 What's going on everyone? JJ Zachary is in here. I am the editor in chief over at Fandal and at numberfire.com. I like to analyze fantasy football. I've got a podcast, a late round podcast, which you guys should subscribe to. I'm on Twitter at late round QB. How's it going, everyone? Let's talk some fantasy football today. I'm here to answer any and all fantasy football questions. Hopefully we get some some trickling in. I feel like this week I've been so focused on this ambiguous RB one theory that I that I wrote about and that I talked about on my podcast on Monday, essentially looking at running backs in the middle rounds and trying to find ways to increase our probability of hitting on those running backs. And, you know, what I found was that mid range RB ones mid range running backs were the RB ones on their own team who also have a teammate drafted after them or soon after them, I should say. They hit at a higher rate than RB ones that have teammates drafted way, way after them. It was kind of interesting. So if you're, you know, taking that and looking at this 2021 season, guys that I'm just generally a little bit higher on as a result of that chase Edmonds, you know, you have Edmonds being drafted, usually like round seven, let's say, and then James Conner like round nine. You know, you can go go after Edmonds in that scenario because he's the higher running back in terms of ADP. You know, you could look over at the Denver situation. It's a little bit more fringe, but, you know, Givante Williams being the RB one there. I prefer Givante Williams over Melvin Gordon. Of course, everyone does. But Givante Williams fits the mold a lot more to be a breakout than to exceed expectation versus a lot of other players around there. So it's just a there's also Trey Sermon with San Francisco. And then who's the last one? Travis Etienne for Jacksonville. I got a question. We got some questions trickling in now. This is from ZZ God speed. Hey, JJ, I'm in a super flex league. Should I take CMC or a quarterback at one on one? You know, I'm in an invitational league with a bunch of analysts and some some pros, some fantasy pros. And I actually drew the one on one. I was randomized today. The order was we're not drafting until August 5th, but I'm going with CMC in that one on one spot. Hopefully I can get a quarterback, you know, decent stable of quarterbacks, if you will. But the competitive edge and the edge that you'll get if CMC does what we think you will do, is more significant, I think, than what you'll get out of Patrick Mahomes, who, you know, yeah, I mean, I think that Patrick Mahomes is the most likely to be the QB one this season, which is why he's ranked as the QB one. But there are a lot of other options. A quarterback who could realistically get to that point, reach that point, whereas at the running back position, you know, it just it just drops off. You know, I think that there's six reasonable players, six or seven reasonable players who could be that, whereas it might be a little bit more at the quarterback position. And then running back just matters a little bit more inherently. Let's go to Joel. Any league-wide trends we should look for this season with the extra game, running back by committee, et cetera. Yeah, I mean, we don't really know, right? I build projections and this season, you know, I was a little bit more conservative with how aggressive I was getting with the running back rush share numbers and the rush share numbers for running backs, because I do think that we're going to see running backs maybe not carry as big of a workload. Now, across the season with an extra game, their overall rushing volume numbers might look a little bit better than what we've seen in the 16 game season, but their overall rushing share might not look as good. The problem is we don't have enough of a sample to really base this off of. It's all speculation. It's all based on what, you know, what we just generally think might happen. And so I wouldn't really overstate that then because that can get you into trouble. You know, anytime that we take some sort of idea or notion that's not backed by real logic and real substance and we implement it into our process, it's very easy for that to be sort of over influenced within our process. And then all of a sudden we're saying, no, I'm fading Derek Henry this year for sure because there's one extra game that Derek Henry would be playing. So, you know, I think it might be a thing. Sure. Once the season's over, we might look back and say, oh, well, you know, rush shares were a little bit lower among elite running backs. Is it going to really change fantasy football? I would say probably not. Let's see. This is from Francis. Sorry if repost app closed. Dynasty, Superflex, Dalvin, Carr and Galladay or Etn, Tua and Visca. Man, that's a really tough one. I'm not very I mean, I would take Tua over Carr. I, you know, I would take Dalvin over Etn and then I'd probably lean Galladay over Visca. I'm probably going to take the former there, but it's pretty close. If I'm in a situation where I'm rebuilding, I would probably be fine with taking the latter because there's a lot more upside there and they're younger. But that's a pretty close one. You know, Dalvin being the differentiator, just because he could have that league winning potential, you know, this year and next year. Let's go to Michael Bauer. He says, listen to that podcast, great, great work as always. How does that