 Ladies and gentlemen, we thank you for this opportunity, we thank you for this council that is before us today. We thank you for invoking your presence today, we ask that the meeting today be fruitful that whatever comes out of it is what it is. We ask you to bless each of these leaders in their different capacities as they serve this community and as they go in to do your will in your way every day. And then Father, we thank you for the staff that serves this great community as well. We thank you for what they do each and every day. Father, and again, bless each of us Lord, and as we leave this place never from your sight, we always give you the glory, the honor, and the praise. Those who are blessed says Amen. Amen. Amen. Obviously, we have asked for very special prayers for the McDowell family and Reverend McDowell is in the loss of his mother, we will have her celebration life on Thursday morning. All right. Madam City Manager. We'd ask for any public input related to the items on the agenda as outlined. The emotion to adopt the agenda. All right. I'm sorry. I want to add the filing matters to the executive session, item 35, receipt of legal advice related to matters covered by attorney client privilege under soccer on the state statute 30-44, that's 78-2, extreme risk protection orders, gun free school zone act in 1990. And I'd also like to add a hate intimidation ordinance as well. All right. Is there a second? Second. Any discussion? Say no and move to the previous question. The clerk call the roll. Aye. Mr. DeVine. Aye. At this time we would ask council to approve the consent agenda items 2-22 with a slight amendment to item number four, adding the language that the contract for professional services would apply to outreach to those 80% and below the population for employment skills. All right. With that on my amendment, is there a motion? Move to approve. Is there a second? Second. I move second. Discussion? Move to the previous question. The clerk call the roll. Mr. DeVine. Aye. Mr. Benjamin. Aye. Inadvertently skipped over the approval of the minutes. Can we have a motion to approve the minutes of the May 21, 2019 city council meeting? So moved. Is there a second? Discussion? Say no and move to the previous question. The clerk call the roll. Mr. DeVine. Aye. Mr. Benjamin. Aye. Your honor, on behalf of our city leaders and the wonderful community development staff at Gora Said, so Ably leads to accept the John A. Sasso national community development week award presented to our city in June 21st of this year in Jacksonville, Florida, a big deal. I have the honor of hosting our mayor's innovation project in town this And so often we, you kind of forget how special our folks are, and one by one, department after department, Gloria did a fantastic job, but seeing your folks up against the best of the best around the country helps you realize how exceptional our staff is. So, thank you, Gloria, and I'll re-present it to you again. I'm not sure how we're going to do this, but let's come get it. So, on behalf of City Council, I also have a brief special award. It's amazing how time flies. Five years we've been blessed with the sage advice of Theresa Knox, our Chief Legal Counsel who just left the room somewhere, apparently, and I just looked up. I won't say nice things about her again, not twice. Item number 34, 24. Ordinance number 2019-022 amending the 1998 Code of Ordinances of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, Chapter 2, Administration Add Article 7, Conviction and Wage History, Prohibition and City Employment and by City Contractors. Move approval. Is there a second? Discussion? With a previous question. Court call roll. Mr. Rickerman. Mr. DeVall. Aye. Mr. Badura. Mr. Vine. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. Thank you all so much. Ordinance is first reading item 25, Ordinance number 2019-043 amending the 1998 Code of Ordinances of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, Chapter 23, Utilities and Engineering, Article 1 in general, Section 231, Civil Penalties for Violations Related to Waste Water Collection and Treatment or Water Treatment and Distribution, Article 4, Waste Water Service. Is there a motion? Move approval. Is there a second? Discussion? With a previous question. Court call roll. Mr. Rickerman. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. Item 26, Ordinance number 2019-057 amending the 1998 Code of Ordinances of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, Chapter 15, Parks and Recreation, Section 151, Prohibited Acts and the Parks. There's a motion. Move approval. Is there a second? Second. Any other questions? With a previous question. Court call roll. Mr. Rickerman. Aye. Mr. Duvall. Aye. Mr. Badura. Aye. Mr. Vine. Aye. