Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Apr 10, 2013
Meetings # 3,215 - Bill Fong says: "In a quick nutshell, China and the No-Alphabet Hypothesis makes a sweeping claim that China stagnated for 850 years, and lost the race to modernity, because China didn't have an alphabet. The gist of the No-Alphabet Hypothesis presents a surprising view of Chinese (and Western) cultural history. The reasoning is as follows:
* No alphabet means no mathematics. * No mathematics means no science. * No science means no technology. * No technology means no progress. * No progress means stagnation * China stagnates for 850-plus years. * While the West catches up. * So . . . China stagnated and lost the race to modernity (to Europe) -- * Because China didn't have an alphabet!
This then is the fast, oversimplified essence of the hypothesis - that basically, the lack of an alphabet made it simply impossible for China to invent modernity, to achieve it first on history's first go-around. So lacking an alphabet, China failed to become the modern world's first superpower. This then is the startling story of China and the No-Alphabet Hypothesis. This then is a linguistic interpretation of history, literally.
And then we move on to the next immediate follow-up story: How Modern China Finally Caught Up.