 Here we are. Good evening. Thank you all for joining me. See the comments coming up. Thanks everyone. Okay, well, I'm back. Since the conference last week, which we're going to talk a little bit more about tonight and we're going to have another speech from tonight, I had a few sniffles and then I just was absolutely floored with sickness this week, so I'm behind on a few things, but I am much better now, thankfully. It's a little bit, but infinitely better than I was. A couple of little warning before I get started. You may hear a cat, and these are the perils of going live. You may hear a cat. My cat is absolutely furious with me for not letting her into this room. And if you could see this room, you'd know A, why I won't let her in and B, why she wants to get in. It is a festival of wiring and things to jump on and jump over and swing from. And she's furious with me that I'm not letting her in here. So she's making our presence felt at the moment. It is so frustrating to not be able to talk to you about the biggest news stories of the day and such a sign of the times. I can't talk to you about what I want to talk to you about because we're on YouTube. It's crazy, but because of that on Wednesday nights now at eight o'clock on Rumble, that's where it'll go on first. It will then, Mark will then put them on to all the other channels that were allowed to speak the truth on. So Wednesday nights at eight o'clock is when I will cover the issue we're not allowed to cover because we live in crazy communist world. So we can't really talk about the big issue of the day, but I'll say what I can about it, which is very, very little. This Omicron variant is, this is the top story from the BBC tonight and from Sky News. This Omicron variant is now spreading in the community, says Sajid Javed. He told MPs today that the variant was continuing to spread here and around the world, and there were now cases here with no links to international travel. There have been 336 confirmed cases of the highly mutated variant across the UK, he said. Today in the Commons, a rise of 90 from Sunday. There are concerns about how Omicron, that really sounds like something from a science fiction film, could interact with current vaccines. So of the confirmed cases, 261 in England, 71 in Scotland, 4 in Wales, while Northern Ireland is yet to have a confirmed case. Sky News is running with the same things. Headline on here is uncertain whether Omicron will knock UK off course, says Health Secretary, as experts warn cases are very high for a Monday. So it's also telling us that there are 336 cases in the UK of this new variant. Yeah, so that's pretty much all I can tell you about it on this channel at least, but 8 o'clock on Wednesday on Rumble and then other channels. And we will continue that on 8 o'clock on Wednesday for the foreseeable future. Again, because we are not able to talk about this. I mentioned last week as well that I was going to upload the Empire State of Mind, my own copy of that interview. This is the Channel 4 documentary that was published broadcast last Saturday night. And I had my own copy of it. I played you a little bit of it last week. A couple of reasons it didn't go out the following day. One, because I was floored with I don't know what. But two, myself and Ed have decided actually that rather than just upload it, we will do some commentary on it. So we'll talk you through the, we will play you some and we'll talk you through it. And I'll give you a little bit more and flesh it out a little bit. And we'll do that in the next couple of days, hopefully. I am the speakers at the conference. And I want to thank them all again. I am now organizing for an interview, a follow up interview by StreamYard with all of those speakers. We'll get a little bit more about them, a little bit more about their background, their story, and their support for us, including campaigns and things that they are working on. So those will be on a weekly basis until we get through everyone I've got. I start recording those tomorrow. I've set up a few of them. If you are in the Northeast, join me this weekend as our first public meeting. These public meetings are going to be continued all over the country into the new year. This is part of our recruitment campaign. I know I'm meeting with activist branch chairs and regional organizers tomorrow night to go through this in a bit more detail as to what our plan is to take this into the new year and to take it to, to take the party out to the people. There's something I want to say about that actually. I talk to a lot of people. And yesterday, for example, I went to stand in the park and I, people are saying that we need to fight back. And this is, this is a, you know, to, to rise up and take back our freedoms. And I could not agree more. The problem is, and this is a sticky point that I get a lot when I talk about this with people, people are agreed that there's an absolute assault on our freedoms going on. We must do something about it. We have to fight back in some way. But the way we fight back is the sticking point. And what we need to do and what we will do as a party is provide that way to fight back. That way, there's a couple of ways. One of them I won't get into. But one of the ways we can't fight back is through organizing ourselves to stand for election and challenge them at the ballot box and really reach out to people to sidestep the media, to go around the media