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. Before we go on the zoning planning matters, Teresa I want to say thank you for your five years at the city. We hate to see you go. And I must jump this jacket. She's never gone anywhere. She's never been. We're happy and thankful for your sage advice and counsel. Madam clerk, Madam City Manager. Moving into zoning planning matters. First reading Ms. Hamptons here. If you have any questions. Seven is the adoption of the unified development ordinance. And if anybody would like to read it, I brought it. Is there a second? Second. Discussion. Mr. Rickerman. Make sure you make a phone. Make sure you make a phone. And my question to. Do we have to pass it with 17 at this point? Because I think some of the things and we've had this discussion with the overlay that we're working on and demolition. But there are a lot of. Concerns and and two twofold number one is we wanted to fix in the community character outlay so that we had a process. But when I read over this again, this kind of goes back to where we were before. And. It doesn't have really a time frame. Originally, we talked about it. 30 day delay to have in a community character neighborhood to look. And then I look at the criteria. And it requires just one for it to be placed on it. But for you to disprove it, you have to apply with all of them, which is this disproportionate. The second part is, is that we didn't define it clearly. We didn't define it clearly. The second part is, is that we didn't define it clearly like we had discussed distinctive characteristics and architectural design. That is so broad based that anybody with any type of. We could go in and just pick something. I thought we were defining this for the neighborhood, especially where it says rare type in Columbia. It should be rare type for that neighborhood because this is specifically for a neighborhood, not city wide. I think basically items three through seven are just two. What they're not detailed enough to provide. Clear distinction and it just leaves an open end ticket. And I think we're having an issue with a house on. I think salute avenue that we have this type of issue with and some other places. So my question is, is. Can we give it first reading. Without 17 and make make any minor changes to it after the fact. You have two options. You can adopt it without the recommended planning commission changes, which was to include demolition review. So you would be adopting it without demolition review for community character neighborhoods. Or it goes back to planning commission because otherwise. We can't change it as we discussed at the last meeting. It was actually incorrect. Any change from the recommended code that comes to city council has to go back to planning commission. So you had said in the last meeting, we're going to have to go back anyway. Did I misunderstand that? No, we will be bringing you amendments to the code that have happened along the way. For instance, addressing tattoo parlors or different items that have come through while this has been set. So we will be coming back to you with those amendments. So the options and I just want to make sure I'm clear. The code as it was in this document did not include demolition review or community character neighborhoods. So the planning commission made a recommendation for several revisions trees and there's some with bike pad as well as including demolition review back into the community character. So the option would be to not accept that recommendation. So let me ask it a different way. That's what I'm wondering if we give it reading and then amend it afterwards. It would still have to go back to planning commission. Well, how do you, how do you, we're amending stuff all the time. I don't understand. Do you mean go ahead and adopt the code as it is. And then amend it. I hear you. Yeah. And that's what we're doing with the number of other items. I would, I would be supportive of moving forward if we did that so that we can tweak this. But I don't think we want to delay the overall plan with us long trying to really be in play by January 1. But I think we could go back and then amend that and clean this language up. I mean, there's probably 50 to 70% of the languages is right. Those other pieces are really not detailed enough and seem to leave a lot of to individual interpretation. And I don't think that's what we are trying to do. I think we're trying to nail it down more. Mr. DeVall. Mr. Mayor, I agree with Mr. Rickman. When I asked Chris to the question when the agenda first came out about this, the language is essentially the same as we have for community character now. And we're trying to protect the 13 areas that have community character districts. And it's not where Mr. Rickman and our committee is going to go eventually. Right. And so my position was we were going to move forward now and then go back when the committee is finished and put in place what the committee and the council agrees to. May I make a clarification? Yes. We have three different parts of the code where we're talking about demolition. The ones where in the committee we've been discussing is with demolition delay. This is a demolition that's in community character. And then there is demolition of historically designated structures. So I just want to make sure that we understand that we will be there may be differences. I think the work that's being done in the committee is instructive for all three. But there are those three very different processes. Well, two of them are totally overlapped. I mean, there's no way you can get around and really say that they're three. They're really two because you got the community character. The historic and the demolition delay are really one. I mean, if you read the language, it's specifically driven towards historic buildings. Certainly, but it'll be two different codes. So there will still be a code for demolition review of historic structures. But it'll be virtually the same. The demo delay. It'll be virtually the same. And whether it's two or whether it's three, the committee can make a