 Okay, so you started telling us about some of the key takeaways for subtitling when it comes from the results of the eye-tracking research. Do we know anything about differences in how groups of people use subtitling or read subtitling? Like, do hearing people read subtitles differently than the deaf people or the hard of hearing people? Yes, there has been some evidence showing that hearing people naturally tend to skip more subtitles, particularly when they're watching a film or a show in a language that they can understand. So as opposed to deaf and hard of hearing, they would simply not look at all their subtitles. So that's one piece of evidence. And when you look at the deaf and hard of hearing populations, we have also seen some differences with deaf people, particularly those with profound hearing loss. They tend to stay in the subtitle area until they have read the subtitle to completion, whereas with hard of hearing people, what we have seen, particularly in those people who are good lip readers, is that they tend to compare what is there in the subtitle with what they can see on the speaker's lips. This particularly concerns intralingual subtitles for deaf and hard of hearing or closed captions, which, again, especially in English-speaking countries, they tend to be verbatim or near verbatim. So there is an expectation in those countries in English-speaking communities, deaf and hard of hearing people, they would expect subtitles to match exactly what is there in the audio, whereas this is not the case for other countries and other languages. However, deaf people have been, some of them, demanding verbatim, subtitling for a long time. And I think this comes from the fact that they are indeed comparing what they can see on the screen with what they can see in the subtitles and also with hard of hearing people, what they can also hear from the residual hearing that they have.