and really reach out to people because I'm not talking about a pressure group to put pressure on the Tories or on Labour. This is going to be a problem now. I'm talking about an actual transformation, a seizure of our rights back from the political elite. Just give me one second. I'm going to deal with this one. My sincere apologies for that. We do need to fight back what we need to know how. This is what these public meetings that I'm going to hold. We need a focused real plan on how to fight back. The concept is right, but you need a plan on how to go about it. That's what I want us to do as a party is to offer that concrete plan, bringing it to the people. We're not talking, as I said, about pressuring the Tories into changing or pressuring Labour into changing. We're talking about real and permanent power back to the people. Democracy. I think sometimes, you know, George Orwell's Animal Farm, where power is seized and then after a while, seized, taken back. And then after a while, those in power become corrupted. And it becomes the, the onus comes on the people again to take back the power again. It's a cycle. And we're in that cycle. And to my mind now, Labour and the Tories have had power for too long. And it is that the Animal Farm scenario has occurred. It is now time for new people to come in and take that power back to, and give it back to the people via democracy. So that's the message that I really want us to get across. And that's the message that we want to offer a plan, a real plan, a real way, a method, not just an abstract notion of rising up with a way of doing it. That's what we want to inspire people with, inspire people to do as we go forward into next year. Okay, I want to talk a little bit now about the manifesto. I can't talk about part of the manifesto, but I will talk about it on Wednesday night at eight o'clock. So let me take you through. It is on, where are we? Here. So a new manifesto is up. Do have a look at it. And more importantly, tell people about it. Do share it. And I'll take you through some of the key parts of it now. So we have in order, coronavirus, NHS, law and order, government, immigration, education, animal welfare, media, Islam, transgenderism, family law, housing, economy, defence and foreign affairs, energy, agriculture and transport, welfare and pensions. One of the things we've done with it this year is make it more succinct, a little bit shorter. We've amalgamated certain sections just to make the thing a little bit more accessible. And to make it a bit plainer, simpler for people, for candidates, for activists to take with them, to get into their heads and take with them. As they talk to people, particularly in public meetings, that we're going to be holding around the country in the new year. So I'm going to have to skip through, it is so frustrating, I'm going to have to skip through the coronavirus section, but we will talk about it on Wednesday night. On to the NHS, there's still a great emphasis on waste in the NHS. And I think this is really, really important, because once again, we're seeing, we've had an announcement in 2021 of tax rises to, which will come into effect, next year or the year after next, to pay for the NHS. And yet again, not from the Tory side or from the Labour side of Parliament, is there any mention of waste in the NHS, even though we all know how wasteful it can be, it is. So there's still a great emphasis on that. But a couple of things that have been added in are that we must restore NHS services to pre-pandemic levels as a matter of urgency, including the restoration of face-to-face appointments and treatment. It's a farce, it's a farce. I always remember someone told me, I think it was on here, actually, that someone told me that they were doing physiotherapy over Zoom. How can you do physiotherapy over Zoom? What am I missing? This is ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous. This is not a health service. And for the last, for some years, pre-COVID, there were some things in the NHS which were completely shambolic, completely shambolic. It's now gone to levels of almost comedy. Not very funny, but almost, it's so ridiculous. And that's an example. To do physiotherapy over Zoom is just ridiculous. It's almost indescribable. And there was, earlier in the year, GPs were threatening to go on strike if they were forced to see patients face-to-face again. This is the very core of their job, surely. And actually, there are these other changes that I think need to be made to the NHS as well. Seeing the same doctor twice might be nice. It really would. If you go, if you hire someone, I'm not thankfully, but if you ask someone who has to regularly see a doctor, you would see a different doctor every time. And there's a feeling, isn't it? If you have to see a different doctor every time, you don't feel that there's no connection, there's no human bond for one to a better word, and I do want a better word. Bond is not the right word, but you probably get what I mean. They don't know you. If you're seeing a different doctor all the time, they don't know you. And you'll have to explain things, and you have to rely on records, which are probably inaccurate some of the time. The whole thing is completely shambolic. It would also help as well greatly if NHS staff could speak English. Sorry, Frank, but there you go. That would also be very nice. But one of the primary, and this is our first manifesto promise