 Felly, we're now producing just an enormous quantity of data which is very generally available. We publish every year, not just our report, but also a lot of data sets which are supporting it. Essentially our research now generates a data set for each year, 1.3 million observations. So we have like a synthetic wealth database for the whole world. We now have this for 15 countries, so you do the calculation. We're talking about 20 million observations sitting there in a data set, and it's a very rich data set and can be used for all sorts of reasons. I think there's just a wonderful variety of reasons. Every year I think of 10 PhDs theses that could be written on this topic, and I do hope that people wake up to this. The reason why it's not really been a popular subject in the past, I think because of the data problem, people have just shied away because it's just too difficult to spend the time cleaning up the data and really trying to get something which is usable. But now the sort of data we're producing I think is just... There's no excuse now, and indeed there is a huge market for this and it's not just in say the regular development field or the people interested in inequality. It is the big banks, they have a very big interest in the asset holdings of people, what's happening there, which regions, which countries in the world are doing particularly well, how many new consumers are coming out of these countries, what sort of things are they going to be interested in buying, what sort of financial instruments are going to be happening, what's going to be happening to their stock markets, all of these things are really very interesting. So we're very hopeful that it will really stimulate a lot of research. This year of course we've had Piketty's book which has almost transformed the landscape. So we're now in what I sometimes call a post-Piketty world, and I think that we just view these topics in a different way. Inequality is clearly important for all sorts of reasons and people need to give this more attention. The WID is really a very important national, international resource and it's so important that it is maintained and developed here. It's a public good so there's some costs to keeping it running and so many researchers rely on this as a basic source of information. I happened to go to a conference a couple of years ago and it was a sociology conference in fact. I think I was about the only economist there and I was struck that every single person was getting up and talking about the WID and how they were using the WID. It is just used routinely in various particularly cross-country comparisons and everyone is interested in now in comparing experiences, variety of experiences in different countries and just seeing whether inequality is a variable which is very often important in understanding what's going on. So the notion about keeping this resource going and developing it to a point where it is even more valuable as a research tool for researchers is really just a core thing for the future and if wider doesn't do this then other people are going to step into that vacuum. So it is being maintained and I think we need to make sure that the resources are available to continue that and continue to update it and to keep the quality very high and to allow people to really use that and make it very easy really for people to use that in their research. The reason why wider is so critical here is because of its network of people. I forget how many were on the network. There used to be 10,000 people on the wider mailing list. It's probably 20,000 now as far as I can see. It just stretches everywhere at all levels in pretty well every country in the world and there are very few places that really have that sort of network of quality academics who know what they're talking about who are involved in the research. So that's what you need. You need people who understand the data for different parts of the world who are working on it and they're often young, active people academics. This is just the core people in the wider network and exactly the sort of people that you want to be able to draw upon in order to produce a quality research resource.