 Hello, good evening everyone. You're all very welcome. Thanks very much for joining me. I hope you're all doing well. Money evening live stream. I'm now doing two live streams a week. So please do join me on Facebook on Wednesday mornings from now until, well, from now on, most likely. Okay, I had planned to talk about local government spending this evening. And the reason I was gonna talk about that is I'm standing in, it hasn't been called yet. So I'm campaigning for the upcoming local elections in May. And a couple of things to say about that. First of all, it's exposed me to a lot of local government work and I've been looking very carefully at local government policies and funding and how they spend and how they miss spend would probably be more appropriate. But, and the second thing to say about that is I have, I've spent today and the last few days, this week actually, the week just gone, campaigning and leafleting letters and tomorrow begin door knocking. So when you do, when you're in a campaign like this, it's almost like leading up to really important exams. It's, or writing a thesis or something, it takes up your entire focus and it becomes, the real world sort of falls away for a while. Normal life falls away for a while. You end up in this very specific, very focused place and it takes up all of your thinking and you don't live in the normal world for a while. So when I got back today, I had a look at the news and the news is enough to drive you mad at the best of times. But today, there is so much going on in the national news that I just have to talk about it instead. I will have a look at this. For those who are interested, I will go to it and I know I have to come back to immigration. I do have our immigration policy here but I saw so much on the news today that I just have to talk about it and it is enough to make you want to pull your hair out. I watch the evening national news, ITV national news and as you probably know, as you no doubt know, it's dominated by two major stories. One is the vaccine and it's potential for causing blood clots which a lot of countries around Europe have now stopped its use, not however the UK. The second major story is around policing and the aftermath of the murder of a young woman in Clapham in London a few nights ago. Now, Clapham is an area of London I know very, very well. I lived very close to it for many years and it is, of course, I mean, this was a very, by all accounts, a very brutal attack and a very brutal murder and perhaps even more shockingly than that, a police officer has been arrested and charged with a serving police officer and the Metropolitan Police has been arrested and charged with this murder. The aftermath of the murder is what is dominating the world part, a large part of what's dominating the national headlines tonight and last night, oh, I better put this on silent, questions as always, please, I can see they're already coming in. The aftermath is causing a massive, a massive outcry and we've had calls for Kressena Dick, the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to resign, she insists she's going nowhere, but on Saturday night there was a vigil, this is where all this controversy started, there was a vigil in Clapham, in memory of Sarah Everard, who was, is the woman in question, the woman who was murdered and the police are reported to have been very, very heavy handed with the people attending this vigil and there are pictures during the rounds in the news and on social media of the police pinning people to the ground and the reports of really heavy handers and it had followed on from the police attempting to get this thing stopped, they banned it because of Covid lockdown rules. Now, I am going to go through some of the main news stories on this to give you a taste of what the coverage is like on this. There is confusion and ambiguity and a growing, a growing distrust in the police, a growing dislike of the police and I'm sorry, but you can hardly blame people for this growing distrust. There's now a national conversation, as they call it, going on about the safety of women and whether or not women are listened to in discussions around safety. So it's a huge, huge, huge story but on the distrust issue and on the lockdown rules issue, I can remember Mike Speakman telling me, Mike Speakman is our policing spokesman and was for many, many years himself a policeman up to senior level and I remember him telling me that some year, and I'm not talking about 100 years ago here, we're talking about a very short time ago that the police were objective, they were unbiased and it was fundamental to policing that they should be unbiased and their role was to keep people's rights intact so that if a person or a group wanted to have a protest or a rally or whatever it may be, it was the police's job to facilitate this and to make sure there was no trouble to keep everyone at it safe. It didn't matter what the protest was, it didn't matter from what side of the political divide protest came, the police had a job to do and that was to make sure people's rights were protected and to keep everyone safe and to stop any trouble breaking out at these protests. It's similar actually for journalism and I can remember myself a time when journalism was very, very different to what it is now. There was a time when a journalist would, you would not know from the report from a journalist what side they personally fell on and that was fundamental to journalism that the journalist's own views were not shown in this. That has obviously changed very dramatically journalists are now political activists but the police have taken sides politically openly and unashamedly and unapologetically the police have taken sides in political protests. We only need to look back at Extinction Rebellion and this left wing mob of climate alarmist loons taking over major thoroughfares in central London and shutting them down places like Oxford Street shutting them down that's not allowed to do by the way and the police were up dancing and singing with them and basically taking part in the protest in uniform taking part in the protest this is the left wing climate alarmist mob then you have Black Lives Matter and the police got down and this was in, Extinction Rebellion wasn't but this too, the Black Lives Matter rubbish that went on last year and the riots and the violence and the criminal damage that they committed in front of the eyes of the police that was post-coronavirus that was during lockdowns so this distrust in the police where they can get heavy handed on one issue and allow, and another example is the statue in Bristol that was torn down and the police, criminal damage and the police survived did nothing about that as well and other defasements of monuments and what have you the police have taken sides politically and now tonight on the news I'd sat through and this is where you want to pull your hair out you sit through Pretty Patel and we all have to keep keys in our hands absolute tripe, tripe and then you have Boris Johnson and when he's finished you don't quite know what he said do you ever notice that about Boris Johnson he can speak for five minutes and when he's finished you think and what did he say did he say anything did he make anything clear did he actually absolute flannel and the problem that they've got the problem that the Tories have got either useless but B, they are stuck they have a left wing public sector that's what they have and they are so inept and so incompetent that they don't know what to do so they do nothing at all they don't want any nasty headlines from the left wing press so they come out with a lot of sound bites a lot of rubbish and nothing ever changes now there's a reason there's a reason that sexual assaults and assaults and there is a legitimate issue here assaults on women, sexual assaults and I've covered this quite a bit in recent streams I've done I wake up UK for example and I've spoken about it here as well assaults on, sexual assaults on children which are barely punished if at all now the same applies to assaults