 Hralen RM, kjer je technologicalen gaustos nebukov vseč, je veliki, že hrva in hrva hrtaj vo zemplih dragojov. Vsak je hralen vseč ko je vseč, odinči vsič neznačno, zračje COD in v Easternu, Nereoperni, Central Asia. Vsič nezavosna hrtaj na izgleda hralen RM v norišnjih načinjo glaba. Samozvali bavili vseč sva tajh ČRskeh zelo, t反šanjevedske proslegi, tedyc meti, in v tej berah pospazitelih prespečni in konistim. Na polici, Georgia, na progad, izgledanje z uročenjem hradišnjom netvorku, da vznik nespešnji vsočenje z vradišnjem in domestičnjom fundinju. Vznik nespešnja je, da vznik nespešnja z vradišnjom donišnjom komuniji z vradišnjom sektoru, nekaj hradišnjih in finančnih ministri in hradišnjom komuniji in nespešnjih, kaj je vznik vznik nespešnjih, kaj je vznik nespešnjih in vznik nespešnjih, kaj je vznik nespešnjih vznik nespešnjih. Vznik nespešnjih, kaj je vznik nespešnjih z vradišnjih z vradišnjih in vznik nespešnjih, kaj je vznik vznik nespešnjih. Nesetno ukromičnost tak contrastovati v zelo, na vznik nespešnjih vznik nespešnjih vznik pinkazda hati tam, in nesetno ukromičnost na kotanie vs tarnih ponad اليag. Aj na vezu, dolnji posličnici na izblij straightenčne gljence ln večadnes prirab잔cker lahkoanim nespešnjih in contratnjih trimelnji s prejelnost in nič Crullig crupl na nekaj nivc, zelo Serbia in Bulgaria, kaj je zvrste složenje projekte zelo, a ta zelo vzveča prekrenje, se zanimizacije, v kaj jih je vse bila vzvečanje na nivrstvih donorov. Selo, da tega vrstvače, nekaj je vzvečanje, nekaj nekaj nekaj nekaj nekaj na vsebih, kaj sem vsebno površel, da tega tvoj zelo, najbolj izgleda vsebenje? Bolj Garia je vzvečanje nekje unika, z vsej kraj, da je v Europijskih Unijah, prijezen jazim in v Europijskih Unijah. V Europijskih Unijah je jevalo iz našem vsej dona. Tako, neč nekaj do srečno, da ima baro v glasbi, da ima baro v mjelosti. V Lenosti, kaj je stavili vsej EU? Zato, zelo, Serbia, Montenegro, kjere se našli vsej čehru v tomovimi programi. Montenegro in Serbia k rotating have relatively low levels of infection and high incomes. We also have do fund other countries, there're countries in africa that are hundred millions of dollars a year under funded to provide services to their people and for the world our total budget is less than 4 billion dollars a year the total need for these 3 diseases in low and middle income countries is in the neighborhood of 50 billion of dollars a year. So does it mean that in those countries like Russia, Ukraine, kako vsega vso vsega vsega vsega izbolj je odmačen, pa ta nismo začala in nismo začala in občajno vsega. Kako je to, kaj je vso kratir, da je se načo načiniti politično vsi, in se kjer taj, kako vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega. A bolj, da vsega vsega vsega je odmačen, bojno bojte. in nabudujem to, če potrebitelnih narkotikov predostavljeni s samom u sebenu. Ja bi nazvalo to daži genocidom, ker imam več mnogo o druzej in več mnogo somertej, več mnogo kakaj boljeznji, slovene v živni, in ne po pravimu šerbozdarovju. Kaj smo vidim, kako s neženjem vredanji nefinansiraj se v drženjem objemi? Ukraini na svoj vsoženje narednjih. Kaj smo solek, če vznikaj je vznikov, če vznikov je vznikov, če vznikov je vznikov, če vznikov je vznikov, če vznikov je vznikov, če vznikov je vznikov. Če je to naredanje? Perkut, najbolj smo nominati To je vseče najbolj vsečen čas, neko vsečenih, neko pravno, za renovacije, revajsneh polisi in tudi. Romar z Arsi bo, da se v programu vej odal jen kartul da se odkot če ne kouzgjali. Aselo tudi se ti damo ki lebi spiro, v širobe v širode, sada mi je nebi, ekvjem ne bore, bi je tazččas, izolacija, tazča meba, tazče šemdek, mi uče dava tazčča v širobe, mislja, ejz programa izleva, sa šole bas, romčven vikot taz, kot realizebuli, vikot tazakmebuli, sko je vzgavčo dot, cheli. Georgija je polizija, da je vzgavčo poživljeni na stri, in poživljeni za mandatorij, drugi test. Kako je vzgavča, kaj je vzgavča, evoliat vzgavča, in kaj je plan za to polizija? Vzgavče smo v procesu, da je vzgavča in da je vzgavča, vzgavča smo vzgavča in vzgavča objevčenja, vzgavče, da vzgavče, da vzgavče, vzgavče poživljeni za vzgavče poživljeni za vzgavče. Vzgavče smo vzgavče, da smo vzgavčenja no zelo, kaj je priko se, polizija počivljeni počivljeni za vzgavče in vzgavče za vzgavče in drugi test. Kaj je priko se zelo, nekaj polizija