 want to talk about then get a chance to do a video today. So why not live stream it? If you would like to join us as always, you can join Discord. Somebody will direct you into the proper channel and you can talk with us. And I will provide that link in the chat if you're there right now, just give me a few minutes. But real quick, let's just start off with... We're gonna talk about the hearings in general and some other stuff, but let's just quickly start out and I meant to do this, but let's go ahead and check out this video of Ted Cruz calling out FBI Director Ray for several things, but specifically the fact that the FBI tipped off Hunter Biden about the searches that were coming for him. Like, what's that about? The FBI tipped them off? Yeah, they did. And just wait till you hear the response from Ray. He's got none, but let's go ahead and do this. Let me ask you also. The whistleblower testified that investigators wanted to execute a search warrant on a storage unit used by Hunter Biden and instead they tipped off Hunter Biden's lawyer before the search warrant was carried out. Is it typical FBI practice to tip off the subject of a search warrant before the search warrant so they can remove any evidence that's incriminating? What is typical is that when you're dealing with an individual who has a protective detail, it is typical for agents to be in contact with the protective detail. Does the protective detail guard the storage unit? Again, I can't speak to the storage unit specifically, but I can tell you that we'll come out for you. Why would the FBI tip off the subject of a search warrant about the storage unit that was going to be searched beforehand? Does that not undermine the very essence of an investigation that DOJ is purporting to undertake? Again, I'm not gonna be able to discuss specific investigative steps. But who is? You're not, nobody answers these questions and it's why people are furious with the cover-up because you don't believe the FBI is accountable to Congress or to the American people. Your time is up. Dr. Ray has requested five minutes. Democrats run to the rescue. Five minutes. I'll just, let me just, Senator, if I might just quickly respond and then go to the break. Thank you. I understand why this is frustrating. I do. But it is also the case that these policies that I am referring to about my inability to discuss ongoing investigations and certainly internal deliberations related to ongoing investigations are policies that have not only been in place for many, many years through multiple administrations of both parties. No accountability. But, in fact, these were policies that were actually strengthened under the last administration and that my predecessor was faulted in a fairly scathing Inspector General report for not following it. Wait, does this have to do with anything? You have an obligation to call it out. Engaged in this job. You have an obligation to call out corruption. Right, okay. Right, the FBI tipped Hunter Biden off that they were coming to search. They had a search warrant. They tipped him off about it so that he had time to get rid of anything incriminating. And when he asked about that, the FBI director, that's what he has to say about it. Blame Trump. That's what he did. He just was like, oh, well, Trump. And of course, oh, we can't comment. I'm going to investigate. It's just like the Trump card away from accountability. And of course, they had to warn Hunter Biden because he's got a protective detail. So like, what does that mean, FBI directors? Does that mean that powerful people are unaccountable because they have protective details? Like, what in the hell? All right, so I'm gonna go ahead and bring in my expert panel in Discord. Oh, you're seeing, okay, yeah. Sorry, this isn't a very professional deal here, but so yes, we're switching. Hello, my expert panel. Hey, how's it going? Hey, yeah, I could kind of hear myself coming through there. It was weird. I hate his wild voice. I was watching what you showed on the live stream, that video with Ted Cruz and all that. I got a question for you. Yeah. What does it mean by protected detail? Like, what does that mean? Who's protected and why are they protected? Hunter Biden's protected? I assume he's talking about security, kind of like what the president, excuse me, has. I'm sure that he's got some sort of similar protective detail. So he's saying, oh, well, we have, that's part of the policy and procedures. And Trump put that, I think he said, Trump put that in place or Trump let that continue or something like that. And then said that the FBI, I'm not sure exactly what he's talking about, but he was saying that he was just following the policy. Almost like it almost came off to me as a sort of condescending sort of backhand. Like, oh, well, the policy that you're so worried about here. Well, Trump put that in place and then we got a scathing portion of this IG report because we did not follow this policy. And so when we warned Hunter Biden about the coming surge, we were just following policy that you have to warn the protective detail. I don't know, he was so vague, but it's like when a oversight is asking the FBI director why the FBI is tipping off somebody they're investigating about a surge, like that's not the response I wanna hear. That's like, what is that? Well, they're basically staying with, I mean, without clarity, they are protecting him. Why are they, the question then comes, why are they protecting him? Well, I got the catch all reason for everything they do. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to talk over your gun. No, I mean, it's different when they do it. If that's what you're saying. No, no, no, I'm not saying that. No, I'm not even saying that. I'm saying that, like, when you turn on the TV every day and I'm sure everybody's got a good dose of it over the last few days, especially with Cheney doing all of her rounds in the media, warning about the coming apocalypse. Right, the coming apocalypse if Donald Trump gets, and look, going back to when I first started doing this, I've been talking about this. This is why I very much distrust that side because they're always doing this thing where it's like, no matter what my actions are, it's justified somehow because here's the reasons and, but that doesn't count for you. That doesn't count for their opponents. It's just them. And that's where it's different when we do it comes from, at least for me. But yeah, it's like, what are they saying? I mean, they're saying that they're unaccountable. But yeah, Cheney and them saying that, Trump, he's gonna be this huge, it's the apocalypse if he wins. They're not saying that they're unaccountable. They're saying that they're protected. So when people go through the normal routes of justice, they're so told in advance that by the time that people show up to look for everything, it just has a gift basket with some apples and crackers in it and that's all that's left in the... Right, well, that's the problem and it's funny because the whole accusation that the Republicans are making that the DOJ has been weaponized against the Democrats' opponents, I mean, that's just more proof that that is happening. I mean, look, there is no other side to this. It's all one way, all of it. I had a point that I was gonna get to there, but I lost my train of thought and I'm really annoyed. It's an extreme statement to say that it's all one-sided, but I will agree that it's more than 90% one-sided. Yeah, I'm being hyperbolic when I say that, but it's pretty darn close. I mean, I'm being hyperbolic because it is like so close to reality. I mean, and yeah, you know. So for this hearing, was this something that just happened recently? Yeah, yeah, and there's more clips that I wanna get into, but oh, and I, yeah, I wanted to make another point because there was another hearing that kind of ties in with what we're talking about here. Oh, and my whole point before when I was rambling there was just that like, these people are dangerous for this reason and it's yet another example of it where it's like the FBI director, the fact that they tip to, it's like in their mind, oh yeah, now I remember how this all started because you asked me, like why would he do that? And I said there's this catch all reason, right? And it's that Trump is this ultimate apocalyptic threat, right? So anything, like at this point, I think these people are gone, like they're so gone because they're in this alternate reality kind of bubble where Trump could actually do these things which he couldn't, it's just impossible and I can get into that, I've talked about before, but like there's no way Trump could do that. And so they're living in that bubble and that gives the press, the press is always biased. The press is always pushing real quick, let me just make sure I'm still, okay. Yeah, the press is always out for the Democrats, but now they have like this excuse they can use, right? And then they can like just outright openly campaign for the Democrats, but they can just be like, oh, but we have to do this because Trump is such a threat. And then ironically, they're the threat because what are they doing? They're actually doing the thing. They're making it so we can have a democratic process. They're basically, they're trying to imprison their biggest opponent. They're demonizing him every night and every day in the free press, making it impossible, like what if half the country wants to be president? Doesn't matter, you all, and then this all just gives them the justification, I'm sorry, I'll stop after this, but this just gives them the justification then to deny the election results when he wins and prison him if need be, and then riot like for the whole four years. You know what I mean? So there's two points I have in response. So you're saying that the narrative that's being spoken on the left is that Trump is an apocalyptic threat, but the question is what is like, I'm not for Trump, I'm not for anybody, but my question to them is what is the threat towards? Is it actually towards democracy or is it towards control? Because right now we're in a situation where it really feels like everything's controlled. They're running script constantly to make you feel like this is a democracy, but when you start to look into things, everything is narrated. It's a top-down dictated narration, not even from our own country anymore. That's what gets me the most. But then on the other side of the coin, let's say that they let Trump get in, all right? There's gonna be riots. Are you kidding me? Look at what happened the last time. If you're not expecting that to happen again, you're crazy. Antifa's gonna come right back out or whatever group you call them is gonna come out in mass to start burning shit. I know