 What would you say to the climate protesters outside who believe that the BOE haven't put their money where their mouth is when it comes to climate change? And do you think the current mandate of the BOE actually gives it adequate room to do what needs to be done for climate-related risks? Yeah. Well, I think the bank has done a tremendous amount and has been one of the leaders on addressing the – and since we're here with the FPC – addressing the financial stability risks from climate change, starting with actually identifying the framework to look at those risks, being the first public institution to do that in terms of the division between physical and transition risks and the importance of transition risks, something we did just five years ago, less than five years ago in fact, moving to catalyze a private sector initiative led by Mike Bloomberg to get proper climate disclosure, not just static disclosure, but strategic disclosure through the TCFD. Consequence of that has been $120 trillion of balance sheet across asset managers through to systemic banks and sovereign wealth funds that are now demanding that type of disclosure from the industry. That information – then the question is, what do you do with that information? What does the market do with that information? From our perspective, the issue is, how well do they manage the risks associated with the transition from where we are today to where, example, in the U.K., where the government has now legislated – where parliament, rather, has now legislated, the country needs to go, which is carbon neutral. And that needs a system that can manage those transition risks. The first step in that, or the most important step – and I wouldn't underplay how significant it is that the FPC and the PRA have decided to run this exploratory scenario for the U.K. financial system – of how resilient are their strategies to different climate pathways, including one that is consistent with the government's – parliament's objective, including other ones that could be more disruptive to the sector. That is absolutely frontier. It will take developments from the development of the technology, if you will, of managing those risks that need to be drawn out of the private sector with the public sector input and then rigorously implemented. That will have a huge impact in terms of the preparedness of the system. So you're shifting tens, hundreds of trillions of dollars into getting the right information to managing the right risks. And that puts the system in a position to do what the country decides, ultimately. It's not for financial regulators to decide what the climate pathway is going to be, but it very much is our responsibility to make sure that the system is a position to support it. And I mean, I think we can – we're doing our job, but we have done our job in a way that has anticipated where the world is going, certainly where the U.K. is going and where the financial system is going. So that's a shorter version of what I would say to those protesters. And then maybe the last thing I'll say is that we also are very conscious that as an institution, we need to walk the walk as well. So we're adopting the TCFD, the same disclosures. Our next annual report will have that. We have – our senior managers responsible for this. We've cut our emissions already by 25 percent per head. And we're going to cut them by two-thirds cumulative by 2030, in other words, consistent with a path to one-and-a-half degrees, which is the stretch target, as you know, for COP 21. Thanks.