a lot of assaults on women and instead of actually having sentences again, you don't even know you don't have to look very far for this rather than watch tell we could go on and on and on this has been going on for years and people get a pittance of a sentence if anything at all so if they really want to do anything about violence against women you can start by locking up the offenders that's what you can start by doing if you are going, if the police are going to punish lockdown breakers do it to everyone I'm not, I'm sure I wouldn't find a lot of common ground with some of the groups making a headway in these protests I'm hearing that there are a lot of left-wing groups involved I'm hearing that a lot of trans rights activists have been hijacked in this I've heard also that the Socialist Workers Party the usual suspects but that's not really the point the point is the policing and it's understandable that people are angry about this if you are going to impose lockdown rules on one group of people impose it on them all or this is just going to get worse and worse and I don't think that public opinion of the police could be much lower than it is now and it's just gotten lower and lower and lower in the last few days so if you're going to do it do it across the board do not pick your signs do not stand by or get down on your knees for some rubble one minute and then start pinning people to the ground for apparently breaking lockdown rules when you did nothing about lockdown rules over here this is the problem the other problem is if you are going to do something about violence against women jail those convicted for substantial times people if they're court at all the sentences are minute and I've talked about this and I'll mention it again that I've been watching this documentary about the police hunting pedophiles online and they said they pretend to be children in chat rooms and what have you and sort of get these pedophiles into discussions with them and then they'll set up a meeting and then they'll go and arrest the guy and then he'll get a year or two in prison so you think why did they it's scarcely worth but what message are you sending about assaults sexual assaults on women across the board these violent crimes are treated like nothing by the courts like nothing and that message filters down so we have major issues here in trust in the police because the police have taken sides politically and we have a lack of trust in the judiciary judges hand out ridiculous sentences for serious violent crimes and this is this is important this is so crucially important but on top of all that you have a government that has no solutions and nothing of use to say about anything sound bites are all you get now instead of doing what they need to do and actually punish violent offenders that's what's needed that is what's needed for that message to filter down if you do this stuff you will be punished for it instead of doing that what the government is going to do is control protest for them that's their answer and they've loved this they've loved Covid 19 lockdowns they have had complete control well up until the other night in Clubham Common they've had complete control over decent low abiding people the only people they haven't controlled are Black Lives Matter and that's because they don't want to control them because then we go back to the circle this is the circle of madness then we go back to the police's preference for the left wing so on paper they've had complete control over us now for a year and they want to keep it and we have to make sure that they can't keep it this is absolutely crucial and in coming elections it has to be it has to be front and centre for this party I would say and other parties but it's not going to be front and centre for the parties but it will be for this one that we get our civil liberties back after this lockdown ends assuming it does end we want our freedoms back now I mentioned last week that Pretty Patel is busily trying to find out how the police can continue or what powers the government needs to give the police so that they can continue to impose restrictions and restrictions on our right to protest so tonight in the House of Commons I'm going to just go straight back I want to go straight back to the BBC News's main page to see where we are at the moment this has been ongoing okay we are going to have a new there is a new bill was today a new bill in front of Parliament about policing now I'm struggling because it's changed I'm struggling to find the review of it that I had okay I will find it before we okay no I've got it I've got it we have the police crime sentencing and courts bill which went before the Commons today I'm going to read a little bit from the BBC about what powers the police now have now this is subject to let me just read this to you this one the BBC three hours ago the police crime sentencing and courts bill is a mammoth piece of legislation that includes major government proposals on crime and justice it's been debated by MPs this week one part of it covers changes to protests if the police want to place restrictions on a protest they generally have to show may result in serious public disorder serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community they can also impose specific measures on the roots of marchers now this is how it is now when I say now I mean in normal life this is subject to the Covid-19 which is not this doesn't include lockdown rules so what just take lockdown take coronavirus out of the equation what police do now and having organized many protests and rallies myself and my time this is generally how it is that is what they will say to you when you approach them and you generally have and it goes on to say here when it comes to major events details are typically thrashed out with the organisers weeks advance that's entirely true that is how it will work you will get in touch with the police you'll have a discussion about what you want to do you'll go through things together what best way to make the thing come together and work that's generally how it's done now the bill this evening or this week will give the police more the ability to put more conditions on protests they will be able to impose a start and finish time set noise limits and apply these rules to a demonstration by just one person so in other words if you want to go out and people do particularly outside the houses of parliament go out and with a little megaphone and stand and say your piece they can apply these rules even to you the change there is that a person single person standing outside parliament is unlikely to cause serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community as per the previous rules now they can even set a start and time a start and finish time on you something that's really I mean when you organise a protest you tell them what time you want to start and what time you want to finish now they tell you the difference given the behaviour of the police you what I can think is that if I take a megaphone and start to shout about take your pick the inept government the waste of taxpayers money the mass immigration the destructive poisonous multiculturalism where it's been subjected to for years if I was to take a megaphone and stand over outside somewhere and start talking about that let's take immigration, perfect example if I was to start objecting to immigration to a megaphone I am certain that the police would say I was being too noisy but black lives matter we're not being too noisy in other words they will set noise limits on the people they don't want to hear and elevate the people they do want to hear and why do I think that because of what I've just described the last year has shown us beyond any shadow of a doubt where the police stand the government as I said is too incompetent and inept to deal with the public sector that is entirely left wing they don't know what to do because they are useless let me read on a little bit taken to an extreme let's say there's an individual holding a protest placard while blasting out their views