 Hobbes, patriarchy and conjugal rights. Some scholars are firm believers of the fact that Hobbes' work is totally patriarchal, but modern studies assert against the argument as Hobbes views verse-a-versive to patriarchal attitudes. Although Hobbes is considered as patriarchal theorist, but the possibility that is considered by neither conventional political thought or the feminist school of thought that he is totally a patriarchal who rejects paternal rights. It is a very interesting debate that some of the old writers think that the philosophy of Hobbes basically reflects the patriarchal rights, but if we look at the existing school of thought in today's times, it is not very clear that the philosophy of Hobbes can fit in with what kind of philosophy of Hobbes can fit in, because feminist political theory that is being dodged by the definition of patriarchy as the authority by paternal rights of fathers and mothers. Now, the debate that today's feminist school of thought is about, through which we express our perspective, where the paternal rights will fall and how society will address these rights. Fast-forward, when it comes to parents, fathers or mothers, who have more duties and what is their right, the debate that is still going on today is also about Hobbes, in which there is a lot of clarity regarding the social order, the family, the parents and the rights and duties distribution, how it can be categorized. So, conjugal rights are the rights exercised by men as husbands over their wives is not a matter that ever falls within the political theories of Hobbes and his contemporaries. Now, some people think that because there were no such debates at that time, the debate being held is meaningless and has no importance or status, because Hobbes is considered to be the only western theorist who begins from the premise that there is no natural domination of men over women, because Hobbes' philosophy is very obvious and very clear that in society you will be divided based on your duties, your functions, the discrimination of men over women or this debate, the perspective of Hobbes is in this context or in this contemporary time period, we do not get much debate on these issues because Hobbes considers that women are naturally free and always subject to men through the marriage contract. This misunderstanding of confusion over the term patriarchy has arisen because of the failure to distinguish between three different historical forms of patriarchy theory, which are traditional classical and modern concepts of patriarchy. In fact, along with time, many concepts and debates have come to this level today, which are based on the responsibility of the family in the society and the responsibilities of the family. What will be the power of the government in the structure of the government, what will be the status of the men, what will be the concept of the person running the government, what will be the powers? These are the debates that, from the very beginning, until today, political theorists talk to them and debate with them. But the differences that come to these, as a result of that, different schools of thought rise, which fall in the category of the non-political school of thought, then there is a classical thought, and then the modern concepts, these old concepts today, all these debates are still relevant, and that debate keeps going on, because every issue that is related to society, in the context of society, along with changes and advancements, that debate keeps going on.