 The title of my synthesis this morning is the development of Greece, with the full force of Asia, Africa and Latin America, Greece takes on a truly global concept, meant for a truly global constituency for us. The intention is to produce products, product lines and milestones, which are big, high-profile, innovative, visible, new, novel, nonsense, new models for city multiplication and city delivery system, new models for jointly building expansion capacity, new platforms for delivering agronomic, post-harvest and processing innovations, new products, new players, new challenges and new opportunities. Greece's vision of success is a series of qualitative impact cards with our outcome-driven innovations through product-oriented harmony and partnerships, partners of two kinds, direct, strategic and key, and the other boundary partners. I really don't know. This is the most contentious issue. Calling investment by partners in a contributing global, benefit-nationally invisible, as a working contribution unit with a specifically defined product, not simply a support or service provided in Greece. And how are they taking into account in this meeting, sharing new life in Greece? Logically, the expected impact is development of new technologies that fit farmers' needs. Our farmers' needs new survey that think fine, fostering improved policies and technology, targeting to enable improved price production and marketing will move to be think one in order to justify, in order to satisfy the demand-driven, farmer-oriented production system focus for what we are trying to do. Research approaches raised from the digital-typing, field-typing strategy, the higher venture and rise, sub-wide improved deadlines, resource management against resistance, dealing with the rise virus, and the rise. To simulate those textured defenses as global research approach for disease resistance, green super-rise for Asia and Africa, variety testing scheme, to learn the Alliance business model for post-arrest operations. But the most intriguing of all is Joe Rickman's 400 ex-combatant women in Burundi, where PPS, old farm demonstration, and farmers' field schools have been conducted. His button cry is getting technology to the target users. Quite interesting is the fact that Africa imports 400% of its obiturized needs. Someone at least bit the Philippines, the titan of the biggest rise importer in the world. Africa advices rise for Africa, sounds like an appropriate name, except that he has stopped naming reading lines of its releases. It continues, however, to track down what it releases without naming there. Every presentation mentioned partners, partners, without all their work would never be done. But how are partnerships possible? Are they the mirrors of altruism or the faces of aggression toward self-interest? What hopes it is the former, not the latter? In doing what they are doing, what a partner hopes, more than me, emerges. That is why a global program admissions. Thinking globally, acting globally, and benefiting globally. Of the many altruism programs I have participated in, this one brought the most questions, the most answers, and the most curious expectations of the audience. Quite noticeable is the active participation of young post-doctoral fellows on the way to being the next generation of rise scientists developed in China, under the green super-rise program. Be free to live China, so they can join other writers, men, producers, the strategy production and mitigate program for as far as one in India, with partners like the state governments, engineers, etc. Training was also provided. The right of tracking is being done using a different approach. South Asia is more than India, Bangladesh, and Nepal. It's part of every project. And I want to underscore this, because without capacity, you can't do your work. Critical working groups must have the rich, the ability, the system, and the credibility. It's more of an action group for knowledge management and dissemination. India's certified club advisory program combines experience and knowledge. Eventually, it will be a self-sustaining program, characterized by examination, education, experience, and evidence. This seaside evaluation of early entries using direct singing is a likely sign of the next revolution because of the present result. The rights-based production system in Bangladesh are delivering, they are developing, but waiting and delivering SSNN technology, fascinated with the expanded version of success from 60,000 directly affected households to more than 1 billion. I don't know how you do that. More than 30 years of research led to science-based SSNN. Printed materials failed to deliver, hence, we have no backbone applications. I wish there were actual cases from the film to report. It's also said that this is not for everyone, especially the rights mapping and global rights information gateway. Why should we do it? The answer is very simple. Together, we know more about rights than any other group or organization in the world. I think that's a valid reason. And then we have the SSD knowledge base using household survey database, which is a gold mine. I believe it. It's a gold mine of information. And now, for the courtable cause. Why? Believe it or not. Number two, business models should be location, technology, and after the specific. Another one from Joe Lickman. We can't eat potential, but we can realize it. Another one from India. Part of our seats are never easy, I agree with you, to have a man straighter impact in Africa. That comes from Africa. And finally, and collaboration makes the world a smaller place. I hope that, secondly, is right. That's all.