 Hello, friends, and thanks for hanging out with us here on the Market Report at Cointelegraph. I'm your host, Benton, and we are joined again by our resident experts, Marcel and Sam Borgi. Sam Borgi is our business editor at Cointelegraph, where he brings a decade of experience in economic analysis and financial market writing. Marcel Peckman applies his 17 years of experience trading derivatives options and futures to the crypto derivatives markets. Fellows, little mini-pump this week, big news with Twitter, Elon, we got Binance headlines, lots of big stuff happening this week, and then the macro landscape, as we all know. What's going on? Marcel and Sam, how are we feeling this week, guys? Oh, Benton, to be honest, I never like when altcoins, especially man coins, pump ahead of the broader markets. I think that's a bad percentage, so I have a bad feeling about this week. We'll see what happens. Sam, what's up, man? Yeah, obviously my overall view of the market really hasn't changed. I've been expecting big pumps during the bear market for a long time now. We seem to have gotten it this week or last week, although concentrated mainly in Doge and some of the altcoins. Bitcoin coming close to 21k isn't really that big of a deal for me at this point. I'm cautiously optimistic about the whole Twitter thing, but we'll see how Musk implements the changes and whether we're going to start to see some more crypto incorporation into the whole Twitter experience. We'll see. I know you were saying earlier on the pre-show, it's time for accumulation, it seems like. I know you're very fundamental driven, Sam, so got to have respect for the constant steady views there on the market and always appreciate here and here in those insights, but I want to take a second to thank everyone for joining today's show. Looks like we have Catherine Rhodes back tuning in from LA. Sunny Los Angeles, welcome to the show today. If you have questions from Marcel or Sam, go ahead and drop them in the chat. They will be fielding those questions periodically throughout the show, and don't forget to drop your Twitter handle in the chat as well as we're going to be giving away a one month subscription of Markets Pro. That's $100 value in your pocket for just dropping your Twitter handle in there. So make sure you go ahead and do that today. But first, we're going to jump into our weekly roundup to see what is going on in the Twitter sphere. As we all know, is Elon going to be using some AI here to help us out today? What do we got here? Let's jump into our weekly roundup videos. Can't forget that it was the Bitcoin wiper paper anniversary yesterday. Big shout out to Satoshi for doing God's work out there. We appreciate it and want to recognize the old white paper anniversary here on the show today, even though it was yesterday. Well, we always bring the memes to you. So let's jump into our memes for today and see what we got cooking up. Danilo, what do we got for this week, man? Just show my portfolio. It's a good meme. Just show my portfolio balance. Checking the address before sending the ETH. I think we've all been there. I have to say I've made some bad transactions. Definitely going to be using that microscope next time I'm sending Reddit collectibles, NFTs on OpenSea. That's right. Big news is last week with Reddit, big stuff on the headlines. You're building free speech platform? Yes. But have you tried building free speech money? That could be interesting. Very, very interesting stuff. Food, rent, crypto? Yeah, we're all there. We're all there. You may have to run one under Doge. Do something. To eat something. Well, Dogecoin, as we all know, made the headlines here over the last couple of days. Seems like a lot of speculation around the acquisition of Twitter by Elon. That's going to bring us into our first headline for today from Cointelegraph. Quick shout out to Khalid and Ahmed for tuning in today. I see Catherine chiming in our chat. Binance wired 500 million to Twitter for this transaction, guys. What are we to gather from this? Why do you think Binance wanted such a stake in this company? Was it for business practice? Was it for philosophy? Where do you guys stand on this, Marcel? First, we got to remember that CZ, the Binance owner and creator and CEO and almighty, he's the big winner of crypto markets. The guy paid $400 million for CoinMarketCapsum two years ago. I think he's much wealthier than Satoshi, than Arthur Hayes from BitMax, from Sam, from FTX. I think he's the real winner here. He created an empire. He has the biggest exchange. He has the biggest market cap site. He promoted a bunch of ICOs on his launchpad platforms. But if you think it through, $0.5 billion, so 500 million out of a 44 billion deal, it's not that much. I don't think Binance will have a voice in saying, well, if you're going to do payments, you have to use Binance Smart Chain or you have to use BNB or you have to use, I don't think he's going to have a saying at all. So it can be important for the cryptocurrency. $500 billion is a lot of money. But if you're paying 44 billion for a social network, 0.5 billion doesn't give you voice. All right. Well, I mean, do you think it's nice to have at least a seat at the table, Marcel? Is it nice to have that crypto voice maybe shaping or forming some of the decisions that may be potentially made? No, I don't. I think it's dangerous. Every time I see someone trying to represent cryptocurrencies, this person