 I also like the analogy you gave about the hold in the dam. So given that truth, right, the state and international financiers don't like that money leaving their system, how do you think they're going to respond in the coming months or years in the target particular future? But how do you address that, Moral? Well, I estimate that they're going to go through five stages of response. Stage one is denial. Bitcoin can't work. Bitcoin won't work. Bitcoin isn't working, except that it is. Stage two is anger. Bitcoin is for terrorist criminals and pedophiles, just like they said about the internet. And so, of course, it isn't. Stage three is bargaining. We can do blockchains. We're at stage three now. We can do blockchains, and that will fix everything. We'll just take the open, borderless, transnational, open innovation, open permissionless system, and make it closed, jurisdiction-specific, permission-based, and take everything good out of it, and then we have a blockchain, which is a bit like the horse and carriage association of America, saying, listen, we've studied this new-fangled automobile, and it seems kind of sketchy. We don't think that's going to work, but we are now heavily invested in pneumatic tires. Pneumatic tires, the technology behind the automobile, is the thing that we believe makes all the difference. So we now present the new horse-and-buggy carriage with pneumatic tires, and that will preserve our investment in stables, veterinary doctors, and hay. That's bargaining. After bargaining comes depression, and after depression, finally, acceptance. And acceptance is when the climate financial system gets re-engineered to work on open, borderless, public ledgers, and it will. There is absolutely no question in my mind about that.