 Yes, come on. Yes, sir. My question is what is the custody for the process of section 47 and 491 ASCR? See, while in the case of an application under section 488 CRPC, that section enables a person to arm himself with an anticipatory order for bail in the event of his apprehended arrest, his apprehending arrest. Therefore, he will arm himself with an order under section 488, that will be a direction to the arresting officer to grant him bail in the event of the apprehended arrest. And in the case of all other cases of offense where he is in custody, the word custody for the purpose of the bail need not necessarily be custody pursuant to an order of arrest by an authority, including the police. It is enough if such person voluntarily submits himself to the custody of the court and applies for bail. So, 437 and 439 presupposes that the person applying for bail should be in custody. That custody need not necessarily be in pursuance of an arrest. It is enough if the person who seeks custody submits, voluntarily submits himself to the custody of the court and applies for bail. This was answered by a 3 judge bench on the Supreme Court, 2 judge bench. In Niranjan Singh versus Prabhakar Rajaram Karote, 1980 Volume 2 SCC 559 corresponding to AIR 1980 Supreme Court 785. I will repeat the citation, 1980 Volume 2 SCC 559 corresponding to AIR 1980 Supreme Court 785.