on a speaker if they refuse to follow police directions over how they should conduct their protest they should be they could be fined up to 2,500 pounds it will also become a crime to fail to follow restrictions the protesters ought to have known about even if they have not received a direct order from an officer well you can scarcely you can scarcely believe you can scarcely believe this stuff so if you refuse to follow directions from a police officer you could be fined up to 2,500 pounds you can still be guilty of a crime even if they don't direct you to even if the police don't direct you but you ought to have known that they would have direct you you can still be guilty of it at present police need to prove protesters knew they had been told to move on before they can be said to have broken the law the proposed law includes an offence of intentionally or recklessly causing public nuisance this is designed to stop people occupying public spaces, hanging off bridges gluing themselves to windows or employing other protest tactics to make a scene unheard this is absolutely incredible this stuff is incredible that's the end of protest as we know it it really is and protest like this, like chaining yourself to things have been ancient these are old old old forms of protest and they're essential and if you don't have the right to protest and if the police tell you a completely politically biased police tells you what to do at your protest so much so that it can according to its own whim tell you how much noise you can make and what start time you can have and what finish time you can have and if you can be guilty and find for a criminal offence either for being directed by a police officer and failing to follow that direction or not directed by a police officer protest as we know it is over and this is coming from the Tories we are governed by tyrants we are governed by incompetence who can get one thing right I don't take back at all that they are inept and incompetent and useless but one thing they can get right is taking away all our powers and that is exactly what they're doing it's almost like when you sign up for something you sign up for some service and it all goes wrong and you have to phone up 15 times and listen to several messages and wait for half an hour to get through to someone who will transfer you to someone else complete incompetence it goes wrong all the time one thing that never goes wrong though is when they take your money it goes smoothly they will take your money instantly and the service will be fraught with difficulties similar here one thing the government never gets wrong it's taking our money or taking our liberties away this they can do with ruthless efficiency and that's what they're doing so I'll just give you a quick summary of what's going on from the BBC tonight on this so hundreds of people have today again attended a vigil for Sarah Everhard in Parliament Square despite Home Secretary Preeti Patel orging against gatherings Patel says she has commissioned a review into the policing of a vigil on a well a review don't worry everyone panic over we're going to have a review nothing to nothing to see here police handcuffed women and removed them from crowds on Saturday night with four arrests made the Home Secretary says she is listening to women and girls following criticism of the police's behaviour Boris Johnson says he has he has full confidence and met Police Chief Dame Cressida Dick give me a break London Mayor Sinead Khan described police actions as unacceptable really were they unacceptable when they were allowing Black Lives Matter to run amok all over the country did he say that then don't know but I doubt it Dame Cressida Dick says she is more determined to lead the Metropolitan Police following calls for her to resign I bet she is nice lucrative package no doubt Officers investigating the death of Ms Everhard have cordoned off an area in this town of Sandwich in Kent the PM is chairing a meeting of the Government's Crime and Justice Task Force to discuss ways to protect women and that's all we get we're going to get a review and we're going to get a meeting and we're going to get a task force nothing and the next time someone attacks and rapes a woman in the streets he'll get two years in prison and that'll be nothing will have changed that's if you go to prison at all last time if you want to truly deal with crime punish the offenders have a police force that is worthy of the name that doesn't take sides that doesn't involve itself in pride parades or anything else but actually catches criminals and punishes them you need a police force that is trained in the punishment of law breaking they're not social workers they don't have to deal with why people commit crimes they are, should be objective enforcers of criminal law nothing else what to have to do and also perhaps most importantly of all we need a clean sweep at the top of policing as well as completely changing how they are trained they're not social workers they're police officers changing how they are trained and reintroducing unbiased policing you need to get the common purpose left out of the top of the police that is first and foremost and the Tory government could do that but it won't because it's useless it has no courage whatsoever and it is far, far more comfortable having reviews and holding emergency meetings and doing nothing at all to make things any better that's simply it, that's simply how it is and very finally make the police accountable to the public this is crucial it is really, really dangerous really dangerous for a society to have this much distrust between the police and the people it really is, it's dangerous, it's a powder keg it's got to be fixed and one of the ways we can fix it is if the police chiefs across this country actually answer to the public and not to equally politically biased or completely useless and inept politicians they should be answering to the public the scandals that we've seen across the country for a decade since the Rotherham story broke for example those police nothing about these crimes are still taking home big salaries of taxpayers money if they were accountable to the public they wouldn't be we need a government that has the guts the aptitude and the just basic intelligence to know what needs to be done here the Tories could de-left the public sector including the police but it won't it is too incompetent and too cowardly to do it so we'll get more of the same reviews and meetings and nothing at all will change okay the second major story from tonight is also showing us again how vulnerable I don't want to use the word vulnerable in some ways it's the only right words how vulnerable we are to the people who govern us and the Russian roulette that they play with our liberties our safety and our lives okay so this is the top story on the BBC tonight and it begins the world health organisation has urged countries not to pause COVID vaccinations as several major EU countries halted their rollouts of the Oxford AstraZeneca job it said there was no evidence of a link between the vaccine and blood clots now remember this is the world health organisation which also said at the early stages of this that human to human transmission I think it was fine because China told told the WHO this and China being a communist country and a non-white country can do whatever the hell it pleases and no one's going to criticise it none of the globalist bodies are going to criticise it if it was America it would be a different thing but China is communist and it isn't white therefore it's a saint and will never be criticised so if China says something and you don't agree with them then you're a racist probably so China can do whatever it likes so China told the world health organisation that this thing didn't spread from person to person probably trying to cover its own back as China does the WHO told the world this and by the time they knew it was that it did it was half way around the world anyway so this is the same world health organisation that we're talking about I could go into