 It sounds a little bit like poetry, also. They say, is it an art, a science, or a bunch of, you know, immense energy that we have on the screen, and what does that mean? That's the topic. But we'll just extend it to another level, a little bit more on the issue, about a new sector on the basis of the channel. They create the impression what we have of bigger icons, all they have here, because what we see, we'll get an industrial view, so as to say. So let me first take your brief and ask you that first question. Is new art starting new over there? Is new actually art, new things are new, science, or just a bunch of energy that you need to go there and show and read out? How do you define it in your way, if you have to tell me? Because there can be different opinions on this. And before I come to my opinion, which has been anchored in the world, in my opinion, the science in this regard is that the anchor is so visible, because if the television is running at home and the husband is watching the event, the visible level of the anchor is that the wife, the kitchen, the kitchen floor, is so heavily filled that you can't even see. Or even the husband, the kitchen floor, is not heard. So science is from that point. Art is from the point that nowadays where is this weight needed for any sort of project, and where does it move? It's on the anchor. The same thing can be seen here and there, in that sense. So these are the things that are present in today's anchoring. But if you have a bigger talk than me, then according to me, anchoring is not done from T to C. The content should be there. Because when the viewers are watching, they don't have the content to tell you. If you are playing, they don't like it, they don't know it. But after a while, they will come and listen to you. If there is content, they will tell you. But if you don't have the content, if you don't have the content, then you don't have the content to tell you. Sometimes you will say, I have asked you this question. Have you ever asked this question? If you don't have the content, then you don't have the content to tell you. That's why it is very important. And these are the most important things in the anchoring. They are connected. There is a connection between the viewers and the anchors. We don't have the content to tell you. But our content, if it is connected, then it doesn't matter. The viewers, if you are watching the world from your perspective, if you don't have the content, then you know that you can't have content like this. It's about social media. So these three things are very important. Please see this in the picture. That the length, the length and the content are connected to the anchoring. Please read through the screen. I will say one thing. Anchoring is either art or science. But definitely not too much energy. You can trade what you are saying like the hyperactive anchors jumping in the chairs, shouting and screaming and I just say, you know, it's not a question of principle. It's not about how small the anchors are. Unfortunately, that's what is now important. I would also say that I very prefer the age of the faceless anchors. Because we are not the news. We are just someone who is the media for you to get to the news. I would invite the experts. Let's listen to what they say about the anchors. That's not news. That's just the drama. That's a joke. People like it. We like it. We like wrestling. So this is verbal wrestling. So watch that. Don't prevent news and entertainment. So I hope you listen to the kind of news that is fascinating today. Secondly, we are the most victim of a person's house. We are the most welcoming and fatigued, which you look at in the eyes and think of the person is listening to you, is believing you, is trusting you, is putting you on in a lively and frightened space. Don't betray that trust. And also don't drag that over you. I would say that. Subjects are also one of the most off-site also. What is the subject? One, two, three, four. That's what we see today. I'm sorry, what is it that you were going to do? You were that big. You were that big. You're that big. You're that big. I'm sorry. I'll take a few more. There are three different scenes. I think the scenes that we're going to watch today are a series of different scenes and a different campaign. I think we should think So you are thinking about it. Because you are also thinking about it, which we are doing with our thoughts. And more than that, I think it is very complicated. As Bia said, you are thinking about a 30-minute show, where you have 12 people. And the actor in it, has a 5-minute long question. That 5-minute long question. She is the right thing to do. She has invited people to know about her opinion. I have invited them to do an insight into her work. These days, they are 5-6 people. I mean, they see it from the viewer. What kind of a person is she? I have invited her to do some research. I have invited her to do some facts. She is the opinion. She is also the opinion. In my work, I have to listen to both of their opinions. Where I feel that I should do a fact check, I will do a fact check. Where I feel that there is a point, that I am not doing my opinion. I have to discuss it with her. She has invited people to know about her. She has invited people to know about her. She has invited people to answer her. She has invited people to give her 5 seconds. I feel that too much energy, I feel that she is doing it professionally. She is doing it negatively. She is doing it positively. You have given us 8 out of 5. I liked it very much. I felt that we are going to do an idea. I had thought that it would be good to give you our idea in the topic of