počivljeni za vzgavče in vzgavče za vzgavče počivljeni od polizija, očence, čas nje se vzgavče vzgavče z drugim zelo, zelo, z drugim zelo, zelo, z drugim zelo. We are now in a country, Georgia, that spends huge amounts of money on incarcerating drug users, but it does not allocate funding for needle exchange programs. So what would be your message to the policy makers in Georgia? I think that our recommendation would be for Georgia to increase its harm reduction investments as it has committed itself to doing, and focusing more on community-based needle exchange programs, and on medically-assisted therapy, wherever possible. And that's something that Georgia's own government has indicated it wishes to do. The Global Fund is soon leaving Georgia. What is your government planning to ensure the funding for those programs, which were funded by the Global Fund? First of all, I have to express my gratitude and thanksfulness to Global Fund, because they are doing great job not only in my country, but over the world, and they are saving millions of lives. Government of Georgia is ready to take this responsibility and take this financial load, and we are preparing phase-out agreement, transition agreement for nearly three years, and I think we will assure sustainability and effectiveness of current projects. There are some criticisms that the repressive criminal laws in Georgia are barriers for accessing treatment for people who use drugs. What would you respond to those criticisms? We already did several very important steps to liberalize these laws and regulations. We did tactical steps, and we are expecting very soon strategic steps. It's not that countries are not having enough money in their budgets. It's just the programs are organized in such a way that they are not really efficient. Previzion of methadone can cost like 1,000 euros per person per year in middle-income countries. This is not because methadone is expensive, this is just because countries are over-regulated. UNA has invested a lot into proving that harm reduction is effective, lot of studies and research, but there are still some governments which did not provide adequate funding for harm reduction after the Global Fund removed its funding. Do you have any possibilities to start a dialogue with those governments and convince them that they have to continue funding? Of course, it's frustrating from a UN point of view when we see some governments not doing all they can to implement programs that are safe, effective and evidence-based. But of course, we only use as an opportunity to reengage our dialogue, to share the information, and from in a time of government austerity when budgets are tight, everyone is watching every euro or every dollar. It's extremely important to show to any government agency, to any funding agency that what we're doing not only protects public health, but actually is a very good return on investment. Many governments read your reports and they see that harm reduction is cost-effective, but they still don't do what you suggest. So what can you do to convince these governments to do better? Sure. I think a key point is, too much of our discussion is with health ministries. We need to take that decision and the discussion to where the decisions are made. So we need to engage more with ministry, the interior home affairs, with judicial ministries, and elevate it to a higher level. Is the World Bank engaging in such a dialogue with ministry of interior? We focus a lot on how countries can optimize their investments in health and the social sectors for greatest benefits. A couple of days ago at the UN General Assembly in New York that all the heads of state and all the UN member states unanimously adopted the new post 2015 development agenda, the so-called sustainable development goals, and goal 3.3 is no less ambitious than ending AIDS by 2030. So ending AIDS globally or even regionally means we also end the epidemic, not control HIV, but actually end AIDS amongst injecting drug users, amongst sex workers, amongst men who have sex with men, amongst any community that is disproportionately at risk or affected by the epidemic. But if we want these programs to really be successful in the long term, they have to be owned and supported and funded by the local governments. And that's why this dialogue is so extremely important.