or this company is in fact trying to shield their products and services. You don't see somebody saying, I'm a grant manager for Bitcoin. I want more people to use Bitcoin. We had that in the past. That was Roger Ver, Bitcoin Jesus. And you'll see what happened to him later. He went on to shield an outcoin, Bitcoin Cash and died. But I don't think that a person or a company trying to promote cryptocurrencies use is good. So Sam, where do you fall in this? And do you feel like this that Binance could potentially make an impact? You heard Elon talk about how he wants to potentially revamp Twitter to be more of a WeChat platform, which is huge in China, all-encompassing. You pretty much can live your life on WeChat. Where do you kind of fall in all this in? Well, I don't particularly care about Binance or what CZ has done. I mean, I suppose having a seat at the table, for me, it's probably a signal that maybe they expect there to be more crypto integration with Twitter in the future. But there's already been rumblings of that before CZ came on board. It's probably a business decision. Again, as Marcel alluded to, I don't really put much stock in these company leaders trying to be the voice of crypto. Look at the whole Sam Bankman-Free thing recently with respect to crypto regulations. So I don't really look to a certain figure to advance the sector forward. So for me, I'm just looking at it and see what Elon actually does with it. I'm cautiously optimistic about the acquisition deal in general because Twitter was becoming unusable. And I think that the censorship that we were seeing wasn't on point. So I'm cautiously optimistic that Twitter is heading in the right direction, whether it actually reaches that goal or not is yet to be seen. But ultimately, Elon made a business decision, I think, and we'll see how it plays out. Regarding the financing, I think there was 18 different firms or entities that were responsible for the financing of the Twitter deal. Binance being one of them is not insignificant, but I don't necessarily look at it as a positive per se. It's going to depend on how the platform evolves. Getting in some kind of crypto-native features is going to be probably a boon to the sector in general. But let's just see how it all plays out. I'm not going to get too excited just yet. So what I'm hearing from you guys is that you don't think it's a big catalyst for crypto. And I guess my thing is this though, is to play kind of devil's advocate here, is what if this ultimately does become a driving force for more crypto adoption? We've seen the integration with the crypto wallets on Twitter. I think that kind of fizzled out. But when it comes to potentially what if you could earn from being advertised to and get distributions to your crypto wallet, things like that, what if an advertising model is completely flipped on its head? Do you think that could potentially sway any of your opinions? Well, let's imagine that Twitter launches its own token for rewards and stuff that you are saying. I doubt that they will hand out cash or US dollar or stablecoin to the users because Twitter is not a profitable company. So they will simply not hand out advertisers money that they don't have to users. So likely they can hand out some NFTs. They can hand out their own Twitter token if there's any value on that. But if you think it's true, in a couple of years, maybe a decade, every company in the world will have either their own token or a crypto digital asset web wallet integrated. And that goes for Starbucks, that goes for United Airlines, that goes for Exxon because our world is based on payment processing. For everything you need, you need money. So the companies can profit in two ways. First is by having the client's assets. So if you deposit money in a bank, the bank can loan money and earn some interest on your deposit. The second way to earn money with clients' holdings or wallets is by having information. If I know where you're spending money, if I know what you are transacting your cash or your digital assets in, that's valuable information and I can sell that. So I do think that every company will integrate digital assets and wallets and et cetera and tokens, but that doesn't mean that adoption will increase. Like El Salvador, they are forcing adoption for the users. So every company, even McDonald's has to accept Bitcoin payments, but less than 20% of the population is using. So I don't think that Twitter having its own token or own web wallet will push adoption up. It doesn't happen that way. We've all seen the flaws, I think, with the Twitter mechanisms. But I guess, based on peer speculation, let's just say that Twitter is able to revamp its model. Do you have any fears of this becoming another surveillance tool for nation states? If this were to become this kind of WeChat type of platform, Sam? I mean, I don't see any indication of that now, based on what Musk is telling us. But again, he has his own vested interests. And Marcel mentioned a really interesting point is that Twitter has really never been profitable. And if you take a look at its earnings reports, I mean, things like organic growth and profitability were a huge sticking point. So I personally think he overpaid $44 billion is a colossal overpayment for Twitter, just given the fact that it lacks profitability. It lacks a lot of that organic growth and there's a massive spam and bought problem. But again, those who came to the table