life. We have given 8 out of 5. But 8 is something that I feel that you can say in the next life that 8 is the idea in journalism. But every person doing journalism cannot become an actor. This means that there is a skill in becoming an actor. And every actor has to be an actor. So the idea is that there is a particular art. I feel that it is not that much. There is no scientific knowledge. There is no rocket science. There is no science. It is just being what you see. What you record. Be neutral. Listen to both of them. My opinion is possible. But when I sit on the chair as an actor, then my opinion will be on me. I was thinking that you have conscious of the world. How many seconds do you have? I am not sure. How do you see this? This is the big, big art science issue. What is there to tell you about that? As you said, there is no science. Somewhere, what do you think? Interesting. I first want to know what we do think about this question. This is a lot I have to say. PPM is in art, science or beauty. What do you think about this? I see the high energy levels that are there. Honestly, I want to know what makes it big. They actually rely on it. But honestly, I want to understand where does that stand on? That polarize your energy, that high core energy. Where does that stand on? Is there an act? Is there a skill that is as much needed to live your life? Just bring it up. I am running out of it. So there are two part of the question. Basically, one, what exactly is this? Is it not science or beauty? But the second part is as to why you see what you see now and how it has not been lost. That is exactly the answer. So I will answer these two questions. I was doing some homework before I came to this place. How do you find art in television? It is basically art of being the voice of the people. I mean, it is an art that you become the voice because you don't have the opportunity to be a medium from point A to point B. And you have to be the voice. TV is often called the voice of the audience, but that is the anger of the audience. People very easily relate to anchors who ask right questions. And what are the right questions? They are very simple basic questions they want to ask. So I guess art is basically it's love. You have to be voice of the people. Very nice to science. Science is the form of knowing what can sell and what can get in the PR. Wherever or wherever you are, somewhere. And when it comes to energy, then I'm sure that most of the people here would appreciate the non-bias behavior and non-bias sense of use in the world in the days of New Testament. But I'm sure they appreciate the energy which the anchors now have. Otherwise, there's a website many years ago it's shut down. It's on this analova.com and there was a robot who used to read news, right? It's no more over there. Because the moment an angel is there you want to feel that connect. You want to see that passion. Now I'll see your question. Which is why you asked all that. I guess when it comes to shouting or being the foundation of being used around us what we all need to understand is just raise your hand if I ask you one question. Do you see the crowd? Please hold your hand. Please. One more time please. Why do you become reckless? Do you see the crowd? And what? Don't you see everyone? Okay fine. But how many of you carry bad things from that fight? How many of you carry bad things from that fight? Maybe you should not fight. That's what you think, right? I'm talking about the public fight. You stop and cease, right? So what we do on television is a public fight. Isn't it or not? What we need to understand is how many of our viewers have something to understand. Higher than you think. So what we need to understand in absolute consciousness is whatever we are talking on screen how many of our viewers are carrying bad something, bad things. Now that's a big question when we when we are there at night and we need to ask. This is exactly what is happening on social media. It's like you need to understand that you want to give it back to your viewers because what the rule of an animal is is not just being an animal. God is necessary in opportunity to be a representative and you are nothing but an animal. Trust me. I mean we have a very esteemed politician sitting right in front of us and he's going to say he's going to say he's going to say he's going to say he's going to say he's a very esteemed politician sitting right in front of me and would be nothing more than that, we are just using it. That's all I've done. So, when did this anchor, who was like, I'll let you take this name, Governor Nandu, when he spoke spoke and Saptu took his time to express his views, he became the like a WQF fighter, right? When did this change begin? Was it also a reflection of what the viewer was to say, was it this huge business model that makes this, what you are saying, anchor community? When did that shift happen? If you do, that's fine. Hi, energy world, I'm just talking about coffee world. Actually, we were, everyone asked how many people stop and see a fight. We do pay the loan and see it, we may not pay anything back for it, but we do stop and see it and that's what we are paying. So, that is what was working, the fact that my energy, the fighting, the fact that it compares a verbal jousting that is not self-unfortunately, so it's not just the anchors, it's also the priorities that come with the words. But I think now, maybe I'll speak, because it was only one channel, two channel, and many more that are saying the way to express your challenge, real world. Now, what is happening is, every channel wants to give an offer of a thing and you try to create the high