it's gonna happen. Absolutely. They're being giving all the justification they'll need right now. Like that's all being set up now. Sorry, and real quick everybody that's watching, we have 53 people watching right now, which is pretty good for us. Five to one. Yeah, and I just wanted to introduce, in case you didn't know, this is R.W. He is one of my admins, one of the most helpful people that's a part of this whole thing. So I just wanted to shout him out in case you all don't know who he is. Thanks, buddy. But yeah, anybody who wants to join us, especially from the opposition, you're welcome. I thought we had somebody. I thought Dank was in here, but. He's busy with this. Did you have more thoughts you want to make? Because I want to keep going with this, but I have more clips. I'd go to the next clip personally, because I feel like all the thoughts that I'm gonna make are the same over and over again. Right, yeah. Well, can I just show, okay, so all the Chris Ray stuff is basically that, okay? I'm not gonna show it all because it's just every Republican making the point that you guys are the threat because you're going after Catholics, you're going after everybody who's an opposition to the left and Democrats. And all you can say to it is, oh, I can't talk to, I don't know why. I can't say that why this. And he just does a bunch of BS. But to the same point that I was making earlier about these double standards, right, where they, and it's more than double standards because what they're doing is they're essentially trying to normalize the double standard. They're trying to normalize it like, yes, we have this right, but you do not. And it sounds crazy, but they are doing, they're over time, it is working in a way. And I want to show you an example of that that happened today with Riley Gaines. And it was another hearing today about men and women's sports. And Riley Gaines, if you're not familiar, I'm pretty sure you all are. She was a swimmer, right? You're not familiar with RW? Is that how you say your name? Am I saying it wrong? No, I'm not good on sports, that's all. Okay, well, she's a female swimmer and there was a man competing with them when she protested and got out of the competition, I believe, or maybe she got beat by the guy. I can't remember exactly, but she's become like this figure, against men being in women's sports and she was testifying today. And this female, this rep, Summer Lee, she's from Pennsylvania, Democrat. And I'll show you the clip here, okay? So she accuses Riley Gaines of being transphobic, okay, of course, right? Because they have their labels, they always gotta put it on you to shut you up. Watch what happens after that. And it's very interesting and it's just so, like, I think we all get it at this point, right? But I just feel like, it's like, man, I saw this coming like 20 years ago, it would get this bad and it is, it's that bad. So here we go. Oh, hold on, I gotta drag it over because yeah, I don't have, here we go. Such as teamwork and goal setting. In terms of mental health, studies show that participating in youth sports is associated with lower rates of anxiety and depression, lower amounts of stress, higher self-esteem and confidence. This woman must stop. Inclusion cannot be prioritized over safety and fairness. And ranking member Lee, if my testimony makes me transphobic, then I believe your opening monologue makes you a misogynist. Thank you. Boom. Oh, she doesn't like that though. Look at her. Thank you. Watch this, watch what happens. I recognize Ms. Perry for her opening statements. Good afternoon. Watch what happens now. Ranking member Lee and distinguished members of the subcommittee. My name is Sarah Partial Perry. I am a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation. As a former varsity athlete, the mother of a girl's varsity athlete and former senior counsel for civil rights at the Department of Education. I have as the saying goes. Madam chair, excuse me, I moved to have the gentle woman's words taken down. Ha ha ha! Oh, she did what I did to her? No, no, no, no, no. That's not the way, that's not the way it works. No, no, no. I get to do that. Not you, just me. Look at this, they literally are doing that. They're gonna wipe her words, which when she called her misogynistic, because she, because the congresswoman there, Lee. I don't think she's engaging in personalities. Can I just ask how it's fair to be called transphobic? There's a thing. I would say men disguising themselves as women. They muted her and she started to call him out. Hang on, hang on, hang on. Order, order. Let's get a ruling. Oh. Fuck you. Look at this. I'm like, this is like, it's such an absurd level. It's really such an absurd. This is like, it's like maybe not purposeful gaslighting, but it has the same effect. Like what is going on here? They literally think they have their own standards and we have another. Okay, I move to withdraw the point of order. Oh, wait, did she withdraw it? Oh, okay. Okay, I didn't realize that. I think she withdrew it. I think they were like, you can't do that. She tried though. They're like, definitely not bad. You should not do that, but it's too late, she already did. Okay, I just wanted you guys to see that because it's just yet another, one of those demonstrations where it's like, look, these people are not good, they're not good people. They're a threat to us all because they will do this from a small level, like a small little thing, up to the big stuff. Okay, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. I think they would have no problem rounding us all up, throwing us in prisons or our ditches. Like I really, and the whole time they'd be like, man, we have to do this because we're saving democracy and oh man, at the same time, we're actually saving the earth too because we're getting rid of all the opposition to all the stuff we wanna do to save the earth. You see what I mean? I have no doubt that's coming. Ranking member of the- Well, coming maybe, but we're not at the point where opposition is being thrown in ditches. That's definitely- Well, no, I'm right. I'm saying that's the end road of it. That's where this ends up. We're currently at coercion. Like, and where you said before that they're normalizing double standards, I think they're doing it because all the people that are pushing back before us and currently are just getting, I mean, I don't know this for a fact, but it seems like it's not getting anywhere for them. So at a certain point, they're just gonna stop pushing back. So, you know, whatever's gonna happen is gonna happen. And so you got into your transgender sports issue there, which we're gonna be watching lady ballers tonight on the server if anyone wants to hang out. I'm curious why we can't entertain the idea of chromosome-based sports like XX and XY. Like that's, is that too definitive? Is that not fair? Is it not fair that if you're born with XX chromosomes, you're in this category and XY, you're over here? Is that too- Well, yeah, I mean, but that's what we already do, right? It's what we fear. We're right, yeah. Right, I don't understand what the issue is with it. I would love people to come, or even having like a trans league, but like, they don't wanna do that. Well, one, because I don't think there'd be enough. Maybe there would be, I think ultimately that defeats the purpose of a lot of these people. I think there's probably genuinely people out there who have genuine gender dysphoria and they want to live it out. And that's fine, you know, as long as I don't have to like participate, I don't have a problem with it in their adults. But I think there is a subset, maybe even like it seems to be, maybe it's even the majority now because it used to be such a small percentage now that's kind of blown up into like a mind virus. And I think there's these people, it seems to be a lot of dudes, white men actually, who wanna use it as like a way to coerce people and get power over them. I don't know. I mean, I've watched lingerie league football. You know, it's stupid, but it's girls running around with like not much on. You're like, eh, I can get behind this. If they made like training football, or I can't say that word on YouTube, maybe. Oof. Lady dudes. I disavow him. Yeah, sorry. Lady dudes football, we might be surprised. Dude, that might get like more views than regular football. We don't know that yet. So maybe that's a business model that they can run with and you know, take all those people that are reading books to kids in the libraries and be like, come on, play some football with us. With the LGBTQ suicide rates, I'm not sure how long you'd have a player base. That's brutal, man. Oof. That's brutal. Well, so yeah, I know we did the transgender sports thing, but we got to let's let's repit it back to Ray just because that I did make the stream on that topic. Let me just play another Ray video. Maybe we can just talk a little bit about it. Hold on. Let me grab it here because the Holly one, especially the Holly one. One second. Yeah, no worries. But yeah, if anybody is watching wants to hang out with us tonight, we'll be watching a movie and hanging out. I look forward to, I'm sorry that I don't do good at speaking with people in the chat. I definitely see you guys typing quite a bit there, but I have to switch between a couple screens. So I'm not really good at that. But yeah. So I'm still finding Holly, but let me show Mike Lee. He did a good job from Utah. If you're not familiar with him, he's one of my favorites. He used to live in Utah for a while. Nice state. Also, if you're not following me on Twitter, or I'm sorry on X, I like to call it Twitter X, you should be. Fake news critic guy. It's FN critic guy. Ashley Jones. They won the director of national intelligence. Stated quote, FBI personnel conducted multiple queries of an individual. Oh, sorry. They had the same last name as the FBI personnel conducting the query. And on further investigation, what they learned was that this query was made after this analyst at the FBI had a conversation with his own mother and his mother expressed suspicions about his father having an affair, cheating on her, having an affair with another woman. And so as a result of that, they looked into it and this particular analyst admitted that he ran the queries because of this tip from his mother that his dad was having an affair. And because I've got a lot of material to cover, I'd appreciate if you could give me a yes or no answer to this. Was that analyst terminated? I'm not sure that I can recall the specific instance that you're talking about, so I'll have to go look at that and follow back up with you on that. And do you know whether the analyst's security clearance would have been revoked? Again, same answer, but let