 There's obviously no conflict, I think the two are the same. I think we're not splitting words, because at the end of the day, Jean and I disagree about the content of morality, in spite of her trying to deny that fact. So put aside the word, let's forget selfishness. The actual content of morality we disagree on. And he's trying to paint my view as, again, he returned to this idea of money. Nobody mentioned money. I mean, that doesn't mention money in that essay. Money is not what she's talking about, when she talks about the virtue of selfishness. The virtue of selfishness is about living. It's about making the most of your life. That's what selfishness is. That's what selfishness means. And while in the, I don't know what dictionary she pulled that definition of, I will research that for Jean's sake. I will send him the reference in the dictionary where she took that from. I bet you there was such a dictionary she didn't make it up. Jean, would you have this conflict with your own? If the word selfishness did not have the odious sting that it does. Suppose it was the word flowers. Well, if the word, I guess if the word greed, didn't have the odious sting, usually it's greedy bastard. The opposite of the word greed, I guess. The word greed, the word hateful, the word you hate her, the word all of those things, if those words didn't have a sting, I guess I'd be all for Yaron. That would be fine. However, there are words that we use for people who are morally odious. And that's part of our language. That important part of the language.