes up. So essentially if you have written a smart contract in a way where you say this particular node is allowed to you know provide this kind of input. And they are allowed to add this entry. Regulatory is just a watchdog over there and saying okay is it happening right. Is something going wrong. So that is their main role. Their role is not to say what to add to the network. But whatever has been added is it wrong. Wrong in the sense should it not have been added right. Maybe someone you know says okay you know I have this farm and you know you know I have an university into it. And it should be calculated to watch my ESG school. You know he was just doing farming. He was not really planting a forest right. He was a farmer doing a farming so that does not necessarily contribute to the ESG factor right. So that is where you know regulated to say hey why did you you know they look at some tokens to that guy right. Or what kind of or maybe you know they submitted a report saying you know okay this is a certificate and that certificate doesn't seem valid. So those kind of things they can say hey I found this issue. And then that can be connected. It's not like you know it is written on blockchain you can't correct it. You can just that you can't delete what has happened. You can just do corrective actions right. So you can chill to all that. So that is why you know this makes sense. You know a private or a hybrid kind of a model for you know this kind of a point makes sense. Of course you know it's not really that this is the only solution right. So everyone you know has their own perspective. And just because they have that particular use case had you know one or two differences in how they were going to implement. It's made a hell lot of a difference on which blockchain platform to operate. Very big difference. You know some of the customers that have come to believe they say hey I have about what. 100,000 or maybe you know 500,000 customers of model. Now in that case you may have already used permission talks and now they say no I want to move away from permission. So there are such customers and then there are customers who say hey I was planning to do it on those. But you know you see it's slow and you know I need too much data to be put in. And how do I manage you know things that comes into the network. Otherwise in public everyone has a you know voice right. So sometimes that also becomes a pain for you so it has you know on the both sides. It's just because what perspective you bring into that solution. And even with the same solution minor thinking can you know can be a major difference when you have to block it. So that is where it is also important that you know when you choose which platform to use. It has to be the right platform you have to invest into it to understand that you are investing into the right platform. Rather than just investing into it or maybe choosing dialogue with this you know blocking platform. X, Y and Z are successful if you do this one. So that's not really a yardstick that they should use. So that's you know my take on that. Thanks everyone for being a wonderful audience. Yes sir. So interoperability you know everyone wants it. It's a utopia of blockchain at this point and there are so many interoperable solutions but what I have found is that if you have to be interoperable. You have to plan before you you know get into a blockchain if you get into a blockchain. Get into a solution you go live then you know there are you know too many complexities involved if you want to go interoperable. Yes you can still go about it and then you know of course you know you have. Generally many a times you know it is a custom solution that is preferred for interoperability. Right because you know you may have chosen one blockchain and then you know the interoperable platforms may not be supporting it. So that is one of the other reasons why there are so many challenges but I think you know we are moving in the right direction when it comes to interoperability. Hyperledger you know we saw that hyperledger kept right so that is you know exactly the right direction. One of the right directions that you know we are moving into. So that is what I love about hyperledger kept high and they have two such solutions right and now they're merging into one. So that is where there are so many improvements happening because you know we are learning from this. We are learning from that we are still young right so blockchain is still young not just me right. Yeah so that is where we are at any questions from the room or from the public. Sorry. Onboarding of whom. Yes. So you're saying that there are so many different type of participants and how do they start or become part of something. I would say that you know the answer to that would be that there has to be a platform right someone has to invest into that platform. It could be government bodies you know investing in the platform or otherwise what I've seen is influential players maybe you know who have you know maybe who are too big. It is always someone who is too big and you know can influence others to join it that is the only way to start. I don't think you know factories themselves you know can you know start their own you know bar carbon trading or ESG platforms and you know expect others to start it has to be someone influential. Yes you know they can not saying nothing entirely no but yes it has to be someone influential so that they can bring other participants and when we say participants there are various different types of participants but not just one. So there are participants yes factories industries but then there would be you know bigger players as well right industry you know big industrial companies right so they'll have to you know probably make way make room for others to join that network. Or because you