theory work if, say, Connors ADP rises above Edmunds? Yeah, I mean, so this is obviously a hypothetical that I don't think is going to happen. But the ADP that I use and source from is from August drafts. So, you know, anything can happen between now and August, which is why I'm not really planning my flag on a running back in the Tampa Bay backfield because the ADP with Ronald Jones and Leonard Fornette is fairly close right now. You could even make the argument to a degree about San Francisco, but we're seeing that widen a little bit more. Whereas Arizona, I mean, there's such a pretty decent gap between Chase Edmunds and James Conner, you know, with the restrictions in place between round six and nine. There's still a significant gap between those two guys that would be kind of shocking if we see their ADPs flip. But yeah, I mean, based on the study, if they did flip, then all of a sudden you would favor James Conner because what that's telling you is that the market is adjusting and the market is saying, no, James Conner is the RB one. And while we're sitting here and saying that's an overreaction or that's this or that's that, I mean, historically, what we found is that the market has been right on who the team RB ones are in those middle rounds. So you would have to adjust with what the market is saying. Let's go to Joel Young. Best hold off and wait on quarterback and redraft. I think that you either go middle round quarterback and get one of those elite rushers like a Dak Prescott, Russell Wilson, Kyler Murray, whenever he's there. Lamar Jackson, if he drops, you know, I'm not really going after Patrick Mahomes per se or Josh Allen as much. I think the next tier, if you will, I mean, I would consider them even the same tier. I'm more aggressive with that tier. But I will say, you know, I wrote an article all about this. I don't want to reiterate the entire article because there's a lot of data involved with it. I don't think the the late round quarterback strategy is completely dead. You guys can can look up that that article over on Number Fire. It's just is the late round quarterback strategy dead or approach or something. I can't remember what I titled it. But because I do think that there are some rushing quarterbacks or have the quarterbacks have that upside, you can get late this year. Mostly I think this could be the year of the rookie quarterback. If we get Justin Fields and Trey Lance on the field, I expect them to put up QB one number similar to what we saw Jalen Hurts last year, but with more passing upside than what Jalen Hurts had. So, you know, if I'm not getting those players, I'm going to the next tier. Jalen Hurts is a guy that I think you can target. Ryan Tannehill, a guy that you can target then after that, and then after that, if you really missed out on all three of those tiers, you can go after some of those rookies, whether it's Trey Lance or Justin Fields. Let's go to Matt Egan. How can we best apply finding breakout running Max to a dynasty league? I haven't studied it, honestly. I mean, I think that that you can understand what's going to happen in a particular year that's upcoming like with Chase Edmonds. And if you're in a win now season and your team is in win now mode, you could go and try to trade for Edmonds or a player like that. I'm not saying that it's a lock that Chase Edmonds is going to work out. But you could trade for a player like that, knowing that, you know, he's probably going to have a decent enough season. But you know, even still in dynasty, I still think Chase Edmonds, even though I like him in redraft, I think that Edmonds is kind of a sell from a dynasty standpoint, because it's very easy to see a scenario where they go out and get a running back over the over the next off season. So I haven't studied this. I don't know the answer to this, but you know, you can take in one of your increments and sort of, you know, use it to your advantage as much as possible. Let's see. The sex was from Srikanth. It says, can you name a few deep, wide receiver sleepers for redrafts? Brian Edwards is a pretty deep sleeper. You know, I think that he has, he was a really good prospect, a young prospect coming out. He had really good production. He had a good production profile, like I said, fairly athletic. He just didn't have a good year one, which is not a good sign for what's to come. Usually, you know, good wide receivers, good running backs are good during their rookie seasons. But, you know, he was banged up and we do see guys pan out even though they didn't do much their rookie season. And it's not like you're paying a lot to get them. So Brian Edwards, who should be on the field, you know, for the Raiders in their base package on offense, I think is a decent dart throw. And I don't mind Michael Pittman as much. I'm kind of kind of getting warmer and warmer with him. You know, he's an alpha. Another guy who had a pretty good production profile, but he's built like an alpha, like I said. And I don't think that there's that much competition in terms of talent on that team that we should be worried about. So I think Michael Pittman is kind of intriguing as well. Let's go to Brian. Brian says thoughts on Echler and Michael Thomas and PPR this year. Yeah, I like them both a lot. Echler, someone who I hadn't really bought into in the past that much. You know, last year, I think he was fortunate that Justin Herbert ended up hitting. But this year, you know, the big question mark