greater detail about this I really could and let's not forget either a greater detail about the incompetence of the world health organisation but let's not forget either who funds it Bill Gates now I'm not suggesting that Bill Gates is earning money out of this jab but he's certainly earning money out of jabs and the world health organisation doesn't want there to be any negative coverage or any even more justifiable suspicion or hesitancy about people taking vaccines because the world health organisation is in Bill Gates' pocket and he likes a vaccine Bill likes a vaccine he's making a lot of money out of a vaccine so anything that's remotely negative about a vaccine the WHO is going to be all over it jumping up and down telling people that they're wrong this vaccine is perfectly safe however Germany, France, Italy and Spain joined smaller nations in halting vaccinations as a precaution while checks are made the WHO's vaccine safety experts are meeting on Tuesday to discuss the jab well why are they telling us to go on with it then if they haven't even met yet to talk about it I know I've just explained why because I don't want anything negative about any vaccines and actually even if they could show without doubt absolutely conclusively that there was a link between this vaccine and blood clots I have very little doubt that the WHO would come up with some slimy forked tongue way of telling us to take it anyway because they will not have negative coverage of vaccines it goes on to say the European Medicines Agency will meet on the same day and is due to draw conclusions on Thursday why are we can they not wait a day can they not wait a few days and this is what I mean by playing Russian roulette with our lives this thing is new first of all it was put together in a hurry it was put together to make a lot of money for a lot of people there's no doubt about that and it will and has made a lot of money for a lot of people but it was put together very quickly and now there are concerns raised about something very serious and they're telling us to carry on using it even before they've meted to discuss it that's playing Russian roulette with your life and that's playing Russian roulette because they don't give a damn about anything except negative coverage of vaccines might just increase the numbers of people who are suspicious of this who don't want to take it and the more people who don't take it the less money being made by the big pharma companies I mean call me cynical if you want but there's a reason for cynicism around this and that reason is the evidence drug companies behave appallingly they've been found guilty of all sorts of misbehaviour and find massive amounts of money various drug companies over the years there's a hidden there's an agenda here so they're playing Russian roulette with you in order to stop any growth in what they call anti-vax discussion theory but the point here they're telling us to carry on and then telling us we're going to meet later in the week to discuss it but carry on taking it anyway even though major countries have stopped because there's a fear of a link between this vaccine and blood clots about 17 million people in the EU and the UK have already received a dose of the vaccine with fewer than 40 cases of blood clots reported as of last week AstraZeneca said Germany's health ministry announced on Monday that it would stop administering the vaccine with immediate effect on the recommendation of the Paul Ehrlich Institute the country's authority on vaccines the background to the decision follows new reports of cases of cerebral vein thrombosis connected with this vaccine said health minister Jens Spahn in light of these newly reported cases the Paul Ehrlich Institute today re-evaluated the situation and recommended a suspension of vaccinations and further analysis he said the decision was not political all of us are very aware of the consequences of this decision and we did not take it lightly shortly afterwards French President Emmanuel Macron said France was suspending the vaccine until new advice was given by the EMA we have a simple guide to be informed by science and the competent health authorities and do it as a part of a European strategy he said Italy's medicine agency introduced on individual batches of the vaccines throughout the country also pending the EMA decision Spanish Health Minister Carolina Darius said use of the vaccine would be suspended there for at least two weeks the suspensions came less than a day after the Netherlands did the same its suspension will last until at least the 29th of March the Irish Republic Denmark, Norway, Bulgaria and Iceland have also temporarily halted inoculations with the vaccine while the Democratic Republic of Congo and Indonesia have postponed the launch of their rollouts several European countries including Austria have suspended the use of certain batches as a precautionary measure Poland, the Czech Republic and the UK said they would continue Thailand announced it would start using the vaccine on Tuesday following a brief delay Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said health experts had assured him all vaccines being administered in the country were safe well they would wouldn't they going on WHO spokesman Christian Lindmeier said the body was investigating the reports as soon as WHO has gained a full understanding of these events the findings and any unlikely changes to current recommendations will be immediately communicated to the public as of today there is no evidence that the incidents are caused by the vaccine and it is important that vaccination campaigns continue so we can continue to save lives and stem from severe disease from the virus the European Medicines Agency which is also currently carrying out a review said the vaccine could continue to be administered again before they have met to discuss it the UK Medicines Regulator also said evidence does not suggest the jab causes clots as it urged people in the country to get the vaccine when asked to do so this is I'm going to move on I just want to cover this a little bit before we go on to questions this is a report further detail on the evidence doesn't suggest this this is again from the BBC this is 11 hours ago it says people should still get their COVID vaccine despite several EU countries pausing use the UK's Medicines Regulator has said goes on to say pretty much what I've already said the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark etc so manufacturer AstraZeneca has said there is no evidence of a link between the two between the vaccine and the blood clot Dr Phil Brian, Vaccine Safety Lead at the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Regulatory Agency said people should still go and get their vaccine when asked to do so we are closely reviewing reports but given the large number of doses administered and the frequency at which blood clots can occur naturally the evidence available does not suggest the vaccine is the cause Professor Andrew Pollard said there were huge risks from COVID and vaccination saved lives it is critical we down to a problem not vaccinating people and have the balance of a huge risk a known risk of COVID against what appears from the data that we've got from the regulators there's no signal of a problem okay look one thing I am not is an expert on vaccination but one thing that does ring alarm bells for me is that if several countries have halted temporarily until they can investigate further a vaccine I'll summarize it like this I've read out a lot of it but I'll summarize it like this until it can be investigated further to postpone it temporarily is not I would suggest a drastic thing to do particularly when there are other vaccinations available the reason the people who are telling us not to postpone it are the very people who have been pushing vaccine vaccine as the only solution to this problem since day one and it is headed by an organisation the WHO which is not only inept and incompetent and the examples of that I could be here all day but is funded by someone who has a very strongly vested