 Students now we are going to study the last design of concurrent approach and the sixth research design of the mixed method research methodology, which is concrete transformative design. This design is characterized by the use of a theoretical perspective reflected in the purpose or research questions of the study to guide all the methodological choices. What happens in this design is that you are taking the main guidance in this design to make your research questions and develop your hypothesis with the help of theory. That is, you design a theory-informed research. And in this, whether it is a quantitative study or a qualitative study, we idealize the questions in the context of the theory and write in the context of it. The purpose of this research is to evaluate a theoretical perspective at different levels of analysis. In this, we do a theory testing and we see what quantitative and qualitative data is saying about that theory. If I talk about the advantages of this research design, the researcher positions the study within a transformative framework and advocates your immense literary worldview. That is, you conduct this research. In this, you have a lot of action research. And the agenda of action research is that you have to advocacy on a social issue. Or you have to empower a marginalized group. You have to talk about its emancipation. So, this study is conducted only when the researcher is going with this goal that he has to talk about some change and some change. The researcher helps to empower individuals and bring about change and action. So, in this study design, when the researcher involves the participant in this research process because this is action research and nature, then they can collectively bring about change and to bring about change, they can perform some action. Participants often play an active participatory role in the research. In experimental research, the participant is passive. In survey research, the participant is passive. But in action research, the participant is active. He is playing an active role with the researcher to bring about change. The researcher is able to use a collection of methods that provides results that are both useful to community members and viewed as credible to stakeholders and policy makers. That is, he uses multiple methods. He uses advocacy campaign methods. He uses other methods to bring about change. And to bring about this change, he gives his findings to the policy makers and to the community members who are helpful to them. If I talk about the disadvantages of this research design, there is still little guidance in the literature to assist researchers with implementing mixed methods in a trans-movementive way. So you need to take help from your experience when you are conducting concurrent transformative research. There is very little knowledge available in this regard. The researcher may need to justify the use of the transformative approach. You have to justify why you are using this design because this design is only used in action-based studies. This can be done by explicitly discussing the philosophical and theoretical foundations. So you can discuss your worldview in your research project in a very detailed manner in order to justify the selection of this research approach. The researcher needs to develop trust with participant and be able to conduct the research in a culturally sensitive way. For example, in qualitative research, you need to build a rapport and develop trust. If you are going to do an action research, it is very important for you to build up a rapport and work on it. If you are not able to do this, then the study you conduct will be a big disadvantage for you. You have not properly developed trust in building a rapport. Along with this, we have studied the three concurrent approaches and the mix methodology. Now we will study the next module, the mix multi-phase design.