 Last Saturday, Britain got its most pro-Islamic king in its entire history. For the very first time, the former colonial Christian kingdom ordained and crowned a man whose opinion of Islam can be best described as authentic and favourable. This is on record that King Charles III, at some point in his life, decided to signulate the Arabic for the sole aim of understanding the Quran better. I understand that some people might dismiss him as just being political, but what if I told you that he had touched on some very, very interesting and often ignored aspects of Islam in the West? Our judgement of Islam has been grossly distorted by taking the extremes to be the norm. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a serious mistake. It is like judging the quality of life in Britain by the existence of murder and rape, child abuse and drug addiction. The extremes do exist and they must be dealt with, but when used as a basis to judge a society they lead to distortion and unfairness. If I may just quote the Quran, have you considered if your water were to disappear into the earth who then could bring you gushing water? This is the divine hospitality that offers us our provisions and our dwelling places, our clothing, tools and transport. The earth is robust and prolific, but also delicate, subtle, complex and diverse. And so our mark must always be gentle or the water will disappear. However, before I dive into this aspect of the episode, it is sad to announce to you that the coronation itself in its plainer beauty and oath went completely against what he had said about Islam and Muslims in general. This is not the talk of Christianity itself. Don't take my words for it, perhaps you may not have taken enough time to go through the oath and its content, but if you do, you would notice that in the spirit and later of the oath, God within the theological periscope of Islam is not Allah and that Islam in its entirety is false. Please don't get agitated or click out yet because what I'm about to reveal in this video would open your eyes into the deep hypocrisy and double standards inherent in the Asian tradition of king making in modern times. A disclaimer, ladies and gentlemen, this video was not conceived with an interest in denigrating over 1000 year British tradition embellished in Christologic no, for me, if it's beautiful, right? Yet what I intend to point out here is the discrepancy between what the tradition stands for and the position of the modern British monarchy. A close look at British politics, you know, policies and legislation will have one wondering how the video you're about to watch adds up to, you know, reality. Sir, to keep you ever mindful of the law and the gospel of God, as the rule for the whole life and government of Christian princes, receive this book, the most valuable thing that this world has to offer. Will you solemnly, laws and customs, will you to your power cause law and justice and in mercy to be executed in all your judgments? I hope you'll listen to those charges carefully. He was asked if he would obey the laws of God in Britain, as apparently dictated by Christianity, like uphold the teachings of the gospel on adulterated and reign over the Christian British kingdom without prejudice to the tenets of pure Protestant reforms. What he said next is the essence of this episode. This is when the bomb was dropped. He vowed to keep the faith pure, sincerely and honestly. Please underline that sincerely and honestly. However, before any further probe into that, let's talk about the pure Protestant reformation that was contained in the oath. Asalaamu alaikum brothers and sisters. Welcome to another episode of the Open Minded Thinker Show. Thank you for always staying around. I encourage you to like and share the video to enable us to reach more people. Don't forget to subscribe to enable us great. The pure Protestant reformation contained in the oath taken by King Charles III was referring to the controversial early 16th century declaration of independence by the Church of England from Rome and the influences of the Pope. The reformation which was beheaded by King Herod VIII, he was not satisfied with the Pope's refusal to ignore his marriage to Catherine of Aragon led to a Protestant faith which would later shape the political and social future of Britain and the Christian faith as Muslims. The pure Protestant faith King Charles vowed to uphold goes against everything Islamic theology for instance. The 39 articles of the reformed reflective Protestant understanding of Christianity that emphasizes the authority of the scripture that's the Bible, the centrality of the faith in Christ and the importance of the individual relationship with God by making Christ central as a second person of the Trinity. It detests Islam and the concept of Tahit. So if today King Charles says Islam is true, it contains the truth. He's obviously lying because the faith he vowed to uphold until death says something entirely different. For more clarity, some of the key beliefs and practices outlined in the 39 articles on which this earth is based are the belief in the Holy Trinity, Father, Son and the Holy Spirit as one God and through a presence. The belief that the Bible is the ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice. The belief that salvation comes through faith in Jesus Christ alone. There are others but how can one reconcile this step and by the King Charles Islam is in possession of one of the greatest traders of accumulated wisdom and spiritual knowledge available to humanity with the fact that there is no other religion spiritual knowledge and wisdom that compares us surpasses the faith in Christ and the supremacy of the Christian Bible. How do we reconcile that, ladies and gentlemen? That's not even the worst. I've only started thinking about it since I've had children really, so it is something I'm nervous about, not because I'm worried about them being gay or anything, it's more about the fact that I'm worried about the pressures as you are and I'm here that they're going to face and how much harder their life could be. So from a parent point of view, that's the only thing I worry about is that I wish we lived in a world that it was a quite user-friendly, really normal and cool, but particularly for my family in the position that we are in, that's the bit I'm nervous about. That was Prince William's obviously admitting that he wouldn't be surprised if his children came out as gay. How can we trust people like this? People who obviously are in certain revered religious status yet possess one of the most liberal opinions contrary to the authentic contents of the 39 attics of the Protestant Reformation and the Bible. Now back to the oath, can one say that there will be friction between the parliamentarians and the monarchy going by the situation where the king obeys the later and the spirit of the oath, well that is completely unlikely. There would never be any friction between them. They are the same and they pursue similar objectives despite the Christian orientation of the monarchy. So don't expect another English Civil War which was first fought in the 17th century between the forces of the monarchy and the forces of the parliament. This is because the whole thing now is painted in hypocrisy and ceremonial collars period. There's no time the monarchy would require the government to reverse laws like you know lesbian and gay rights and whatever or some of the very very anti-God laws in Britain today. So we don't expect that from the monarchy that claims to obey the Bible and the Christian faith and follow Jesus Christ. Do not expect that from this man. That's the hypocrisy and the art of mocking God himself. Let's live it right there ladies and gentlemen thank you so much for being part of this show today. Really appreciate your time. Until next time Assalamualaikum