 H39 coming in at 2 o'clock. So let's just take 10 minutes to talk about S40. And I would just like to go around the room and just hear, individually, from people what you're looking for. Why don't I start with you? I just feel that if this mandate should not be put on anyone except for, it should go to the general fund. One on each side. Risking of Edo. Risking of Edo. OK. I'm kind of on that same pony right there, but I don't want to put it into a fund that you can just raise proper tax to cover whatever they do in that case that's needed. Currently, this is all in the general fund. Right. Yeah. So I wouldn't want to do that. But you'd like to see 100% out of the general fund. I guess. OK. Rita. Yeah. I've just heard, like, in the last, this weekend, from two superintendents that I have tremendous amount of respect for saying, please fund this 100%. And these, I think these districts have money. These are just the county districts, so they have money. I can't even imagine what districts in the rural area, what kind of burden this could, what could fall on them. So I want 100%. OK. Yeah. I mean, if I could get exactly what I want, I would rewrite this bill to put testing on the schools because that is the fixed cost. And I think they can pay for it. And I would put all remediation in a grant program with these same numbers. And I think that we could put a lot more money into that grant program if we basically had a mandate to the state, to the local district. Given that that's not going to happen and that a get-the-let-out focus is not going to become what this bill is, I could agree to this bill if it funded at 100%, or if it capped the state's amount at 30%, and it's currently written, I don't support it. You would just say cap the locals amount of cash. Thank you for that clarification. I appreciate that. Dylan. I want to advance the bill that gets the let-out. I have to agree with Dylan, whatever is going to get it out of this community so we can get started. We're not going to know how much we need until we figure out what's the matter. I like the idea of 100% because it falls back on what the schools have to come up with and how would that affect our property taxes. I am on the 100% train, but I'm also sensitive to the urgency of our response to this problem. So I'll board whatever train will leave the station. Kathleen? I feel pretty strongly about 100%, but I'm not going to stop this bill. Whatever train is going to get the whatever we want to say? Whatever train will be we are going to board the train and get it out of the station. The fastest train out of here. I think that I go back to what Dylan said on Friday, about sort of the reality of things. Also sensitive to the fact that a year is going to go by. It's not going to be a complete project. And if there are financial realities to be faced then, they can be faced then. Yeah, I'm not married to 100%. I think it would be a good thing. But I'd like to see the bill advance. Trying to see if I can find a way to move it. But I don't think that we can do this forever. I think the longer that we're taking to get this bill out of here, you know, I just thought this was a Senate bill with them finding money. Did I say that? And the record was in the room? Take it back. I actually truly don't mean that. That's what he's thinking. So would vote against, OK, we've put it into words for me. All right, so it sounds like we're looking along. OK, first of all, I just walked in 20 minutes ago. Thank you, Seth. So we have our bill, and the question is moving it out of committee favorably or unfavorably. And the question will be, do we move it out of committee at 70-30 or do we move it out at 100? Who would like it to be 100? Like. Like, yeah, that would be our wish. That would be our wish. What's the chances of a veto? There was discussion this morning with the chair and myself and some of the people from the governor's office. I think the chances are slim, but available. And a little conversation at lunchtime with someone in the governor's office was, you know, really whatever way it goes, I don't think that the governor's going to veto. To me, I can't see that. He's right. Put the money in. The issue is what happens next year, the year after the year after the year after the year after the year after the year. So believe it that. We're putting pressure on the 2021 budget, not on the 2020 budget versus pressure on the 2021. The two positions, there's already 250 that we're hoping is going to be appearing in the 2021 budget. I am looking to see if I can get it to 100. I would like to get that sorted out today. And if I'm not, I'm going to bring the bill back to you at 7030 to vote on tomorrow morning, unless there's time this afternoon, but I don't think there is unless we want to come back at 6. Who would like, let me put it this way, who wants to vote the bill out right now at 7030? And who wants to wait until I'm able to see if I can find a pathway for the 100? Wait. OK, I was just going to say, I'm sorry. I can wait to see what you can find out. Who wants to wait to see what I can find out? OK. I'll see what I can do. I know we've worked really hard on this bill. And whatever I can get tomorrow, it's going to be the vote. It's going to be it. Because now we're holding it up. And the bill has two more stops to make just in the house. I just want to say, Kate, I really appreciate you trying. Thank you. Me too. Me too. Yeah. There's a point of fact that it should have been. Yeah, it should have been. Looking for the fast train, that train left quite some time to go. Why don't we take 10 minutes, and we'll go back to another easy topic. At 46. Yes, sir. It's already 9 AM. We are voting the bill. We're voting a bill out. I will let you know if I've got a pathway. Then the vote will be, do we go with the one in front of us? Or do we go with 100%? OK. And we will look at that. So 100 or it'll be 70. We do not have an appetite for anything else. Correct? Correct. Correct. OK. So my request is no surprises over the week, over the evening. That would go through your mind. That's our choice. 