obviously expect to benefit from it. I mean, CZ, for example, is not going to deposit $500 million for nothing. He's obviously expecting there to be some kind of positive tailwind. In terms of the surveillance aspect, I hope that doesn't become the case. I'm not terribly familiar with how WeChat operates. But right now, I'm just cautiously optimistic that he can at least nudge Twitter in the right direction when it comes to free speech. Even people I don't like who've been banned, there should be some reconsideration as to whether they should be able to return or not. I don't get the sense that Musk is going down the WeChat route, the authoritarian route. Again, what the hell do I know? We'll find out in time about how this whole thing pans out. So my last question, I guess, regarding this is a couple I see Catherine trying to chat there questions about Dogecoin becoming the native token of Twitter. What ultimate direction do you think this platform will head into considering the minor stake that CZ has could be in Beechain and BNB or is it a native token or is it Dogecoin where simply Elon just loves the irony and that will become a leader for Twitter? Marcel, what's your take as to what could potentially be a native token for Twitter? I think instead of speculating, we need to think what has Elon done with his own companies. And what he has done in the past was accept Bitcoin payments for Tesla acquisitions. And more recently, he initiated Dogecoin payments for memorabilia like t-shirts and stuff on his website. So not Tesla cars, but Tesla memorabilia. But for buying cars, he only accepted Bitcoin payments. So I do think that a kind of integration of Dogecoin with Twitter comments or at least for new users to pay a $10 fee to join Twitter so you avoid bots, that could be done in Dogecoin. And I don't think that's going to drive adoption. I don't think that changed what the holdings of Bitcoin in Tesla's balance sheet. There are two different things. One, it's micro payments for a bot problem. The other is solving fiat money issues which Bitcoin was designed to. So I do think that he's going to try to integrate some micro payments. I don't see Lightning Network as Elon Musk's preferred solution. And it's important to note that A16Z, which is a venture capitalist in cryptocurrency industry, is also backing the deal. They love sheetcoins. So I do think that sheetcoins, but not BNB, will be used on Twitter integration. Sam, any different take there? No, but I've seen the question from Catherine asking whether Dogecoin becomes a native token of Twitter. It's certainly possible. If Doge became the native token of Twitter, does that really solve any of the monetary issues that we have today? Doge is an inflationary meme coin. In fact, Musk backing Doge, he backed it as a sort of a joke and he basically said as much, wouldn't it be funny if this meme coin that was created as a joke becomes the default currency? But if it did become the default currency, it doesn't really solve any of the issues with the monetarism that we see today. So for me, his whole dabbling in Bitcoin was more of a distraction than anything. So I don't necessarily think this is going to increase adoption. Adoption has to occur on the organic level. It has to be a reason why people are adopting crypto. For example, you have an emerging markets, people are adopting stablecoins because it's a lot easier to have access to stablecoins in certain markets when your native currency is being inflated. So we have seen a real world use case for stablecoins. We're starting to see more in Bitcoin. Although the top down approach of El Salvador, I don't know how positive that's been so far. But overall, I think adoption levels are still fairly nascent, especially on the payment front. Twitter could help that if it incorporates different crypto payment methods. But again, incorporating Dogecoin, what's the difference between that and the US dollar in that case? I don't really see much of a difference from a monetary perspective. So that's kind of my take on it. Yeah, it seems like it's the same problem, just different technology that's being used there. So I guess while we're on the topic of this Dogecoin seems to be the rave this week, obviously, lots of people buying this rumor, we saw the price rally about 150% in about four days. Now it's showing signs of being a little bit overbought. So meme coin madness, Dogecoin was one of like six coins that pumped this week. I'll quickly kind of scan down this article here. We saw SHIB, we saw Doge Elon Mars, Baby Dogecoin. Were you packing your bags on any of these? Were you scooping up any of these meme coins, Marcel? No, I used to have some Dogecoin back in 2017, 2018, but I sold them during the bear market, unfortunately. But I do think that Doge, it is a fork of Litecoin, which is the fork of Bitcoin. So the code works. We know how Doge works. The problem is that I don't know anyone running a Doge node. I mean, yes, the validators out there, the miners are the same people mining Litecoin. They can mine Dogecoin together. It doesn't waste time or computers doing that. But the problem is that if you have a network that no one is running nodes, no one can even check if the total outstanding number of coins is correct. And when you have a fork like we had in Bitcoin against Bitcoin Cash in 2017, the Bitcoin Cash fork works, who decided what was the correct version of Bitcoin, not the miners, not the exchanges, the