know if I expect everyone to host a note one that's not you know economically feasible right it's not budgetary feasible for you know everyone to host on their own load. And again blockchain platforms if they become this big they you know the management overhead and that network requirement itself increases. That is where I said that you know you go with permission blockchain you know few of the players come together few of the you know reliable ones come together you know government has one and then you know maybe you know some banks or something like that some you know bodies can come together and then they can create their you know their notes and their platform and then they can offer that platform as a service to other so that they don't really have to invest into you know they don't know. They can just be a user of that particular service. Right but it has to be transparent transparency is must that's why you know again you know coming back to fabric because transparency is must. While you know you do close for who creates those notes but the data that has to be transparent what is happening who is doing what that has to be transparent. We should know anyhow you know you have we have seen so many places that there are you know meters put up okay how much how bad is the pollution right we are we are living in Delhi so we know it the best. So that's why I'm saying so it has to be completely transparent we have to be transparent about the as you may be you know some data is not favorable not suitable but so it has to be transparent so that people you know maybe point fingers or something like that so that you know we improve the end goal is improvement. Okay thank you Sunday thanks for your time and for giving sharing this you know presentation with us. Do we have any question from from the virtual audience. I don't any questions. I see you are the one you know joining us virtually. Okay. With that I suppose I give you a thanks. And then next. We have Pratyush with us Pratyush. So Pratyush is Pratyush is currently a student and a blockchain enthusiastic and he is you know by doing E and E right. Yeah, electrical and engineering sorry I'm not that good at it so electrical and engineering from Manipal University right Institute. Yes. Over the stage to you so that you can. I don't suppose it's right. So, I would like to mention a very prominent problem that exists with almost a vast amount of population out there that is about recording our medical history out there. So how many of us can we keep track of our medical history from our, but to as we grow older and older, like keeping all those prescriptions together all those reports X reports your blood regulation reports and all, and getting a meaning out of that. So that's actually a huge task and currently there's no protocol that actually that actually is taking care of that. And to solve their problem we come across with this concept visca visca stands for. Variable interoperable security architecture protocol. This brings in the power of healthcare amalgamation with blockchain where the interoperability needs the security part with the composable healthcare building a decentralized healthcare app is a complex presence. All problems that comes into place are as the technical complexity with the problem like maintaining the decent price infrastructure that exists out there, the data privacy and the security data interoperability user experience compliances network effects like getting the new user onboarding on to our systems integrations and a huge problem about when the vendor locking to solve all these problems out there visca is here. Visca brings in the interoperability by means of health care as a solution visca protocol is a composable and decentralized health draft ready for developers to build on so they can focus on creating a great experience and not scaling their users then visca enables cross-chain contracts by means of inter-blockchain communication that is IBC. IBC enables the execution of the cross-chain contracts aligned for seamless communication and interoperability between different blockchain networks. For the dev simplification, we are implying the power of the Hyperledger Firefly which simplifies development by providing the user friendly interface and comprehensive tools for building decentralized applications on the top of secure and scalable blockchain platforms. And finally, for data privacy, which is added by FHE and zero knowledge protocols, users take control of their health information, they own their medical records, they decide who has access to their medical data. Now let's have a glance what the health graph actually means about a health graph representation of individuals health data and related information in a structure format that can be easily shared and analyzed. It is composed of data from a variety of resources like the electronic health records, personal health devices like your Fitbit or the mobile mobile devices and other resources and a design to enable interoperability between those different systems. This process improves the medical record management and respects patient privacy, facilitates research, disease prediction, automates hospital administration, reduces unnecessary doctor visits, accurately calculates the health insurance rates, enhances data sharing and personalizes patient care, which is our utmost importance. Now, moving on to what VISTA actually is. So, as I mentioned already mentioned, VISTA stands for Vensival Interoperable Security Architecture, which brings in a revolutionary approach to managing medical data that empowers individuals to take control of their health information into their own hands and share it securely with trusted parties. In the particular blockchain technology with FHE and zero knowledge groups, the protocol enables the creation of decentralized