 Types and varieties of social conflict, this is the topic for this session and we are going to evaluate that what are the major types and varieties of social conflict under the philosophy of Ralph. The problem of conflict is no less complex than that of integration of societies. When we are trying to understand the integration of societies, then in the same way we have to see why the conflict comes there, if the conflict overcomes, then of course societies will be integrated. So first if we understand dividing forces, then then it will be easy to understand integration and it can also be possible. So we now know that the attempt to reduce all occurring conflicts among social groups to the common principle say that classes, they actually matter. That if there is class system in any society, then definitely there will be a social conflict and it leads either to empty generalizations such as every society experience, social conflicts or to empirically unjustifiable oversimplifications such as the history of all societies so far has been a history of class struggle. Now if we start talking about conflict, then according to Ralph we have to face a lot of generalized statements. For example, everyone will say that there is a social conflict in the monsters, history has been filled with such examples. But what are the major types and what are the major realities, the certain realities of these social conflicts are to answer this question he basically highlighted two types of conflict, exogenous and endogenous. Now with regard to every society basically he tries to apply these two certain types of conflicts that the exogenous one could say that there are exogenous conflicts brought into A from the outside and there are endogenous conflicts generated within A. Now Ralph thinks that a lot of conflicts come from the outside and then they create conflict within the system. And sometimes it happens that these two categories work together and somewhere it can happen that we separate them so that the reasons for conflict at some point take birth from the inside of the society. And sometimes it happens that some external elements play a role because of which sometimes they are combined but sometimes they operate separately. Now if we want to understand this in detail or if we want to understand their real spirit then we can now make it easier to understand that how can conflict happen that slaves versus freedom, sometimes Negroes versus whites, bazookas, protestants versus Catholics, these all are the opposing groups but they all does not fall into a separate category of social conflict. Now all these conflicts are in the West, in Africa, in the developed world or in the developing world. How? If there is a religious difference, if there is a difference in the nature of the race, then what will be said that the difference has come from the outside or it has taken birth from the inside of the society. So the nature of conflict or social conflict is not specific to a society. There are certain routes in the whole world where there is a more severe difference. Where there is a severe difference, it varies. So this is how we can see that if at some point people want to get freedom but some people are the opponents of that freedom, then how will this social conflict be seen that is he doing some sport from the outside? Now it is the internal matter of people that if they are not satisfied and they want to get freedom, then with those people, the affiliation with their system will raise questions on that. This will also vary in the system, in the society. That is, there are many such questions that are born in any society. It is not necessary that a specific society is present. In fact, it can also be that its reason is in different conditions. And in every place, that social conflict is present in some form or another. Similarly, when we use to classify, we want to understand this classification, then we have to understand the objects of contention. The structural origin of the conflicting groups. And then definitely that what type of results they have. That is, if we only want to understand the social conflict in this way, then what is the result of the conflict? Now again, it can be said that as the nature of the conflict varies, it can also vary the result of the conflict. That is, in some places, the outcome of the conflict can be different, but in some other society, in some other system, in some other state, the outcome or result of the conflict can be very different from the study of some place. And also we can say that there are a variety of social conflicts as well as their outcome is also different from state to state or from society to society.