C of C 4-6-13 China and the No-Alphabet Hypothesis: How China Stagnated Lost the Race to Modernity





Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Apr 10, 2013

Meetings # 3,215 - Bill Fong says: "In a quick nutshell, China and the No-Alphabet Hypothesis makes a sweeping claim that China stagnated for 850 years, and lost the race to modernity, because China didn't have an alphabet. The gist of the No-Alphabet Hypothesis presents a surprising view of Chinese (and Western) cultural history. The reasoning is as follows:

* No alphabet means no mathematics.
* No mathematics means no science.
* No science means no technology.
* No technology means no progress.
* No progress means stagnation
* China stagnates for 850-plus years.
* While the West catches up.
* So . . . China stagnated and lost the race to modernity (to Europe) --
* Because China didn't have an alphabet!

This then is the fast, oversimplified essence of the hypothesis - that basically, the lack of an alphabet made it simply impossible for China to invent modernity, to achieve it first on history's first go-around. So lacking an alphabet, China failed to become the modern world's first superpower. This then is the startling story of China and the No-Alphabet Hypothesis. This then is a linguistic interpretation of history, literally.

And then we move on to the next immediate follow-up story: How Modern China Finally Caught Up.


When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...