recommendation for amendments that this council would then have the option of adopting. Most certainly. I just want to make sure that everybody was clear that we had these different processes. It's confusing. But they are instructive for all of them. The clarification is good for all of them. Mr. Davis. It's a general question regarding the timeline. You indicated that some of the tweaks or recommendations that have come by and been approved since the document was prepared. Do we have an opportunity to address those before the next hearing or again beyond the hearing? What you want that the timeline for the next hearing won't change. Is that correct? So the next reading would be at your next meeting, which if this is successful at August 20. But that could be considered maybe the same as we're discussing regarding the character. No, sir. Those would be coming later. Those items would be coming to you probably in the fall. We would bring you a whole roster of amendments to this newly adopted. Consider for consideration. For your consideration. That's it. And in that time we could continue to work on this. Mr. Badura. Just for clarification, there's a lot of discussion. So we made a motion and second to amend the chapter 17 and the new zoning codes. The chapter 17 that we had made, we brought back community character review by DDRC. We're voting on that today. But if we want to change it later on, after Mr. recommends committee comes with new recommendations to overhaul or to redesign the whole demolition process, we can still do that. I mean, but as of today, I don't want to take any community character protection away if we vote on this today or not. So we have to vote on this today to keep protection in place until we can replace. And that's what I want to make sure we clear on. Right. And what may be helpful is for an amended motion or something to ensure that it's clear that the recommendations made by Planning Commission are part of your adoption approval. Right. And that way it can be in the record that those amendments to this code you all are adopting at this time. Now until, and it's actually May 1st is the effective date. We're still under our code with, we still have the same protections in place. So all that we will be doing is prospectively amending what will be effective on May 1. So it's not going to be a surprise a month from now if somebody cares down a house in Shandon. We're still under the current code that has demolition review. Yes, sir. All right. Any discussion of none with the previous question? And you do need the motion modified. I apologize. To be clear that those recommendations for Planning Commission of amendments are part of your approval. And that we reserve the right to amend those. Demolition appropriate time. Absolutely. Absolutely. So it is clear that the recommendations from Planning Commission are a part of this motion. And it's also clear from council contemporary answer and vote said we'll be having further discussions about future visions before the law becomes effective. With the previous question, I'll call the roll. Mr. Rickerman. Aye. Mr. Duvall. Aye. Mr. Bodura. Aye. Mr. Vine. Aye. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. For second reading, zoning and planning matters entails interest courts and neighborhood commercial districts. Second. Second. Discussion. With the previous question, I'll call the roll. Mr. Rickerman. Aye. Mr. Duvall. Aye. Mr. Bodura. Aye. Mr. Vine. Aye. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. Moving into a period of resolutions, item 29, 064, adopting a program for temporary alternative payment of parking fine. So moved. Is there a second? Okay. Any discussion? Any none? With the previous question, I'll call the roll. Mr. Rickerman. For the record, I just went to Staples to buy eight dollars worth of school supplies to pay for the parking ticket I got yesterday. Did you keep your receipt? It doesn't come to effect to the Mars. I haven't paid it yet either. Mr. Duvall. Aye. Mr. Bodura. Aye. Mr. Vine. Aye. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. So thank you, Ellen, your team. We're going to hopefully help a whole lot of our children with their school supplies this fall. All right. Aye. Thank you. Item 30, resolution number R 2019, 067, adopting the city of Columbia neighborhood traffic control project policy. Second. Second. Ms. Duvall. Discussion? I've certainly never given them that impression, but from what I've told them. Yeah. And I think part of this will address that Councilwoman Duvall. You know, we've had some issues recently one where somebody said they weren't sure that the speed up was going, going in front of their house or on their block. Some of this neighborhood consultation is actually addresses that. That there'll be a sign in the yard or a speed up in the further house. Well, and I think to add to that is, you know, some of the master plan has been done by a couple of the neighborhoods that followed the boundary line, which then really doesn't curb anything in Devereux, an example. You got one speed hump right after there and then nothing for the rest of the stretch. And so it really is not doing anything. It's actually a waste of resources. So I think having, you know, the proper review, I think it's important and I think you're, you're duly noted. Miss Devine, that ultimately we all have the last say so that we make sure we're coordinating with staff what makes