me check into that and we'll circle back to whatever we can share. Let me ask it to you this way. Yes or no? Would abuse of section 702 by a FBI employee, would that be something that would warrant the revocation of security clearance? Well, certainly abuse. I think we'd have to know what the circumstances were. Sometimes people have used terms like abuse in this discussion when it's been something other than what I would call abuse, but that's why we have this accountability procedures that have cascading. It's an example that I've given you as abuse, I assume you would not disagree with that. Now, the September of 2023 P-CLOB report disclosed two additional intentional incidents, intentional wrong searches from 2022. One instance from 2022 in which two analysts conducted queries seeking information about a person who was a potential tenant of a rental property owned by one of the analysts. And another instance from 2022 in which an NSA analyst conducted queries on two occasions, seeking information about two individuals that the analyst himself had met through an online dating service. Were the FBI employees who conducted those two illegal searches, were they terminated? Well, you lost me there for a minute. You referred to an NSA analyst? Yeah, yeah. So, NSA analysts, do you know whether anyone at the NSA was disciplined for that? And if they worked at the FBI, would they be subject to discipline? Well, I don't want to get into hypotheticals, but as far as NSA analysts, I think that would be a question for NSA. Now, were FBI employees involved in those? And if they had been, would their security clearances have been terminated? Well, again, I don't want to get into hypotheticals, but we have both the disciplinary process, which is separate from the security clearance process, and somebody who engages in a compliance violation related to 702 could be relevant to both. I understand. I would hope that the default answer would be, yes, they'd be subject to having their security clearance stripped and be subject to dismissal. Now, in an April 2022 opinion, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court noted the following searches of Americans' communications. 19,000 donors to a particular congressional campaign, 133 Americans participating in civil unrest and protests in the summer of 2020, and Americans who were in the vicinity of the Capitol, not necessarily inside the Capitol, but in the vicinity of the Capitol on January 6th, 2021. The DNI's semi-annual assessment of Section 702 disclosed illegal queries conducted in 2019 to 2020, quote, using only the name of a US congressman. The FISA court disclosed two particularly egregious searches from 2022. In June of 2022, an analyst conducted four queries of 702 information using the last names of a US senator and of a state senator without further limitation. On October 25th, 2022, a staff's operations specialist ran a query using the social security number of a state judge who had, quote, complained to FBI about alleged civil rights violations perpetrated by a municipal chief, a police, close, quote. Were the FBI employees who conducted those illegal searches terminated or did they have their security clearances stripped? Yes or no? Again, I don't know that I can speak to specific instances, but what I can tell you, and I think it's as important to this exchange, is that all of the instances you just listed off all involve conduct that occurred before the reforms that we put in place. Before the reforms you put in place, reforms that we don't even have access to. Right. Reforms that you've put in place. It was a whistleblower that brought that out. For 13 years. Not the FBI. During the entirety of those 13 years, I've expressed concerns to FBI directors appointed by presidents of both political parties and three different presidential administrations. Every darn one of them has told me the same thing. Don't worry about it. We've got this taken care of. We've got new procedures. It's going to be different now. It's never different. You haven't changed. And you keep referring to these policies, these new procedures. We haven't seen that. We're not even allowed to have access to it. And we have absolutely no reason to trust you because you haven't behaved in a manner that's trustworthy. You can't even as we sit here, tell me that people who intentionally, knowingly, deliberately violated the civil rights of American citizens that they were fired or that they had their security clearance stripped. Okay. So yeah, basically Lee's whole thing there is, we know they did all these things, but there's been no repercussions at all. Like nobody's fired. Why would they be, right? And Ray's whole thing is, oh well, they didn't know what they were doing or I don't recall. We got to circle back on that. You're the director. And look, I don't trust Ray already because he's got such a long history of bullshit. What would actually make a change in all of these systems where they meet and they don't have to say anything? They can ask all the questions they want. They can blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. What actually needs to happen so that there is a meaning to it all? Because right now it's just bullshit theater. Right, I know what you mean. Like the Republicans are doing all this, but where's like, where's the meat? What happens? You're showing us that all this is happening and how egregious it is, but in the end, what? Did I break the internet with my good-ass question? Yeah, it's good. Oh, can you not hear me? Can you hear me? I can hear you now. Oh yeah, I was responding. Sorry, I apparently had to be right on the thing. I was saying that, yeah, it's a good question because they're just telling us, yes, this is happening. Yes, it's corrupt, you know, it's out of control, but ultimately what happens? It's almost like another kick in the teeth almost. It's almost, you know, it's almost its own boot smashing on your face because they're telling you, yes, this is happening, but no, nothing's gonna, there's not gonna be any repercussions and nothing will change. It seems that way, right? All right, I'm expecting this to play out. Go ahead, Peter. So I was trying to listen, I was listening to what RWA was asking. It sounded like you were asking how can we, like our politicians are coming out and asking the FBI. And I think it's a good thing that the FBI doesn't tell the people to a point because the Federal Bureau of Investigation is just that investigation of we know how they investigate and it's easier to avoid their investigations. But what I'm thinking, I know that that might not be the best opinion, but what I'm thinking is maybe behind closed doors have them explain like their new, their reforms to the politicians. So at least somebody knows outside of the FBI what's going on. I wouldn't be surprised if after this court meeting they'll all meet behind closed doors and eat Jimmy John sandwiches and laugh and pat each other on the back, buddy. Why, you think it's all pure theater? Like they know, like they're all in on it. You really think so? 100%. I mean, I'm at the point where I feel like anybody that's in government at that power level is a part of the club. They might not know exactly how the club works at every single level, but they're in the club enough that they're gonna sit there and they're gonna obey and they're gonna play ball. I don't see any aspect of government anywhere in the world where it looks like the people, the commoners, us people that are bitching on the internet make a difference. I'm, I guess I'm black-pilled now. I don't know what to call it. Well, can I offer you a little bit that might change your mind on that? So as somebody who has been at this a while, I've been at this since, I mean, I used to listen to Rush Limbaugh and I got in on the, you know, don't trust the left wing liberal media back in the late 90s, early 2000s, you know? And I saw it back then and there nowadays, like for me to say that is like everybody knows that now. Like you look at the, and I'm not saying I did that, but I'm saying that like it's common knowledge now. Like everybody, like it wasn't just me. There's tons of people that over time have been doing it. And now, like I'm just one small dude and there's tons of like huge people doing it. There's like a million Rush Limbaugh's out there now. So there has been some change, I think. There's people that are speaking out against the narrative, yes. But let's look at the world stage for the United States. We have all these people that are running for president and it doesn't matter that all the candidates don't really matter. They're all just going through the motions. But at the end of the day, they know that it's between a guy that doesn't even know what's happening and a guy that everyone wants to put in prison. And those are the ones that we have to vote for in the end. But at the same time, we're still going through the motions. Yeah. That shows that the system's broken. And that's- Yeah, no, I agree. The playing is controlled. No, I agree 100%. It's definitely broken because it's like they get elected. They get up there and then it's like they're powerless. They realized that at that point, but they still have to pretend because they still have some power with us, right? And so they got to pretend like they do have some sort of power. And because I mean, look at the border. That's a perfect example. There are all these videos now of just border guards just helping them in. And who was it? Who was the right leaning female leader just elected? And she promised her whole thing was like stopping the migrants. And now she just agreed to let a whole bunch of African migrants in their country just completely like with the counter. It's like the people are- It's almost like we're being told you have no power. Like you can whine and complain all you want, but we're going to do what needs to be done or whatever we think needs to be done. It does seem that way. It probably is that way. What does that mean though? Like if that would mean that we're actually living in a tyranny right now. So what's that mean? What do we do at that point? I mean, I just waiting for them to take away our free speech rights, which they're working on. But I just worry that my whole like worry, and I think this is the way it'll go is they'll make it as hard as possible to understand like where the actual evil threat is. And they're going to convince people that the actions they're taking are for like the better good or whatever. And it's going to be really hard for most people to differentiate good from bad, good from evil or whatever in that situation. It's already there. And like once they've deteriorated our ability to redress our grievances with the government through free speech, then