on this, restore NHS services to pre-pandemic levels that has got to be, that has got to be. The old ones, some of the best ones from last time are still in there, audit the NHS, absolutely, hold chief executives to account by the public, absolutely, end health, tourism, absolutely. And the old stuff is in there as well, law and order. Mike Speakman has done a fantastic job as always. You're going to be hearing Mike's speech from the conference towards the end of this stream. I said to you last week that we'd removed the police element, which I think this was prompted by protests from members during the lockdown and the behaviour of the police. During that time, people were, let's say, the perception of the police suffered and continues to suffer the ending the political bias of the police, depoliticising the police, getting rid of police and crime commissioners, for example, which has politicised the police. All of that is still in there and still as crucial. As always, and actually in the last year, the politicised police, I would suggest, has gotten even worse with things like insulate Britain and all, but bringing them cups of tea as they unlawfully block the M25 and the police are might as well just be sitting down with them, frankly. So all of that is still in there. A couple of additions, which I think are very important. This was in there last year, but I want to mention it as well, making a criminal offence for a police officer to publicly demonstrate for any activist or political group. Designators, terrorists, those who engage in violence for political ends, such as Antifa or Black Lives Matter. A couple of additions require greater discipline in the police and create a centralised process to deal with red flags, such as the behaviour of Wayne Cousins. We know who Wayne Cousins is, the man convicted and sent to prison for a life term for murdering Sarah Everard, a serving police officer at the time. Significantly increased sentences for rape and sexual assault. I think that is long overdue. So a couple of additions in there with that one. Government, a lot of the same things as last time I want to mention a couple of them, which I think are really important, getting rid of the Human Rights Act, which is not a Human Rights Act. It does not protect our rights. It has not protected our rights. It has been used primarily, I would suggest primarily, as a method of applying and sustaining and pushing a multicultural open border, can't get rid of anyone. Even if they are terrorists, murderers, rapists, we can't get rid of them because they have human rights. To hell with your human rights, by the way. It's the foreign terrorists and foreign raiders. They all have human rights. So that's where the Human Rights Act goes. The form the House of Lords is still in their referenda for major construction in an area. This would allow people to decide whether or not they're particularly pertinent, I think, for smaller areas, smaller towns, villages who don't want to see the place they've called home, turned into something that they don't recognise. And they have very little, if any, not actually say in that. And a lot of this stuff goes on controversially, but I think true, a lot of this stuff goes on behind closed doors with backhander deals between counsellors and perhaps not such actors in good faith, should we say. The people have to have a say over this. That is very important. Installing CCTV in polling stations focus primarily on counts, allow candidates or candidate representatives to observe the transport of ballot boxes from polling stations to their destinations, ensure the Union Jack is publicly displayed outside public buildings, including schools, create a new bank holiday to celebrate the UK's independence, quote unquote, independence from the EU, restore any statues defaced or torn down by violent left wing mobs, including that of Edward Colston in Bristol. Legislate to protect monuments and memorials from destruction by local councils or mayors actively bring an end to anti-white hate and discrimination, as well as the false concept of white privilege in all areas of public life. Immigration has had a complete overhaul. Let's have a look at this one. Now the figures have been obviously updated. This is this year's manifesto not last. So net migration from net migration over the past year or so, we've got an amount of 622,000 inward emigration, 375,000 with a net of 247,000. So 247,000 more people in the country than the year before. And of course, if you've got immigration of 622 and emigration of 375, then you've still got a massive demographic change, big change in 2021. The number arriving illegally via the English Channel alone was 23,000 when this was written. It's now above 25,000. This is up from approximately 8,000. So from 8,000 to 25,000. 