level jousting and have, you know, people in windows who live from verbal dioxide, people have got fed up of that, which is what I am saying more and more now. People are saying, where is the conversation? Let's bring conversation back to the table. Let's get them back on the table. So, maybe, there was a cycle, I was there, they called on that team. Now, I am hoping and I am seeing the change also, that people are coming back to their conversations of the kind of police. Well, Sushant, is there a pressure of performance on anchors a big day that we have to leave the journalist part of the site? It's a dual perspective. You are a performer and a journalist. Is that the good crash that we are in a moment of time for all the time? It's because the pressure on the channel is not on the anchors, it's because you have to keep it on both sides. But from what I am aware of, there is a graph that I have worked with Dr. Boyd. So, from there, Sushant was there, he was there, he was there, he was there, he was there, he was there. And I am telling you, many of the people in the audience were like this, but the rest of the audience were like this. But the editors forget and tell you that there was a very strange debate going on. They were like, how did it happen? It was just a joke. Now, there is no way of giving a joke. There is no way of giving a joke. We are sitting there, and the people in the audience who are in the audience and the people in the audience who are in the audience are getting connected. Sometimes the audience will think that this is the same question I want to ask. And that can be asked again, the question you are asking me, you want me to ask you the same question, how did it happen? Tell me, how did it happen? So, they have their own thoughts, and they have their own thoughts. That it was a little more fun. Now, along with our performance, we have to decide this time whether you are in the audience and say that you are going to the right place. Or you come into the audience and say that you can't do this much. You can't do this much. I want to ask you this question, I want to ask you this question. So, that is a challenge. How do you challenge your editor, how do you challenge your channel and how do you challenge your audience. So, along with the performance, this is more interesting. What are your thoughts? Do you think there is a meaning between the film and the audience? Do you think there is a meaning between the film and the audience? So what does that mean? When you see the pressure of the performance do you think there's a little bit of a hole in the head or not? If you think that there is a sense of This is a deliberate attempt, which is a sensation in my eyes and here in all of them, what you call, a journalist, you know. Is there a, without any pressure, existence of these actions? Have you, have you heard about that? I have heard about it. Now I am going to try to do it. Because every day, I think, I am going to try to do it myself. I have never seen a competition like this. My style, the style of Rishabh, is the style of Rishabh, which you have seen. I try to do it in a way that I speak to you. My real attempt is to do it myself. I do it like this. I do it like this. I think I am going to try to do it with you. I am going to do the same tactic. Today, most of the time, I see people, women, girls, boys, girls, all of them are acting. They are playing the ball, they are playing the ball, they are playing the ball, they are playing the ball, they are playing the ball, you have heard so much about it that you have worn a ring in your hand. I think there is a lot of activity in this. That is why people are not connecting with people. Second thing is to try not to make yourself more afraid of your channel. I know that when I made a report that I called you. We called you but you didn't. You called us, it was us. I didn't know whether it was in this or that. I don't know whether it's in this or that, A lady, the lady, who is wearing a ring, Life is like a career. What I try to do is to connect more with the news. What I try to do is to disconnect others from me. I don't want to be treated like that. If you are doing ground reporting, then you should be under her guidance. I am saying, if someone is doing a very good job today, then I feel that as soon as a mother becomes a very small example, then you should be somewhere, okay? You should be somewhere. And that is the only thing that matters. No one should do anything about it. If I have someone who is following me, what can I do? Today, I don't know who is doing so well. I have reached such a high level of guidance. How can I send it? Where can I send it? She is teaching me how to do it. She is teaching me how to do it. I don't know anything. That is the most difficult question I get. If I don't have a reporter, I don't have good information. I don't know what to do. But if I have done ground reporting at that time, then I have to know that the first thing that I can do from my point of view is to do your work. I can never do that. When I don't know what to do, when I don't know what to do, I can't do anything. If I am an actor, if I become an actor, if I don't have a journalist, then I will try to do that. Because the first thing that comes to mind is that if a reporter is this late, then I can control him. So, you know, you have to have that knowledge. You have to have that experience. If you have the right question, and if you have the right question, then you have to work with the right people. I don't know what to do. If I become an actor, I can read them. I don't know what to do. If you don't know, then try to have that knowledge. That's what