what? Well, Maya, do you want sugar coated response to your question? Well, we can't really, I don't think we can really get into it, but yeah, I would say walk on eggshells, but go for it. All right, here's a nice candy coated response. If you have the ability to move away from the city and get a nice little pretty farmer ranch out in the middle of nowhere, now's a pretty good time to do that while the economy is still working the way it works because it's very possible that in a short period of time that economy may not work that way. And it's very possible that in a short period of time they might move from coercion to persecution for anyone that's not following the narrative. And at that point in time, it might be a little bit too late to get far away from the hubs of chaos, which I call the city. Yeah, that's definitely true. Sugar coated as I can put that. No, no, I agree. And we're getting there, like the Democrats, and look, there's a lot of Democrats doing it, but I've noticed in particular, and this is not, I'm not being racial or anything like that, but it seems like the far left kind of Democrat, Black women right now are really trying to float that. Like I've seen it with, who was the other lady? What's her face? Her name's around the tip of my tongue. I can't think of it all of a sudden, but she, I'll get here and say it, but she was just, she was floating the whole idea of, oh, like we can go after our critics as heavily as we want, and she's like this other chick. But if our opponents criticize us and what we're doing, or, and this particular Democrat was talking about the Twitter files people and the journalists involved in that, she said that them trying, like them doing the stories and investigating Twitter, that it was creating threats against the Democrats who were defending Twitter and everything, and that that should be stopped somehow, okay? And that's what I'm talking about. I'm like, it seems to be a lot of Democrats floating this idea that we're gonna try and criminalize opposition to what we're doing and saying we can do all these things, but it's criminal if they do it. And we're getting really close to it. Because I mean, the media is not calling them out or holding them accountable. They're just kind of like, yeah, well, you know, we're not gonna say much. And then when it starts like the popularity of it starts ticking up, then we'll start promoting it. I guess I'm curious how many people in the, that are watching now and hanging out with us, how many of them in their daily life go out and talk to people in the public and, and get the vibe. Like I'm in North Carolina, I'm in the foothills. When I go out and I talk to most people, they think something's wrong and it's broken and they're worried about it. I don't experience many people that are the blue haired crew. And I'm curious if people that are watching now get to interact with the blue haired crew and what it's like in real life for them to have this type of conversation and just ask, you know, what do you think's going on right now? What do you think's gonna happen? What do you want to happen, blah, blah, blah? I'd be really curious for their insight because I don't get to experience it outside of the internet. Right. Yeah, you wonder how the normies or whatever you want to call them because I do feel like sometimes when I talk to family members or friends who aren't really into it much, they do seem kind of normie-ish. Like they just don't really know what's going on around them, you know? And yeah, those people, that's the people I kind of worry about. I feel like those, and when we're talking about mass illegal immigration stuff, I worry about those people too because I feel like those people and especially these, you know, our own like normie people that we're talking about are gonna be easily manipulated and convinced that like what's going on is okay and right, you know? The term normie frustrates me though because that means that to be normal means that you're not paying attention to anything. You're just like watching Netflix and drinking Bud Light. That's what you do. Sure. You're normal, keep up the good work. Yeah, for lack of a better term or you could say MPC maybe I guess that's a better one. But I feel like that's kind of like old now. I don't know. Goon, get your butt in here, man. I see you in the chat. You know where to go, dude. Goon, what's up, man? Come and debate us. All right, I'm gonna go help my wife here real quick but I'm gonna play one more and then we can move on to another topic. I'm gonna play one more Ray video. Now, this is the good one. This is Holly ripping Ray and for the FBI targeting Catholics. And it is interesting just how like dismissive and just kind of nonchalant they treat it. But we all know if it was like a, if it were Muslims or something like that or Sikhs, that'd be a completely different story but let me play it. Tristan, your testimony that you said and I'm quoting you now. The FBI uses all tools available at its disposal to combat domestic terrorism. Which now apparently includes the crime of being Catholic. Let's talk a little bit about the FBI's egregious targeting of Catholic Americans. You have repeatedly been asked about the memo generated by the Richmond field office. We now know in collaboration with multiple other field offices about recruiting sources in Catholic churches, you have repeatedly said that no human sources were approached. This is you on July the 12th in the house. You were asked directly by Jim Jordan. Do you think that priests ought to be approached to give information on parishioners? You said no sir, no sir. You went on to say we do not recruit open or operate human sources. We do not report on religious organizations. You went on to say this product meeting the Richmond memo has not resulted in any investigative action. But now we know that in fact FBI agents did approach a priest and a choir director to ask them to inform on parishioners. So were you lied to when you gave this testimony or were you lying to Congress? Neither, so your question conflates two different things. There's the intelligence product itself which the Richmond field office created. It was written by as our inspection found by analysts in Richmond, reviewed by people in Richmond and captioned Richmond field office product. Separately from that, there was an investigation of a specific individual who was amassing Molotov cocktails and posting about killing people. And it does not surprise me that there were people who knew that subject in that investigation. That is the guy building the Molotov cocktails and trying to kill people. The people talked to the witnesses who knew that person and I think the product, the Richmond intelligence product which cites that investigation is actually pretty transparent about exactly what I just said. No, I don't think so at all. In fact, the only reason we know this is a whistleblower has come forward and told the house under oath that the FBI went and interviewed priests and choir directors in the Richmond area. The house goes on to say that the FBI has repeatedly refused to disclose this information. The only reason we know it is because a whistleblower came forward with it. Just like the only reason we know about this memo is because a whistleblower came forward with it. How many other parishes around the country have priests or choir directors been approached? By the way, are Catholic choirs now or are they breeding grounds for domestic terrorism? Is this your latest theory? How many other parishes have FBI agents approached priests and choir directors to ask about parishioners? Look, Senator, we do not and will not conduct investigations based on anybody's exercise of their constitutionally You have done so and your memo explicitly asks for it. Your memo labels traditional Catholics as racially and ethnically motivated, violent extremists in need of investigation. You have a list of churches, a list in the memo. You've repeatedly said we don't target churches. We don't list churches. They're listed in the memo. So how many other parishes have you gone to to talk to choir directors for heaven's sake? So the answer to that question. No, I don't know the answer to that question, but I can tell you that we don't investigate people for their exercise of their constitutionally protected religious expression. That particular intelligence product is something that as soon as I saw it, I was aghast. I had it withdrawn. Well, you were aghast. I was. Really, and what have you done about it? Did you fire the people who wrote it? No, I had it withdrawn. Have you fired anybody involved in it? Senator, if you will give me a chance to answer your question. No, it's not hard. Have you fired anyone involved in the writing of that outrageous memo about which, frankly, you've repeatedly misled the public? Yes or no? The individuals involved in that product were not, just a minute were not found to have engaged in any intentional or bad faith conduct. And in fact, in fact, Senator, a number of the individuals involved, a number of the individuals involved in writing that product in the Richmond office were themselves Catholics. So the notion that they were targeting their own faith is nonsense. So they're going to get out of jail free card. I see. I see. So you're immune and they're immune. So we shouldn't ask questions about it. You haven't done a darn thing. You haven't fired anybody. In fact, what the House found is, what is it? You admonished them. They were admonished. And their respective supervisors were told to engage with the Human Resources Division to ensure that deficiencies are addressed. Oh, I feel much better. They've been sent to bed without food. Good heavens, director. This is one of the most outrageous targetings. You have mobilized your division, the most powerful law enforcement division in the world, against traditionalist Catholics, whatever the heck that means. And you're just told us you have not fired a single person. Here, it gets worse. Your Richmond field office, they thought there was nothing wrong with this. The House interviewed the head of the Richmond field office. He testified. It's all here in the public report. I refer you to it, pages 12, 13, 14. He testified. He saw no problem with this. He said he thought it was fine. In fact, we have internal memoranda of the members of the field office, high-fiving, one peer reviewer, another member of the field office wrote, I think this is a great product. I really enjoyed the read. Do you have a problem with systemic bigotry against Catholics in the FBI? No. What are you gonna do about this? Are you gonna fire these people or not? Those individuals have all been admonished and it is all going into their, if you would let me finish my