 Rwyf y Feel. Mae'r pôr cyddiad erbyn cyhoedd yr ysgol dros cymryd. Diolch argymallu cymrydau ymddangos ymddangos 7 ac 8. Y cyddiad ymddangos 7 ymddangos ymddangos wrth llunio cymryd. Udych chi'n ysgrifennu cyddiad ymddangos cyfrydau ymddangos ymddangos byddeu yn y Cymru, 1933, Scoltawn byl. Ymddangos 8 yn y cyddiad ymddangos cymrydau'r cyddiad ond y Comisiwy o rhaid yng Nghymru, ond ti'n ddif�os yr oedd y F BCE yn diwyllio am ff shrifoedd dylunio ar ein pethau 7 i 8 yn gywchon. Yr agendaeth yma mae'r ffordd o'r micr yng Nghymru. Mae'r gyrsdraeth y Llandffill, ychydigfawr, mewn amguedd ailladau yng Nghymlch 2017, SSI 2017, Gwyrdd 27, Cyllid ailladau The order is subject to the provisional affirmative procedure. The provisional affirmative procedure is common in UK tax legislation but relatively uncommon in legislation enacted by the Scottish Parliament. The form of provisional affirmative procedure for the purposes of the bill is set out in section 41.3 of the parent statute, the landfill tax Scotland Act 2014. Under this procedure, the order must be laid before the Scottish Parliament and will cease to have effect unless affirmed by a resolution of the Parliament within 28 days of being made. This 28-day period does not take account of periods of dissolution or recess for more than four days. It is worth observing that the order was made on 26 January and that the Parliament will be in recess beginning from 11 February up to and including 19 February. However, no points have been raised by our legal advisers on this instrument, so is the committee content with this instrument? Item 3 is instrument subject to affirmative procedure. Again, no points have been raised by our legal advisers on the draft, judiciary and courts Scotland Act 2008, Scottish Land Court Order 2017 or the draft continuing care Scotland amendment order 2017 or the draft national health service Scotland act 1978 independent clinic amendment order 2017 or the draft Scottish fiscal commission modification of functions regulations 2017. Is the committee content with these instruments? Item 4 is instrument subject to negative procedure. Again, no points have been raised by our legal advisers on non-domestic rates rural areas Scotland regulations 2017, SSI 2017 number 22. Is the committee content with this instrument? Item 5 is instrument not subject to any parliamentary procedure. Again, no points have been raised by our legal advisers on health, tobacco nicotine etc. and care Scotland act 2016 commencement number 1 order regulations 2017, SSI 2017 12 or the act of sederant rules of the court of session 1994 amendment temporary exclusion orders 2017, SSI 2017 number 26. Is the committee content with these instruments? Item 6 is draft instruments documents subject to approval. We first consider the public services reform corporate and solvency in bankruptcy Scotland order 2017 proposed draft order and proposed explanatory document SD 2017 8 and SD 2017 9. This draft order has been initially laid under a superaffirmative procedure. That means that the draft order is required to go through a prelegislative scrutiny period which involves a formal consultation period of 60 days before the Parliament is asked to agree the legislation. The draft order amends the insolvency act 1986, the Bankruptcy Scotland act 2016 and the public services reform insolvency Scotland order 2016. The purposes of the draft order are to modernise certain aspects of Scottish corporate insolvency law to bring them into line with the position in England and Wales and to promote the on-going operation and rescue of viable businesses that are subject to personal insolvency proceedings and to apply certain aspects of the 2016 order to a winding up of a company that is under way at the time that order comes into force as opposed to those aspects applying only to a new winding up. The explanatory document that was laid with the draft order sets out the background to the draft order, the policy objectives and the effect of the various provisions. Four points were raised with the Scottish Government arising from the draft order and resulting from this the Scottish Government have undertaken to update some aspects of the explanatory document. So the question is does the committee therefore agree not to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament but to welcome the Scottish Government's agreement to update the proposed explanatory document in the following respects. Firstly, to explain in further detail why the Scottish ministers consider the article 6 of the draft order does not prevent any person from continuing to exercise any right or freedom which that person might reasonably expect to continue to exercise in accordance with sections 18.2e and 27.d.1 of the Public Services Reform Scotland Act 2010 and also to explain why article 6.7 and 8 of the draft order reduce the burden within the meaning of section 17.2c of the 2010 act, that is an obstacle to best regulatory practice, in accordance with section 27.1d.2 of the 2010 act. Does the committee agree to encourage the Scottish Government to update the explanation provided in relation to articles 3 and 4 of the draft order in the explanatory document to refer specifically to paragraph 10 of schedule 8 of the Insolvency Act 1986? That would assist the readers of the explanatory document to understand more fully the basis on which the powers and duties of liquidation committees are defined in rules made under section 411 of that act. Are we agreed again? Thank you. We now move this meeting into private.