 I don't understand how UBI will lead to increase inequality. Olaf, here's the way it's going to work, right? Who's going to hand out the UBI universal basic income? The centralized power is going to hand out the universal basic income, right? It has to. If it's going to be universal basic income, it's going to be centralized power, right? Now if you take this to the extreme limit where there's a global government, then one location in that global government is going to hand out money to everyone. If that doesn't raise red flags, you have to look into that, right? But let's assume it's going to be a country. You have universal basic income per country. So let's assume universal basic income is in the hand of a centralized federal government ruling body that governs over a country. On the most basic level, if you want to take the United States for example, we'll take one example. Obama brought in the, what was it called? He gave semi-dreamers, the Dreamers Act, where he allowed some of those who have entered the United States living and working in the United States illegally for decades protection that they could continue. And then the new administration came in and all of a sudden there's a database of all of these people. Some people have been saying this was a tag team that they wanted to create the database and then the Republicans come in, but that's going into theories, right? Let's stay with the facts. The new administration came in and they have this database and they, with the central government policing ice, they've been zapping people up, right, or sending letters to people. Now just imagine this with universal basic income. Universal basic income, right? Let's assume one government says everybody's eligible, universal basic income. Another government comes into power, right? Another party comes into power and that party all of a sudden criminalizes a certain type of behavior in that society. Let's say prohibition on tomatoes. Anybody that's growing tomatoes is a criminal and governments have done this, not necessarily tomatoes. Even though tomatoes, I believe there's a period in American history that tomatoes were even illegal, right? But many things could become illegal. Gold was illegal to hold at a certain point in U.S. history, right? In the last 100 years, right? Many things can be prohibited by governments. So let's assume these governments and the new party comes in and prohibits something in that society and anyone that is associated with this is now a criminal and then they say anyone that's a criminal cannot receive UBI, universal basic income. Just like the way that anybody that has a felony conviction cannot get student loans, cannot get support for housing, cannot get this, cannot get this, right? All of a sudden, all of a sudden inequality, right? That's on the most simple level. Did I answer your question, Olive? Once you centralize power, that power can do whatever the hell it wants to the society. And once you centralize power, okay, those who want to corrupt this society or control the society have their jobs cut out for them because they don't have to go all around the country to corrupt, right? To take over. They just have to go to the central institution, regulatory capture the centralized institution and control everything.