 Peer assessment and self-evaluation tool. To add a workshop, turn editing on. Add an activity. Workshop. Give your workshop a name. An introduction. Allow peer assessment and or self-assessment. Submission instructions. Assessment instructions. Save and display. There's essentially four phases to the workshop. Setup. Submission. Assessment. And grading evaluation. Let's edit the assessment form. We can assess against various aspects or criteria. According to corresponding scale. You can have as many or as few aspects or criteria as you like. And weight them accordingly. Relative to one another. Okay, so the setup phase is complete. We now switch to submission phase. Log out momentarily as the teacher. Now we're going to involve three students in this peer review exercise. We're now logging in as student one to submit our work. We're going to attach a file and logging in as student two and student three. Logging in again momentarily as the teacher who is managing this workshop. Let's allocate submissions. Student one. Submission. We will manually allocate student two as the reviewer. Student two. Let's add student three as the reviewer. And student three will have student one review their submission. So we can see the summary there in terms of participants and the respective reviewers. You can also randomly allocate. The submissions to the various reviewers. Let's return to the workshop. And we're going to switch to assessment phase. Now that we can see that all submissions have been received and subsequently allocated. Logging out as teacher. Log back in as the first student. And the student is going to assess student three's work. Let's presume they've opened the work. Reviewed it. And they're now going to assess based on the three aspects. Save and close. Log out as student one. Logging in as student two. Assessing student one's submission. Logging in as student three. And we will assess student two's submission. Logging back in as teacher. And now switch to the grading evaluation phase. We can compare the assessments in a fair, lax or strict manner. Naturally we've only three submissions and three reviews. The comparison and recalculation of grades won't make any difference. But we've a larger pool of submissions and reviews that function would certainly be useful. Let's now close the workshop. I'm sure the students may now review their submissions and their assessments.