I am trying to do. You have to have that knowledge. You have to have that knowledge. You have to have that knowledge. You have to have that knowledge. So, do people actually watch news if they can suffer? If there is more information, less performance? Do people actually watch it? Oh, we are stuck in that branch. So, I mean, I don't think we will classify the time values of a huge channel. We don't mean the ratings we are getting and what is their interest. I'm going to think the right way. I'll just come back to it myself. So, in that way, at this time, debate is important. And maybe at this time, of asking for something else for itself. And if you put, because again, it's like the ratings. So, if a news we suffer, any news, well, news is all about acting. That's what I am trying to do. This has been old school news. I don't know what to do. I don't know what to do. It's very lively about you. So, so any way you walk into any news and you walk into any conflict, you try to address it. News is full of adrenaline. It has to happen. You remember that you will go through the fish and it only talks about how you can make up what plays as a fish market. It is a very interactive, very one on one kind of thing. So it has to have energy But whether it will say or not, you might not, if you're talking about ankles, the ankles starting to move, it will start to move and it will start to move. I somehow feel, and very much so. Yes, there are points where you have to raise your voice to ask someone, which is what I'm going to examine. But I'm going to examine it for you. Tomorrow evening, I'm going to examine it for you. This is a question from Mr. Jamun. Mr. Jamun, please give me a question. This is a question from Mr. Jamun. Mr. Jamun is very keen to shout out. And he is very famous for that. So he is going to answer it tomorrow. Now, let's sit in Pakistan for a while. It's like a trap. The moment you shout, then shout back. But the moment you ask questions, you have no answer. So if you're ready to do your fights, say, for instance, you don't know what to do. You don't know what to do. And you know your fights. If you assume this as a doubt about Pakistan, then Pakistan answers all the questions. He'll run for Congress. Which actually, that guest was going to. But he is a journalist after all. He is very famous for shouting out. So he didn't know what to do. And he was very happy that Pakistan's guest was a Pakistan's reporter and very beautiful. They gave him a lot of information. About the show. I am a bit over the moon. I have never seen a person like him. And my words were directly pointing towards my own journalist, Mr. Pakistan. Because I am not allowed to use any of the witnesses I am talking to. This is what I am talking about. Maybe he didn't say anything wrong. In the end of the day, every single one of our journalists said that I am a liar. Then I said, it's enough. I said, I am not a liar. I am not a liar. So in the social media, I don't even want that. But when you look at Pakistan, they have a very good partner. They are still on the moon. And if you look at them, you start laughing at them. They are not saying anything. They are laughing at them. It's like, my journalist is right. Indian forces are so right. He is made to make what he has done, is to make a speech. I don't know what to say. I was wrong about it. I was talking to him. I don't know if it was a debate about Pakistan or something. I don't know. I don't know. I was talking to him. I didn't know. I had to tell him, I didn't want to talk to him. I said, you are talking about war, war, war, and this kind of war is the final look. And no longer we are in the conventional war type of situation with any country whatsoever, whatever part of the world. Unless it is America or somebody is like as now calling us in our country. So when it is the end of the world, then I can tell you as a son, I am just asking you a question. I am not an advocate of Pakistan, I am asking you a basic question. And we are not just talking about that. So your question can be used, it can be done, it can be not. It can be done. But, use may be passion to a certain extent. A little elaborate is a little bit. Passion is important, happiness is important. So I will, this is my, this is my final round of applause. This is my final question and I like to use it as a second round of applause. Just a second round. Do you see, when you see news anchoring going in the next few to three years, there is digital news, reading is coming back, you know, we have got a lot of saturation, same, same, you know, every news channel that a crime guy looks to the world, 20 people in the world. I mean, when you see this world in the next few, quickly, then it's as it is. I don't know where it is going in the next ten years, I don't know, I don't know whether my answer is true because it is the people who debate, or something like that. How is this going, and where it is going, I will be back when the thoughts are gone. I will be a little more subtle and I will be more gentle. Social media can impact me. Okay. So we just had one actually. But I'm hoping that it is coming back and I will say back to basics, back to the way it comes into conversation. Yes. The question of your answer is very small. You all are going to go back to the way it was in your mother's womb. The decline of brain impact. Box moves can be a very good idea. In 30 years it will be 6 or 12. In 12 years it will be very good. Exactly know what I'm talking about. Thank you. Thank you so much. I will be back in just over one more time. Thank you so much. Thank you once again. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you so much.