health graph that can be accessed and updated by the patients, healthcare providers and researchers based upon their authorization needs. The composable nature of health graph allows for the easy integration with other systems and application, fostering a seamless and interoperable ecosystem for health data. This leads to improved collaboration and coordination among different stakeholders, ultimately resulting in better healthcare services and outcomes. VISTA's initial protocol was developed and inspired by the Lens protocol and during the ETH India 2020, 2022. Wait, now what Starlight is and what's it connected with VISTA? So, VISTA has been using the prototyping power of the Starlight to execute the ZK knowledge proofs out there. Now, moving on to what Starlight is. So, Starlight is a prototype compiler that is contributed by the EY teams and is designed to support the need of the complex business agreement where business logic needs to be shared between parties at network level, but the privacy from the competitors is also critical. For more details on Starlight, you can go on to the GitHub repository that is linked below. Now, moving on to the compiler architecture. So, basically, there's something we call Zappify. That is about compiling the Solidity code as a means into the coordination with your ZK proofs to create a Zoll file. The compiler must take the Zollivity file that is a .Zoll file and complete the following simplified steps. First of all, it pass, takes the Zoll code, analyzes it and creates an abstract syntax tree or AFT and representation of that code. Then it transforms changes that AFT into a circuit AFT, a smart contract AFT and an orchestration AFT, which are required for the deployment of the ZK proofs. Then it generates the codes for the output Zapp circuit. That is, the basic requirements include the circuit part, the contract part and the orchestration code. Here's an extended version of how the parsing and the transfers of the Zollivity code actually works with the help of the Starlight compiler. This is being attached as a reference. The detail expression regarding this is actually out of the scope of this presentation. So, for reference, if you need more information, you can move on to the repository. This is attached there as well. Now moving on to the architecture for the Viska 2.0. So, after the hackathon, we are iterated upon how we can actually extend this idea to bring it to further more possible and more extended version of that. So, for that, we design an architecture and it brings in you the Viska 2.0. So, Viska 2.0 comes as a different components are listed out there, that is, like the tenacity network. So, it is the native chain for the Viska, which is based out of Cosmos SDK and runs the Cosmos and contracts out there. Then there's something called Edgegrid. Edgegrid is a multiplicatory matrix which executes the data for the MixNet as we are dealing with a lot of private information that exists in the medical records. So, for that, a MixNet concept is used by the data that is being derived from the NIM blockchain and the Edgegrid actually takes care of that component. Then Hmesh is about the interlinking of those ZK protocols with the unique identities that exist out there and the authorization part. Edgegrid is about bringing the interoperability different the multi-chain ecosystem that's when Viska goes on there. Then Edgegrid is about storing your credentials, that is the decentralized credentials out there. For that, we are using a coconut credential scheme that the NIM blockchain has been working upon, the NIM team has been working upon. And for that, we are using the mixed blockchain ecosystem. Then at the center, it acts as the multi-chain contracts which interfere with each other by means of an IBC and also one of the protocols that we are currently working upon. Then below that layer is about the hyperledge of Firefly, which actually takes care of all the deployment and deployments need so that the developers who are building upon our layer of Viska 2.0, they won't have to worry about the node calibration or setting up of the complex network out there and they can just more focus upon developing the logic for their Dapps. And then below is about the decentralized storage part wherein there's a shared storage for the public data or the metadata that can be out there. Then the private database that is about the critical information that exists in the medical records and then the blockchain part. Now moving on to the Athena. So Athena is an FHE engine which is currently in development. Athena is a FHE which stands for fully homomorphic encryption, is a technique wherein the analytics or different logics can be run over the data without actually decrypting it. And Athena is designed for decentralized medical records keeping where it allows for the secure storage and processing of sensitive medical data without the need to decrypt the information. This ensures privacy and confidentiality of the patient's personal and medical information. It utilizes the concept of dynamic NFTs to provide a unique digital identity for each medical health record. Like each health record is in the form of a dynamic NFT so that whenever a report changes or parameters changes they automatically get updated by means of a decentralized oracle or that NFT record. And then the full bound tokens which actually bound to your particular wallet or identity of the user and takes care to grant access to the encrypted medical records recorded on the NFTs. This combination of the technologies overall allows for the decentralized storage and processing of medical records improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the health care industry. Now there are different use cases for which Visca can be deployed upon like teleconcertation. The developers who are interested