 So let's say Ellsbury, I think he's owed $47 million, but just for math sake, we'll say he's owed $50 million. So he has a no-trade clause, so does Cano, but they probably agree because that's close to where Ellsbury lives. Cano loves New York. So $50, subtracted from $120, is $70. So then you've got $70 million divided by $5, which is $14 million a year. I still think that's too much for a guy coming off a PD. Yeah, that's the way he can miss an entire year. If I'm the New York Yankees, if I really am exploring Cano hit $309 last year, here's what I do. You're going to have to make it $40 million. You're going to have to add another. You're going to have to bring our costs down to $8 million a year. Then we'll take them. Now, will that be worth it to the Mariners to do, where they're only saving the $40 million out of the 120 they owe them? And they're getting a player back in Ellsbury, and it's anybody's guess if he has anything left. But if I'm the Yankees, I still believe they're truly in on Machado. And this is probably just due diligence by Cashman and Company. But if I'm the Yankees and I can get Robinson Cano, who can still hit at $8 million a year, I'm doing it. I will do it, because even if he's shot the last two years when he's 41-42, he's just releasing. Even knowing that the next time he gets caught, it's a full year. Right. He won't get caught again. When you say that, he doesn't do it. You can never say never. You can't tell me that it's not possible that it could happen. No, look at Mahia. He took it only half a year and not be eligible for the playoffs. With the Mariners, let's face it, if he didn't get suspended, they could have possibly made the playoffs. They finished above $500. They played well at the beginning without him. It's just very intriguing, but it is a warning to everybody. Harper and Machado are different cases. Because if you look at A-Rod's first contract, that was a great contract. You got great performance out of him because he signed it when he was 26. That's exactly what Harper and Machado would do. The bad contract was giving A-Rod after seven years a 10-year deal when he was 32. The last three, four years would sunk costs. Baseball, I think they've learned from their mistakes, but I think that both Harper and Machado will get 10-year deals because of their age. Because they're young. I get it. It's intriguing because it's Cano. Would you do it if you could get the cost down to $8 million a year? Listen, if you really look at it, Robinson Cano is definitely worth more than $8 million a year. So you're kind of getting a bargain. I'd be scared off a little bit by the fact that the next suspension is a full year. When I'm a win-now team, do I want to invest in this guy? It sounds silly that he would do it, but it happened to him. He had to happen with Cano. He knew he was going to miss half a season and he still did it. This is the guy. They traded Melchie Cabrera away because they knew there was something going on there. So you know something's going on. I still think deep down in my mind that they knew something was up with Cano too. They still made him an offer, but they knew the offer was going to be refused. It's got to be on their mind. I'd probably do it. I'd love the Mets to get involved, but I don't even know if they would go as far as that. For 8 million a year they would. You're getting a guy who, before he got suspended, was a Hall of Fame track player. Hall of Famer. His numbers have been pretty good the last couple of years. That's 300. He's a good player and he's a good defender. But is he going to be a good player in five years? That's why if you're the Yankee sending Jacoby Ellsbury there, it's not enough because 70 million over five years is too much for me to pay for a guy who you would assume is off of PEDs and you wonder how much of a player he's going to be.