 Felly, y cwmifio arwyf dechrau i'r cyfrifysgrodd gwcwmwy o gyfrifysgrodd gyda gennych i gwybodol y cyfrifysgrodd a chyfrifysgrodd gwcwmwy o ffrifysgrodd gyla, rydw i ganosand o gwerthiau ac mae ychydigwyrdoch sicrhau i ddod. Rydw i'n fyw ychydig y gŷn sydd yn ceisio яwgofwyr yn ysgolôl fwrdd cynllun cyrfrydyddol i'r ddylch causeddau byddig yn gwyllgor. Daeth y fwrdd yn credu, i'r pryddol yn freimlo'r wneud, ac i'n gyrddydd, i'n gyrddig, i'n gyrdd y blw carbion yn gyflwytaf. Gherth ysgol anfaenfaennau nifer o'r cyhoeddach oherwydd ac mae'n rhoi'r cyllid yn gan i sicrhau bod yr Oopsood yn bryd i amlwch ac oesiannolol i fod yn gyfnodol i ddod oesiodedigol a chefydigol, a oesiodedigol a cael grannu'r ddiweddarach. A oesiodedigol i gael i ni ddymniadu hwy o unigor ddelwedd ag y cyfnodol ar gyfer o'ch cyfnodol i gael i dddefnyddio'r wath i bidra i gael i ddod oesiodedigol i gael i gael i ddod oesiodedigol i ddydd yn gweithlwyno ac i ddydw i ddreiddoch chi i gael i ddiddorol ac rwy'n credu pasgwiliaeth aethol. Efallai mae'n gofynuio'n ystafellio ac yn ddwych i gynhyrch gael ac mae'n ddwych i gael o'r aethol, ac mae'n gweithio'n ddwych gael i'ch eu ddwych, ac mae'n gweithio'n gyhoedd yn gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio i'ch gael o'r cyffredinol iawn o'r sefydliad. Roda Grant. Y Comynthesis will be aware of the type of sale that is increasing—that they stop the communities in their land that are there. That also continues the concentration of land in a small number of hands. Scottish Government has delayed action on land reform for far too long and the rush to offset carbon emissions by blue terr is now happening. We need action cream to prevent it now. It is not in the public interest and it is not in the interest of now. It's not in the public interest and it's not in the interest of our planet." Will she consider ending payment of public subsidies to landowners who do not live on their land or pay their taxes in the UK? This is something that she could do now. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I thank the member for her question and recognise her ongoing and long-standing interests in this issue. I would disagree with the point that the Scottish However, the Welsh Government has failed to take action on land reform.蜂 sgwrel-force sciencegroaning on daergent—I ride length—main might ship. In our last term we worked to implement the terms of 2016 land reform act, which, among other things included, implementation of the register of controlling interest in land—really important for transparency—setting up the Scottish Land Commission and the Scottish land fund. We will now move to introduce a new land reform bill, which I mentioned in my consultation on the summer area. Rhoda Grant angen i'r prydwydig ymddangos o'r ffordd o'r oedd eistedd. Rhoda Grant angen i'r prydwydig ymddangos o'r oedd eistedd. Rhoda Grant. Mae'n fawr i ymddangos i'r cyfforddau hyn o'r rhain i'r gwagiau, credu ychydig mor fel ysgrifennid a llwyddo i'r enghreifftig 명h olyw i ddiddig o ranol yn mythol. Felly, y mae gafael i gael mwy o meddwl am y byd y mae gynhwys i ddiddig i ddiddig i gael, a fyddech chi'n gwneud yn gyflawni, mae'n gobeithio'r ddiddig i'r fra wahanol i'r dechrau ar gyferon i ddwylliant i ddwylliant i ffordd? Thank you, Presiding Officer. The question of woodland creation is one that is very important when we talk about land use and land use change in the name of mitigating climate change and ecological decline. I am very conscious of the interplay between the need to create woodlands with the need to ensure we have sustainable food production in Scotland. Of course, we want to make that balance work very well. On tangible actions, I point to the principles for responsible investment in natural capital that I mentioned in my opening answer. One of the principles therein, which states that carbon management should be integrated with delivery of wider environmental, social and economic outcomes such as biodiversity improvements, resilience to food supply and natural flood y gallu gwneud yw'r cyhoeddful yng Ngysylltu'r Fylau Gweithgawr. Daethwn o'r ystafell, mae wedi'i fawr yn ymgyrch yn dda. Rwy'n gweithio y byd wedi ddigonol Gweithgawr. Thank you, Presiding Officer. The Drive for Net-A-Zero is one of the most important political endeavors of our time but, as we know, our SNP Scottish Government is resolutely committed to land reform. Can I ask the minister to expand on how the interim principles for responsible investment in natural capital will ensure that efforts to tackle climate change will work alongside a desire to empower communities and continue reforming Scotland's relationship with the land. I thank Jenny Minto for the question because the interim principles for responsible investment in natural capital are exactly about ensuring that much needed environmental investment that we need to support our land reform objectives is responsible and that it benefits communities. The vision of our recently published national strategy for economic transformation is that by 2032 Scotland will be a wellbeing economy thriving across economic, social and environmental dimensions. The interim principles have a really important part to play as early action in that regard. I quoted one of the principles that related to food supply to grant. I draw Jenny Minto's attention to some of the others, including that investment in and use of Scotland's natural capital should create benefits that are shared between public, private and community interests, contributing to a just transition. Investors and land managers should engage with communities in decisions about land and land use, and when acquiring new land, investors should seek early engagement with relevant local communities to identify opportunities to collaborate. Investors should have full regard to Scotland's land rights and responsibility statements. We will use those principles to underpin a much wider discussion and to ensure that our policy development responds to what is a very rapidly developing market. Our approach will position Scotland as an innovator in developing a new type of high integrity values-led market that centres community interests. To ask the Scottish Government what contingency plans it has in place should train drivers reject the latest pay-offer in light of the reported hundreds of cancellations at the weekend. The temporary timetable that Scotland put in place is delivering a reliable service, moving around 90 per cent of passenger numbers prior to the current disruption. On Friday and Saturday last week, additional late evening services were added because drivers continued not to work the rest days, as is their right and