answer, it is all going into their annual performance reviews which has direct impact on their compensation, among other things. Oh, I see. Oh, I see, I see. So the 60 million American Catholics who now learn that your FBI has recommended that priests be recruiters in formats, your FBI has gone to priests, choir directors, but we're to feel better because you've admonished them for their wrongdoings. You again are conflating two different things. Why not? I am taking your testimony where you said you do not. You said categorically, categorically, you said we do not, we do not go to priests and ask them about their parishioners. You said we do not, you didn't say we haven't, you didn't say we won't, you said we don't. It turns out you do and you kept it from the public. You deliberately misled Congress about it and the only reason we know about it is because a whistleblower came forward. I just fundamentally disagree with your characterization. There's no characterization, the facts are the facts and I fundamentally resent the fact that you have violated, if not the spirit, if not the letter, certainly the spirit of the First Amendment and use your law enforcement agency against Catholics in this nation. Let me ask you about, all right, I'm sorry, I'm back. Sorry, I was upstairs. Here we go. Thank you for being here. I noticed with interest in your written testimony that you said and I'm quoting you now. The FBI uses. Nice to see you there, Goon, buddy. How you been? Good man, how are you? I'm all right, I'm all right. You have any thoughts? Is it your chance now to talk about fucking Tim? So yeah, what do you guys think about that? What am I gonna talk about? I'm just curious, Goon, you know me well, buddy. I'm curious, I'm curious what I'm gonna say. I talked to you with some shit like that. You wanna talk about Doctor Who and the woke Doctor Who? Oh, is drone playing more video? What's going on? No, I'm here. Oh, sorry guys. For some reason I gotta like click on, I gotta click on Discord for it to transmit when I'm, yeah, I don't know what's going on with that, but yeah, I'm back. Are you done with that video? Cause I have some questions I wrote down. Yeah, that's the last one. All right, so first of all, bandit. I see you in the chat. I see you join Discord. If you wanna get in here in the chat, we're in the gaming voice chat just by chance. So I look forward to you talking. And then when it comes to the content of the video that you're just sharing, are they only targeting the Catholics when it comes to Christian denominations or churches? And if it's only the Catholics, are they only targeting conservative Catholics? Because that seems to be a world narrative. Yeah, so apparently it was just this one field office that put out this memo about Catholics specifically. And they were recruiting priests, I guess, as informants in these Catholic, specifically Catholic churches. Cause they've been, that guy in particular has been pounding on that for like months now, right? Yeah, I mean, it's for no, I mean, I'm sure he's got a bunch of Catholic constituents that are like, don't let this go. And they shouldn't. It's just in the environment that we're in, they're never gonna get like media attention. Nobody in the media cares, you know, so. And the current Pope is very, you know, woke and leftist, which makes the Holly kind of Catholic and the Catholic that the FBI is targeting kind of like, not that we know that these people are out, you know, don't like the Pope, but, you know, it's almost like they're trying to separate like two kinds of Catholicism, maybe. They're definitely pushing against conservatives because the movement is for the identity crisis type thing going on in society with people's genders and they're accepting that and he's also, the Pope himself is also going against certain, there was a bishop or cardinal, a cardinal, a retired cardinal that was pushing against him. And if I recall correctly, he just removed him from his luxury living retirement situation and threw him out of it because he was going against his narrative. So I thought that was pretty interesting. There's definitely a push amongst the Catholic Church between the two sides of liberal and conservative. And I'm not used to experiencing that from what I've paid attention to recently in history. Yeah, I mean, yeah, I don't really know. I was raised Catholic, but I don't know what's going on like the Catholic community, so. But yeah, I mean, that's pretty much all I had on the slate. I'm sure I can find something else to go into here actually. What is the, so for this hearing that's happening and the videos that you've shown, how long is there meant to be hearings yet? And then what is meant to happen at the end of it? What is the goal? Well, I think this is part of, this might be part of the weaponization of, let me see real quick here. That's what I thought it was, but it was a Senate judiciary. Here we go. It's the Senate oversight bureau, so. Oh, okay, so they're discussing the potential renewal of surveillance powers. And so they're saying like these hearings are like, why should we give you these powers when you're using them as a weapon against the Democrats opponents? Do you think it's gonna make enough waves that it will stop them from getting what they want? No, probably not. That's a negatory. In fact, I'd laugh at that. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Oh, that's depressing. Do you guys across the pond have any thoughts on us crazy Americans and what we're dealing with? I mean, I've only just joined in so I have no idea what you're really talking about here. Neither do we. I couldn't on the back tail of things. Oh, oh, hold on. Let me jump in there real quick. Doc Holliday with the big, he's Big Spender $5 Super Chat here. Pete Buttigieg is the hot dog eating champion of DC. I believe it. Well, if Doc Holliday says that, I believe it as well. I think he's a historic figure, so I think that counts as a trustworthy factual figure. I don't think Doc Holliday would ever lie. I don't think I'd go. Toonstone portrayed him as a pretty good guy, so I'm going to go with that. Toonstone is amazing. But to go on what you, your original question was. Doc Kilmer is a pretty amazing dude. Somebody just walked over your brain. What's up with me? There you go. Go ahead, Walsh. I got to hear right for you. Yeah, I mean, I've kept a reasonable eye on American politics since 2015. And from what I can see, I know this is from a little bit of a distance at the moment with Hunter Biden's laptop, but you can see that the way they dealt with that in October, 2016, by controlling basically calling it a fake, the three-letter organization is supposed to be there to protect you. They're actively lying about the contents of it and it's where it came from. Whereas it turns out it's all true, et cetera. They said it was all fake. And from what I'm seeing now, I'm thinking it's just going through the motions again and it doesn't even matter what evidence they got against certain families in America like the Bidens at the moment. Nothing will happen. And I mean, Trump looks like he might get done for something at some point with all the other, you know, with the other way the call. I would say the one case. I don't know. I think they're all going to fall through because the fraud case, I think that looks like it's falling through because the witnesses are like, this is all normal and it doesn't matter like what he would have, it doesn't matter the quotes or whatever he gave, the appraisals, like we would have given the loan anyway. And this is normal practice. And so that's probably going to fall through. They keep like reaching on that. And the January 6th thing is also like just total BS. Like just, I don't understand how it got as far as it's gotten to be quite honest. Like that just shows how far we've fallen. But basically, you know, they walked into a trap, didn't they? It was set up for them. And they walked straight into it. 100%. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the whole thing was a... And the legacy media and the Democrats, it is very much one-sided the way... It's like the REAPs business, and they can get done for a misdemeanor but then calling people to storm the capital. Right. That whole thing is insane. Yeah. You know, and he gets nicked two and a half years after everyone else, and he gets a misdemeanor, fucking no time serves or nothing. Right, and literally only because people were raising a fuss about it. Like if nobody had ever said anything about REAPs, you really think he'd have ever been charged? No. So I watched that 60 minutes interview with REAPs. I watched it knowing, you know, what I was watching. And I put a comment in. It was like two weeks after it was released, or like four weeks. It had loads of responses, which you'd never really get on a late video. And I put it in there. That's all I put in there was. Now, after watching this video, I've never been more convinced that REAPs worked for a company that worked for the FBI, whether he worked from directly or something. He was definitely there for a reason. He was definitely encouraging people to do things they shouldn't do. And they completely ignore it. And yet the evidence against this REAPs is so plain and clear. You know, it's audio. She's saying it, it's on camera as well. It's audio, whispering in the ears, baked Alaska. Yeah, we're gonna storm the Capitol. Yeah, literally saying storm the Capitol. I know. That's, to me, that's just like the icing on the cake. It's like, oh, come on. Like that's too on the nose. And let me just, and Colter, who now, you know, after watching, you know, remember she said the Trump was gonna, Trump was gonna be the repellent, we're gonna laugh to an honor. She's talked some sense in the past. Now, I don't know if you've noticed, Jones-Eck, she's now saying that the Patriots picked on REAPs. Yeah, I know. I, as you said, and Colter, yeah, I did a video on it. It was you that the video, was it? Yeah. I watched the video though. It's crazy. Yeah. Yeah, and Colter, and Colter, who has been called, you know, going back to the Bush years of being, you know, she's been accused of being a racist, far-right lunatic, you know? And now suddenly she's getting on with the New York Times to say, oh, this REAPs thing is just wacky conspiracy theorist, and I say this because there was a New York Times article, and the New York Times article told us what happened. And it's like, what, what? And how he lost his business and they're in hiding. It's like, okay, what? And you can see she's reading off something the whole time. Like she's literally reading off of something the whole, like the entire thing. And it's like, what is this? You might as well go into the capital or something like