 We have another issue, which is the issue of taxation and how do we organize our taxes at EU level? I see that after the crisis, or now with the crisis of the coronavirus, this debate is more present in the agenda, so this is already something important. But we don't have yet anything firm on the table to start, for instance, challenging the fiscal pumping at EU level, the rulings at national level, who facilitate profit shifting of multinationals. I'm saying that because we just had the ruling from the General Court in Luxembourg, annuling the fine that was imposed at Apple, that was extremely bad news yesterday, probably you followed that. But in a way, as Greens in the European Parliament, we reacted to this by saying that this is a proof that we absolutely need to change our different norms that govern our taxation system in the EU. So also for you to know that the Parliament has just created a subcommittee on taxation matters, a permanent one. This is an all request on the side of the Greens, and that will exist. It will start working in September, together with my colleagues, Van Gogh and Kira, from Denmark, we will be the members there. And I think that our role will be basically to push for those issues, to build a common consolidated tax base for the EU, to go for the very famous CDCR, the Tax Transparency for Multinationals, which is very important. And also to see how do we break this unanimity rule at the council level on taxation. So no big development, no big revolution on that front for now. But the debate is there. And this, I think, is going to be one of our priorities. So we have to invest today, now, into a green economy and start investing in an unsustainable economy. And that is for sure. And that leads us to a very, very crucial point about the repayment of debt and potential austerity. Effectively, it is impossible to think of a sustainable level of debt in an unsustainable economy, in an unsustainable world. Very often, we talk about sustainability of debt. And before the crisis, everybody is saying, OK, sustainability of debt means you must not go beyond 3% of GDP deficit and 60% debt-to-GDP ratio. That was the so-called mantra for sustainability of debt. And there were the partisans of this orthodoxy, so to speak. And those were saying, hey, this is not the essential. We need to invest to build a better world, a sustainable world. Well, today, we know that regardless of the scenario, those 3%, 60%, stability and growth-backed rules will not be respected regardless. So the issue is really to invest in a sustainable economy because if we don't invest in a sustainable economy, tomorrow's world will not be sustainable. And if it's not sustainable, that goes back to my previous argument about destruction risk, the world will be disrupted. And if the world is disrupted, you can rest assured that the level of sovereign debt will just explode.