their choice. Services were disrupted on Sunday. I know that that is inconvenient and frustrated many travellers. ScotRail will continue to look at what more can be done to improve weekend service availability. There are no contingency plans then. Even if ASLEF recommends members accept the offer tomorrow, it will take three weeks to ballot them, so that is nearly a month of disruption to start with. It was carnage on the railways at the weekend. On Sunday, 320 services were cancelled and there may be more this Sunday. We are in this mess because drivers do not want to work on their days off. Why should they? The RMT's Mick Hogg says that it could take five years to resolve. Is he right? We could face the same disruption next year, but the Government rejected a multi-year deal. Why do that? It is crazy. We need stability right now, not chaos, when is the Minister going to deliver it? I am not going to shy away from some of the very real challenges that passengers have faced over the past two weeks, but Mr Simpson needs to remember why that is happening. It is action short of an industrial action, but it is nonetheless true to say, as Mr Simpson has outlined, that ScotRail's train drivers have been choosing not to work on their rest days. The rail network in Scotland has been dependent on rest day working for decades. It is not a new invention that occurred on 1 April and it is not unique to Scotland. However, it is also worth pointing out that TransPenine Express is currently operating a reduced timetable, similarly at around about 70 per cent. That is as a result of rest day working being banned. The Northern train operating company, which is directly controlled by the UK Government, has also experienced similar disruption this weekend, and that is expected to continue into increase. ScotRail did make the difficult decision to implement a reduced timetable from last week. That was to allow for a greater certainty for passengers. Clearly what happened on Sunday was far from ideal, but I am told that, because ScotRail did not have enough drivers making themselves available to work on Sunday, it was very difficult to timetable on Sunday accordingly. Aslef will put the offer to their Executive Committee tomorrow. I do not necessarily accept Mr Simpson's description that that would take up to three weeks to resolve. It could be resolved tomorrow, but that is, of course, in Aslef's gift, as is the right of trade unions. I am sure that he would agree with that. Aslef is a democratic union and they will put that to their members and it will take three weeks. That is the fact of the matter. We have had drivers sitting around twiddling their thumbs, itching to get in the cabs, at the weekends even. Tomorrow, Scotland play Ukraine, the extra 11-hour services laid on are welcome, but there is no use whatsoever if you come from Dundee, Aberdeen or Perth, but there are other events coming up, which also deserve our attention. We have the Edinburgh Fringe and the 150th Open in St Andrews in July. What about all those events that are coming up at the Glasgow Hydro? In a couple of weeks' time, Billy Eilish is playing there, lots of young fans, including young women, who will be going there wanting to get home afterwards. Does the Minister not think that there is actually a basic safety issue here, particularly for young women? What will she do about it? I thank Mr Simpson for his supplementary question. We covered much of his questions last week around topical questions, nonetheless, as I outlined last week's topical questions. There has been some movement in relation to additional services. For example, we saw additional services running on Friday and Saturday. We also saw from ScotRail's announcement yesterday that there will be additional services implemented to take fans home to Edinburgh, Stirling, Ergwyr, East Kilbride and Nealstone. There was a delay in announcing those services from ScotRail. Of course, it is an operational matter for ScotRail, but that was to ensure that the timetable was robust and deliverable to give passengers reassurance and certainty of service. It is also worth saying that there has been some unclear and unhelpful commentary this week about final services for fans travelling home to some locations after the game. For example, Inverness 707 is the last ScotRail train from Glasgow to Inverness on both the full May 22 timetable and the current temporary timetable. There has been no change to travel options for fans under the temporary timetable. On the Aberdeen service, the 641 is the last ScotRail train from Glasgow to Aberdeen on the temporary timetable. 940 was the last service under the May 22 timetable. Fans would not have been able to use this service after the game. In Dumfries, the 713 is the last train on the temporary timetable. 10.13 was the final service on the full May 22 timetable. Fans staying to watch to the end of the match would not have been able to use the service under the full timetable. For fans in the north and some in the south, the temporary timetable makes little difference. Many of those fans will be travelling by private bus hire. I am sure that Mr Simpson, like me, would like to take this opportunity to wish the Scotland's men team all the best with tomorrow's match. Clearly, everybody would like to have a pay increase that matched inflation, but it is just not affordable. Will the minister encourage both Aslef and RMT members to accept the pay offer, because that will be for the good of the general public, it will help us to recover from the pandemic and it will also help us to address climate change? I would agree with the sentiment of the member's question. Of course, this is a matter for Aslef to decide upon. The important soul of Scotland's railway in terms of our recovery from the pandemic cannot be underlined enough. In relation to addressing climate change, we need to facilitate that modal shift to get folk out of their cars and back on to public transport, particularly on to rail. We know that patronage has not yet recovered from the pandemic. I think that there is more or two that can be done in relation to the cost of living crisis. Scotland has announced a number of ticket offers recently, and I am keen that that continues. However, we can do very little to take forward our vision for Scotland—of course, one that is largely shared by our trade union partners, who campaigned for public ownership with reduced timetables and fewer services. I hope that union members will consider the current offer positively, and they will see it as both fair and affordable. We can all get on and focus on working together to make public ownership of Scotland's railway a success.