that. Yeah, oh yeah, she totally blows off. She's like, and Tucker Carlson, this wacky, she didn't say wack. She was lumping him in with like wacky conspiracy. Say, Tucker Carlson played this video over and over of REAP saying, I don't know, enter the capital or something. And she like rolls her eyes as she says it. It's like, I could almost not contain myself anymore at that point. It's like, I don't know what's going on here, but it's absurd. So yeah, I think you're up against it. Just as a general rule of thumb, the law seems to be going against it. Like you said that, I mean, the FBI then, you know, being questioned about the Catholics, I remember this coming out about 18 months ago, four a year ago when this horse come out. And you know, what the fuck are they doing? I mean, seriously, is that where they think their problems are with Catholics that maybe don't agree with a lot of this modern, I don't know, degeneracy that's going on? I mean, I don't know. Yeah, let me play that actually real quick, just because we're talking about it. People may not have seen it. Did you want to say something, RW? I got to get it ready. Yeah, I'm just curious if well, she can share if anything across the pond is kind of mimicking the same narrative that's happening. I'm not sure how many people here in the chat are used to overseas politics, but I feel like it's the world experience what's happening right now with the left and the right. And I'm curious if you can... Yeah, there's so much, I mean, I got really interested in the politics. Obviously when Trump started coming in and just entertaining, if nothing else, there's so much mirroring. There's so much mirroring, the immigration thing, like your housing, like, I don't know what the numbers are in America, but currently for us, 8.2 million pound a day in hotels, of 50,000 asylum seekers just on like a current basis. And I'm saying, you know, the sort of things that it's going on where the borders are left open, they're not tackling it. It's all mirrored. It's like it's a position. How does that work on your island though? Yeah, don't forget, you know, we fought against the Nazis. We had, you know, Dover is where basically we fought off many evasions because it's the closest point to France, 22 miles. And yet we can't stop, you know, a load of young males in a dinghy. Yeah, it's like it was, they sent over the brain virus first and then or like infiltrators or something that then recruited and they're just destroying us from within now. It's some sort of master plan that we're just watching unfold and there's nothing we can do. I mean, I mean, I want to make a comment to Lamont in your YouTube chat. Oh, so you just get booted. Shut in your mind. There was a guy that was basically saying that he doesn't appreciate like white racists and he's calling, he's like, you white racists, this and that. And so I'm just, I'm curious, he's gone now, I think, but like, was he really experiencing white people in his life that were coming up to him and being racist or is it just internet jargon? Who, who, I didn't see him. Oh, Lamont. No, he's gone. Someone, I think, I think Nillionaire took him out. Anyway, I just, I hope that he's not actually experiencing that in real life. And it's just like something he's saying on the internet. Cause besides the old people that live around me that are from that generation, I really don't see it. Yeah. And I'm just, just like, just, I live in Wales. And today there was a heavily pregnant woman that was stabbed repeatedly by an ex-boyfriend that turns out he's a Romanian immigrant again. And like two weeks ago it was the children being stabbed by another Algerian migrant. And like said, Europe's like a tinderbox and my win is just, you know. Yeah, let me, I actually have a clip I wanna play in relation to that. Let me, let me play this real quick just cause we were talking about Ann Coulter. Let me just throw this out there for anybody who hasn't seen it yet because it is pretty wild. Let me, and this will just be the clip. I think there might be my little meme things in there, but one second. The little meme things. I typically talk about the Ray Epps case because I mean, even people I like and I think are usually pretty sensible right wingers, they are all down with the Ray Epps conspiracy theory. And, what's up with this guy's eyebrows? He's got like vegeta eyebrows. I've spent my life covering them. We're trying to see what you'll see. I hate to regret. I hate Christopher Ray, I hate the FBI, but the New York Times, sorry, I often hate the New York Times too. Weird. Had a full and complete description of why Ray Epps was there, how he was defamed and had to sell his business and life. He was a true Trump supporter. He was going to his nephew, the clip that Tuppercat playing of him saying, and then we're gonna go into the Capitol or something like that. A human. That was the night before the day of he and the person he was whispering to, both told the FBI separately. No, he was telling us, don't go in, don't go in, don't go in. What the actual fuck did you just say to me right now? He literally had to sell this stolen business he had in Arizona with his wife. It was a wedding venue. Now they're in hiding. I wanna talk to the New York Times about it. I mean, there's a lot of it. The way the New York Times lies is by omission. They don't tell you things that are really sort of a relevant part of the story. No shit. All right, so I wanted to play the whole thing for you so I could just. So yeah, yeah, that whole, like, she told, here's, this is what happened with Ann Coulter. She's getting very old now. She's got, nobody cares about her, you know, the media. Oh, she's sorry. I mean, she's in obscurity at this point. I mean, even at her height, I was never a huge fan. I was like, I like Ann Coulter. I never was like, I didn't follow her, you know what I mean? But she would appear on Rush on Bon Tucker and stuff like that. But now she's obscure. Nobody cares about her. So the New York Times, or somebody offered her a bunch of money to be like, hey, come on and, you know, speak out against the Ray Apps thing. We'll give you a bit paycheck, maybe a gig. You'll get a gig. Maybe you'll be a, you know, columnist here on New York Times or wherever, you know, doing something. I have no doubt that she would do that. Why not? I think the carrot on the end of the stick is blue. It's blue. What do you mean? Well, the carrot on the end of the stick that she's chasing after, I think it's blue. That's just symbolic for it's liberal. It's left. And if she wants to have to obey, she wants. She yeah. Or she was just always, you know, a controlled opposition type figure who knows. It makes no sense to me because everything she said there, it just sound every single one of her fights was dumb, like really dumb. Like I couldn't, Yeah. Sorry, Ryan, but she didn't say storm the capital, did she? She said, let's go into the capital or some capital or something like that. But even that, the way she blows off such a big point is odd to say the least. Yeah, yeah, that's my point. That she's got it wrong or something like that at the end as well, right? Where it's a big difference. Well, you know, go into the capital, storm the capital, but either way, it's not a thing you should get wrong. Right, it's like, if you're going to speak so authoritatively about this, it shouldn't be like or something like that. Like you should know what you're talking about. You know what I mean? Like what you're saying? Yeah, she does not. She's just reading. I don't know if you paid attention there, but she's definitely reading off like a script, which, hey, look, when I do my videos, I make a script, but I make the script. It's not even a script. It's just like notes. And sometimes I'll look at the screen because just keep my train of thought, you know, and what I want to say just to keep the video, you know, anyway, but that's not what she's doing. She's literally just like reading some talking points that she was sent emailed by whoever paid her. You know what? I know that this is what happens, okay? Cause I get sponsors and gets what they do. They email me talking points. Yeah, but the worst thing about that is she's mostly seen the same stuff we've seen. So if he knows the real story, she knows exactly what the form is. Yet, I don't think she's clueless to actually what the reality is with Ray Apps and what was all that about. She just fatter, literally just fumble and bullshit her way through the interview. That's what I believe. Right. It was just, it was embarrassing. You know what it reminded me of was what's his face? I'm mad. I forgot his name already, but he did that interview about Hunter Biden on that podcast and the interviewer. Do you guys know what I'm talking about? And the interviewer just like slapped him around. Hold on. Anyway, it reminded me of that. I know the one, I know the one. Yeah, I don't know why I can't think of the guy's name, but he just got smacked around. It was embarrassing. It's like these people who are supposed to be the professionals and are betters are nowhere near as informed as we are. Like nowhere near it. Like what motivation do they have to be? They get paid and they get, they get accolades. They get pats on the back for just repeating the narratives. Yeah, it was funny because they said, no, this has all been confirmed now. This is like, and they're like, what? And you can see their face drop. I think it pulled it apart like two or three points in a row and by that stage, it was a car crash, wasn't it? Oh yeah. He's like, well, I got to go. And he had, and to his credit, he had been on the show for a while and getting smacked around for a while. But then he was just like, oh, I'm going to go now because this is getting too, here, here, here, here. Just because we're talking about it, I'm just going to play a clip of it one second. I'm going to get ready. It's ready. Just because we're talking about it and it's funny as crap. So let me just throw it out there real quick. I have to get some shorts done real quick. I'll try and get back. I hope you guys have some fun. Hello and welcome back. Thanks for watching. I don't want to do that. Hold on one second here. Oh, here we go. We'll just skip through it here. So I asked somebody, I don't want to say his name, who is the smartest guy in America who thinks that the Hunter Biden story is a nothing burger. And this guy told me, Phillip Bump. So I am of the opposite opinion and I want to talk to the smartest person I can find on planet Earth who disagrees with me. That's great. OK, well, I hate to disappoint you, but I would not say the Hunter Biden story is a nothing burger. I would say that the effort to extrapolate from Hunter Biden to his father is at this point a