70, or 100, and it's out of here. Whatever it is, it gives me a pass and a vote. Yes. So now we have another vote. What's that? Oh, this problem. All right. So now we go on to something easy. Yes. H39. And is that from the Senate? It was already calendar today. I postponed action so we could speak today. Today we are going to hear from Nicole. We hear from the School Board Association, the Superintendents. We're going to hear from the Agency of Education. The question will be, do we concur? Do we concur with further proposal of amendment, or do we go to a committee of conference? Those are the three choices. Is anybody seeing a fourth choice that I'm missing? Postponing indefinitely. Postponing indefinitely. I am really hoping that we will not make that one of our choices. That's why. Postponing indefinitely. OK. So Nicole. So we had a presentation of the bill on Friday. Right. We do not have our attorney here today. You can ask him to come in or anything. Why don't you ask him if he can come up? Yeah. OK. Thank you, Nicole. Good afternoon. Good morning. My name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. We did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. And we did make a few changes, so I'll make sure you get that. Since then, the last time we testified in this committee on age 39, we did not have a position on delay. As we prepared to, for the record, my name is Nicole Mace. I'm the executive director of the Moscow Board Association. And it looks like I sent you the wrong testimony. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our executive director of the Moscow Board Association. So I will send you the update in Virginia. OK, directed to the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our vice president, Neil O'Dell, in the Senate Education Committee. But essentially, the testimony on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our board association. So I will send you the update in the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our board association. So I will send you the update in the House of Education. But essentially, the testimony I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our board association. but essentially the testimony that I have as the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our Political Board Association. But essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our Lets School Board Association that That essentially, the testimony. The record today is the same testimony that was offered by our board Association. Send you. Essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our board Association. So I won't send you. but essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was awkward via my tlb Association I will send you the but essentially the testimony on the record today is the same testimony that was awkward by our But essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that was offered by our Board Association, but essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that ona education that essentially that testimony on the record today is the same testimony that I will send you. But essentially the test is a record today is the same testimony that. You that, essentially. But essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony that I have on the record today today's the same testimony of the Court of Od College Association, so I will send you the replied to как But essentially the testimony of the record today is the same testimony of the Court of Od college association. I will send you the that essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony of the Court of Od College Association and the up of the But essentially, the testimony on the record today is the same testimony as the School Board Association, so I will send you the uppercut. の国会に加说した But essentially, the testimony on the record today is the same testimony as the School Board Association and the Teacher products Projected So I will send you the uppercut. The Lets Education But essentially, the testimony that I have on the record today is the same testimony as the School Board Association I will send you the 먹을board association. But is the but essentially the testimony that I have on the record today is the same ... I will send you... ... but essentially the testimony... ... on the record today is the same testimony... ... talk for the sotation... ... I will... ... send you... ... the case of a screening session... ... ... send you the... ...哎... ...잉There's little time to repeat it again... ... until the end of the 2021 summary.