with Echler is obviously not his past catching ability. It's what's going to happen at the goal line because he's not seen a lot of goal line rushes over his career and over in recent memory. But the thing is that we know that, you know, he has a low end RB one time or he should get low end RB one type production in PPR. Even if he's not seeing that goal line work and then what if he does see that goal line work? It's sort of like Chase Edmonds, right? Chase Edmonds, as long as he were to be guaranteed, you know, that Austin Echler type role, which we think he will. You know, the downside with Edmonds is he's only seen two goal line rushes his entire career. We don't know if they're going to utilize him by the goal line and that's big from a ceiling perspective, right? So, you know, I think Echler is in that tier with Cam Makers and Joe Mixon. He's a lot safer of an option than those two guys. So I can understand if you want to go him over those players. Michael Thomas, I really, really like, you know, a lot of people will look at last season, didn't perform very well, didn't find the end zone at all last season, actually. And, you know, the positives here are that when Michael Thomas was active last year, he was still seeing like a 30 percent target share in that Saints offense per game. And so, you know, I understand Drew Brees isn't there anymore. He's going to he's not going to put up a season like he did in 2019, where he had like the 35 percent target share and he was catching everything. But I think Michael Thomas, regardless of who the quarterback is, should be fine. And I think he's a top 10 wide receiver this year, actually. I'm very, very high on Michael Thomas. I think he's a great value. And yeah, so I would be attacking both of these guys. I think they're both good, good players. Let's go to Francis says, which late round tight ends are you betting on for breakouts slash far exceeding ADP? I'll do an episode. So I'm doing a wide receiver episode on Tuesday. Let's say it'll come out. It might be out of Monday. It depends on how much I can get done. And then the week after that, I will do the tight end episode. Three tight ends jump to mind when I'm thinking late round tight ends this year, who could far exceed ADP. One of them is Blake Jarwin, who, yes, he's like the fourth or the fifth option in that Dallas offense, but the Dallas offense should have a lot of passing. And he's a decent. He's a decently athletic tight end who could who could do some work in that offense. I don't like him as much as I like Adam Troutman, who could be the de facto number two option outside. Well, number three, if you count Camara in that Saints offense, really productive tight end in college, decent enough athleticism, measurables. And I care about athleticism at tight end far more than I do wide receiver running back because a lot more correlation between that athleticism to being successful at the NFL level than there is at the running back and wide receiver position. So Troutman, someone I'm definitely interested in. And then Gerald Everett. I feel like I'm into Gerald Everett all the time, but now you have him on a team where he could be the third option in that's Seattle offense. He's he's with an offensive coordinator, Shane Waldron, who was his coach in LA. And then they went out and got him. I think that they they like Gerald Everett and they should. He's athletic, he's very versatile. And again, there's not a lot of options outside those two wide receivers in that offense. And who knows, maybe it's a more pass heavy offense than we expected what we're projecting. I think it will be. And so I'm I'm fairly bullish on the Seattle passing attack. And Gerald Everett is definitely part of that. Let's go to Danny Frey. Who's the top fantasy player for 2021 in your opinion? It depends on how you're defining top fantasy player. I mean, if you're looking at at it from the perspective of who scores the most points at the skill positions, I'm going to say Christian McCaffrey. If you're looking at who's going to be the best value, it's hard to be a great, great value in the early rounds, just inherently. And so I'm going to go and just pinpoint and go back to the study that I did on Monday on the late round podcast. You guys should listen to that because it gives a lot of detail as to why I feel this way. But I think that that Javante Williams is someone who I just continue to be gravitating towards, you know, that offense, you know, the quarterback is a question mark for sure. Offensive line should be fine. Defense is really, really strong. We could see some some positive game scripts for them. But then also, you know, you don't trade up generally, you know, with a day to pick and take a running back and not utilize them. We do see a little bit of of substance there in terms of those backs seeing a little bit more work in year one. And Javante Williams is just a really good running back. So I'm kind of intrigued by him. That's just a random player who popped into my head as a value right now because of what I've been talking about this week. But sure, we'll go with that right now. Let's go to David Carlson, who says, what do we think or what do we do with the Tampa Bay backfield? Is is Rojo? Is it Rojo? I'm assuming you mean. Yeah, so so it's difficult. I'll go back to that running back study that I keep referencing where if there are two middle round running backs, like we're seeing in Tampa Bay, generally speaking, the