nothing burger. I've been a business partner of Hunter Biden's. That there would be times 20 occasions he said over the course of something like a decade of the two of them working together. During which, in particular, Joe Biden would be calling his son Hunter Hunter would pick up the phone as he was in a meeting with other people, on speakerphone and say, here's my dad. Dad, say hi. Do I think that Joe Biden, when he was cognizant of the fact that Hunter Biden was in those meetings, was aware that Hunter Biden was probably using that as a way to bolster himself? Yes, I think he probably was aware of that. Now you see that, you know, fucked up, you know, that. Does that mean that probably or for sure? I don't know. I can't read his mind, but I think he's probably aware of it. How many times look, I work for the Washington Post probably he's already realized that he screwed up and had conversations about the weather with strangers. Never. Strange? I don't understand. I'm saying that. He wasn't calling, he wasn't calling Hunter Biden's business associate, he's just calling his son. But wait a minute. Didn't Bump just admit that Biden probably knew that he was helping his son fight making those calls? Do I think that Joe Biden, when he was cognizant of the fact that Hunter Biden was in those meetings, was aware that Hunter Biden was probably using that as a way to bolster himself? Yes, I think he probably was aware of that. I don't understand. I'm saying that. He wasn't calling, he wasn't calling Hunter Biden's business associate, he's just calling his son. Right. And this was particularly in the time after Bo Biden had died and he was building a stronger relationship with his son. Normally when you get a call when you're in a meeting, you say, dad, I'll call you back in a meeting. Yeah, but that was Hunter Biden's decision, not Joe Biden's decision. Was Hunter Biden trying to leverage those calls? Certainly. Archer also said that Hunter called Joe Biden. He said there were occasions in which that had occurred. Yes. But do you have children? Yes. If your son calls you, do you know what it is or do you just take the call? Do I think that Joe Biden, when he was cognizant of the fact that Hunter Biden was in those meetings, was aware that Hunter Biden was probably using that as a way to bolster himself? Yes. I think he probably was aware of that. No. Well, no, I don't. If I'm in a business meeting, I usually won't. But that's what you're saying. You're saying Hunter Biden called Joe. I got to skip ahead here. Joe Biden thinks that Hunter Biden's call and Hunter Biden starts like really falling apart. Give me with things that have been debunked multiple times that I've written about. What's been debunked? These claims. I've written about this, about this argument about his dad calling him. I've written about this. Did you read what I wrote? It's not debunked. Neither of us were there. Well, I debunked it in the standpoint that I've already addressed this and presented the counter-arguments to it. OK. So I debunked it. I absolutely can see it. I debunked it because I disagreed with it. It's an article. Biden took it from me. What do you take from the text message to his adult daughter, Hunter Tech, that I have to give 50% of my income to pop? I have no idea what that means. I don't. I have no idea what that means. It's circumstantial evidence, and you prefer that. Has anybody asked her? I don't know. I don't know. Don't you think somebody should ask her? OK. I just said I don't know, and I don't know what to make of it, so I have nothing to say about it. Right there, Hunter's text says half of his income goes directly to the president. Thanks. I don't know what any of that means. Anywho, ready for lunch. What do you want me to say? Well, hold on. I got to leave. So are you leaving? No evidence, but then there's a text message where he says, I give pop 50% of my money. That's evidence. OK, well, OK, fine. So I appreciate you having me on. It doesn't. Something like that. Who do you think it would be more? I live in that. I'm saying, you can free to go. I feel you want me to leave. Like, just walk out and do this, because that way you can like, it's like you want me to leave. Is this a standard really? This is the way that Washington Post handles people who disagree with them. Yeah, when I agree to be on for 45 minutes. All right, anyway. Yeah, I played that. Sorry. All right, anybody there? Everybody still there? Real quick, I want to read out Doc Holliday. He said, love your videos, DroneTek. It's a shame you get throttled by the algorithms. Thank you, Doc. I appreciate it. Yeah, I mean, I don't know if that's what it is, or if it's just my content's not as good as it was. I mean, hey, I got to admit, I have three kids, one baby, one, I'm not going to call him special needs. He's not special needs. But he does require a little extra help, because we got a little couple of things going. But it's tough, and it takes a lot of my time, a lot more than it used to. And I'm doing the best I can. And I think maybe I'm just not, I don't know. Maybe I'm just not doing the right things in the videos. Whatever. I'm going to keep doing this whatever the algorithm does. I don't care. I'm just going to keep doing it, so thank you, Doc. I appreciate it. Oh, Doc again. Thank you, Doc. Man, he's so giving. It's Christmas early. Doc is, it's Christmas. Am I the only one that thinks it's odd that seven Capitol Police officers committed suicide over January? I don't think it was seven. I think it was two. I don't think it was seven. I think it was a couple. But even that's odd. If anybody's around, I do think that is odd. Maybe it was three. But the media definitely tried. The media is all about connecting these suicides to January 6. And I have so many questions, so many questions. And it's very odd, and everybody else should think it's odd, that nobody asks questions about that. And I think that's because the media basically portrays it as worse than 9-11, worse than Hiroshima, or whatever. Worse than the Civil War, it was an insurrection, an armed insurrection, they always say, when the arms consisted of flag poles. But and then they show the gallows, even though the gallows was like a miniature and not functional. The whole thing is Hollywood production, almost. And that's part of it. Early on, they were saying, Brian Sicknick was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. These police were killed. That was a lie from the very beginning. He died in natural causes. There was no blunt force trauma. There's no proof whatsoever. That had anything to do with January 6. And then these other officers committing suicide, like, OK, immediately my question is, one, why did they commit suicide because of a fairly minor riot and involving less than 400 people, which is pretty small compared to what they had been dealing with years prior? So that's one question. And is there any evidence that any of these police who killed themselves had any violent interaction or anything? I've not heard anything about that. All I've heard is that, oh, yes, because of what happened on that day, they just couldn't live. OK, so then my next question is, did they do something on that day that they couldn't live with? Is that why they killed themselves? Or, lastly, did they not actually kill themselves? Were they taken out because they were part of something or saw something that they weren't supposed to or they took part in something and they were a loose end? I don't know. But the whole thing is very strange. And I only think it's strange because the media is so determined to use that as to bolster the whole January 6 narrative. Anyway, I'm done. Yeah, that's definitely one hell of a rabbit hole. I don't exactly know what to comment on that, but I can understand each of your viewpoints of possibilities. I do want to give Doc Holliday some respect for helping to support you. I know that it's not possible for all of us to do that, but the fact that he can is great. Yes, thank you so much. I got to hang out with DroneTech the other day. It was like three hours, three and a half hours. He streamed his process of him compiling his video in the background. And after three and a half hours, he spit out a 10 minute video clip that he posted to the internet. I'm trying to get him to do a live stream of him doing that process so you guys can appreciate how his eight hour day turns into 10 minutes for you guys to appreciate. But if he livestreams the process, we can pick on him while he's doing this stuff. Thanks, man. Yeah, it's funny you mentioned that because I was actually, I think I am going to live stream a few of them on your recommendation. Actually, I used to. I told him, if you look at my old live streams, I actually did that a few times. Maybe not in the best way I should have done. R.W. has offered some suggestions that I think are great suggestions that I'm going to try a few times. But then, if you want to watch those afterwards, I am going to make that a Patreon thing to where you can come if you subscribe to me on Patreon. You're going to be able to come and watch that in Discord and just hang out with us while I work on that stuff if you want to. I don't know. Some people might like that. R.W. seemed to think it was cool like you just said. So yeah, I'm going to stream it a few times, but then that's going to happen. I'm going to make it pay for it. Behind closed doors. Yeah. Hey, man, thanks. That makes me feel good. Oh, man, Doc did it again. He did it again. Five dollars. Hey, man, that's 20 bucks from you. Thank you. He said, but not one single officer committed suicide. The Pacific Northwest. All right, not one single officer committed suicide in the Pacific Northwest during the 2020 summer of love. And that is worth mentioning because in 2020 alone, you can look this up, over 60,000 officers injured, over 60,000. And anybody who followed that stuff, we know there was the attack on the White House, I believe June of 2020. There was the, there was, I'm sorry, I'm trying to think of it. There was another big incident. I'm trying to think of it, but there was several big attacks on police during that time. And that was just 2020, like go back to 2015 when the media started lying about cop shootings to try and incite riots. Think about that. They're trying to charge Trump right now before an election for inciting a riot, even though I made the argument a million times longer, not gonna go into it, but it's absurd. But yet they incited years worth of riots that led to people dead, communities wiped out, businesses wiped out, 60 over, well over, probably hundreds of thousands of police injured. Have you ever heard of a suicide? Have you ever heard, have you ever heard of anybody charged for injuring any of those police