users, regular guys like you and me and everyone running their own nodes. So if you don't have a network of a lot of people running their own nodes, the monetary value in the long term is zero. So I don't think Dogecoin is a solution to anything. But in the short term, for Twitter to solve their bot problem, it can work. I would agree with that. I think any kind of integration that's going to be able to authenticate users, hopefully is a good thing. But I wanted to pull this chart real quick because historically speaking, we've seen this in the past from Dogecoin previously trading in that level from July of 2019 in between 2021 there. And it looks like we're going through something similar. So we've seen these breakout patterns before in the past from Dogecoin. And I think this is just all part of the narrative. Dogecoin is driven by news or rumors. And this is exactly what we're seeing here. You see that God candle, green candle breaking the downward trend here. To me, it's just all speculation. And Marcelle, I think you're right. Same thing with Sam is that there is not going to be a major catalyst even if Dogecoin is accepted or starting to be integrated with Twitter. And Dogecoin I think still needs to establish its use case utility because for all intents and purposes, it is just another form of fiat just happening and functioning kind of in a different technology. Sam, anything else you'd like to add here while we're on? I see Marcelle. He's got something to say. Let's imagine the best case scenario for Dogecoin on Twitter. So every payment on Twitter needs to happen in Dogecoin. So if we have the blue check mark, you have to pay $20. If you want to pay some banner advertisement or some premium content, you have to pay $2,000 in Dogecoin. I don't think anybody will accumulate Dogecoin and say, well, I'm going to buy $200,000 of Dogecoin because some guys need to pay $20 each month to get their blue check marks. It doesn't work like that. You can't force adoption, as I said. And El Salvador is a perfect example of that. Most of the regular guys and regular people and companies in El Salvador are not using Bitcoin. So I don't think that Dogecoin price will pump to $1 solely based on Twitter or not used. Also, important to mention, just because the Dogecoin developers decide to adjust the protocol and make it deflationary, doesn't actually mean as a deflationary asset. I mean, a deflationary asset, deflationary principles are hard coded into the asset. You don't just change it on WIM, because then it can be changed again on WIM later on. That's why I hate to be that guy. I really hate to be that guy. Bitcoin is still the only thing that we have that even mirrors a monetary system, a parallel monetary system, a parallel financial system because Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever he, she, or they are, were absolutely brilliant in their ability to forecast these things and to build it into the system. The incentives are built in, the technology is built in, and the safety and security of the protocol is built in. So that's why the Bitcoin community is so hesitant about change, not because we're so damn conservative, but because we have something here that is an actual alternative to the financial system and the monetary system, whereas changing on WIM doesn't really put you in that category. But as Marcel alluded to, we're still nowhere near mass adoption, Bitcoin adoption, I think, at a payment level, it's still very, very low. We're seeing more adoption as an investment great asset, which is fine. But for us to get more actual organic adoption, Bitcoin's going to have to be used as a payment system, but that's also going to depend on regulation, because in a lot of parts of the world right now, if you spend your Bitcoin at a taxable event, why would you do that? So lots to consider there, but I still don't see much positive with the meme coins, aside from the fact that you could speculate on them and make money, which is not a nothing. I've speculated on coins in the past and made money off them. There's not a big deal about that, but understand what they are and what they're for and try to separate that from how you actually save money, how you actually look at your future horizon and how you want to want to save versus how you speculate. Great points, Aaron. Marcel, if you'd like to jump in. Sam, what's the difference between dodgecoin or AMC and GameStop or the meme stocks? Well, I guess the first difference from the meme stocks is the stocks are actually, supposedly, at least in some case, backed by an actual company that produces revenue. Now, obviously, the AMC pumps, they were all artificial, right? I mean, people actually bought them as a joke. So in practice, the pumps that we saw, there were no differences between the doge and the AMC, the meme stocks, right? So again, you want to speculate on them, speculate on them, but know what the dangers are and know that it's just that it's a speculation. And all the the BTC maxis are coming out saying them. We appreciate your very good. Well, that's going to do it for all of our big headlines for the market news this week. And we're heavily focused on Twitter because potentially impacts we have yet to see and we will continue to keep the coverage going on that. But next thing, we got to get you your crypto tips for this week. We'll be diving into a little bit of how to earn passive income with Ethereum. So let's go ahead and