 As teachers who are employed in the university now, one thing we cannot do is participate in its destruction and we will not do that. Last year we saw a program of Shadda and JNU. This is a continuation of that program. There is also an act of parliament in 2006 which is the Central Educational Institutions Reservation Act which clearly says that intake, that is seats in our university cannot be cut to less than 54% added to 2006 levels. So one reason why the JNU figures have gone that high is because we have had no recruitment of faculty or very little, who is responsible in the JNU Act for determining the admission policy of the university, very clearly it is the academic council meeting. This vice chancellor, because he knows that the bulk of teachers are good citizens of India and they respect the laws of parliament, that they will never agree to violate any law. Either the JNU Act or the Central Institution of Education Reservation Act, as a consequence they will not allow seat cut. So now, teachers want to supervise, students want to study, but the university wants to cut 50% of the seats. So through this UGC notification in JNU there will be no intake in several centres. That is a major issue. Now vice chancellor is telling that the people, those who completed the MFIL course, everybody they can't continue in PhD. And this whole decision he himself taking without taking the consent of academic council. So it is itself against the JNU Act passed by the parliament. So that is the basic question and in 2007 implementation of UGC, the OBC Reservation Policy and the policy there is a no passed by parliament that there will be 54% increase in the total intake. Then after that the OBC Reservation Policy implemented. Now they are cutting down all the intakes. It means that this UGC regulation itself is against the rule passed by the parliament. A lot has been happening with this present government in the education area. Not one, that million things. And I think JNU stands for autonomy, its DNA is that. And this VC should understand that. I think he has, I don't know where he has come from, what is training you. But there is the academic discipline, you need academic honoured people, you have got the best of the talents in your faculty and you can't just be like a little, tiny little gunda that it has been passed, you don't do like that. It says very, very bad things about the office of the vice chancellor there. He can't handle it, you can't leave it, you can't actually leave it. You can't listen to your teachers, they are the backbone of an institution and they are out, what are you, you are nothing. And he is going to be there for a few years, he can't be there for life. But he will damage this institution for life and that is the worst. Every day they come with silly, silly things and you know they don't understand the legacy of an institution. They want their legacy and that is no legacy, that's irrelevant, it's outdated legacy. Chancellor as well as the vice chancellor to hear the voice of the children, hear the voice of the young people, hear the voice of the students. The university is for the students and not for the government. J. U. T. is the vice chancellor of the institution. He is doing the work of the administration. He is the leader of Sandeer Ichadbara.