officers ever? But when he's talking about the officers up there not committing suicide, from what I remember seeing in the Northwest, when Antifa was riding and burning the buildings down and stuff, it looked like the police officers were trying to protect people or protect the buildings and protect what they believed in. And then for January 6th, there's the possibility that they were told that they have to put on a show and some people might not have been able to live with that in the end. I think that is probably the truth. To me, that seems like the most, that's the Oscrums razor right there. I would tend to agree with you. Oscrums razor. But you would say, I would say that's quite conspiratorial, isn't it? Is it though? I'm not gonna sit here and try and prove it. That's just my own discernment, I guess. Right, but like the official story has got no explanation whatsoever. It makes no sense. It's just like, what? It's just to make the point that I think we all, we all look down, I mean, me more than most, yeah. You know, looking for conspiracies. Real quick, Doc Holiday did another $5 Super Chat. Thank you so much, Doc. They turned down, or they tried to burn down police stations with officers inside. Yeah, they did that on, they burned down a guard post at the White House in June of 2020 and almost a church, a historic church. And in Portland, in Portland, they tried to burn down a precinct. Yeah. Yeah, and if you got any of you watching right now, get on YouTube, look up Portland Riots and just look at the like almost, it looks like a military almost, launching an all out assault on federal buildings in Portland. I feel like there's a, there's probably quite a few of us here right now that should happen live. Right, all of us did, I think probably. I mean, I was watching, yeah, during those times, I was watching it almost constantly, all day long. I remember when they were with it. They were throwing petrol bombs at departments. It was all boarded up. I mean, it just looked like a boarded up building, basically. But yeah, it didn't go up on anything, but they were launching, but he launched in Molotovs at the front, like where they could, but you could see the sort of police inside, sort of dealing with a little bit of flame that was going inside, but it's crazy. They even threw actual bombs. There were, there were like, I don't know if they were dynamite, but they were, there were like actual bombs thrown, multiple ones. There's videos, there's some videos. I don't remember. Not fireworks, not fireworks. There was a, at least one. Here, let me see if I can find it here real quick. It's probably hard to find now. I tell you what, you know, the battle of, it's a, it's a, it's a battle of Berkeley three, I think it was. That footage, I don't find it on YouTube anymore. Yeah. I just want to play this sound for Doc Molly real quick. This is for you, buddy. You make me want to be a better man. Yeah, Doc, man. Really, I appreciate it. I really do. Every little bit helps, especially these days. Not getting the views I used to, you know, but you know what? I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing. And I think it'll come back around eventually. Hopefully. Cause what am I going to do now? I haven't done, I had done IT like all my life up until this and it's like, I've been out of IT now for six years or something. I think I'm useless at this point in IT. This is still internet technology, man. I know, but it's different. Yeah, maybe I could get into like video editing or something like that, a graphic design. I don't know, maybe like, you know, I think I've said this before, but when I first got with my ad agency, they were really surprised that they thought it was like a team of people that did these videos. They were really surprised by that was just me. That and your four kids, right? You're right. I was just, well, I didn't have four kids then I had two. So what's happening Ryan? You get no traction at the moment. What do you mean? Dude, he's both tires in the mud, bro. Yeah, man. It's just, I mean, there's been. I just watched your video. Why am I confused again? Yeah, I know. Well, it matters. You know, it doesn't, ultimately it doesn't matter to me, but it does because I've been there, you know, I've been at the high point and I want to get back there. You know, it's like chasing the dragon. So, you know, I like the format you do with a bit of comedy and the videos and I should show it as well. I like that format. You know, it's something I can quite, you know, quite easily listen to. It's not like a 15 minute video where you, you know, sometimes that's like seven minutes too long, as far as I'm concerned, a lot of occasions. So no, I think the way you do it and like I said, if, for example, you haven't changed your format, which I don't think you have, and you're now not getting the views you were getting, you're definitely in the bad books at the moment. Yeah, it's, you know, it's ups and downs, but partially right now I'm my own worst enemy just because I am not doing daily. And if you look, they'll say, oh, you know, there's no proof that doing daily will help you with the algorithm, but it does. There are 100% books. I know a couple of YouTubers in the UK called DJ Audits and he does a video four o'clock every day. He's very good at his job. He's one of the best in the UK at it, in whichever he is. And the views he get is, because he does daily 100% regular downloads, which is like you said, and the algorithm of all accounts, they keep saying it, loves it. And from what I see here, it fucking does. Yeah, back in the day, that's the way it was. That's why, because I was just, I had a lot of energy. I had some free time because I only had a couple kids and I was just able to pump out stuff. And I did that for a long time and it adds up. But I've noticed, you know, in these last few, like this last year, yeah, it's like really affected it. But I'm, you know what? I'm just treading water right now. And in 2024, I'm gonna hit it hard and we'll see what happens. But I am gonna wrap this up now just because we're dropping viewers. And it's starting, you know, we're kind of running out of things, talk about it. Before you close it up, can I say something real quick? Yes, go for it. So for all the people that are watching right now, I think there's still 37. It would help Drone Tech if you would actually join the Discord because YouTube's one thing, but a lot of the background thoughts and the think tanking and the event planning and all that stuff, all the ideas flow in the Discord. And if you could become a part of that, it would really help the end product that you guys appreciate. And you get to have a say in it and appreciate it more. And he actually does pay attention to the Republic of the people in his Discord. So you'd benefit and he would benefit if you guys would be willing to become a part of that. And that's my two cents. Yeah, absolutely. Come and join the community. I, honestly, the whole, my whole trail up to this point, I started out in lots of different little communities that grew into big things. And that's, I've always been about that. And I think that in order to, it's one thing to be pumping out content, but if you have a community that community can grow and you can actually spread ideas that you're trying to spread. And that's what I wanna do. I don't wanna just put out videos. I want to actually, I can make some change. And so I can only do that if you guys come here, join the community. And like RW said, add to the ideas. This place is always brainstorming, always coming up with ideas and events and just ways that we can actually do something instead of just, like he said, spinning our wheels. But yeah, guys, I'm gonna go ahead and wrap this up. It was fun. I think we've been going for a couple of hours now or about. And man, so much thanks to Doc Holiday. Thank you so much, man. I know it's throwing your money at some random person on the internet. That's not something I do a lot. So I really appreciate it when somebody actually has enough faith of me that they'll do that, really. As well as all the people that came and just hung out and made the chat light up and did some view time, some thumbs up and just chilling. Doc, he asked, I don't know what a Discord is. So yeah, Discord is just a, it's a, if you don't have, so it's just like on your phone where you can just use a website or the app, download the app. You can download the app, you don't have to. You can just use your browser, just click the link, it put you in a server, our server, the drone technology underground server. And you can just text chat with the group that's hanging out here or you can get in voice chat. You can play games. There's built-in games at Discord where you can join the group, just any of these little channels and play with the group. It's really easy, it's fun. And actually maybe I might hang around and maybe we'll do something like that if everybody wants to, just to kind of show you what you can do here. But yeah, it's a lot of fun. You guys should join. It's just something extra you can do. You got nothing better going on. Hey, if you wanna just talk about a topic that's going on, look, you got a community here that's ready to go. And I gotta tell you, these people that are in this community are great. They're all great people. Many of them have been with me for going back forever. Cindy Ben, I don't think she's in the Discord. She's in the chat right now. She was earlier. She's been here forever. So yeah, check it out. If you got nothing better to do and you wanna join a group, we got it. Yeah, real quick. I'm asking Nilly to drop an invite link for the chat. Otherwise, it's in the description. It's very at the one at the top of the frog head on it. It's, you click the link and it's gonna send you either on your computer or your phone towards the app. And it's just, it's basically a community hangout app with voice chat and games. But we drone check and I use it to sync tank and prep and chill. And it's the background that spins the wheels for his end content. Absolutely. RW's been a lot of help to me as well as Riddle and many other people in this Discord. So I really appreciate it. And it's fun. I don't think we wanna play games because I can hear up there that my wife definitely needs my help with the kids here getting them to bed. So I am gonna- I'll hang out, once I'm done with my chore list in like 20 minutes, I'll come back down and I'll hang out if anyone wants to chill them out. Yeah, I might actually hang out and play some games. I'm just not gonna stream it. But if you guys wanna hang out and do anything, probably gonna be here for a little bit. And I thank you all for watching. Keep checking back and I should have a video tomorrow.