2020, 8,000, 2021, 25,000. A political and media class would have us believe that those migrants housed in hotels at taxpayer's expense, while British homeless sleep rough, are refugees and asylum seekers fleeing for their lives, but we know that they are not. I mentioned this actually on my other live stream last week. I want to mention it again here. I was reading a story of the deaths that occurred in the English Channel the week before last. And one of the survivors of this was speaking and saying that he took his mobile phone and was phoning for help in both France and in the UK. Now, I'm sorry if this sounds really callous, but I do have a, I really need to know this. If you are fleeing a war zone, Syria, for example, oh, some are not from Syria, but that's besides the point. If you're fleeing a war zone and you've come apparently on foot from, let's say the Middle East or North Africa, all the way to France. And now you're in the water, but in the English Channel having left France on your way to the UK. And remember you've come on, apparently on foot. I assume on foot or do some sort of covert transport. How do you have a functioning mobile phone? I'm baffled by it. I just have to mention it because I'm baffled by it. What network is it rolling on? How is it charged? Who's paying the bill? How do you, I just, the whole thing is so surreal, absolutely surreal. Okay, so we go on to talk about the UK border force and how it's facilitating this, how we don't know who these people are. So highlights of this, and these are new and all illegal immigration and return offenders to their country of origin without delay or appeal. All of those who arrived illegally in Dover or elsewhere will be deported. Install a physical border in the English Channel or elsewhere if needed and utilize the border force and Royal Navy to patrol our waters and return illegal boats to their departure point in France or elsewhere and all payments to France for preventing migration, something it has obviously failed to do. Arrest all known illegal immigrants, hold them in the tension until they are returned to their home nations. We will build new prisons for this if necessary and ensure the head of the border force is 100% committed to protecting our borders from illegal immigration. This is an important point because the outgoing former head of the UK border force doesn't believe in borders. I'll say that again. The outgoing head of the UK border force in his speech as he was leaving the job called borders a pain in the backside but didn't believe in borders. He was giving all this lefty stuff about how we're all people and unbelievable. He was head of the border force and he's a lefty open border flowery. You just it's unfathomable. So you would think that you wouldn't have to put in to a manifesto that the head of the border force must believe in borders but apparently we do because we're living in cloud cuckoo land and all better off with madness. Education hasn't changed much because I think we had much of it covered. Anyway, censorship has to stop. We have to start teaching children the truth, not political spin but the truth and prepare them to be responsible, self-sustaining, law abiding adults and to rein in the loony left in the education system and put a stop to the anti-Britishness. Animal welfare a couple of things have come out because they've changed but still as still by far the best animal welfare protections that any party is going to be offering, a media. When I was in my sick bird for a couple of days this week I was rummaging around on television as you do, so to pass the time and I was on, what was I on? This on-demand my five is channel four's my five thing which is sort of internet on-demand thing. Sure there's a name for it but I don't know what it is. And I was having a rummage through true crime documentaries. I love a true crime documentary and there was one on the murder of Joanna Yates. You probably remember this case. She was murdered back in 2010 in Bristol and body found on Christmas Day. Terrible, terrible, terrible case. So the police were stuck. No leads, no idea really where this was, where to start looking. And the media were putting pressure on the police to arrest somebody, to find someone. The police get all this pressure from the media and they arrested the her landlord, Joanna Yates' landlord, they arrested and while the policeman who had been in charge of this investigation, while he was speaking, I thought to myself, I think he doth protest too much because it went to great pains to tell us that we don't arrest people for just any old reason, you know, we, he had no alibi, well he was alone in his home. But crucially, he was a little bit odd and this is, this, he was, he was an eccentric Englishman, one of my favourite type of people. And he did a cultured, he was very into, he just put posh and he was into his opera and he was, he was an eccentric and absolutely fabulous eccentric. But he was a little bit odd. He had access to her flat because he was a landlord and he had no alibi for the night that she went missing. So they arrested him. And again, as I say, the policeman I thought was protesting a bit too much. Pressure from the media was a large part, I believe and this is why I took from it, was why they arrested him in any case. They utterly destroyed the media, utterly destroyed this man, destroyed him. They put him on front page, they made him out to be some sort of, they made him out to be almost pedophilic, some sort of predator. This, you know, they, they, one headline on the front page called him The Strange Mr. Jeffries. They dismantled him and his reputation. The man had done nothing wrong. He was completely exonerated. It was actually the next door neighbour who was convicted of her murder and not the landlord. And after the press had destroyed this man's reputation and torn him to shreds publicly, he sued them. And he got an apology from eight different newspapers and a what undisclosed, at least in this documentary, substantial sum. And as I was watching this, I thought to myself, he's lucky he was only accused of murder and not of racism. Because had he been accused of racism, an abstract concept that nobody seems able to define, there'd have been no apologies. He'd have been completely unpersoned. He'd have completely ripped it. