 And it's really a great honor to be here. And I just do a lightening talk presentation for five minutes. So just a pure user experience from Taiwan. And I'm also a fan of liberal office, even though I'm not a technologist. My major is education and cultural study. So this topic is my research, a qualitative research conducted in 2019, and it's totally common people's usage from Taiwanese undergraduate students. So my funding would be like the Confucianism as a way of a traditional practice, hindered, somehow hindered, the Taiwanese people to understand the liberal office and to use it more. But some backgrounds keep the liberal office was popular. It was well-known in Taiwan. So the key points of my abstract is that these research was conducted in 2019 with a general course with 67 students and 38 students are willing to participate in this research. And I assigned them to have two assignments, one written with writer, the other one is written in press. And I collected their assignments and also their feedbacks about the user's experience of liberal office. And most of them are the first time to use writer or in press. And my finding is that there are two variables coming from Confucianism, influence the students to understand the liberal office more. One is free, the other one is respecting authority. Why would it be like that? I will introduce a little bit about the backgrounds. The Taiwanese government has declared open document format as an official usage in the official document format to communicate with government units from 2015. And there are two waves of promotion 2015 and 2018. So my research is on the second wave and also joined a competition with the governmental funds and got a further prize. So I got a prize and the money to travel here to show this presentation. So that's why most of the people, most of the Taiwanese people know liberal office, but they only use it to deal with the official documents. But when they want to do their personal presentation or writing, they will use the Microsoft Office mainly. And in this research, I mentioned Confucianism as a traditional force and the cultures that Taiwanese should rather than the philosophy. So I collected the data and using the theme as a categorized for their feedbacks. But I cannot show all the feedbacks. So I printed out as a handout a hard copy in the back of the conference room. So if you are interested about the whole categories, you can just take out one page. But I just highlight four points. The first one, the writer usage is similar to words. It's 29 out of 38. Free of charge is the most concerned, 30 out of 38. And about the input, most students do not understand, do not heard about or use it before 30 out of 38. And 10 out of 38 thinks that input is better than point. And my finding is that the two values, the free and also respecting authority, hinder the students to understand the liberal office more. Because they think that a free of charge one may not compete to a profit one. So that, of course, is a bias and a limitation to hinder them to understand more. And the other one is that most of people use the Microsoft Office. So they respect most people's choice. So they don't even want to pay time or attention on the alternative choice. So that, I think, is a shortcoming. Because when the time this government promote liberal office, there's a way to combine the cultures issues. But on the other hand, it hinges the real values and the real inspiration of free software movement. So that's my presentation. And if you'd like to leave some feedbacks, please just use the QR code, or you can also take the handouts I put in the back of the conference room. And also, I have an online course, my personal course, in my university. It's talking about digital divide. It's from 6.30 AM to 7 AM before our conference. So if you are interested in sharing with some ideas with the multicultural students from Ethiopia, Kenya, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Taiwan, of course. So please join my personal online course and talk with my students. And it's in the QR code feedback as well. Thank you. Of course. I didn't manage that it was a lightning talk. So by the way, there is time, so I would like to have a question for you. And yes, the question is, I read about and heard you and listened to you about this philosophy of being confirmed to all the other, the same and less. But since the government has chosen the different format, and through, we may say, somehow, the different software, which is fighting against himself, for those students, for those people, on one hand, they have the conformism to use the old software, but on the other hand, they have the government which has chosen an innovative way, an innovative route. So how do they perceive this decision from the government regard to the conformism philosophy that you have in your habit and confusion? And thank you. OK. Thanks for the question. And if I get it right, my understanding how the most common people know about how the government push using the liberal office, because a layer of promotions mainly talking about this is a free charge, and you can save money to use this. So that's why they want to try it, and since they can save money. So that's somehow a sure coming as well. Because when they understand the liberal office only just as a superficial benefits, it cannot give them the opportunity to know more about this wonderful community and also the idealism which pushes us to go further. So that's the point that I want to share. The tennis promoter, we need to focus more about the core issues, the ethos of free software movement rather than the very vivid benefits of the whole practice. Thank you. That's my understanding about this issue. We have another question. Yeah, please. I was wondering how you come to the conclusion regarding the motivations that the survey participants have. Because in other countries as well, a lot of people, if they're introduced to the liberal office, might not just rush to adopt it with other specifically the Microsoft Office, which is more familiar and more popular. So how can you tell that this is due to a specific kind of needs a cultural aspect rather than just a general magnificence of adopting a new piece of technology? Thank you. And that's the other cultural issue that I mentioned is authority respecting. Because in Taiwan, when the government say, you can try this and you need to use this in operating the governmental document. The people need to do that because that's authority says a lot. But they will respond like, oh, since you asked me to do this, I would do it to just a response. And they don't pay much attention on it. So it's not a good way to promote it from my personal understanding. And on the other hand is that when I ask the students to do this kind of research, it's because I'm a teacher. And I explain to do the assignments. So they need to do it. But when they encounter liberal, some students will feedback to me that, oh, it's wonderful. And it's very powerful, it's innovative. Very has many potentials to learn to do with it. But they don't have the chance to touch it in their young age. So that's the other thoughts that I want to do now. It's like promoting in my course and to share the idea or the experiences of this one for conference. Tomorrow morning, I will share with the whole idea just to share with my students. And some of them are Indonesian university teachers as well. So I think they will be very interested in the personal real encounters rather than the authoritative state doing this. So that's the other way I want to do on the reverse of the government authority. Thank you. OK, I think that's the question. It's under review, it's under review. So I hope it can be published, like a second review in process. So I think that's all. Thank you very much and thanks for the time.