 With that being said, how can Congress best ensure the need of public safety are prioritized when developing national spectrum policy? There are a number of ways, Senator. Certainly the investment of dollars in next generation 9-1-1 as a public interest value is one that we've highlighted today. An emphasis on resiliency and thank you for your leadership on the resiliency of communications networks. We need to continue to emphasize that so that during natural disasters and other emergency situations folks can trust that the networks will be available. But also when we're talking about spectrum policy, the importance of setting the rules for prioritization on the network. We talked about the success of the CBRS ban, which has tiers of access prioritization, but making sure that emergency communications and other public safety are prioritized, especially when those emergencies happen I think is an important priority. Now as part of that, Mr. Lewis, outside of spending proceeds, your testimony pointed to something that caught my attention. And that was with enhanced competition and incentive program that some folks will refer to as ECHIP. Now the chair of the FCC, Chair Rosenwurzel, has highlighted how this program aims to promote greater competition and increase access to advanced wireless services in rural and tribal communities. How can Congress expand on ECHIP to better promote competition? Senator, I think a simple mandate to extend the same concepts and values that we saw with the recent decision on ECHIP at the FCC would go a long way. You know, this is the idea of partitioning off spectrum, incentivizing licensed users to license services to partition off that spectrum so that communities that don't have access can use it when they're not using it. We've talked about buildout requirements and that can lead to partitioning or sharing opportunities. So we just need to enshrine that further into the rules on other spectrum bands.