sense and what doesn't. You want us to redo that and bring us back? Just add that on. And with that, we'll, we'll move forward on all the ones that are in waiting. Yes, sir. Yeah, speaking of, I, I, I agree with the most. And I think one of the things we might want to do as we have those discussions. You know, I'm in about three discussions down with some neighborhoods. And that is one, there's no guarantee that we will move forward on all the ones that are in waiting. Yeah. Speaking of, I, I agree with the most. And I think one of the things we might want there's no guarantee. I usually tell them that. And also where they want them may not be appropriate because of the due diligence that you guys have to go through and also some of their own neighbors don't want them in front of their house. And that becomes an issue. And that's why we put language in there to that effect. And I, you know, I put it out there. Right. So I think by us also letting them know that up front, then that saves us some headaches, too. Right. I had a motion for Mr. Rickerman. Rickerman. I second. Yes. You second. Okay. She always wanted to deal with the neighborhoods. Move the previous question. Clerk Colorado. Mr. Rickerman. Aye. Mr. Duvall. Aye. Mr. Badura. Aye. Mr. Vine. Aye. Mr. Davis. Aye. Mayor Benjamin. Aye. Mr. Medicare. Aye. Aye. Mr. год. Sir. is there any loss of lease crossover in that that caused any heartburn for congressmen or ourselves? This handles the heartburn for the congressman, Mr. Rickman. I couldn't find it. We come out of the lease in June of 2020 from my memory. I was going to add that note for you all's information and over Labor Day weekend or shortly thereafter we're moving out of 1225 Lady Street in my resources, community development and office of business opportunities moving into 1401 Maine, moving forward with that process and then at your next planning retreat we've talked about we want to go over some additional steps with you all. But this is happening a little quicker than what we anticipated. There's an interest of another entity, strong interest to get into the building. So we can sublet? Yes, and yes the preference was not necessarily to do that but to accommodate congressman Clyburn's needs. That's how we're going to have to handle it for now. Moving into a period of appointments, if you have any questions. We haven't voted on it. Oh, with the briefest question. Mr. Rickman. Mr. Baduro. Mr. Duvall. Mr. Vines. Mr. Abel. Mr. Benjamin. Now moving into a period of appointments. Item 32, city center partnership and 33 commercial involvement loan fund. It's more now. Move the nomination of Jason Kasky. I'm sorry, city center partnership, I apologize. Yes, it's in the partnership. Just a second. All right. Discussion with the previous question. Mr. Rickman. Mr. Baduro. Mr. Duvall. Mr. Vines. Mr. Davis. Mr. Benjamin. Mr. Davis. Mr. Benjamin. There has been no work session today. We have one full meeting. I don't know if there are any council committee reports or referrals that any of you have. Yes. Are you working to schedule the meeting for the CPAC report? I'd like to refer to the Public Safety Committee for us to explore looking into a request to South Carolina Department of Transportation to take over Kilburn Road between Beltline and Ford Jackson. I think we've exhausted every avenue to try to create a better safety atmosphere on that road through suggestions, meetings, residents in that area have come to their wits end and tried to work with the delegation and everybody else and can't get anywhere. So I'd like us to explore on taking that section of Kilburn Road over from the state so that we can move forward on traffic calming and other opportunities to create a safer zone for those families. For procedure standpoint, I thought we had to take it through the committee. If you're saying we don't, then I'm okay with that too. I'm from the state so I'm not locking it in the committee because you know those discussions come up regularly. Well, with some of them, I think we can do a better job. I think since we're in a little discussion, I think if you're going to look at Kilburn, let's maybe discuss other streets that might be, has been a problem in the past, whether to ensure or put any traffic calming devices on it like odd South Kilburn and there's other streets that we might be looking at. Can you make a recommendation to the committee to look at the whole major corridors or streets in the city whether we can do it or not or you want to take one street at a time? I would take one at a time because it is at an expense once we take them over. My sense is historically we've looked at them as, I mean, kind of in aggregate, right? I mean, as they're trying to do things. I mean, obviously that's the preference or council that goes on the list and we'll move it, but let's have a committee meeting that has staff advice and council. Let's look at the more strategic role. You're saying leave it in committee. Yeah, but you can move forward with that one. But obviously if there are more streets that need to be considered. Well, there's a buyback program that D.O.T. was in the midst of while it was reminding me. I'm not quite sure where we landed on all of that as far as what we proposed, but I think putting Kilbourne in committee is fine. So a presentation at work session rather than, rather than committee and maybe in the interim if there are other, other roads in addition to Kilburn