RB one, so the one that's being drafted first is the one that you want to target. There's a much more significantly higher hit rate for that player. Typically, we want to see a little bit bigger of a gap between those two players because it depends on ADP source, really. You know, like some ADP sources are going to say the Leonard Fournets, the RB one, some will say that it's Rojo. I lean Leonard Fournets a little bit more than Rojo right now just because the pass catching is there, more so. And that's something that generally happens with late round running or sorry, breakout running backs is that, you know, when you're getting them in the middle and late rounds, the guys who break out or ones who are catching passes and Rojo has not been that guy throughout his career. Leonard Fournets has at times. I mean, I don't think that he's a spectacular pass catcher, but I do think he's a better pass catcher than Ronald Jones is. So I'm leaning I'm leaning Leonard Fournets. We also, you know, from a recency bias standpoint, you know, we saw Leonard Fournets carry the load down the stretch last year during the Super Bowl run. So, you know, there's a little bit more, I think, to his potential than we're seeing with Ronald Jones. I don't think we have any more questions waiting. So if you guys have any more, definitely, definitely hit me up. There might be one that I skipped. Let's see. I'll go back. Um, let's go to Strykant, the thing I skipped this one. Eighth pick in a 12 team Superflex, who would you who would you take an elite quarterback like Kyler or Lamar and elite running back like Camara, Saquon or Zeke? So if it's a redraft league, I'm cool with going with one of the running backs only because you could usually swing around and still get someone in that quarterback tier, whereas the running back tier would dry up. Right. So if you can get I'm really high on Zeke this year. So if you get Zeke there, I'm cool with getting Zeke there and then hoping that like a Russell Wilson is there in the second round and still getting someone who I think has just as high of upside as like Kyler Murray does, you know, in round two and still in that tier or DAC or something like that in round two. And then that way you're sort of having the best of both worlds because you're able to get one of the elite running backs and then you're able to still get one of those quarterbacks who has a ton of upside. Let's go over to Danny. He says, will Joe Burrow be a top five fantasy quarterback with the adding of Jamar Chase? It's tough to see top five in his range of outcomes coming off that injury. You know, he does have some sneaky rushing ability. You know, there's some athleticism there. So I do think that he should get some sort of a floor slash ceiling from his legs. You know, we've seen in the past from like Andrew Luck or what we're probably going to see from Trevor Lawrence. I don't think he has that much rushing upside is like Trevor Lawrence. But I think it's there to some degree. So usually with like more pocket passers, they need to have some sort of outlier season in terms of touchdown rate to really be in the top five, especially in today's NFL, where there are so many rushing quarterbacks. So will Joe Burrow be a top five fantasy quarterback? I'm going to say no. Can he be a top 10? Yes, absolutely. So I'm much more bullish on him exceeding exceeding ADP, but not far exceeding ADP. I think he's a very safe pick this year. I think he's a good pick for a two quarterback league. You know, injury aside. Let's go to Brian. He says, can you see a scenario where Edmunds outscores Jacobs this year thinking about moving Jacobs for Edmunds? Plus, yeah, absolutely, especially in a PPR format. You know, Josh Jacobs, someone who profiles to be an early downback, especially with Kenyon Drake there. But, you know, over the last over the two years he's been in the NFL, he hasn't been someone who's got a lot of love through the air to begin with. So with Kenyon Drake there, that's just reemphasized. I am not very high on Josh Jacobs in an offense that probably going to be pretty mediocre, whereas Chase Edmunds is in an offense that has a lot of firepower, could march down the field every drive. And really, you know, I mentioned this earlier, what we need from Chase Edmunds is for him to be the goal line guy. You know, Kenyon Drake saw a ton of goal line work last year. If that if that even gets split in half and half that goes to Chase Edmunds, half that goes to James Conner, then Chase Edmunds is in really good shape because he's going to see a double digit percentage target share he did last year. He's going to see that again this year, especially because there's, you know, Kenyon Drake is not or Kenyon Drake is a better running back just generally than James Conner is, in my opinion. So yeah, I would I would do that if you can move Chase Edmunds and get or if you can move Josh Jacobs and get Chase Edmunds plus from a redraft standpoint, this is or you know, this is sort of what you're asking because it's this year, even though this might be a dynasty question. But yes, from this year's standpoint, yeah, I could see a scenario where Edmunds outscores Jacobs. Let's go to Patrick. What will be the best quarterback wide receiver connection this season? Mahomes Hill, Rogers Adams, Herbert Allen. I'm not that high on Justin Herbert this year. You know, down the stretch, he wasn't that great of a fantasy asset. And again, I'm looking for guys