jump into that next. All right. Do you have extra ETH just sitting around in a hot or cold wall somewhere? Well, you can actually make money off of ETH without doing much. Passive income opportunities are great for ETH investors and traders who want to offset losses during periods of market volatility. Some of the best methods are staking, which involves locking up your funds to earn rewards, automated trading using pre-programmed algorithm bots or buy and sell cryptocurrencies on exchanges 24-7. And the third option is lending to borrowers on DeFi or C-Fi platforms to earn high interest rates. Always the caveat, make sure you are doing your own homework as we've seen with other C-Fi platforms like Celsius. Be very careful when you are investing and using those type of platforms. And the fourth option is going to be liquidity mining, where you lend your crypto to liquidity pools and earn rewards, which is my favorite way to earn on my ETH. So these are very tantalizing options. And if you want to learn more, go make sure you go to our Crypto 101 section. We have this article for you on the Cointelegraph website so you can dive into all the nitty-gritty details of how to earn that passive income with Ethereum. All right. I know Marcel's got some great stuff to dive into this week. Talk about ETFs and Bitcoin ETFs. So we're going to hand this over to Marcel next to go do a deep dive on some trading insights. So Benton, we've been hearing a lot about the Bitcoin ETF over the past years. And yesterday, the CSEC chairman, Gary Gansler, commented on Twitter, added some food to the fire. So Danilo, can you share my screen, please? Basically, Gary Gansler said, happy 14th birthday to Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper. It has led to innovation, crypto estate investing. Let's make sure as crypto enters 15th year that investors get proper protection. So that's the twist. Thank you, Danilo. So there's no clear definition on what Gary is saying about proper protection. But let's first digest what is an ETF. How does it differ from the current investing methods? And why is it important to catapult Bitcoin to the next level? So the ETF is a stock, similar to IBM or Microsoft, traded on regular stock exchanges, NICE, Amex, etc. But instead of having offices, products and services, those shell companies exist for a single purpose, buying non-listed assets. For example, there are ETFs that hold physical gold, gold bars, and there are ETFs investing in lithium reserves for batteries. So why do ETFs exist in the first place? Can people buy gold bars themselves? Sure. Most of us are able to buy the underlying assets. The problem is mutual funds, they cannot hold physical gold. They cannot acquire real estate land. Now imagine how much money is sitting at pension funds, wealth management companies, and even government entities. So the global ETF and ETP industry is $10 trillion worth, and it grows about 10% each year. So we're talking about an inflow of $1 trillion per year, and the crypto market cap is about $1 trillion. So just so you can see how important the ETF market is. So it's an important vehicle for investment mutual funds and wealth management that cannot invest directly in Bitcoin, that cannot invest directly in gold. Other countries such as Brazil and Canada already have such a solution in place. It's relatively simple to implement and to operate, and the management fee is less than half percent per year. So there are some funds that are 0.2 or 0.3 percent per year. However, the biggest market in the world in the United States, and theoretically the most advanced, does not offer the Bitcoin ETF. So we might not know what Gary Gansler is prepping, maybe it's regulation, maybe it's CBBC, the GITO assets of the central banks, so the GITO dollar, but still a fiscal Bitcoin ETF is only a matter of time. I don't know if 2023, 2025, 2027, 2034, five years, but one day it will be allowed in the United States. And this will open the door for a new inflow from large institutions. Are they going to jump in the bandwagon on day one as soon as the doors are open? I'm not sure, but a Bitcoin ETF approval is going to set up a much wider audience, so potential increasing our market cap limit from $1 trillion to $10 trillion, because it's a huge industry. So make sure to keep waiting and pressuring the SEC to approve the ETF. So even you talking to friends and explaining why Bitcoin is important matters. So you also need to help us out. Write a letter to your local government official about this. I feel like Gary Gensler is throwing some shade in that tweet though. Kind of feel like he's constantly toying with the crypto people, and he's giving us hope and then kind of taking it away. And it's just like these breadcrumbs of shade constantly being thrown at us. Exactly. Exactly. Great segment. Yeah, exactly. But great insights there, Marcel. We appreciate you sharing those. Folks, you got to do your part here. We want to make this reality in certain countries, Canada and Brazil, where you guys are already have this stuff. So USA lagging behind. Next things next. So we got our market pro tokens that you should have been watching this week. So let's go ahead and get you some of those. Let's dive right in. All right, this week we were tracking RGT, and this one lit up the Vortex score, and these scores went back with a vengeance this week, proceeding solid returns on several tokens. One of these tokens, which was RGT, saw a rare score of 100. That's right, folks. A 100 is a rare score, and market support subscribers were extremely bullish on these historical trends. And in just 24 hours, the assets price shot up from $1.21 to $1.62. 