interest in there being no negative coverage of any vaccination there is again a pro-vaccination bias across the board in the globalist bodies in the press and in governments to the point where they absolutely refuse to listen to doctors and scientists who are saying there are other answers to this besides vaccination such doctors and scientists are treated as quacks and loons and a bit like if you question the climate change narrative and the climate change alarmism you are a denier this is the kind of language they use and they use the same things against doctors and scientists who say that vaccines are not the be all and end all so the people telling us to keep taking this are those same people and there are countries stopping it because we just want to check it a little bit further that's the situation in summary and those are the two major stories dominating the news tonight I'm just looking at a couple of notes I've made which is one thing I wanted to mention as well I saw this on the news respond before I went out and this is about ethnic minorities not taking the vaccine in larger numbers than the majority and of course there's they were talking a little bit about how in sort of closed ethnic minority groups and this is how the news was discussing it as if every black and Asian person or every non-white person in this country belongs to a sort of closed off immigrant group they don't but what we're talking about actually is those closed off immigrant groups and they were saying that there's a lack of trust between immigrant minority ethnic minority immigrant groups and the authorities and I'm sitting and I'm listening to this and I'm thinking they're wondering they're lamenting over this lack of trust between sort of self marginalising by the way immigrant groups and the mainstream majority and they're wondering why is this lack of trust and then five minutes later they're not literally but may as well be five minutes later they'll be talking about how racist this country is and how black people are not safe in this country and that white people are all nasty racists who are to get them and then they wonder why there is this distrust between racial groups in this country it is constant this stirring up racial division everything and very finally honestly it is there are no limits no limits to what Diane Abbott won't make about race there's nothing she has managed to turn the Sarah Everard controversy into a race issue by saying give me a break that this police and this bill I've just been talking about is a ploy to attack Black Lives Matter oh this really if only if only Black Lives Matter will be the only people not caught by this bill is more likely to be the truth okay let me get on to some questions would for Britain look through the massive number of laws we now have in many cases so open to manipulation for misuse and political reason with a review absolutely absolutely and that is a great question and yes many many many of the laws we have need to go you're absolutely right in how you frame this question because these laws are open to manipulation and misuse for political reasons that's exactly what's been happening for example with the COVID-19 the lockdown measures have been used by the police in the most I've just gone through it I'm not going to go through all that again but I've just gone through it and the police have used lockdown laws for their own biases they often do this I mean the extinction rebellion I spoke about that was pre lockdown but this was not this should not have been taking place and yet the police allowed it to take place and they were up dancing and singing with them because they took side that is exactly exactly what it is the police using laws that aren't particularly clear and which don't set out in detail what needs to happen and what shouldn't happen and the police then can use these laws however they please and to suit their own biases and it is a political police and they will use these to suit their own politics that's what's been happening that's what will continue to happen and no doubt that's what will happen with these new powers they're going to have to tell us how we can protest now we already have as you rightly point out we already have far too many laws and I'll explain why we have all these laws we have laws because the politicians are I'll say the word again I've used it a few times tonight but I'm just it feels right and no other word feels right enough useless absolutely useless chocolate fire guard territory when politicians don't have the courage to actually do things which will effectively reduce problems which will bring effective change the kind of change you need to a society when they don't have the courage to do that or they're too lazy to do it and that's I mean that's not a flip and the laziness is always an issue they're too lazy they don't want to fight the press they don't want the difficulty of having to fend off a left-wing press give me a break but they don't actually do anything that's effective because it's just too much like hard work what they do instead is bring in new laws they might already have a law which covers what the issue at hand we already have whatever they're going to do now they're going to have a task force on how to make women safer well you already have a criminal law the law on paper if enforced would make women safer but they don't want to enforce it because enforcing it's too difficult and enforcing it might bring us into some problems so for example to go back to Rotherham yet again if they'd enforced the law that already existed we didn't need new laws Rotherham did not require any new laws we had the law it was enforcing the law that was the problem because that would have caused political difficulties for the police because they would have had to admit that this was largely seek girls as well but largely white English girls being raped by Muslim men they didn't want to confront that they certainly didn't want to enforce it you don't want to arrest a Muslim I mean how islamophobic is that so what they will do is let it carry on the police will let it carry on there will be some public outcry the government doesn't want to actually do anything about the police and the fact that the police is not arresting and jailing these prosecuting these people the judges aren't jailing them rather than deal with that they will take the let's look like we're doing something approach and introduce a new law a new law that's not needed because we already have laws we're just not enforcing them we're not going to enforce them because we're not going to go there that's way too difficult way too incendiary over there that's the criminal justice system we can't do that it's too difficult let's bring in a new law let's look like we're doing something philosophy of the government and it would be the very same if it was Labour as with Tory there's useless and inept and there's lazy as each other so that's why we have so many laws because the politicians want to look like they're doing something while doing nothing at all but yes a great deal of them to be repealed what measures would you introduce to the tech firm well I've talked about sentencing and the point of it there is genuinely no point you sometimes wonder why the police I've spent the last half hour the last hour criticising the police and rightly so, justifiably so but even when they do even when they do catch someone the sentences are not there we have we had higher sentences thrown around by Mt. Hancock of our people for telling a lie about where you went on holiday higher sentences than for child rape this is what's wrong this is really what's wrong, violent crime is not punished your question on the death penalty is a very difficult one and I it's one of those issues where I can understand both sides of the argument I really do understand both sides of the argument, my issue with on one side is that it is so easy to get these things wrong and you can't bring anyone back from the dead but on the other side we have people who are so indescribably cruel and evil that people