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. But point to it. I could feel my blood pressure. My blood pressure probably already up. The press will destroy people for a headline, destroy them just to sell the paper. There's no morality. There's no principle. There's no integrity. There's no, it is an absolute horror show, what the press will do to people. And the fact of the matter is, they have to be forced to behave with integrity, because we know that they won't do it of their own volition. You can talk also, I noticed, I spotted as I was having a rummage, I haven't watched it yet, I'm going to the abduction of Milly Della. And how the press behaved in that they are amoral is to compliment them. Rotten to the core is to be a little bit more accurate. So they will have to be, the press will have to be forced by law to act with integrity, because their behavior is beyond shocking, beyond appalling. And not everyone like this Joanna Yates's landlord, not everyone has the money to go after the press and get an apology from them. And you can bet that whatever apology they gave was printed on page 60 underneath the classifieds, whereas when they were hounding him and destroying him, it was all over the front pages. Absolutely completely devoid of miles, completely devoid of miles. They'll destroy you. So this is, and we are, this again is unique to us, this focused actual concrete walkable plan to make the media work. Now concerns, isn't it authoritarian for the pre for the state to have any say over the media? Yes, on face value. Yes, on in an ideal world. Yes, the state should have very little if any say at all over the activities of the media. However, I think in the interests of truth, and therefore of democracy, it is justified in these instances. So reform defamation laws so that those affected can take legal action if a lie is told about them in the media. This cannot be prohibitively expensive as it is now. I remember when the telegraph headlined me as a neo fascist. I went to a defamation lawyer. He said, have you got 100 grand in your pocket? I said, no, I don't. And well, tough. Ensure candidates in an election are given the right of reply by the newspaper or TV news program and that this right of reply must be of similar length and placed in a similar section of the newspaper TV program as the initial piece to which the candidate is responding. In other words, if they write a full page about you, you have to be given a full page back to respond. And genuinely, I mean, this isn't going to happen. The point is, I hope it would in some cases, the point is it would teach it would make them stop this, it would make the press stop if they were legally obliged to give you a response. They are far less likely to smear you in the first place. We wouldn't have this left wing activism masquerading as the press require newspapers and TV programs to fully explain the meaning of political labels. And this is interesting. Now, I know a lot of political labels don't have a clear defined definition and a lot was debatable. But some of them do have they do have characteristics. They can't just call you a fascist and leave it at that. Let's explain why why they're calling you for what is a fascist and why are you a fascist. This has to be we can't allow this to continue. Resist and oppose all attempts to shut down independent blogging sharing or exchange of information online. Resist and oppose all attempts by social media to practice political bias and ensure media reports active, not active, accurate. Ensure the media report, I hope I'm allowed to say this bit, media reports accurate data regarding coronavirus and vaccination and ensure that all sides of these debates are presented to the public. Next up is Islam, which was as little change, transgenderism, a couple of additions we've made to this are to prosecute incitement of violence aimed at those who criticize any aspect of transgenderism. We know that in the last year or so there have been high profile cases of threats of violence, threats to kill, threats to rape of high profile people who have however mildly expressed some disagreement with the trans activism mob, violent trans activism mob and provide crucially as well provide a legislative framework so that people may take legal action against employers if they are fired or harassed as a result of their views on transgenderism. Family law has remained relatively the same, similar with housing, the economy, made some additions to the economy in conjunction with coronavirus and the damage that has caused to the economy. Defense and foreign affairs has been very much shortened, they've been amalgamated the two and shortened and simplified a couple of things that have remained that I think are high lightable as the raising defense spending and ensuring that we are, troops are fully equipped and looked after before and after, during and after their service. Transport, energy, agriculture and transport, you'll, that's Paul's, Paul Borges' wonderful analysis of the climate change alarmism and great amount of detail on electric cars, future energy sources, we are of course, we propose, we don't just talk in the abstract, we propose