who, you know, aren't necessarily just pocket passers. I think I mean, I think I think Herbert. I think Justin Herbert has the ability to escape the pocket like a Josh Allen, but he just didn't last year. And I don't think we can just bank on that. I think the upside might be there, but I don't think we can bank on it. Mahomes and Hill is the go to. I mean, they're both they're actually my QB one of my wide receiver one. So I'm going to go with Mahomes and Hill here. We don't know if Aaron Rogers is even going to play for Green Bay. And Aaron Rogers has a lot of touchdown regression coming his way. He had the second highest touchdown rate in NFL history last year. That's a number that regresses. You had a very, very high pass rate at the goal line last season. A lot of short touchdowns. That's something that doesn't doesn't correlate strongly year over year. So I'm not very high on Aaron Rogers, regardless. I mean, I should say, I think he's still like a QB one. I just don't think he's a high end QB one. Let's see, let's go to Francis. Who will it be when Moster gets hurt? Sermon, Gaulman, Mitchell or Wilson, one and if he returns. Let's just say that Trey Sermon could just be it to begin with. Is that is that helpful? I Trey Sermon is the guy that I'm targeting in this backfield most. No pun intended. But Moster is is not. I mean, Moster is fine. You know, obviously he's a guy who can take it to the house on any play. A lot of speed there. But I am much higher on Trey Sermon as a player and his fit just generally speaking to be a true workhorse back in that offense. Let's go to Michael Bauer. Any player right now that you have no shares of based on ADP? I'd say it's very rare for me to have zero shares of a player. But yeah, I mean, let's look at it. Let's look at it from a me projecting in August when I'm drafting the majority of my managed season long leagues. Patrick Mahomes probably won't have much Patrick Mahomes because I'm not going that early with a quarterback pick. Josh Allen probably won't have much Josh Allen. I will have some of those guys in that next year of quarterbacks. But but if you're looking at it from that perspective, it's it's just I'm just being realistic. You know, I don't want to spend a third round pick in what will probably be what you'll need to spend in a managed league to get Patrick Mahomes. So he's one I think that's really like the one that stands out the most to me. Josh Jacobs, I'm not very high on right now. And then there's a lot of the the RB twos that I've been talking about on my podcast with this study. I know you guys are sick of me talking about this study because I've brought it up for about half of this show. But a lot of the RB twos on those teams like James Robinson, James Connor, basically, if a running back is named James, I'm not drafting them this year. But that's not as fun of an answer because they're not being drafted early. But I'm sure I have some sort of answer. I just can't think of it right now. Let's see. This is from Jose. How do you feel about the Titans offensive players this year? You got to be pretty high on them. The one thing that I feel like people aren't talking enough about with this tennis offense is that they could be more past heavy, right? We've seen them be a very run heavy team under my my variable. But you have no Arthur Smith now. The defense is suspect or has holes. They go out and they get Julio Jones. So I mean, I don't think it's that crazy to think that they're a little bit more past heavy this season than they've been. And that will definitely benefit a guy like AJ Brown, benefit Julio Jones, and most importantly, benefit someone like Ryan Tannehill, who I think is one of the better values of quarterback this year. This next one is from Joseph. Thoughts on Miles Gaskin. He's being drafted in the dead in the dead zone range. Miami signed Malcolm Brown and still have Savon Ahmed. But his expected fantasy points last year was elite. Yeah. So the thing with Gaskin is why not just get Chase Edmonds? Why not get Chase Edmonds a round or two later than Gaskin when they do the same thing? They're both past catching backs on their team. Yes, Gaskin was seeing more red zone work and goal line work, but Arizona is a better offense naturally in general. So I don't think there's that big of a difference between Gaskin and Edmonds. So I'm going to play the arbitrage there and just go with Edmonds. And historically, you know, this is just based on ADP trends, but historically guys like Miles Gaskin have been bus. And so I'm not super, super high on him. And to that question earlier of who I'm avoiding, here's a name, Mike Davis. I look, I understand his situation is perfect. I understand it is great. There's no one behind him on that depth chart that we should be worried about. You know, Atlanta is not a bad offense, not a bad situation. It's just very, very hard for me to in the in those early to mid rounds pick a 28 year old journeyman running back who has one season under his belt of being a workhorse. And it wasn't even a full season. I know that we don't know who that running back would be who steps in and takes over that backfield. But look at what happened last year. You know, it was Todd Gurley for a lot of the year. He was very touched on dependent. He was fine enough, but he definitely wasn't winning you leagues. And then what happened on the stretch is they just had a committee. They had a bunch of Jags back there who I shouldn't. I