perhaps justifiably want them gone my own view on that is that I don't really take a position on it perhaps I need to think about it a little bit more but I'll tell you something simpler we can do and my view has changed on that issue over the years but I'll tell you something simpler we can do and one thing that I do want to put into the manifesto I need to mention the manifesto to you I do need to mention that because I said I was going this is my totally manifesto what happens is I want to make a couple of changes to the manifesto and then these ideas start flooding out and people start sending me in suggestions and suddenly I want to make hundreds of changes to the manifesto and then it just it will all get very messy the manifesto will be changing but after these elections but one thing I do want and I'm still working on it but one thing I do want to put in is something very very simple self-defence we're not allowed to defend ourselves we're really not and we mentioned self-defence generally in the last manifesto no not generally actually but we did mention self but I want to make some additions to it there's a call tonight from some of the protesters in London just simply to allow women to carry mace I mean I'm sure there are people watching in other countries who are shocked by the fact that we're not actually allowed to carry mace you're not allowed to carry things to defend yourself with and you're not even allowed to put things around your house to defend yourself with I mean if you put a baseball bat under your bed you better put a ball with it because if your intention is for that baseball bat to be for self-defence you can find yourself in some very hot water so self-defence on the streets for women is very there's one simple way that we can do it but over in the bigger picture and that will be going into the manifesto but in the bigger picture the problem is a broken criminal justice system where sentences are miniscule where the police are too busy on twitter to deal with actual criminals where the police are too busy thinking they're social workers and talking about why people commit crimes it's your economic marginalisation it's none of the police's business they should be out catching thugs and locking them up that's what's wrong, that's what's really wrong and the government will do nothing about it guaranteed, guaranteed question is Stu, if the alleged perpetrator in the murder of Sarah Everard or he wasn't a serving police officer do you think the media would cover this tragedy at all it's certainly, I think it's certainly a very big part of it very big part of it it is very shocking and I think one of the things as well that added to the controversy surrounding this was the police putting out a tweet saying that women should stay home at night to avoid this, I mean you can understand you can understand why people would react angrily to this, it was a police officer has been charged with this, now he hasn't been found guilty or enough but he's been charged with it and then for the police to come out with women should stay at home I mean this is, there's been protests about this sort of stuff going on since the Yorkshire Ripper and the same sort of things happened then the police were telling women to stay home then and actually the same protest groups using the same name reclaimed the streets were protesting then against about the police response that the police were so again took so long to catch him and I think they interviewed him eight or nine times, they had him several times, they had witnesses telling them that this guy had it, surviving witnesses telling them that he had a Yorkshire accent they insisted no those witnesses were wrong, that he was from Sunderland or from around the northeast area, not listening and so this thing went on for years and years and why this was going on, well police were making mistake after mistake after mistake they were telling women to stay home and the same thing happened then and here we are all these years later I think it sort of lit a spark that tweet from the police, lit a spark and caused a lot of anger but yeah, perhaps it's definitely a massive element of it, but you're right people are, there are violent attacks all the time that aren't covered like this it happens I suppose, it happens every so often there is one that stands out from a crowd and it sparks anger and it lights a fuse and that fuse blows and this is one of those instances and I do think like you say Stu, I do think that the fact that a police officer has been charged with this and the fact that the police told women to stay home has really lit that fuse okay when will you get when you get inside and will you take a look at the Worldwide Memberships such as WHO, UN, NATO etc and whether they are any good for the UK public 100% 100% look at them there's a lot of things we already know if you look at the United Nations the United Nations is a scandalous globalist body which has long flown its flag and long showed its hand the UN doesn't pretend that it's not a globalist anti-western body and a shower of absolute hypocrites the UN will go relentlessly go for western countries for human rights abuses it relentlessly attacks Israel for human rights abuses and meanwhile sitting on its human rights councils are countries like Saudi Arabia and the UN Declaration on Human Rights guarantees for example freedom of expression freedom of belief equal rights between men and women various different fundamentals which the UN says it stands for and which it was founded upon and then it put Saudi Arabia on its human rights council not just any old council, its human rights council I remember it put Iran on a women's rights council I mean you cannot fathom this stuff it sucks up to people like Saudi Arabia and all the Muslim world in fact are relentlessly attacking Israel unbelievable unbelievable, it is long ago showed its hand so personally I think we should be, I don't have nothing to do with any of them with these big globalist bodies we have to expose them we have to be saying and this is what was so great about Trump when we had him he would say things like this he would say the unsayable on the global political stage he would talk about China for example and tell it like it is about China a brutal, brutal tyrant which seeks global domination no tinfoil hats China seeks global domination Trump would have, Trump called that stuff out the American administration under Trump called out a lot of the hypocrisies of the UN that have just been talking about so even if you don't up and walk away you have to make decisions like that very carefully, but even if you don't up and walk away you need to have people at senior levels of politics who are not singing from the globalist hymn sheet who are not doing exactly as they are told by these hypocritical globalist organisations and just one more example of the UN and its anti-western open anti-western stance its open anti-democracy stance and that's what it really is all about was the global migration crisis back in 2015 that wasn't a global crisis at all what it was was the third world coming to Europe en masse this was largely a Muslim migration as well now Trump said build the wall went crazy he's a massive risk to the world he's a tyrant, he's a Nazi he's a fascist, he's this, this, this Saudi Arabia refused to take any of them despite them being Muslims and get this because they were a terrorist threat Saudi Arabia actually called out Saudi Arabia one of the biggest terror sponsors on the planet actually said it wasn't going to take these migrants despite them being fellow Muslims because there was a risk of terrorism the UN said zip zero about that but continued to attack Trump and continued to insist that western countries open our borders to all in sundry despite the terrorist risk so Emma in answer to your question absolutely, I actually feel really really strongly about this all these organisations are pretty much the same they are globalist, they want global bodies to provide global solutions to global problems, that will be their mantra and that's