 Hi everybody, I'm Kent Anderson, I'm the CEO of Redlink, and I'm going to talk a little bit about how annotation is being put to work in a broader editorial engagement tool that we're launching this month. It's called Remark, and it's a, as I mentioned, an editorial engagement tool. So the purpose of Remark is to help editors, authors, and readers engage with one another. So the annotation solution that we have in place allows annotation between the PDF and the HTML, so you can annotate the PDF, and it goes into the HTML and vice versa. It allows the annotation to be differentiated as to whether it's private annotation or comment, and every comment is tested as far as the qualifications of the person commenting on it. It doesn't require any plugins, and editors get other tools as well as authors that can enable post-publication review, and can be structured at a per-journal level. Editors can put polls in place on their content to increase engagement. You can see there the nice little widget for highlighting, notetaking, or commenting. This can be a voted-down voted reply to all the normal things, reputation management, and it will be available on the first publishers adopting this on May 15th. So we think we're excited about this because it really allows annotation to play a role in editorial engagement, but it's a role. It allows private personal annotations, it allows commenting for public annotation, users get profiles, editors get tools, authors get tools, readers get additional tools for engagement. Because that's for us been one of the biggest challenges is any one of these tools alone is necessary but not sufficient, I think is the phrase, but by bringing it all together in a place in a tested way. And a lot of this is based on experience I had as publishing director of New England Journal of Medicine developing editorial engagement around an article type called clinical decisions. And that's now 10 years old and still gets hundreds of readers involved in commenting and responding to it every time they publish one. So it's a pretty proven technique, but everybody has different ways of engaging with content and so by giving them multiple pathways into that engagement, we feel that that's going to draw them in and let them go through whatever concentric circles they need to go through. So look forward to look for this and more about this over the coming weeks. You'll be seeing various things if you're in the scholarly publishing community, you'll be seeing various things about this. So thanks for the time.