actual solutions to these but we also talk about real environmental problems like pollution, like the filth, frankly that is rivers, oceans and seas, methods and plans to deal with plastic waste for example, all of that is in there. Also the six points for taxis is in there separately as well and that, thank you to Ian for that one. And welfare and pensions has been amalgamated but as we made very little change to it because it was so good in the first place. Okay, I'm going to leave, we're going to finish with Mike's speech to the conference last week. Let me just take a couple, do I have any questions coming in? Okay, let's see, are you for Green Pass or Vax Passports? No, no, we are not, we're completely against both. I've got quite a lot of questions. Stu, if you put the commie flag behind you, I'm sure the censorship would end. Perhaps Stu, but we can't be flying commie flags willy-nilly. I'm not going to be able to answer all of these tonight. There are a couple of things in here I'm going to come back to though, if police corruption would be fixed would you consider giving police guns? That's a really good question but there's a lot of work to do to fix the state that the police is in. And if we could get this country back into some sort of civilized behavior, perhaps they wouldn't need it. Have you read the story about Dr Sam White using the Human Rights Act to get his voice back after citing concerns about CV? I haven't but that's something I'm going to take a note of and I'll have a look at that. What are your thoughts on the death of Arthur Labinho Hughes? Yeah, I mean this is absolutely shocking story, this young child tortured, tortured to death and what really you know we've heard Nadim Zaha we stand up in Parliament and say how unfathomable it is for us, for decent people to understand this kind of cruelty to meet out this kind of cruelty to an offenseless child. For decent people it is hard to fathom, hard to understand. But what I would you know I read also this evening just before we started if I've got to have a report and an inquiry and you know this seems to be all we ever get from them. The system doesn't work, the justice system doesn't work in so many ways. But look I think what I'll do actually because that's a big story I think I'll actually cover it in a bit more detail next week but you know it's nauseating to me to hear of an inquiry and a report. Look we know we know what's wrong, the justice system's broken and it's broken because of incompetence and laziness and and lack of accountability and when you have a broken justice system you end up sadly with things like this and but to give this to give this story the attention that it deserves I'm going to come back to it next week. Okay what do I make of Boris Johnson's announcement of a war on drugs? It's a complicated one that one I don't want to see a society where heroin is available in the local shop. I know this is but is it is it working? Does it work? Is war on drugs? I mean hasn't America been waging a war on drugs for a long time? It's a good question Frankie and due to time I will I will actually give it a bit of thought through the week and we will come back to it. So I've made a note of a couple of issues I want to come back to next week and I'll give them a bit of a bit of time and attention next week. If for Britain we want a general election enter 10 downing street would it be possible to go and answer for Manchur Babal who currently tell Bojo what to do? Okay I'm going to finish with this one actually. If the for Britain movement won a general election and entered 10 Downing Street would it be possible to go against the financial cabal who currently tell Bojo what to do? Yes look we have not it hasn't always been as corrupt as it is. Nothing's ever perfect but even I in my lifetime can remember at time when at least there were some principled people in the House of Commons. I mentioned in my speech at the conference the the poll tax issue and and the fact you know the the government introduced a poll tax. People protested rather loudly and they scrapped it. Don't make me imagine that today it's not perfect but look let me tell you something if you can put people into power who are absolutely unbiable unbenderable unbreakable sometimes that is unstoppable you know the the the corruption will always try to win and again like Animal Farm it will rise again and then when it does you need to re throw the dice again and put new people in but sometimes just sometimes principled people with values do make headway and if you are unbiable unending in your resolve to do the right thing because you believe in something greater than yourself you believe in something greater than money you believe in something great yes is the answer Alan yes it is yes it is possible and if we don't think it's possible there doesn't seem much point in pulling ourselves through all this in the first place it is possible it is doable there is a quick story I want to to finish with which sort of made me laugh actually it shouldn't have but it did and that is this is from Breitbart this evening I'm going to finish with a speech from from Mike in a second but the speaker of the House of Commons had said is taking seriously reports of widespread drug abuse amid traces of cocaine being found in several laboratories in Parliament the House of Commons Commission is also considering using slipper dogs following reports from the Times