 Frank, thank you for that very generous contribution. He says he's an anarchist and he's giving me money in spite of that. So thanks. All right, Jennifer. What do you think of these companies recently withdrawing brands like Anchimima and Eskimo Pi and things like that? I mean, look, brands, it's an issue of marketing and I don't think there's anything. I don't oppose that in principle. I don't get the Eskimo Pi. I mean, Eskimo is cold. I mean, there's nothing derogatory. I kind of get the Jemima reference because of the context, the historical context in which it was done. It is somewhat insulting, you know, to blacks, that image that is projected. So I get that they want, from a marketing perspective, to change the image of whatever it is that they're selling. I really have no real problem with that. I, but the Eskimo one just, I think it's ridiculous, but I mean, Eskimo is really insulted by having an ice cream named after them. I mean, that's just bizarre. But I'm sure that it goes overboard. And look, you know, what is the Cleveland Indians? I don't know if there's pressure for them to change their name because Indians, I don't know. Redskins, Washington Redskins, there's pressure on the Washington. I don't get it, you know, but I guess maybe if you're a Native American and, you know, we live in a tribal world right now. We live in a world full of tribes where people get easily insulted if they think their tribe is being insulted. So I'm not surprised and I think you'll see a lot more of it. It's just the beginning. It's the tip of the iceberg. Political correctness is on steroid and has now been mainstreamed completely. So in that sense, Black Lives Matter won. I mean, they won big time in establishing much of what they think as, I mean, they're more moderate positions. I don't think they're nutty positions are winning, but they're more moderate positions, I think are winning out, are winning out a majority of Americans. Thank you. It's just a reality. Let's see, Darius, you're muted. Muted, muted, muted. Okay. So yeah, on the topic of BLM, I think this is our first hangout since the protests began. So you've spoken critically about them in recent episodes and while I certainly agree that a lot of the protests have kind of created a toxic atmosphere where reasons given away to emotionalism and insane ideas like abolishing the police and all white people often confess their guilt. But what I wanna try to do today is play devil's advocate on the Black Lives Matter movement, particularly around the narrow issue of antisemitism, which I think you've focused on quite a bit in the past. I was researching the connection between the BLM movement and antisemitism. Is that yours, Darius? Unfortunately, it's Alfie, yes. Okay, that's fine. No, it's part of having a great watchdog. Sometimes he goes berserk at the wrong time. So on the flip side, I'm safe as heck up here. So I was researching the connection between the BLM movement and antisemitism and I found a number of articles written in 2016 that refer to what was at that time a recently written manifesto. And I haven't been able to find anything more recent than that that cites this and all the links to the actual sources to try to see what that manifesto says, those pages are all gone or they're just pages that no longer speak to that. And the talking points on the actual BLM website at this point appear to be sort of generic progressive talking points of inclusion and equality. And they appear to disassociated themselves with those trying to use their cause to promote an expanded agenda that includes antisemitism. So while they still will always be a magnet for evil intellectuals to try to tag along with them, it's not clear to me that we should throw out the baby with the bathwater. Well, this is the problem. The problem is that BLM was founded and it's found as a three women and you can find their names, I don't remember their names and you can track their record. And these three women are very influential. They speak for the group, they appear on television and you can find out what they stand for. And they stand for the nuttiest, most leftist, Marxist, socialist, anti-Israeli, I don't know if it's antisemitic, I don't think I claimed they were antisemitic, but they're anti-Israel in a disgusting way agenda. So as far as I know, BLM as an organization has never denounced these three women who were the founders and again, speak for them under the title. Now they have cleaned their website. I remember in 2015, 2016, going to the BLM website and finding anti-capitalist screeds. I remember that when they protested in Chicago from that horrible shooting of a young man by a Chicago police officer that literally shot him 16 times in the back. And I mean, he was ultimately sent to jail, the cop. I mean, it was a horrible shooting, but they didn't choose to demonstrate in front of city hall or in front of the police or anything like that. They chose a million dollar mile and were purposefully preventing people from shopping and obstructing the ability. And they will be interviewed at the time. And the anti-capitalist agenda was very, very clear and obvious. So I don't think that it's an issue of being hijacked. I just think it's an issue of, they've got a broad agenda. They realize it hurts them to put that up front. They want to gain legitimacy for this much more radical agenda through advocacy around police shootings. And, but what they sign, what they name, what the movement represents is a much bigger agenda. And I think they're trying to con us. So with, you know, say everybody's wearing a black lives matter sign and t-shirts and everything. Cause they, cause we all think that it's an hour agenda. But when you hear them talk on television, the agenda's broader and broader and broader and really crazy. I mean, it's not a left of center agenda, right? It is a nutty radical left agenda and it's very, very dangerous. And therefore I do think we should throw the bathwater out with the baby. I'm not sure there is a baby there. I think it's all dirty bathwater. There is an issue that's true. The issue of police abuse and potential racism in the police force. But that issue, we should not let a group like Black Lives Matter dominate. If that is an issue people care about, they should start an organization dedicated to that issue and not let Black Lives Matter dominate that issue. Plus, you know, if you think about when they really gain prominence, they gain prominence around the, forget his first name, something Brown, Ferguson. And Michael Brown, yeah. Michael Brown and Ferguson. But if you read the transcript of the court case against the carpet of Michael Brown case, it turns out that the police were completely justified in shooting Michael Brown. That is Michael Brown was not a case of police abuse and this is why he was let go. And all you have to do is go and read the court case which colleagues of mine have done. And it's quite clear that Michael Brown was reaching for a gun of the police and was shot in self-defense. And yet they have never said, okay, not Michael Brown, right? Or Travon Martin, which is again, he was not innocent at all. So they don't separate the cases between when it's true police abuse, like this case in Minneapolis and other cases that we've seen video of, and cases where it's not. So they just lump it all together. So you have to be careful of that if you're gonna support the better portion of the cause as well. So it's a package deal, like I mentioned about package deals with good and bad, but they have defined their package deal. And the only way to deal with a package deal like this is to trash the concept and to come up with a new one. One quick little note too, one of the founders of the BLM organization yesterday was quoted literally in video as saying we are trained Marxists. I mean, you can't get more literal than that. Yeah, yeah, I'm not surprised. I mean, when you read them and another one, I read an interview with another one who calls herself an abolitionist. Abolitionist because her goal is to abolish the police and the jail system. She wants to abolish all police and jail. These are the intellectual leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement. So you have to judge a movement by its leaders. It's hard too because you have to, in a way, you have to talk to your friends and say, man, I know what you're trying to say here by standing for them, but you're standing with the wrong people. I think that's right. Gavius, you look like you wanted to follow up. No, no, thank you. Jonathan. What we need today, what I called a new intellectual would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, whims or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist. Broads. Using the super chat. And I noticed yesterday when I appealed for support for the show, many of you step forward and actually supported the show for the first time. So I'll do it again. Maybe we'll get some more today. If you like what you're hearing, if you appreciate what I'm doing, then I appreciate your support. Those of you who don't yet support the show, please take this opportunity, go to uranbrookshow.com slash support or go to subscribe, star.com uranbrookshow and make a kind of a monthly contribution to keep this going. I'm not sure when the next...