that we need staff looking at to become important. Let's do that. I think I will support a work session discussion maybe and look at other streets at the same time. All right. Thank you, Mr. Anson. Mr. Mayor. Oh, I'm sorry. Are there any other committee reports, referrals or have you seen them yet? Something else? Yes, a moment of personal privilege that I've intended to take at the beginning of the meeting. Apologies again for the distraction. But I have two introductions. One is Ms. Lindsay Sherbert. She's here shadowing me, so it's interesting day to shadow me. Lindsay, you see how we have to be very fluid in this job. FHWA. Leadership Development Academy with the Federal Highway Administration. And I'm excited she's asked to shadow me. I don't know. What else? Lindsay, you need to do to fulfill your... And then another introduction, and I'd ask him to come forward is Mr. Henry Simons. He is your manager over operations. Henry is a graduate of Benedict College with his master's from the University of South Carolina. He is a 15-year career professional with Pal Metal Health, and we talk a lot about retaining talent in our city. I think this is a wonderful example. And he's really excited. I apologize to him too, but this is what you signed up for. Some titles will be lots of changes and you got to roll with it. So Henry is here today just briefly. I really wanted you all to put your eyes on him before he starts on August 12th. His direct reports will be Jacqueline Richbert for 911 Communications, Randy Davis, Parks and Recreation, Calvin Keesler with General Services, and Marlon Epps with Fleet Services, and they're gonna go downstairs and get to know each other for a minute, but I'm really excited. This is a wonderful hire for our city. Henry, welcome aboard. I got a list of questions for you real quick. We'll see much more of you very soon. Absolutely. Welcome, ma'am. Mr. Davis, I attended several events. I missed Saturday morning, which was kind of at the top of my list, but anyway, I did have an opportunity to talk with some mayors and some I think some staffers and other presenters. Folks are impressed with what we're doing and they really I think I think that's kind of the move nationally now. Most cities that are looking to make an economic dent is focusing on on city centers and how things tend to branch out. They seem to be impressed with what we're doing. And I got an opportunity to kind of give, I think, some step-by-step things of what we've done and what we've gone through and what we've tried as a city. But a lot of them have done and I think are currently sort of pursuing some of the same initiatives that we've done. So it says that we're moving in the right direction and we're kind of putting some thought to some of the things we look to do. I want to thank Mr. Davis and Ms. Devine for attending and Tamika presenting and moderating a panel. It started off with a real bang. Deputy Chief Kelly just killed the first panel. Killed it. Killed it and it was amazing the work being done by our police department and again seeing validation from leaders all across the country as to how special CPD is. From historic tours to aggressive discussion around food policy and food insecurity to getting out into Parks and Rec, Randy and his team, an excellent job of books to boys, books to girls, having people see the way we're investing in our children, our young people. I mean from beginning to end arts and culture Main Street was alive popping first Thursdays. It was top notch all around and again every once in a while we get kind of insular. We like to fight over little things but to have folks come in from as far west as Washington State, as far north as Vermont down to West Palm Beach over the New Mexico really had every corner and also several cities from the heartland here and to show as strong as we did was validating, was validating in a number of different ways. So thank y'all and thank this council for supporting the conference as well via HTAX. It was important. So thank y'all. Thank you Tamika. All right. We have a couple of citizens who sound to speak. Dr. Jamal Miller. We have a very special guest, an encore guest here. This is Harold Nune Ward from Chicago. He is internationally known for his anti-violence presentations. He has a you can Google him and get all the real history. He's met you sir before and some of the members of council and he's traveling to all of our parks and recreation sites. We've been to two today. I'm just running him everywhere in the city to talk to the young people about anti-violence, about the need for peace. And he's very quiet. All right. I was hoping maybe he would say. No, I just want to say thank you for having me for a second to my being a man. They correctly remember me when I remember her. Thank y'all. It's a blessing because when I come to Chicago back and forth, they use me a lot. You know, and you know, it's a lot of stuff going on. Y'all doing an excellent job. I'm not just saying it's normal. I don't say that I'd be going against the system, but y'all doing a good job for it. I appreciate y'all. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I was wondering if we could get a picture. Yes, ma'am. Thank you, sir. And Mr. Davis. All right. Thank you very much. Mr. David Bolton and like him read Romans, Romans 13, one to eight says, obey and you'll be blessed. Just obey and you'll be beat for place. So if Martin Luther had taught it, you'd be the first policeman. Guess what you would never need? The second policeman. And like the rapper would say, if you broke it down, he wouldn't even need a radio. And I tell people, Chinese and Japanese already got it. Just try not obeying a cop in China and see what happens to you. As I'm a child once and I grew up from a sergeant major's family and a buddy of mine in our Colonel's family became the bureau chief of the FBI. But he told the president something and if the president would have taught it, then that great church in Charleston probably wouldn't have had that little white killer in it because he blamed it on somebody else. And that's what everybody does. They blame their problems on everybody else. But if teachers taught it, obey, I want to pay raise because if distinguished men thought about it, we pay them and teachers out of the pain. Same thing. Taxes. So if you pay the first, you don't need the second. All I'd like to ask somebody to do is so live PD to freshman sophomores and juniors in high school. And then ask him to write a report one three hour program. How many cops did it take to stop subject one, subject two, subject three, subject four. And then for seniors, I literally did offer $50,000 to Richland County captain. If he would get the principal to ask the seniors to write a paper, date and name, everything you know about Mr. O. J. Simpson. In the second paper, everything you know about who to and tootsie. Ladies distinguished gentlemen, I've offered $1,000 to kids walking the streets two at a time. As the best friends I've ever had looked like the mayor, the pro tem and this gentleman here, best man in my wedding 45 years ago, stood up for me in San Francisco. There's no 13th Street 13th Avenue 13th place, but there were 13th in our wedding. And the judge said, I'll get a bailiff and make it 14. I said, no, thank you. But 45 years later, I'm married to my beautiful wife. And both our sons went through the school system and went through Carolina FR double E. I was telling the lady back there, I paid my kids five for a C, 10 for a B, 20 for an A from the third grade up. The new straight A students go to college free. I didn't have to write the big check. But check it out. If you can have this minister read one day, it will tell you the solution. And the president asked for a solution. And that's the solution. Because these local guys go local because they see things repetitively going wrong when nobody will straighten them out. Check it out and see in eight verses, it sets the matter straight. And I love verse eight, because it tells you don't owe anybody anything, except a love because love is the fulfillment of the law. So I thank you for listening. Thank you. I was surprised. All right. This is the people's house. Listen to the Lord, because the Lord knows the answer. That's why I'm married 45 years, because he said what I've yoke together, let no one put apart. Ever since a fingerprint or a drop of blood proves to him and judges who you are. You got to answer to him. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. All right. Are you all just watching here? Nathan, we've got a student, a Boy Scout. What's your name young man? Come on. Come on. You're gonna earn that badge. Come on. Come on. What's that? He wants to explain what he's doing. Oh, please. Absolutely. I'm doing the communications mail badge. It's for getting eagle. It's a eagle required mail badge. And I did most of it at summer camp a month ago-ish. And this is my last requirement. It's like attend a city council meeting or like a school meeting. It's like just attend a public meeting, I guess. What did you think? It's interesting. You got a good game face at least if it's not Mr. Mayor. You picked a good meeting. This is the shortest meeting we've ever had. You need to come back on the evening ones or we'll stay till till 11 o'clock at night. Well, keep up the great work, okay? Thank you. All right. Thanks for coming, buddy. Thank you. All right. And Brooks's dad is one, he's still on BPAC. Brooks's dad is one of our BPAC members, so he's still, so thank you. Thank you. Can we have a motion to go in the executive session? We need to repeat them. You already amended it. So motion to go in the executive session for receipt of legal bias relating to a pending threat and a potential claim, SC code 34782, Rutherford v. City, receipt of legal bias related to matters covered by attorney client privilege pursuant to 34782, Parks and Rec Foundation, tree removal policy, Forest Acres, Gills Creek, with debris removal, and receipt of legal bias relating to matters of 34782, again, extreme risk protection orders, gun-free school zones Act of 1990, and hate intimidation ordinance. All right. Is there a second? Second. Any discussion? Item 36 on the back of the agenda. I'm sorry, ma'am. Item 36 of proposed contractual arrangements. And discussion of negotiation incident to propose contractual arrangements pursuant to 34782, Banking Investment Services. Thank you. Those on the next page. Moved. Seconded. Moved for discretion. I'll call her roll. Mr. Rickerman. All right. Mr. Bilal. All right. Mr. Bedora. All right. Mr. Vine. All right. Mr. Davis. Mr. Benjamin. I want to alert the public. We do not anticipate being back in public session afterwards, unless you just really have nothing else to do. Brooks, y'all can hang out all day long, but we'll be back in session. We won't be back.