mean, I'm not saying anything bad about these guys. They're way better at football than I am. But the replacement level running backs that stepped in there like an Edo Smith, they step in and and, you know, they get production from the running back position, but there are no fantasy relevant assets in that backfield. I just can't get behind Mike Davis this year. Let's go to Joseph again. Will you be drafting much of Deandre Swift this year, given where his ADP is right now, bad offense in Jamal Williams there with rumblings of Gurley coming. I still think Deandre Swift is a good pick. Great pick. No, good pick. Yeah, he's fine. I have met RB 14, I think, in full PPR. The one thing I will say is, yeah, we want running backs in good situations, but if they're in a bad situation, it's good that they went when they are pass catchers. That's usually where they can still thrive. Deandre Swift could see a really high target share in the offense and catch a lot of passes. I'm not overly concerned with Swift this season. I'm more concerned, sure, about his ceiling. So if you're getting him as your RB two, you might want a little bit more of a ceiling there than what Deandre Swift will offer. But he's fine. I mean, guys in that round all have question marks in one way or another. So they're in that area of the draft. So, yeah, I'm fine with Swift. I think that he's a decent enough pick. Next one's Danny. Do you think Najee Harris would be a first round pick in the first round for a wait, do you think Najee Harris would be a first round pick in the first round for a running back one? I don't know what that means. I'm assuming you're saying, do you think Najee Harris will be a first rounder? I don't know. I'm going to skip this one because I don't really understand what you're saying. Let's go back to Shriekant. Who scares you the most from Henry, Zeke, Saquon, or Camara to your this season? It's a good question. I would say of those guys, the two that scare me the most are Saquon and Camara. Saquon scares me from an injury perspective and then he might not be ready to start the year or as healthy as we want him to be. Camara scares me from the perspective that his target share did dip with Taysom Hill last year, with Algerubri's in that lineup and how would that carry over into the season? And look, Alvin Camara has crazy touchdown regression that's going to hit. He still comes out looking pretty good in my projections. I still have him as a top five, six running back but I might lean Camara with this answer just because there's so much ambiguity with how that offense is going to look and who's going to be under center for them. Saquon, though, has that injury concern. I'm not concerned about Zeke at all. Everyone loves Tony Pollard and I like Tony Pollard as a player coming out. I like all Memphis running backs basically over the last few years who have come out but Tony Pollard's numbers have not been very good. This idea that Tony Pollard is a better running back than Ezekiel Elliott, just get out of here with that. It's there's nothing that really backs that up. I mean, Zeke, we can talk about his inefficiency especially last year but there's still something to be said with a running back who can carry a full workload the way that Zeke can carry it. And we saw when Dak Prescott was healthy last year Zeke was a very, very good fantasy running back and I think that's going to continue here in 2021. Let's go to Michael Gorman as the last question this week or this week today. He says, Jonathan Taylor chances of being a top five running back. I think that he has a better probability than most running backs but his ADP is reflected there. The issue I have with Jonathan Taylor is the issue that everyone has with Jonathan Taylor. Definitely not the talent. I love Jonathan Taylor as a prospect, loved him. And so I have no issues with him as a player. My issue is more so, is he going to see enough volume through the air in that offense with Naheem Hines there? You know, if I were running the Colts I would not take Jonathan Taylor off the field. He was a great pass catcher last year too. So I'm not saying that he can't catch passes. I'm not saying that he's not capable of doing that. I'm more so saying that from a target share projection standpoint, you know, we don't have Phillip Rivers there who tends to dump off the ball more than other quarterbacks. Now we have Carson Wentz. What's that going to look like? But then on top of that, he's not the primary pass catching back on that team right now. And what's that going to look like from a season long perspective in terms of ceiling? I don't know. I mean, I think that it's there. I think if Jonathan Taylor starts to see that crazy high target share, if he takes on more of that Naheem Hines role, yeah, his ceiling is insane. And that's the reason why you would be drafting him in the first round. I just don't know if that's going to hit this year, which is why I'm a little bit nervous about Taylor as around one pick. But that's going to do it for me today, everyone. I really appreciate you stopping by and asking some questions. I'm just pumped that fantasy football season is here and we're about to be drafting some teams in our managed leagues. You can follow me on Twitter at late round QB. All my work is over on numberfire.com. And then also search for my podcast, the late round podcast. Anywhere podcast can be found. Hopefully I get to do this again soon. I'll talk to you guys then.