 Hello, my name is Roger Watson. I'm the editor-in-chief of North Education and Practice, and that's published by Elsevier. To check what specific details you need to include for some different kinds of reviews, and also it's worth checking the checklist. I have a checklist here in front of me. It's a 27-item checklist, and it's really a way of laying out your report of your systematic review or meta-analysis, and it really includes the headings and subheadings that you'd expect to see almost in any publication, and publications that follow Prisma will require that you report your study in the way that's required here. So it starts with a title and tells you what the title should be, it goes on to the abstract and an introduction, and it also directs you to other checklists, for example, to make sure that you know what should be included in the abstract. The methods section should include the search strategy, the selection process for papers, and any means by which you assess bias in the papers, and so forth. Again, I'm not going to be through all 27 items and address them here. It's up to you to ensure that you check that checklist, and you complete it as much as you possibly can. Clearly, if you do a systematic review that isn't a meta-analysis, you'll be unable to address the aspects of it that refer to a meta-analysis, and you've got to indicate what you've done and what you haven't done as well. So there's provision there for ticking off what you've done and indicating the page in your submitted manuscript where you can find that. There's also provision in here for registering the protocol of a review. Now, this is not something that is considered necessarily compulsory by journals at the moment. However, there is a system called Prospero run by the UK NIHRs now used internationally where you can register clinical reviews, and of course, if you are doing something like a Cochran review, especially one under their auspices and funded by them, the protocol will have to be registered with the Cochran database. But there are an increasing number of places these days where you can register your protocols and as an editor and as somebody who believes in open science, I would strongly encourage you to consider registering your protocol for a systematic review and finding an appropriate place where you can do that. So, just to finish off, as an editor, I would emphasise that if you are writing up a systematic review or a meta-analysis that you must refer to and report using the Prisma guidance, when you submit your manuscript, make sure that you submit the flow diagram and the checklist. So, don't forget to include them when you submit your manuscript to the journal. It may prevent you or certainly will hold up getting published. So, that's a very brief overview of the Prisma guidelines, which is one of the major reporting guidelines in medical research. There are many of these now. You can find information of all of these at the Equator website. I hope you found that useful. Thank you very much for listening.