in building the teleconcertation apps, they can utilize the Visca layer to share the private data remotely or with the doctor out there without concerning about the data privacy or the security needs. A prescription which can be something which maybe we will be seeing in the future wherein all the health records can be just in the form of all your prescriptions can be in the form of just electronic mode. Like the EMR extension version and all this can be in form of dynamic NFTs which keeps on intriguing themselves as soon as the latest medical data is available out there. Then the healthcare logistics part, which also gets improved by means of our protocol, then UHI management. So recently, the government of India has been working upon United healthcare interface which is something similar to the UPI. So we are also working upon to match the protocol to be suitable to combine with the and also being interoperable with the UHI management thing. Because that's something we see will be the future of healthcare in India will look like. Then the visualization part, so it's like it can something that we might all relate like all those blood reports, they have a lot of scientific stuff out there which is not very used to for the daily user order. So for getting insights of the data and the Visca analytic layer can be analyzed which basically interprets those scientific records and gives you a better visualization. Now here's about how this actually started. So the idea of this was born out of the recognition that current healthcare system often struggle with data silos and interoperability issues. Me and one of my friends apply for the ADS India hackathon in the November 2022. Then in the same month we got accepted for the ADS India hackathon presence out there. Then in the first week of December, we bid in the ADS India in the Bangalore this year. And we will also announce that the EY Starlight winner out there. Then after the hackathon we traded and we worked upon like, okay, this was a small project that how we can actually extend this technology, how we can build upon this layer to bring in the solution for the healthcare need. So then we started iterating for the Visca 2.0. Also, we recently onboarded our first set of developers who are interested on building upon our layer and they are closely working with us. Then Visca 2.0 is announced and it is currently in development with all the Athena and the FH engine in place for the March 23. We are taking a target where the Visca chain will be available in beta for the end users to try out all the developers to build upon and will be going multi chain. Now here's our action plan, like we have divided our whole action into like a whole plan into three phases. Where in the first is about the research, where in will research and evaluate different technologies that can be utilized to achieve the desired goals of the second iteration of the protocol that is visca 2.0. Then the second comes about the prototyping stage that is developing a prototype for the Visca platform using the technologies that we identified in the phase one. Then finally the testing, where in we will conduct extensive product testing to ensure its functionality and also it will also involve like auditing of the smart contracts. Now here's a developer portfolio, where as I already mentioned some of the teams are interested to build upon our own layer. So here's a demo where like a startup team who is working upon developing of the medicine by means of bone, they are interested to build upon the visca layer. So we are closely working upon them how to match upon their needs and this is the snapshot of their time out. So yeah thank you so much for taking time to hear me out regarding our vision. It is really a pleasure to sharing it with you and we hope this marks the beginning of a productive collaboration that will originalize the healthcare. If you have any observation or feedback on our ideas, we would love to be grateful for the opportunity to learn from your experience and thoughts. I am in one for any Q&A. Also this QR code is available on which anytime in future or now itself if you want to go and have the view of the documentation on any of the resources regarding this protocol, it will be available out here. Thank you so much. Thanks a lot for your time. Any questions anyone? I had a little lovely presentation today so any questions? Okay. Yeah actually like today also I have been working last night on the presentation and this morning 6.30 I actually left my home to attend the presentation out here. Wow. And being a student I think you have explained it to people who have been practicing and no one has any questions so you can think of that. That's a great applause and excellent I suppose. Thank you so much. That's actually what Hyperledger actually motivates me like my journey was actually starting with Hyperledger Fabric itself like with the blockchain. I was trading up on an IoT project and I felt I need to record all that data and share it on a mass public and then where I came across the Hyperledger Fabric concept. So that's like the part that I can closely connect with the Hyperledger family out there. So that was kind of a motivation that just motivated me. Great to have you with us. Great to have you with us. And also like I'd like to give a huge thanks to sir like he basically accepted my presentation at the very last like I was not able to you know submit it. You know to be you know say no to this way. Yes, so we are glad to have hosted you so with that you know we'll break for lunch. So lunch is also organized up shares and then you know we'll be back I suppose and the time is to you know when we are supposed to start but I think you know there will be you know some delay. So I'll communicate with you as we know we go. If you can all please you know paradox yes.