 Let me turn to Motoshige Ito. Thank you. I think the first comment about the unipolar versus multiple globalization is very relevant. When we are thinking about the process of globalization, we probably have to think there are at least two or maybe more different types of globalization and deglobalization, and each has its own momentum. So in order to just make it point more clear, let me first discuss the case of semiconductor industry, which is maybe typical of the strategic issue which Mr. Park mentioned. Traditionally, the semiconductor industry has expanded and deepened their global division of labor. A typical example is just if you have an iPhone, there's a semiconductor called the logic, which is mostly designed by American companies and manufactured by Taiwanese called boundaries, and of course using a lot of the materials coming from Japan and Korea. And this semiconductor is actually used by mass production process of iPhone or personal computer in China. So it's a typical globalization. Now what happened is the United States is moving to cut China out of semiconductor supply chain, and in addition, the US government is just preparing a huge subsidy to concentrate production bases in the United States. So even for Japanese and probably South Korean future requests to participate in this US-centered supply chain, it is not very easy to expand investment in China at this moment. So there seems to be a very typical geopolitical movement of the system. And of course, China is rushing to build a supply chain centered on its own countries. That does not depend on the United States. So this is part of the maybe deglobalization or different type of globalization that we are observing. But if you look at the reality, I can find many other industries of this degree. There is of course a lot of concern. This kind of political movement is spreading to other industries such as the EV electric vehicle, motor vehicle, or other maybe supercomputers and so on and so forth. But so far it is very limited. So it is very important for us to watch how the scope of this kind of process is expanding to other industries or not. And also, we have to just admit, in spite of this fact, quite a large amount of the industry is still conducted under the so-called fluttering of the global economy, which Mr. Thomas Friedman said. I mean, so both the United States and China depend on each other quite a lot. And so this is different type of the globalization. Maybe I should say traditional type of globalization. And the question is whether we can continue this or not. So let me just discuss the two types of globalization and discuss each arrangement more carefully. Now, for the first type of globalization, important thing is in order for the economy, this is advanced technology. So deeper integration or deeper partnership or deeper integration must be not just simple trade. It must be to deal with the strengthening the geopolitical effort to promote deeper integration such as the capital tie-ups, government-involved support policies or technical corporations or the personal exchange. So it is just beyond simple trading. And there's a lot of the kind of very intimate collaborations necessary. Now, this is even we can observe this kind of phenomena before U.S.-China division was visible. Like, take the case of the free trade agreement or the economic partnership agreement where there is some kind of limited number of countries being involved in the global deepening. Now, important thing is the question is whether we can just expand this kind of partnership among the limited number of companies to the larger number of companies. I mentioned Japan, South Korea, and the United States in my example of semiconductors, but it is very important to include this network, the European countries, Australian companies, Indian companies, and so forth. And so let me just mention one very famous word by Professor Jagdish Bagwati of Columbia University. What he said, let me just read, if the block economy stops at some point of time, that can be a so-called a stumbling block for the globalization. But if the block economy is expanding, it's called increasing number of companies, that can become a building block for the globalization. Now, reality is when we are thinking about the technology complication and sophistication of globalization, this kind of the so-called deepening of globalization among a few countries may be a very good starting point. And the important thing is we should just expand that kind of globalization to increasing number of countries. So this is one part of globalization. Let me say the second part of globalization. I have to say there's still a very large number of industries that face so-called the flattening of the world economy. So there's still a very large number of trade and dependence on each other. And the question is whether we can just continue this process. So, for example, the WTO is very important. Although WTO is now very slow to progress the negotiation. However, it is increasing more important for each country to adhere to WTO the rules. And there are many other very important, the multilateral scheme for the continuation of the flattening of the economy. And let me finally just mention briefly about just the climate change issues. I'd like to particular emphasize the importance of effort on climate change. It is necessary, of course, to address the issue of climate change with the participation of all the world's major countries. But at the same time, participation of many countries on cooperative subjects will be important bill work to prevent the global warming from collapsing. So discussing that kind of global issue with increasing number of the countries is also very important to just continue the process of globalization. Thank you very much. Thank you very much indeed. Thank you for putting your finger on technology and this issue of the technological potential divide.