why they love climate change so much because they can't make climate change into a national issue, that's a global issue so they come together for the global response and what you end up with is a pseudo a de facto de facto world government and heading in the direction of world government that's why there's also anti-western as well because we're relatively hitherto if you like free, unrich and democratic and that's not conducive to global governance western countries pretty much used to having at least some say and we're pretty much used to law and order again up until recent years and thanks to things like the UN so we have to come under attack from these globalist bodies because they need to bring us down in order to make us accept the unacceptable, in other words if we were free and independent financially and otherwise, we wouldn't accept what they are pushing on us wouldn't accept this mass migration would accept this deterioration of our societies if we were truly free and independent and that's why they must make us not free and not independent so the globalist agenda can move forward and all of these bodies that you mention are more than in on it so absolutely yes in answer to your question what measures would you like to see taken against China oh dear several so I'm just scrolling down a little bit there apologies for that ok they can be sued for this there was a great I think it was a Henry Jackson society it may have certainly been involved in it the details I would have escaped me now actually I've spoken about it before I spoke about it back when this thing started that China in the early stages of coronavirus was in breach of international law and its international obligations and in lying about the transmission of it which I addressed briefly earlier with the World Health Organization in lying about that it was also in breach of international contracts that it has signed and in breach of international laws therefore they can have legal action taken against them I'll come back with the study next week let me make a quick note of it actually just to make sure I do I do need to get back to government spending because I do want to go through that but I also need to I want to come back to this, I want to bring you back the details of this next week but they concluded the study was carried out that actually yes China is in breach of various international laws and can be sued for the economic damage it has caused I would have a team of international lawyers working on finding any way any way at all that we can take legal action against China to compensate us for the economic loss we have suffered because of their however it happened however it happened the jury is out on that one whether it's disgusting lack of hygiene whether it's the disgusting conditions in these disgusting wet markets or whether it was from a lab or whatever it was it came from China they did nothing to stop it they're in breach of international laws I would have the best legal minds in the country that I could find finding me a way that I can take legal action against China to compensate us for the money we lost because of their action or inaction or their disgusting cultural practices whatever it may be what I'm concerned about is getting the money back that's one of the things I would do the second thing we would do and I want to break over the medium to longer term I want us to stop our reliance on Chinese products in our manifesto is a policy of tax breaks for British companies that source their production in countries other than China this will break help to break this stranglehold that China has on the world make no mistake China is buying the world it's buying power all over the world that's how it intends it's business practices are beyond description it steals a copyright theft it's just unbelievable completely lived by its own set of rules a completely different set of values and ethics than we are used to here in the west and we have to stop stop its dominance by stop buying every second product from it so to go towards breaking its dominance in this country we would offer tax breaks to companies who source production in countries other than China that could be made but more urgently and more importantly we should see it for our money back we can we'll bring you the details of that next week we can in the medium to long term stop buying from it but we can also we can also start making stuff ourselves especially on essential items we need things that we found out at the start of this again that we can't even see a country we're not even apparently able to provide protective equipment for our own medical staff we're not able to provide the required medical machinery for our own medical treatments without having to go to China for them that's not a position that's not a healthy position for a country to be in I don't want this country to be in that position that's just a couple of things that we can do already for Britain policy in what would you say the three main policies it's very hard to do that in because of so many so many important issues that we have to tackle and of course in that top three would be immigration and part of the reason that immigration is in the top three is because it affects so many other things it affects the NHS waiting lists it affects housing significantly very significantly it affects housing housing the cost of housing is going through the roof and that's always going to happen when you have fewer houses then you have people wanting houses that drives the cost of housing up that then drives the benefits bill up we have immigration of people who are not sorry to say coming here to work and all you ever hear immigrants being economic value well that's as maybe with some I'm not doubting that some people are very hard working come here for a better life but if you if you look for example at the asylum seekers and I mentioned the 2015 movement from the third world into Europe how many of those do you think are working and contributing to society today I think it's around 5% are working the last figure I saw was that 95% some years on 3 or 4 years on from the initial influx into Germany I read that 95% are still unemployed and there's a reason for that because many of the people coming will be illiterate in their own language much less in English or in German so you are inviting lifelong benefit dependency you're inviting lifelong ghettoization you're inviting all these problems into your country including of course a greater and often very grotesque violent crimes you're inviting that but you're inviting an oversupply into jobs market and putting either bringing down wages for for British workers you're inviting all of that with mass immigration and with the careless and reckless immigration that we've had immigration would have to be near would have to be in that top three our civil liberties this also has to be in that top three because without it we don't have a democracy and what I read out earlier that the government is now trying to hold on to a lot of the powers it has gained throughout this pandemic and bring in and I'm no doubt again we've addressed this as well no doubt very vague laws which can be used by the police on their political whim very little we can do if we can't protest and if we don't even more importantly have our freedom of speech so the hate speech rubbish has to go we must be able to without minus only direct incitement of violence and it has to be direct incitement of violence and that has to be defined clearly so that left wing judges can't interpret it in accordance with their political biases so we have to get rid of the hate speech we have to restore freedom of speech we have to protect freedom of speech from the freedom thieves in parliament we need protection from parliament which is why we need a written constitution but our civil liberties and freedom of speech have to be up there as well okay I'm going to I'm going to try and get through a couple more of these okay it is the Henry Jackson society thank you for to whoever sent me that it is the Henry Jackson society