 Our panelists today, Drs. Thomas Christensen, Victor Cha, John Park, and Seng Ho-Shin, all agreed that it is within China's strategic long-term interests to restrain North Korea and to rally with the international community to prevent future provocations, which could ultimately destabilize the region and brand China as an irresponsible member of the international community. Now to follow our highlights from today's event. The sinking of the South Korean naval vessel Chanon on March 26 was one of the most destabilizing events in Northeast Asia for decades. As the regional heavyweight, China can no longer continue its traditional approach of playing both sides of the 38th parallel. There has been a real internal debate in China on North Korea policy and it has gone public. There have been academics who are influential, who have not only said in conferences that China's policy on North Korea is problematic for China's own national security interests, they have published this. And basically in a nutshell what they're arguing is Beijing's caution and traditional conservative approach towards problems on the Korean Peninsula given North Korean behavior is allowing North Korea to drag China's name through the mud and harm China's overall diplomatic strategy. The fundamental interest, a question for China is what to do with North Korea and what is their strategic interest? And in that sense obviously they still for the China most important interest in dealing with North Korea is stability and peace in the region. I didn't hear anybody up here ruling out the potential for more North Korean provocations. This was a conventional provocation which in many ways is almost more serious in terms of escalation potential than another missile test. And nobody up here has ruled out the potential for more provocations and I wouldn't rule that out either. Which also I don't think operates to China's advantage.