on Sunday alleging evidence of a class A drug cocaine in parliamentary toilets absolutely no surprise but it does explain one or two things right that's it folks join me I'll be live on Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock I will be on rumble eight o'clock on Wednesday night where we will cover the issues including the coronavirus element of the manifesto thank you for the questions and comments lots of questions and comments coming thank you so much the issues that I didn't that I said I'll come back to next week I will come back to next week and including the war on drugs we'll have a little bit of a think about that and we'll have a look at the various different sides of that debate thanks everyone will I'll play for you now Mike Spiedman's speech to our fantastic conference last weekend and I shall see you back here live next Monday take care of yourselves share share share the manifesto share these videos share share share see you next week thank you as always look after yourselves bye for now okay well good afternoon again um obviously I'm the party's law and order spokesman and I wanted to reflect upon the theme of the conference this bring back Britain so I thought I'd take a look back at what's we've lost in the last 50 years and I will look at it through the eyes of law and order many of the values we have lost are those which help define us as British and many of them came from within the British legal system in my view the rot started in the 1960s when liberals started to dominate our public institutions and the first event which I became aware of was the introduction of suspended sentences which were introduced in 1967 this meant that people who've been sentenced to imprisonment would have that sentence suspended as long as they didn't reoffend now you may think this was an idea driven by sound reasoning and the thinking was that a threat of going back to prison would prevent reoffending in fact the main reason was to find an excuse not to put people in prison in the first place because at that time the government didn't have enough space to accommodate all the prisoners that were in the system and this theme has continued throughout the last 50 years and more and more governments are trying to find excuses not to send people to prison and you hear it from the left all the time should only go to prison for offenses of violence or something like that well I can tell you the only way you'll stop some shoplifters and that is by locking them away it's nothing unusual for a shoplifter to be on bail for 50 offenses at a time so the idea that he stopped offending by suspended sentences is just not true for Britain would abolish suspended sentences we would make people serve the time they're given next event children's act 1969 this act was a misguided attempt to keep children out of the criminal justice system and it arose from review that children only became criminals because their mothers didn't love them or they came from a broken home or some other social cause it was never the kids fault this act abolished approved schools and bore stalls and meant it was very difficult to deal with offending children particularly if they were under 14 there were very very few sanctions available and kids and particularly the scouts kids I dealt with soon learned this the European Union in 1973 we joined the European Union of the European community this didn't directly change the criminal justice system but it meant our laws were no longer under our control and this included criminal law and the EU became capable of interfering in our domestic law and they did in 1981 we had riots and I took part in them obviously on the side of the goodies the government commissioned an inquiry after these rights which became known as the scarman report Lord scarman was a judge and the riots were in predominantly black areas of the country and Lord scarman's inquiry believed everything he was told the result was that the police were portrayed as distant and unsympathetic to black communities and this was the start of the appeasement of minority groups and it continues today look at Yorkshire cricket club from 1969 the police service started becoming less a service of law enforcement and more social engineering the priorities ceased being locking people up it was to make sure they felt good about themselves in 1985 we had the foundation of the crown prosecution service historically prostit police prosecutions were managed by their own prosecutors these prosecuting sisters were employed by the police forces themselves on a local basis in 1985 the government abolished them and replaced it with the body we all know now as the crown prosecution service and they became responsible for the initiation and conduct of all police prosecutions this was a very bad move the priorities were different prosecuting solicitors worked for the police now they work for the government and are no longer responsive to local issues also it seems as though they deny it the crown prosecution service have been given racial targets in other words the government tells them that they should not prosecute more people of a particular minority group than are present in the population consequently decisions are no longer made on the merits of a case and ethnicity has become a factor and this is very obvious today in the different standards we see applied to white and non-white offenders a similar centralization has taken place