and I'll go through this in a little bit more actually I'll read it I know we're running out but let me the report claims of the Chinese government's early handling of the disease and failure to adequately report information to the WHO has reached articles 6 and 7 of the international health regulations a treaty to which China is a signatory and legally obliged to uphold these breaches allowed the outbreak to rapidly spread outside Wuhan its place of origin in particular the research discovered that the Chinese government failed to disclose data that would have revealed evidence of human to human transmission for a period of up to three weeks in breach of article 6 and 7 thank you very much to whoever sent me that so again to repeat I would have the best team I could find 95 whatever legal avenue we can possibly take to hold China to account for this and probably get our money back okay last question Elaine has asked me what is my view on the reaction of those out protesting over the model of Joe after which I pretty much gone through she mentioned short for I do want to say one thing about George Floyd this is a mural all over the place and including one in Manchester it is the face of a thuggish criminal communist movement and the face of a long-term hardened criminal and yet that's the face that is being lauded as heroic in this country and beyond and to say that it's sickening is an understatement okay what will you do about the House of Lords would you keep them now we had a vote on that Emma in the party and the members voted to keep but reform it I've spoken quite a bit about the House of Lords and in my own experiences of dealing with the Houses of Parliament and people in the Houses of Parliament and with the controversial things that I've campaigned on over the years so for example Sharia law when I was working with both one law for all and Sharia Watch UK and my primary soul at that time political activism surrounded Sharia law I found very very very much that the MPs wouldn't give you the time of day the Lords however are much much braver and I've spoken at various events in the House of Lords had reports that I've helped prepare presented to the House of Lords the Houses of Lords have been so much better and are so much better at dealing in controversial matters the House of Commons I mean one or two MPs have spoken to me over the years but they would not they will not stand up in the Commons and denounce Sharia law absolutely not whereas there's been a few well three that spring to mind actually that have been the three members of the Lords that have been quite clear in their condemnation and their criticism of it my worry about for example if we made had an elected House of Lords my worry about it would be that we would have another House of Commons and another House of party if you think of the big political parties as a one of those things called when things come out on a line a factory and they all come out on a line and they're all produced and they're all shaped by the party and the party creates them and shapes them and tells them what to think and tells them what to say and out they come on a little machine coming out all of them the same out they come out they come now I'm not suggesting that parties don't have to keep party members and MPs of a party don't have to adhere to the party's manifesto they do but you get people with no with very little courage and very little individuality and very little principle such that they will stand up and say what needs to be said because they are products of the party machine and most of them are only products of the party machine their life experience is they've probably been members of the party since childhood they will have gotten into the House of Commons by knowing all the right people in their constituency and when the opportunity comes up say in a safe labour seat or a safe Tory seat they'll know all the right people so they'll get selected and hey presto they're in Parliament and this is largely what we have in the Commons I would in the Lords on the other hand there is life experience so you have people like Baroness Cox someone I know quite well and I'm very very fond of you know she has a real history behind her she has worked she's spent much of her life fighting against communists all over the world she's a devout Christian and she's spent much of her life in Africa in war zones this is a woman with life experience and this is a woman with strong strong principle and you know it's going to be I'm not saying there's no one in the House of Commons like that but it's it's not black and white to me it's actually quite a difficult issue I just don't want another House of Commons with a load of more party machinery anyway so we put to bring back to the point this question was members of the party and they voted to keep the House of Lords but reform it and make it smaller make it less expensive and people should go in there on merit the House of Commons supremacy over the legal right of the House of Commons to override the House of Lords should remain and that is there because of the Democratic deficit in the House of Lords that should remain there but people who go into the House of Lords should be there to provide a check and a balance on legislation and to debate legislation and to send questions back to the Commons for example to raise points with the Commons to make amendments for the Commons to consider which is essentially their role but they must be there on merit and I think there's a lot and this expenses thing needs to come down we need to slim the result of what the members voted for to streamline make it far less expensive not other money out of it but to make it on merit so what you won't have and what we shouldn't have is David Cameron's wife's hairdresser getting put into the House of Lords that has to go we can probably address that question again if there's a demand for it in the party I certainly have no problem addressing it again but that's the current position following a vote with the members okay okay we're nearly at nine o'clock now so I think we are going to have to bring this one to a close thank you to everyone who sent in questions thank you for joining me thank you for everything really but I mentioned at the start my campaign in Hartlepool is absolutely up and running any help and support could be very very much appreciated very excited about it very much looking forward to it but of course I'm only one of many we have brave, wonderful principled candidates, forburitan candidates standing all over the country I could not be more proud of us as a party or the wonderful candidates who are standing up and putting their head above the parapet it's an incredibly honourable principled thing to do and I want to thank everyone who's gone to do it and everyone who will be supporting them in it I'll be back on Wednesday morning I am going to have to reign in the other things I've been doing throughout this lockdown I'll bring them back after the elections but between now and then my focus will be on the elections but I will have my second weekly livestream which will be this Wednesday and every Wednesday at 10 o'clock on Facebook and it's www.facebook.com please join me on that thank you all very much for joining me this evening I apologise for the overrunning but there are important things to talk about very important things to talk about okay thanks everyone look after yourselves and if you can offer any support for these elections for our fantastic candidates please do see you on Wednesday morning if not I shall and if you can't tune in at 10 o'clock on Wednesday morning do go on to my Facebook page and share these videos around and please share this one as well and as always talk to family and friends about Forbidden word of mouth is very important okay thanks very much everyone see you all soon take care thank you for watching if you agree with what you hear on Forbidden videos remember to like them share them and subscribe to our channel and why not follow us on social media as well the relevant links are below thank you