 One of the many miracles of Allah has always been turning this whole mouth of the unbelievers to utter truth that ordinarily would be essentially difficult for them to say. When signs like these are detected that know that God is up to something, ultimately He is up to something when one of those who mock Islamic teachings makes statements that stands if in His ardent followers. Sadguru is one man knows always juxtapose the teaching of Islam with a mockery of salt during local and international forum appearances is a pair to mock the concept of Hevla rewards in the afterlife. The thing is you left your body here and went to heaven. You don't have a body. What do you do with good food and virgins? This in a sense baffles me so much so that it reduces my regard for Him as part someone who claims to be very educated and boasts of at least two New York Times bestsellers. Someone who in my estimation has considerable knowledge of theology and a wide pasture of philosophy. And so much a part of our daily language, I believe this, I believe that, then I believe other things, everything. Belief essentially means you have concretized your assumptions about life and beyond. Seeking means you have realized that you do not know. I do not know is a tremendous possibility only when you see I do not know the possibility of knowing becomes a living reality for you. I know any number of teachers around you are going about feeding you philosophies and explanations for everything that is not in your experience. People have been talking about gods and heavens and this and that with great confidence and authority. Have they seen? Again, this further brought down is written for me as a religious analyst and a long student of theology and philosophy. It is quite shallow of him to talk about the philological experience of sight and the metaphysical reality of beliefs. Let form a hypothesis around his argument, let name it blackasticism. This hypothesis should embody the theory of one rejecting his mother and father and the name given to him after Beth on the basis that he did not see his mother pregnant of him and was not aware of his Beth. In fact, Sadguru whose real name is Jagadishi Vasudev should even question why he is Indian but dark in complexion. If we obey the principle of these hypothesis then we would even doubt Sadguru's sanity. Guys does the implication of using the ephemeral principles of physiological experience to gauge the death of metaphysical realities. This around code of metaphysics yet aren't real as physical experiences so his arguments are baseless. We believe that he was one of the mightiest messengers of Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala. We believe that he was the Messiah translated to Christ. We believe that he was born miraculously without any male intervention which many modern Christians today do not believe. We believe that he gave life to the dead with God's permission. With that in mind, Sadguru seemed to have gone off the script in a latest local appearance where he defended Islam with such deep appreciation that he called the entire earth a mass quoting Prophet Muhammad. What triggered this detainer? Is he being political or has Sadguru recounted his past errors to see that Islam hoots the truth and what are the lessons Muslims must learn from this latest development? Asalaamu alaikum brothers and sisters, welcome to another episode of the open-minded thinker show, liking and sharing this video would help YouTube show this amazing analysis to other interested people, Muslim and non-Muslims. Don't also forget to subscribe to the channel to help us grow bigger. In this whole thing what I see is the main mischief has come from the colonial forces and the second level of mischief has come from very far left-leaning kind of scholars and professors. So let us remind them that when we say Islam, we talk about Muhammad. Muhammad said, whole earth is a mosque for me. Can you make a more inclusive statement than that? Please let the Muslims live by that. When we say Hindus, now they're talking about Ram. Rama is that kind of man. Just to out of his integrity, he gives up his kingdom. He's a coronated king but he walks away into the forest and his wife is stolen, terrible things are done. But when he kills his enemy who stole his wife and did terrible things to the people, he repents having killed him. So that is the man you're fighting for, don't forget. And for the leftist, left them remember all this conniving nonsense that they're doing everywhere, even today they're continuing like this. I want to remind them they are not progeny of Joseph Stalin or Maoistang. They are supposed to represent Karl Marx who thought of an equitable society, a society without disparities, a compassionate economy which will nurture every human being. This is what he represents. Please let all three remember this. Right now this fanning of that Hindu-Muslims must fight, this whole thing is unfortunately not coming from Islamic community or largely from Hindu community. I know that the bulk of this video was dedicated to the explication of things that would foster the progress of India as a diverse nation. His ultimate intention was to let Indians understand that their religious differences offer a unique blend of experience which if channeled the right ways could effectively unite the country and bring forth vistas of development and progress. However, citing the statement of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, is well significant for me. This is a total departure from his usual tantrums about Islamic teachings and theological positions to which basically he refers to a commonly cited saying of Prophet Muhammad in Islamic tradition that the earth has been made in marks for me and a pure place of worship as reported by Ibn Maja. This statement is often interpreted to mean that the entire earth is a place of worship and that Muslims can perform their prayers and other acts of worship anywhere as long as the place is clean and free from impurities. The statement is believed to have been made in the context of the Prophet's migration from Mecca to Medina where he and his companions would pray in open spaces such as in the marketplace or in the courtyards of houses due to the lack of a dedicated mosque at that time. The statement emphasizes the importance of the accessibility and universality of worship in Islam and the idea that Muslims can perform their religious duties anywhere on earth by using the example of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, to set forth an example of peace and humility. He is set out to inadvertently debunk the notion that the Prophet of all times was at Lundish with violence. Dr Zakir Naik has something to say. Example, the role model for the person who was the most Allah-centered is the last and final messenger Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. Our beloved Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, is the best example of a person who is Allah-centered and a mercy only for the Muslims. He was a mercy for the whole of humankind and Allah says in Surah Ambiya, chapter number 21, Wastam 107, that we have sent thee not but as a mercy to the whole of humanity, as a mercy to all the creatures, as a mercy to all the worlds. The best example for a person who had the best purpose of life, the best example humankind for a person who converted the barbarians into human beings, for a person who changed the humankind and when we read his history, you can speak for hours and days together. Leave aside what the Muslims have said about the beloved Prophet Muhammad, we can give hundreds of quotations of non-Muslims who have praised the Prophet. Just to give you a few examples, George Bernard Shaw, he said when talking about Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, he said, I have studied him, that is Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. And in my opinion, far from being an anti-Christ, he should be called as a saviour for humanity, George Bernard Shaw. Thomas Carlisle was a famous historian, he was a European, a non-Muslim, he writes a book, Heroes and Hero Worship, and he gives down the history of hero, and number one hero, a hero prophet, it was in Jesus, peace be upon him, it was in Moses, peace be upon him, it was not David, peace be upon him, it was not Solomon, peace be upon him, it was Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. Imagine Thomas Carlisle, a European, was a Christian, he places number one hero prophet, as Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. We have the example of La Martin, La Martin was a famous historian, he was a French, who wrote the history of the Turks, and he writes, if greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results, if these three are the criteria to judge the greatness of a person, there will be no one in modern history who dare to compare himself with Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results are the three criteria for judging how great a person is, I dare any man in human history, modern history, who will come close to Muhammad, peace be upon him, and he continues, with all standards of humankind, there is no one who can compare himself to Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. Michael H. Hart, he's a famous historian, and he writes a book on the 100 most influential people in human history, right from Adam, peace be upon him till present time, and number one he places is Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. The most influential person in history from Adam till present time, peace be upon him, is Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and he writes, my choice of putting Muhammad, peace be upon him, number one, will surely astonish many people, would not go down the throat, would not be agreeable by many people, but the reason I've chosen Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him as number one, because he was the only man in history who was successful in the religious field as well as secular field. Then if you read Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, when talking about Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, he says that Muhammad, peace be upon him, was the most successful religious personality of the world. Imagine Encyclopedia Britannica.