at the court system and in 2011 the court came under government control rather than the local control they used to the centralization of the criminal justice system has been a dominant theme for some years and for britain would reverse it and return the criminal justice system to local control in 1998 the labor government under Blair introduced the human rights act the UK had always been a signatory to the european convention on human rights and indeed we helped write it however this act brought it into british law and opened the floodgates for criminals to avoid punishment on quite spurious grounds which the courts enthusiastically adopted most relevant today is that it provides grounds to avoid deportations for britain would repeal the human rights act and we would introduce a written constitution in 1999 we had the mcpherson report after the murder of steven lorenz this was the most damaging move the government made in policing since the war they branded the police institutionally racist and made the police frightened of their own shadows once again they swallowed everything they were told by the left wing motivated organizations race has since become the most dominant factor in policing and it has made the police frightened of their own shadows and i believe this is facilitated the growth in pakistani grooming gangs and the lack of law enforcement in many minority areas like bradford the report also abolished the height minimums for entry into the police which was said to disadvantage ethnic minorities that's why we have police officers today who are incapable of dealing with the streets the forensic science service now everyone knows the part of dna technology played in crime detection britain used to have an agency called the forensic science service and they were pioneers in this field it's no exaggeration to say that the world came to britain to learn about the use of dna in 2010 the government abolished the forensic science service and gave it to the private sector literally gave it away this is after lobbying by several private companies who wanted the business it turned into a disaster there is no longer a central repository of forensic science expertise in this country and several of the companies that took the work on couldn't cope with it and in fact it turned out their staff were making up the results when drugs went for analysis or breathalyzer samples where blood was analyzed for alcohol levels they just made the results up and as a result some people were wrongly convicted although there is often a view that the private sector is more efficient than the public sector there are significant disadvantages in a profit motive in the criminal justice system for britain would remove the private sector from the criminal justice system police and crime commissioners in 2014 the tories created the role of the police and crime commissioner and also incorporated that role into some of the regional mayors this has hurt the police the absolute golden role of policing what used to be one of impartiality and particularly political neutrality it used to be a chief counsel's job to keep the politicians at arm's length whilst remaining accountable to them now it was quite a difficult line to work walk and sometimes it went wrong but now the police are controlled by a police and crime commissioner who is a political animal and it shows you only have to look at greater Manchester where Andy Burnham's the mayor he is quite happy to walk on LGBT and all the other letter parades with his chief constable but when the competence of the force was found lacking the mayor went missing his he saw his political career as more important than the response accepting responsibility for the role he was supposed to fulfill police and crime commissioners are a bad idea and for britain will abolish them and create a local accountability act not just for the police but for all the public services and we will restore power to the people and almost lastly police numbers in 2017 treason mayors home secretary and later prime minister decided to cut the number of police officers and start the process which reduced police numbers by 20% that partly explains why we hardly see a bobby on the beat these days public presence is no longer seen as a priority but there are more sinister reasons police resources have been diverted to hate crime and social engineering for britain would abolish the concept of hate crime the tour the Tories are reversing the cuts they made to the police service but they seem to have abandoned all the standards that previously existed one force has even told my army applicants that they don't need to submit a cv physical and educational standards have been either abolished or rendered meaningless in fact you don't even have to be british to be a british policeman anymore i could go on in this vein but there's other people who want to talk to you i've just highlighted some of the points which i think have been instrumental in our decline of our identity as british the rot has set in and it pervades all our institutions it's not just about the police i've identified some of our remedies i've said we will reverse some of these changes but for britain is not just about reversing change we have a vision for the future which is bold and imaginative we have our own plans for change and our latest manifesto available today sets out our plan we know how to fix this country and we will bring back britain