33% gains for RARI governance token this week. And that's why you got to have market pro because you're able to get these Vortex score alerts in action. These trades as quickly as possible, as you all know, got to move fast when these alerts hit. And that's why we are also giving away our one month free subscription to markets, bro. So make sure you drop your Twitter handle in the chat for your chance to win today. Next one we got was a newsquake. And this one was about Clay token on October 24th, FTX announced that it'd be listing perpetual futures for Clay on the same day that Clayton Community approved a proposal to reduce block rewards. Newsquake immediately informed market support subscribers of the announcement when the price of the token was only $0.18. Over the course of the next week, the price grew to a peak of $0.26, and that is a 44% gainer. So if you look there on the bottom of the screen, that little circle where the white line starts to go up, that's that newsquake. And you can see that ride all the way. And those moves happen quickly. It looks like they happened over just a course of a couple hours. So newsquakes, Vortex scores alerts, huge indicators to parlay into your already current trading strategy. Gotta make sure you get markets pro can't emphasize that enough. But if you haven't tried your Twitter handle in the chat today, make sure you go ahead and do so now. All right, guys, we got some closing thoughts. And then we'll pick our winner for today's giveaway. I want to hear the words of wisdom that Marcelle wants to shine upon us today. Well, I do think that people during crisis, whenever they're the fear they're going to lose their jobs or the fear that the housing prices go down, people tend to do decisions that they regret later. For instance, holding too much cash saying, well, I think that stock market is going down. I think cryptocurrencies are going down. So I'm just going to hold cash. Then you see the stock market going up 20%. You see cryptocurrencies going up 50%. And you still hold your cash saying, well, it's just a bear market balance is going to go back out of the way. So even if you have conviction that the market is going down, don't sell everything of your position in Bitcoin or stocks or whatever assets you're holding. The worst time to do decisions is when you're in pain. So you should not be doing that. If you're in pain right now, do nothing. Stay with the same portfolio ahead and wait for better days. Don't over-trade. Excellent insights, as always. Sam, any words of wisdom for our audience today? Well, we know that Satoshi Nakamoto was the faceless leader of Bitcoin. And they even disavowed the leader aspect of it when they open sourced and released the protocol. Let's not attach the future of crypto to one person or one company, whether it's Binance, whether it's Sam Bankman, Free, whoever it is. Remember, it's much bigger than just one person or one company. So it's good to be cautious, to be optimistic about adoption, especially when certain companies are trying to push it. But overall, let's take a step back and realize that we're in a monetary revolution with Bitcoin. And the future is very bright, but it's going to take a long time to get there, just given where we are on the adoption curve and how much obstacles we have to come with respect to adoption. So overall, as we've said before, it's good to have a long-term horizon for investing. And the bear market is brutal, but it provides us with ample opportunity to accumulate. And of course, not investment advice, but it's definitely what I'm doing and what I've been doing now for a while. Sam, Catherine wants to know, do you expect another downturn for BTC this fall? It's still my base case. I was expecting it to have happened by now, to be completely honest. I'm expecting one more flush out before we can have a definitive bottom. But again, if we get it or not, nothing really changes my time horizons on Bitcoin in the next four-year cycle and the adoption level. It's really an academic discussion. Do we hit 14K? Do we go lower? Or have we bottomed as our friend, Mark Yusko, has said? We'll find out, I think, very shortly. Very good. And I do want to take a second to thank all the audience members for tuning in. Today is going to be my last day hosting the Marker Report. So I want to give a big shout out to everyone to make this possible. Marcel, Sam, yourself included. Danilo, let's see, we got Jackson. I'll just run through the list. We got the graphics team with Fabio. Everybody, this has been an awesome ride. And we will continue doing the Marker Report. Marcel and Sam will be here every week. Maybe I'll get a few guest spots in the future who knows. But big shout out to everyone for making this a reality and building this awesome community that we come and talk to every week on Tuesdays. So I do want to thank everyone for being involved with this. It has been an absolutely humbling experience. And I will be signing off for the last time today. So make sure you're here next Tuesday and go ahead and like and subscribe for our next show coming up at 12PM Tuesday. Next week, we appreciate you. We love you. Keep dollar cost averaging and hold steady, folks. We'll see you later.