 What Japan is missing is a culture of entrepreneurship, allowing failure. Because, you know, the worst you can do in a big company is to fail. Because then your career path is stopped. But it doesn't matter if you are an entrepreneur, you start a company and it doesn't work. And you realize what the problem was in the United States. This person gets a second and a third chance because he now knows how to do it. I saw the future of the reactionary society. So, when Sonia was growing up, I became a senpai when I entered the company. So, after seeing that, I realized that there was a venture in the company after the war. Everyone was a venture. After that success, I was able to do many things. There were many regulations. There were so many risks. When you put it together, it's over. So, it was a course like that. You can't borrow money from the bank. So, there were so many risks in Japan. There were so few in the United States. So, it's over to make a mistake. You can see that in Israel now. But it's already a mistake. But if you want to incentivize startups, you have to be more relaxed as far as taxation is concerned. As far as the rules are concerned, when you have to start paying taxes. In order to lower the risk for both entrepreneur and venture company. The traditional Japanese universities have to be also more flexible. They have to be better organized in their governance principle. They have to be more professional in their technology transfer. So, the point I'm making is not just money. We also have to change the culture within traditional universities. And that's why OIST is attractive. I think OIST is a miracle. It's pretty much there. The country has a very good building. And there are so many cities. I know that. I know that. And I'm such a great person. I'm a good engineer. I'm a good scientist. I'm a good scientist. When I first saw it, I thought, this is amazing. Now, it's better than ever before, right? It's better than ever before. It's the 9th place in the world. That's a miracle. That's a miracle. But this success... I'm only doing basic research. That's why I wanted to focus on basic research. That's why I wanted to talk about this. I want to direct this to innovation. I want to do basic research. Not only basic research. I want to see if I can do it. I want to see if I can make money from the government. What do you think? In a study in the United States, they have analyzed every patent written, every patent over the course of 10 years. 75% of the citations, so the references, comes from publicly funded research. The most successful, to my mind, models of university recently are, Stanford, MIT, Caltech, Boston area. Why is that? Because the intersection between academia and business is so close. And it's working so well. And this is what we take. This is what we need in Japan. You need a very strong transmission axis between academia as the intellectual center. But professors are no good in founding companies. You need the industry. You need the spirit of making a product to be successful on the market. And nowadays, this only works if people are in the environment together. We have, of course, Kubo Kawa who was the board of government before he retired. And we have also Kitano-san. Who is a general professor. So there are some contacts. We're both geniuses in Japan. We love each other. But we need more. When I took the semiconductor lens, I was in Silicon Valley, but the semiconductor in the next generation was no longer in Silicon. So that's how it is. That's why the patent over the course of 10 years is called research. So the patent ought to cut these things down. What is the truth of it? What is the truth of it? I'm really looking forward to that. I know that I actually talk a lot more about the future of the future of the future, that you do, that you need to research the process of the future. This is the future of the future. That's what I do. The best people want to think about problems themselves. But if you think, for example, there will be a new area in semiconductor business and you finance a professor in this area, that is something which will benefit both basic research and the company. So that's what I'm saying. You have to think not suppressing the creativity of individuals, you just give them the task. Well, the Japanese government has done a pretty good job recently in generating what they call the moonshot programs. They selected areas of research where they feel this is important for Japan as a whole, as a society, or as a business country. But obviously, if you do a moonshot, it means you think you know what the future will bring. On top of this, you have to have the free spirits working. Don't exclusively do the moonshot type research. You need also the free research to come up with completely unexpected ideas. That's why, for me, a good balance between the moonshot type programs and the free basic or fundamental research, this is what we need. Japan is in need, in dire need, of a major reform of the, you know, fundamental research slash university system. And that can be done in two ways. One, obviously, you demand from the government, unless they do it, you do not provide funds. The second, you can incentivize in certain areas, not changing much, but then the second, the route will be a long term. They have to do it, but you should encourage them to form gas, so you need to think at least how to enable that. I'm not being able to do it, but maybe they can do it, and then work on the reasons that they really do it. Maybe you can think of the systems in the future that are out of that. Maybe they can do it. Instead of ventures, they maybe you think of the areas that they're in, and then they develop. They can do it. I was talking to investors and they said you know who owns to me they asked me who owns the patents I said we do and he said they answered to me well most of the Japanese university prisons wouldn't know who owns the paint because if it's the professor this is a very difficult route to make tech transfer so you have to have a very clear cut technology transfer and IP property that's the one thing I would think every CEO not just the business person everyone has to be educated so OIS is trying to establish a new platform of educating all levels that is a model the let's call it life long learning considering an aging society will be even more important in the future you should open up