 That's the state where you can find it, too. Is that the old radio box? Of course, they don't even mention it. We sat next to each other. Do you remember that? It was before the campaign even coming out of the way. And I remember it because the several speakers before that, one by one, I'm crossing off lines in the middle of my mind. And I'm not doing it. Finally, I'm down to the one. He asked the resistance that I was saving. And that was gentlemen. India and China, 40% of the world's population, both their leaders, understand full well. And on our side, we have a great chance with both of them, Mr. President, because they instinctively like to do business with us. Our problems are too full in taking advantage of that tremendous opportunity. One is on technology transfer, we will say. We've got that straight now in China. With India, we're just saying how we think provides the adequate, safe balance. If we don't speed up on the technology transfer to India, it takes six months now to get something approved. We want to bring that down to one month. We can do that if we have a defense on board. Like they came on board with China, so we're going to do that. I think it's well worth doing for us, because India is a non-consonant nation. It means that our co-comp partners can send stuff to them without an export license. If you're an MOU, they have to give us an export license to show us who's going to buy them. That's one problem. We can whip that. Second problem is adequate. I'm going to follow up. Hello. Nice to see you, Mr. President. Have you met Reagan? No, I haven't, Mr. President. How's it going, sir? How's it going, Mr. President? I haven't. How do you do? I'm good. Good morning, everybody. Sit down. Thank you. Well, we're going to present to us young men. Well, it's a great elastic person, and it's not through the printed page and whatever. Right. Well, I know the time is short, so I'd like to make a couple of specific proposals, which I've taken the liberty of putting in memo form but a single page each, no more. And if we have time, a couple of other ones that might be mentioned. But one problem that's been exercising me for quite a long time is what I call equivalence between Soviet representation in the US and other Western countries and the other around. Now there's obviously an imbalance. There's no uniformity of policy as between the Western Allies, either on the principle of representation or on the principle of expulsion. Now, once is an exception to the rule, but for once I think the Brits are ahead of the ranks. And that is when the Heath Administration expelled 105 KGB and GRU men in 1971, 14 years ago, a fundamental decision was taken if anybody at any time is uncovered as a KGB or GRU agent, that man is not replaced. Now the other day, for example, two months ago we expelled four soldiers. At that time, the permitted level was 43, it's now 39. And each time that happens, it goes down. Now, I don't think you have that principle. I'm not aware that any other Western country has. If you look at the strictly diplomatic, intended to be diplomatic representation, there's a slight imbalance. Right. He was correct. He thought that Washington was in a rhythm over here and he was really... and not Washington has. I made a mistake. He correct me. He's looking forward to visiting your presidential library. He said, we're trying to make them all. Yeah, right. Sure, we need to get the same conversation over. Right? He went to CSM in college for a work that could stand as a coffee wheelchair. It was a kind of art. And your own presidential seat, your own desk or something. And it was the seat of... Oh, he's just shaking. He's going to put in these words. Yes. Right. Here's a hint for you. Oh, thank you so much. Thank you so much. Is that his paper window? Oh, that's nice of you. Thank you so much. And thank you for having him. You don't have to be here. And that's... Thank you for being with me. Thank you. You're welcome.